TPM LiveWire

Bush on Larry Craig: 'What Is Up With All these Republicans?'


Former Pres. George W. Bush

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Former Bush speechwriter Matt Latimer's new book detailing life inside the White House officially comes out tomorrow. But with the tome already on some bookstore shelves, we're already seeing some gems.

For example, President Bush's reaction when he heard about the sex scandal involving Sen. Larry "Wide Stance" Craig: "What is with all these Republicans?"

Huffington Post reporter Ryan Grim picked up the book early at a D.C. bookstore and shared some choice nuggets with the world.

Then there was the speechwriter who wanted to add a few lines against gay marriage to a commencement address Bush would give at Furman University. "I'm not going to tell some gay kid in the audience that he can't get married," Bush said.

Bush isn't the only one whose quirks are outlined in the book. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld wanted to edit his own entry on Wikipedia -- or, as he called it, "Wika-wakka." He also watched YouTube videos making fun of his press conferences and read Drudge Report.

Speech-less: Tales of a White House Survivor will be released Tuesday.

Join the Conversation!

15 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

September 21, 2009 9:55 AM   

"I'm not going to tell some gay kid in the audience that he can't get married," Bush said.

"But I'll gladly take tons of money from people who think I believe that and say it all the time."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 11:34 AM    in reply to TrentinaNE

Bushit a LIBERAL-commie-fascist-Marxist-Nazi-socialist!?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 10:07 AM   

Anyone else getting a little sick of all of these "tell-all" books from Bush admin. insiders? It's the same thing every time - pre-release ad campaign in the form of a few slightly embarrassing bits of behind-the-scenes gossip, but the book itself is a mildly favorable (or mildly critical) whitewash. Hopefully the only people who buy these things are liberal reporters.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 11:36 AM    in reply to superking

Nope. I'm all for the negative about the Bushit criminal campaign -- especially as some won't believe any of the negative -- whterh true or false -- unless it's from an insider.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:27 PM    in reply to superking

To me the value in these books is not so much the objective (new information or facts reported truthfully) but the subjective: what it was like to be there at that time. How the power dynamics worked. What the president was like to work for.

People are usually pretty protective of that which they can be held factually accountable of; they are often much freer in stating opinion.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 10:31 AM   

Anything that reminds the electorate of what George Bush did as president is fine by me. The GOP would like to erase our collective memory of the man and especially his policies because their policies haven't changed at all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 12:15 PM    in reply to markg8

Mildly embarassing quotes about gay rights and Rumsfeld editing wikipedia have nothing significant to do with "what George Bush did as president."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 1:13 PM    in reply to superking

I'm sure there's more to the book than that.

My point is since January the right has pushed back hard against any mention of Bush, let alone his policies - which are still their policies - as if the last 8 years never happened. They would have us believe the recession and damn near economic collapse is Obama's fault. They screamed about GM and Chrysler closing dealerships and conveniently forget that if red state senators like Corker and Shelby who have transplants in their states had their way in December there wouldn't even be a GM and Chrysler. I don't plan for one minute to let the wingnuts get away with trying to make Americans forget. Their policies have been disastrous and if they had the chance they'd go right back to them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 2:40 PM    in reply to superking

Every little bit helps. That's how history happens.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 1:30 PM    in reply to markg8

The problem here is that they are not focusing on the damage he actually caused, but are instead supporting the narrative that Bush wasn't really a conservative.

And that only helps conservatives.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 1:58 PM    in reply to brewmn61

For conservatives who read it they A.)become demoralized they were fooled and B.) demand more assurances from their current office holders that they're as legitimately crazy as they are.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 10:39 AM   

We need more books like "Angler".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 12:09 PM   

markg8, I completely agree with reminding what happened with the last Republican President, but I think the GOP wants to erase the 'Bush Years' so people won't remember that it was the Republican controlled Congress that gave Bush his policies, and then some.

With the Democrats in control, while Obama is receiving a lot of plaudits, there are still a good number of conservative Democrats making any policy difficult to implement. With Bush, the Congressional Republicans were taking whatever moderately wingnut policy Rove could come up with and taking it one step further.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 12:33 PM   

"there are still a good number of conservative Democrats making any policy difficult to implement. With Bush, the Congressional Republicans were taking whatever moderately wingnut policy Rove could come up with and taking it one step further."

I personally used to make fun of the lockstep tendency on the right, but at the moment I really wish the left had some of that message discipline.

It's very hard to convince people that the government is the right entity to handle health care reform when one is insisting otherwise that the same government mishandled the bailout, gave the country to Wall Street, didn't do one thing right, including putting the right people in place, and is bogged down in Afghanistan.

These are deeply conflicting messages. I'd like to get onto one thing until this is done - health care reform and support for it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 21, 2009 5:24 PM   

Hi there, TenaX!

I have missed your commenting over the past few months, and I'm glad to see you here once again.

~Malcolm

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on