TPM LiveWire

Pelosi: 'There Is Strong Support In The House For A Public Option'

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) released the following statement on health care reform on Monday, August 17:

"As the President stated in March, 'The thinking on the public option has been that it gives consumers more choices and it helps keep the private sector honest, because there's some competition out there.'

"We agree with the President that a public option will keep insurance companies honest and increase competition.

"There is strong support in the House for a public option. In the House, all three of our bills contain a public option, as does the bill from the Senate HELP Committee.

"A public option is the best option to lower costs, improve the quality of health care, ensure choice and expand coverage.

"The public option brings real reform to lower costs over the 10-year period of the bill."

Join the Conversation!

9 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

DF

user-pic

August 17, 2009 3:50 PM   

Wait, I don't understand what's going on here. It looks like Democratic leadership, but that's like seeing the Tooth Fairy give birth to an immaculately conceived child on the back of Pegasus.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 17, 2009 4:06 PM   

Forget public option! Try Medicare for all. It's a simpler piece of legislation to pass. People on it, love it, abortions aren't allowed and no death panels. Just extend it to everyone and let them buy in at 100-200 a month for a family. Poor could easily be subsidized.

Only downside--insurance companies are against it--that's good, no?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 17, 2009 4:07 PM   

Looks like she has cojones. Wish O would discover his

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 17, 2009 4:20 PM    in reply to Middle Road

Why is it that Democratic women have bigger ones than the men?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 17, 2009 4:29 PM   

*Rock* us, Nancy!

Rock, rock, *ROCK!*

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 17, 2009 5:06 PM   

President Obama has been a consistent disappointment. He needs grow a pair of balls. Seriously.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 17, 2009 5:18 PM   

President Obama has been a consistent disappointment. He needs to grow a pair of balls. Seriously.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 17, 2009 6:07 PM    in reply to ru4862

I disagree. Obama is a realist. The Senate is not a democratic body. Sure, we have 60 seats, but a number of those seats are held by folks like Blanche Lincoln, Joe Lieberman, Max Baucus, Ben Nelson, Bill Nelson, etc. These are not folks that are liberal because (usually) to win a rural state's Senate seat, you have to be somewhat moderate (states like Montana, where both Senators are Democrats, overwhelmingly supported the GOP in the last national election).

Again, Obama's a realist. Until the people in North Dakota and in Montana and Missouri and elsewhere demand a public option, it's not going to happen. Besides, a public option only helps so much. If the option is structured correctly, it could really bring down costs. But, my hunch is that guys like Baucus and Lieberman will make the option essentially available only to those without insurance (or those small employers which cannot insure their employees in the current market). This will kill its benefits because unless you have true competition, you have no reform.

The cooperatives, on the other hand, could work if they're structured right. Everyone has to purchase; every employee gets an allowance to use with the cooperative or through the employer's plan, the cooperatives are national in scope, no more banning pre-existing conditions; cap on out-of-pocket, etc.

So narrowing the issue to public option vs not-public option is tempting, but until we know what comes out of the Senate bill, we should not assume the worst.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 18, 2009 9:19 AM   

I'm sure Nancy can delvier the House on this.

The big problem -- and OBama's problem -- is the Senate.

She can't pull that rabbit out of her hat.

Has anyone seen Dean's website where has a counter of the number of votes in Congress? I don't think we are close to 50 yet. More like 45.

Key question is this:

Does anyone have any workable strategy for getting these votes in the Senate?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular