As ThinkProgress reports today, Sarah Palin was for end-of-life counseling before she was against it.
As governor, Palin declared April 16, 2008, "Healthcare Decisions Day," signing a proclamation to "encourage medical professionals and lawyers to volunteer their time and efforts to ... increase the number of Alaska's citizens with advance directives."
An advance directive can be a living will, which describes the medical treatments you do or do not want at the end of life, or a power of attorney, which designates someone to make those decisions for you.
Palin has been railing against a provision in the House health care bill which would reimburse doctors for counseling patients about such advance directives. She says that provision really calls for a "death panel," where government bureaucrats would decide who could get life-extending care based on their usefulness to society. This claim has been thoroughly debunked.
The proclamation was part of National Healthcare Decisions Day, an effort to get more people to plan ahead for end-of-life care. Both houses of Congress and several other states also signed on, and you can see the extensive list of NHDD's participants here.
More of Palin's proclamation:
WHEREAS, Healthcare Decisions Day is designed to raise public awareness of the need to plan ahead for healthcare decisions, related to end of life care and medical decision-making whenever patients are unable to speak for themselves and to encourage the specific use of advance directives to communicate these important healthcare decisions. [...]WHEREAS, one of the principal goals of Healthcare Decisions Day is to encourage hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and hospices to participate in a statewide effort to provide clear and consistent information to the public about advance directives, as well as to encourage medical professionals and lawyers to volunteer their time and efforts to improve public knowledge and increase the number of Alaska's citizens with advance directives.
WHEREAS, the Foundation for End of Life Care in Juneau, Alaska, and other organizations throughout the United States have endorsed this event and are committed to educating the public about the importance of discussing healthcare choices and executing advance directives.


tpmgary
August 13, 2009 6:53 PM
My sense is that Sarah Palin doesn't know what she believes or doesn't believe. She doesn't know what she supports or doesn't support. She's being used, and it's her own fault for never taking a passionate unwavering stand on anything of substance in our political dialogue. (consistently implying that Obama is a terrorist does not qualify as substance.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nora
August 13, 2009 7:53 PM in reply to tpmgary
Indeed. All of her attack lines during the campaign -- "socialist" etc. -- were scripted for her. And I don't think anyone believes she actually wrote those FB posts, especially not after seeing the script of her resignation speech.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mJJ
August 13, 2009 7:56 PM in reply to tpmgary
You could stop your comment with these words. Sarah Palin doesn't know! In fact, her dullness of mind is so obvious no matter what subject this womasn discusses. And seldom in my long 77 years have I heard a more inane statement than her statement about advance so directives. The woman is positively ill informed about so many subjects that she just sounds silly and ill informed. To imagine her in any leadership role demands so much imagination from me it almost boggles my mind. She is surely no promoter of intellectual efficiency. And poor, poor Alaska where I used to live. We had great governors like Governor Eagan, Hickle, Murkowski and many more that I cannot name here. Of all the governors that have served while I was in Alaska, Palin has to be the silliest. She has little intellect, less sensible approach to governing than any governor the state has had even while just a territory to the present time. Poor thing is just too, too silly!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TheraP
August 13, 2009 8:26 PM in reply to mJJ
She surely is NOT a leader. And she's not too good at following either. Definitely "out to lunch"!
Like you, I thought tpmgary could have stopped where you indicated.
My guess is she has no idea what many words mean, though she slings them around. And thus she ends up contradicting herself because she is little more than a slogan-machine! Remember the debate, where she read cards? And read answers regardless of the question? That's what I'm getting at. She parrots things - but can't connect up ideas! So has no recall from one time to the next for "stands" she's taken!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
August 13, 2009 6:57 PM
Great catch (ThinkProgress).
The substance hardly matters. But I think even the morons in the MSM can understand hypocrisy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DanielFBoone
August 13, 2009 6:57 PM
She may have been hypocritical and there's no question her claim is an outright lie, but she still managed to scare Harry Reid and our wimpy Democratic Senators into dropping that much needed provision from the bill.
Sad,
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thomas1
August 14, 2009 9:24 AM in reply to DanielFBoone
While I'm not here to support Reid, a supporter needs some balls to hold, you need to recognize that it's Chuckles Grassley that says it will be out of the bill. Hopefully the fact that Chuckles has been guilty of verbal diarrhea over the past couple days will cause the D's to give him a big FU.
I did say 'hopefully'.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
WineDarkSea
August 13, 2009 6:59 PM
There is no discrepancy or hypocrisy here. It's really quite simple. IOKIYAR. If it's in a Dem backed bill, even if originally proposed by a Republican, it's scary.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
August 13, 2009 7:55 PM in reply to WineDarkSea
No one has been able to come up with a cogent and REAL reason why this is "scary". Please enlighten us.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BillMcD
August 14, 2009 8:30 AM in reply to ohyeathatsright
The Republicans find it scary because it's just one more thing they could have done, and should have done, while they had both houses and the Presidency, but didn't. Now if the dems do it, it'll strengthen their hand in future elections. That scares the Rs.
See? Scary... for the only people who matter to Republicans: Republicans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Spencers Mom
August 13, 2009 7:23 PM
What I find interesting is that she made this declaration on April 16, 2008 and Trig was born on April 18, 2008.
Now, 16 months later, Palin is not only 180 degrees from her declaration, but also suggesting that these Death Panels are going to kill her baby.
I guess nothing happens in this world until it happens to Palin.
What a fcuking hypocrite!
PEACE
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
twirling fartknocker
August 13, 2009 7:38 PM
Maybe that's why she walked the original death panel comment back in just 2 or 3 days. Someone reminded her of her celebration of Death Panel Day in 2008.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
August 13, 2009 7:56 PM
Actually, and advance directive and a power of attorney are two different things, but are often combined and called "a living will."
As you might conclude, an "advance directive" directs, in advance, what kind of end of life care you want. Do you want all efforts to keep you alive? Fine, you can state that in advance and your greedy children AND the government death panel will NOT be able to pull the plug. But if you want to direct that certain things NOT be done, you can do that to.
So despite the fact that "deathers" are afraid of it, an advance directive is the BEST way to assure no one pulls the plug.
A power of attorney for health care appoints someone else to make decisions for you if you are incapacitated. If you want to live as long as medical science can keep you alive, you'll want to have an advance directive, in addition to giving someone else a POA, or the person with the POA WILL be able to pull the plug.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
August 13, 2009 7:59 PM in reply to Cal Gal
I thought a bit late that another really good reason to give someone a health POA is that without one, doctors will be asking your legal "next of kin" to make these decisions.
So especially for gay and lesbian couples who can't marry, a health care POA is essential to make sure your partner is making the decision s/he knows you want made.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
August 13, 2009 8:01 PM
No doubt, our ever-vigilent liberal mainstream media will quickly highlight this flip flop, discern that she's a vapid, opportunistic hypocrite and stop allowing her to repeat the same lie over and over again without calling her out on it.
Just like they did with "Thanks, but no thanks to tha Bridge ta Nowhere!"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thomas1
August 14, 2009 9:28 AM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
wink, wink
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MichiganMark
August 13, 2009 8:10 PM
She "walked the original death panel comment back"?
I think she doubled down. http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=116471698434
It reads like a shit storm of lies.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Adrianne Jeffries
August 13, 2009 8:21 PM
Rachel, this article is a ripoff of ThinkProgress's reporting, don't you think? What did you add here? Should have just been a link. More original reporting, please.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Corpiscator
August 13, 2009 9:16 PM
Please stop paying attention to Dr. Palin. It only encourages her delusions of authoritative knowledge.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Henryde
August 13, 2009 9:56 PM
This silly woman is so obviously sublimating her own feelings of guilt for having tried to spontaneously abort poor little Trig on her flight from Texas to Alaska. No one can blame her for feeling guilty about this, or for having such misgivings about carrying a Downs baby to term. We can, however, blame her for trying to turn her own twisted feelings into a public platform. Leave your children alone. Mrs. Palin? Leave my children alone, and the rest of us for that matter.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RobbyLove
August 13, 2009 10:10 PM
Palin is using this as her springboard to 2012, which I whole-heartedly endorse.
First of all, she looks like a blithering idiot to anybody that's not a wingnut. Second of all, the wingnuts will go ga-ga over the fact that she's championing their "cause" and fighting against health care reform...err...excuse me...*socialism*. This will win a special place in their hearts, win her the nomination in 2012, and assure that President Obama is re-elected in a 50 state (+ DC) landslide.
Keep right on talking, Sarah.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
crazyrudy
August 13, 2009 10:40 PM
Sarah Palin's handlers know one thing, and they know it well... there is no such thing as bad publicity... Sarah Palin is the latest in a stream of know-nothing dummies who know how to read a teleprompter... and the more we hear about her, the more we hear about her, the more we hear about her... its what wins elections... name recognition... if we saw it on TV, must be good...right?... everybody's talking about it, must be good...right?... can't remember who said it, but it makes sense to me, must be so... right?... brace yourselves!... Palin in 2012, by a landslide!... you can say you heard it here first... must be so, right?...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CharlesBrown
August 13, 2009 11:01 PM
What is Sarah Palin without her charms? She's your typical average AMERICAN. Look at yourselves in the mirror, and then look at your neighbors. She wouldn't even be in the spotlight without the stupid and gullible Americans lapping up all the lies. Or the evil, selfish, and opportunistic Americans making up those lies. Sarah Palin is only a symptom, not a disease.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mike Licht
August 14, 2009 12:50 AM
First appointment to Death Panel.
See:
http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/08/09/paula-abdul-named-to-obama-death-panel/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FebM
August 14, 2009 7:27 AM in reply to Mike Licht
Video of Sen Isakson (R-GA) articulating the issue of end of life counseling. He is articulate, he is right so why is he now a "deather"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPqRFuSZyZg&feature=player_embedded
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FebM
August 14, 2009 7:29 AM
I am getting sick and tired of TPM obsession with Sarah, she has been your cover girl since last week. At the slightest tweet she makes your day. C'mon
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
carlyt
August 14, 2009 7:32 AM
Palin is a hypocrite about end of life just like Gingrich. there are related posts about the two at http://iamsoannoyed.com/?page_id=588
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ricky
August 14, 2009 7:43 AM
this dumbass hooker does not have a clue, she is just a prostitutefor the repbulican party, she has no political future at all, there is no way in hell she would ever be elected as POTUS.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
August 14, 2009 7:44 AM
Off topic but Big dog:
""Do you want to go through that again?" the 42nd President asked the crowd of bloggers, online activists, and a slew of Democratic lawmakers at the Netroots Nation convention in Pittsburgh. "Of course you don't. I'm telling you no matter how low they drive support for this with misinformation, the minute the president signs a health care reform bill his approval will go up. Secondly, within a year, when all those bad things they say will happen don't happen, and all the good things happen, approval will explode.""
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ivy22
August 14, 2009 8:28 AM
See also Jon Stewart's take on this from last night. He showed Glen Beck ranting this week about how we have the greatest health care system in the world. Then he showed tape of Beck ranting after his surgery a year and half ago about how bad his health care was. Just another wingnut hypocrite.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?