TPM LiveWire

Gibbs: Obama Willing To Be One-Term President To Get Health Care, 'Important Things' Done

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

President Obama is "quite comfortable" with being a one-term president if that's the price he has to pay to get "important things done," including health care reform, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said today.

I have heard the president say that, if making tough decisions in getting important things done that Washington has failed to deal with for decades means he only lives in this house and makes these decisions for four years, he's quite comfortable with that.

Gibbs said he hadn't heard him say that "specifically on health care," but said it applied to issues including reform, the economy, Afghanistan and Iraq.

"The way he approaches [these issues] is not in a mode of self preservation, but in a mode of how best, given all the information out there, how best he can make decisions in the best interest of the American people," he said, "not what's in the best interest of his polling numbers."

Last week, Rep. Leonard Boswell (D-IA) told a town hall that he'd heard Obama say he was willing to lose his chances at re-election over health care reform.

Join the Conversation!

17 comments

Recommend Recommend (1)

August 21, 2009 2:09 PM   

Still don't know who he's willing to piss off though.

I suppose it will be clear on September 15.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 2:12 PM    in reply to superfly

You, superfly. He's willing to piss off you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 2:43 PM    in reply to LarsThorwald

I'm only frustrated at this point. I would like to see LBJ style arm twisting and head cracking as necessary, but there is a plausible reason for all the current BS.

One of two things is going on, we should know which one when / if they get something out of SFC, out of the Senate and into conference.

Now, Steny Hoyer, that guy is pissing me off.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 2:23 PM   

I'm okay with his being a one-term president because he accomplishes a number of important things that have needed to be done for decades, however unlikely that would be.

What I would hate, and I hope he would too, is one term because he fails to accomplish anything worthwhile, which surely would be the more probable reason for not winning a second term.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 2:24 PM   

Obama might be a one term President because he his blind, tone deaf and stubborn. You can’t make a deal with people who undermine you and want you to fail. If you are in the power position, which Obama is, you NEVER give up anything to someone who offers nothing. If Obama would just drop the hammer on Congress and use the majority American gave him he might just become a great President. Obama must realize that right now he is just the republicans bitch.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 2:25 PM   

Well Obama sure has not shown that he is willing to sacrifice a second term. He has not rescinded Bush era wire tapping, renditions, and has increased the war in Afghanistan, and has been completely non committal on true health care reform.


All this back and forth on the public option shows he does not have the desire to make himself a one term president.

Image if LBJ was so weak, we would still live in a segregated society, and Obama never would have a chance to be a US Senator never mind POTUS.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 2:27 PM   

Then fight to accomplish it the right way, i.e., with a strong public option.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 2:29 PM   

Good. No holds barred.

---------------------------
Call the Senate Finance Committee wafflers on the public option today:
Sen Thomas Carper D DE 202-224-2441
Sen Blanche Lincoln D AR 202-224-4843
Sen Max Baucus D MT 202-224-2651
Sen Bill Nelson D FL 202-224-5274
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/observer2/2009/08/public-option-senate-contact-l.php

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 2:37 PM   

The man has been in office, what, seven months? And they're already saying it's over?

Tell me what you think here: To me, it seems like it's easy to make dire, "Obama is a badass risk-taker who will put it all on the line for his ideals" statements like these when the reality is that the public attention span is so short, all Obama really has to do is to do something popular in the last few months before the election to win people over. It feels like, this early on in his administration, there's not really a huge amount on the line. So statements like these are just bluffs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 2:41 PM   

Obama channeling Teddy Roosevelt. I like it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 3:38 PM   

If the economy bounces back, the deficit is on its way to getting back under control and Iraq/Afghanistan is not a nightmare, I don't see how he could lose in 2012. To whom? Pawlenty? Romney?

If we are anywhere back to normalcy, plus on a path toward a more green economy, and our troops are out of the Middle East, Obama will be able to stand on the stump and say: "I rescued the economy from the brink, saved the U.S. automotive industry, brought our troops home from the nebulous mission given by the previous CinC, and put this country on a path to sustainability. Oh, I also reformed health care, a task that eluded presidents for six decades." The last one remains in doubt, obviously. But I think you can bank on the rest. ANd that is not a bad resume.

Yet: I agree, 2010 could be ugly. I think that was inevitable.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 4:22 PM    in reply to plynch22

Yabbut...if 2010 is gonna be ugly, meaning the Dem majority is going to shrink or disappear, what happens then? If BO can't get us out of Iraq, can't get single-payer, can't close Gitmo with the deck stacked in his favor, how's he gonna do anything after Congress changes color?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 3:57 PM   

Say wha? I mean, what an idiotic thing to say. If he loses the House or Senate next year (primarily because of Democratic disgust with his inaction on many of his campaign promises) he'll be lucky if he can get squat done.

So, if he gets nothing done.. two terms, right?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 4:01 PM   

Another thing:

Is that some kind of threat? And to whom? Why wouldn't he get re-elected if he really accomplished what he promised to accomplish and was elected by a majority to do just that? It's just another statement from a confused WH.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 4:04 PM   

Barack Obama will make a comeback. That's his MO, or perhaps his mojo.

Whether his comeback can pull the Congress up is another point. He staked out what he was going to do his first 100 days. He did it for the most part and then he handed some leadership off to Congress, where they quickly:
a: laid out a cogent and succinct agenda defining their political priorities.
or
b: went after each other over how much time to spend flogging the Bushes.

I really think the Dems should put out a resolution on the broad principles they favor. Nothing complicated. How about let's find out haw many Democrats actually support the 2008 Democratic Party's Platform, for example. Just lay out some of the planks for legislative priority, abbreviate them, give them a name, pass them and lay out their priorities for the People to judge.

Newt's group did this with the Contract for America. It gave coherence to the legislative agenda. They managed to use the moment following their legislative success to define what they had achieved electorally with a political document.

Carpe Diem!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 21, 2009 6:30 PM   

Without some significant "change" of his own, he just might get there.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 22, 2009 9:32 AM   

Obama is in kamikaze mode. He is willing to nobly sacrifice himself for us. Except that we are on the same plane he's flying.

You da man Obama. Talk tuff. Be tuff. Meanwhile, how do I get off Obamacare flight 044?

WEE-WEE WEE-WEE WEE-WEE WEE-WEE WEE-WEE WEE-WEE.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular