TPM LiveWire

Obama: IAEA Must Investigate Iran's Covert Enrichment Facility

Spread the word and support this article by retweeting it!


President Sarkozy, President Obama, and Prime Minister Brown

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Yesterday in Vienna, the United States, France, and England "presented detailed evidence" to the International Atomic Energy Agency demonstrating that Iran has a covert uranium enrichment facility near the city of Qum, President Obama announced at the G-20 economic summit in Pittsburgh this morning.

The decision to build this facility represents "a direct challenge to the basic compact at the center of the nonproliferation regime," Obama said, appearing with President Nicolas Sarkozy of France and Prime Minister Gordon Brown of England.

"We expect the IAEA to immediately investigate this disturbing information," he said.

However Obama added: "We have offered Iran a clear path toward greater international integration if it stands up to its obligations, and that offer stands."

Senior administration officials told news organizations before Obama's remarks that Iran has a "secret underground plant to manufacture nuclear fuel," 100 miles southwest of Tehran. The enrichment plant, however, is said not to be in operation.

President Obama said today "the size and configuration of this facility is inconsistent with a peaceful program."

He said there is now a "sense of urgency" about an October 1 meeting in Geneva with Iran, Germany, and the permanent members of the Security Council (the so-called P5+1).

Iran sent the IAEA a letter earlier this week revealing that a "new pilot fuel-enrichment plant is under construction."

The Obama Administration made the decision to go public with the evidence about the plant, which the US has reportedly been tracking for years, because Iran learned that Western countries knew about the facility, the New York Times reports.

The IAEA, for its part, has asked Iran for specific information about the facility, and access to it, as soon as possible.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told the Washington Post in an interview this week that the country's nuclear program has energy and medical aims, and he said he would buy enriched uranium for the U.S. for medical purposes.

Late Update: Here's the video of Obama's remarks.

Late Late Update: Full Transcript of the remarks of the three leaders, provided by the White House.

8:43 A.M. EDT

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Good morning. We are here to announce that yesterday in Vienna, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France presented detailed evidence to the IAEA demonstrating that the Islamic Republic of Iran has been building a covert uranium enrichment facility near Qom for several years.

Earlier this week, the Iranian government presented a letter to the IAEA that made reference to a new enrichment facility, years after they had started its construction. The existence of this facility underscores Iran's continuing unwillingness to meet its obligations under U.N. Security Council resolutions and IAEA requirements. We expect the IAEA to immediately investigate this disturbing information, and to report to the IAEA Board of Governors.

Now, Iran's decision to build yet another nuclear facility without notifying the IAEA represents a direct challenge to the basic compact at the center of the non-proliferation regime. These rules are clear: All nations have the right to peaceful nuclear energy; those nations with nuclear weapons must move towards disarmament; those nations without nuclear weapons must forsake them. That compact has largely held for decades, keeping the world far safer and more secure. And that compact depends on all nations living up to their responsibilities.

This site deepens a growing concern that Iran is refusing to live up to those international responsibilities, including specifically revealing all nuclear-related activities. As the international community knows, this is not the first time that Iran has concealed information about its nuclear program. Iran has a right to peaceful nuclear power that meets the energy needs of its people. But the size and configuration of this facility is inconsistent with a peaceful program. Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow -- endangering the global non-proliferation regime, denying its own people access to the opportunity they deserve, and threatening the stability and security of the region and the world.

It is time for Iran to act immediately to restore the confidence of the international community by fulfilling its international obligations. We remain committed to serious, meaningful engagement with Iran to address the nuclear issue through the P5-plus-1 negotiations. Through this dialogue, we are committed to demonstrating that international law is not an empty promise; that obligations must be kept; and that treaties will be enforced.

And that's why there's a sense of urgency about the upcoming meeting on October 1st between Iran, the permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, and Germany. At that meeting, Iran must be prepared to cooperate fully and comprehensively with the IAEA to take concrete steps to create confidence and transparency in its nuclear program and to demonstrate that it is committed to establishing its peaceful intentions through meaningful dialogue and concrete actions.

To put it simply: Iran must comply with U.N. Security Council resolutions and make clear it is willing to meet its responsibilities as a member of the community of nations. We have offered Iran a clear path toward greater international integration if it lives up to its obligations, and that offer stands. But the Iranian government must now demonstrate through deeds its peaceful intentions or be held accountable to international standards and international law.

I should point out that although the United Kingdom, France, and the United States made the presentation to Vienna, that Germany, a member of the P5-plus-1, and Chancellor Merkel in particular, who could not be here this morning, wished to associate herself with these remarks.

I would now like to turn to President Sarkozy of France for a brief statement.

PRESIDENT SARKOZY: (As translated.) Ladies and gentlemen, we have met yesterday for a meeting -- a summit meeting of the Security Council on disarmament and nuclear disarmament. I repeated my conviction that Iran was taking the international community on a dangerous path. I have recalled all the attempts that we have made to offer a negotiated solution to the Iranian leaders without any success, which what has been revealed today is exceptional. Following the enriching plant of Natanz in 2002, it is now the Qom one which is revealed. It was designed and built over the past several years in direct violation of resolutions from the Security Council and from the IAEA. I am expecting from the IAEA an exhaustive, strict, and rigorous investigation, as President Obama just said.

We were already in a very severe confidence crisis. We are now faced with a challenge, a challenge made to the entire international communities. The six will meet with the Iranian representatives in Geneva. Everything -- everything must be put on the table now.

We cannot let the Iranian leaders gain time while the motors are running. If by December there is not an in-depth change by the Iranian leaders, sanctions will have to be taken. This is for the peace and stability. Thank you.

PRIME MINISTER BROWN: America, the United Kingdom, and France are at one. Iran's nuclear program is the most urgent proliferation challenge that the world faces today.

As President Obama and President Sarkozy have just said, the level of deception by the Iranian government, and the scale of what we believe is the breach of international commitments, will shock and anger the whole international community, and it will harden our resolve.

Confronted by the serial deception of many years, the international community has no choice today but to draw a line in the sand. On October the 1st, Iran must now engage with the international community and join the international community as a partner. If it does not do so, it will be further isolated.

And I say on behalf of the United Kingdom today, we will not let this matter rest. And we are prepared to implement further and more stringent sanctions.

Let the message that goes out to the world be absolutely clear: that Iran must abandon any military ambitions for its nuclear program. Thank you.

END 8:51 A.M. EDT

Join the Conversation!

19 comments

Recommend Recommend (1)

September 25, 2009 9:20 AM   

I am sure it was simply an oversight on the part of Iran to report the existence of this secured nuclear facility, owing to the fact that Iran had it on a list of things to do, but just forgot it, what with the hectic schedule of Iran having to take it's son to soccer practice and given the fact that Iran spent all day cleaning the garage. Look, it just slipped its mind.

Not that it's a big deal. This facility, which was kept undisclosed by one of the world's least trustworthy and most aggressive, and which secretly employed dozenss of nuclear scientists, will be used solely for the production of rich, creamery ice cream.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 10:04 AM    in reply to LarsThorwald

Most aggressive? Please.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 11:33 AM    in reply to LarsThorwald

Aggressive? Yeah ok we get it you want the United States to spend more of it's peoples money to protect Israel.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 2:21 PM    in reply to LarsThorwald

"Oh, that secret underground nuclear facility. Right. Boy, don't know how we forgot to declare it before. Boy, good thing our program is totally peaceful or this might look kinda suspicious."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 9:44 AM   

It's all theater though - that's why I don't like the optics of this "breaking news" with a big trilateral presser. The West new about it for months(at least), Iran admitted it on Monday after learning the West knew about it (and probably rightly realizing they were about to be confronted with it), however the show Obama, Sarkozy and Brown put on today seemed out of place and wrong-headed.

there was no need for the presser with "we just learned..." breaking news because that is simply false. This presser was planned for awhile and Iran saw the writing on the wall and beat them to the punch. I mean a day after the big non-proliferation agreement there was to be a big "Iran has a secret nuclear facility" is a stunt that Bush would have pulled, and I thought Obama would have been better than that. With it admitted and known about since Monday, this presser should have been canceled. Now Iran can correctly point to the US playing the same propaganda games "We admitted it on Monday, and the West has known about it for months, but they went along with their dog and pony show anyways". And when has threats ever worked with Iran? Since there is the big meetings between the big players and Iran next week, why not broach this topic with them face-to-face then? Without the chest thumping threats and not-so-breaking news conference?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 9:57 AM   

Would be interesting to know how many hours between the press conference and this:

Above all, will the international community stop the terrorist regime of Iran from developing atomic weapons, thereby endangering the peace of the entire world?

--Benjamin Netanyahu, September 24 speech to the United Nations General Assembly.

It's almost like there was a hold on the announcement for effect, to be able to do it in Pittsburgh with a press conference with the three of them, after Netanyahu's speech. It's almost like there's a P.R. firm on the job...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 10:03 AM    in reply to artappraiser

Exactly. It's too orchestrated. According to the Times article the West has known about the secret site for months. This wasn't breaking news. Iran learned about this stunt and beat it to the punch by admitting it on Monday. So now only did the West know about it for months but Iran admitted it five days ago and still Obama and Co were up their spouting off it's propaganda about "We've just learned" BREAKING NEWS press conference.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 10:37 AM    in reply to Walter Mitty

Well, I think the "breaking" aspect is partly an answer to Bibi in a way. It's saying: "quit yer whining. Here, see, we're doing it, loud and proud, no more beating around the bush with diplospeak and leaks to various media persons. (Now, Bibi, while we get busy on that, let's move on to other local topics, shall we?)"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 10:21 AM    in reply to artappraiser

Oops, doh, I've checked out the background, should have read today's paper before commenting.

It's Obama himself that's doing the P.R. organizational work here--he led a little Security Council confab, pushed a measure and held a vote on it, just before leaving for Pittsburgh:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/25/world/25prexy.html

I must say I find it refreshing for everyone to stop playing the diplomatic codespeak cat and mouse game on this that has been going on for years--instead everyone talks straight, what you actually think, see how easy that was? And lo and behold, you get an immediate answer out of Iran, instead of chess-like game play, imagine that.

(BTW just head on CNN that they had broadcast that Security Council vote live.)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 26, 2009 11:26 PM    in reply to artappraiser

Somebody needs to remind Bibi that if he keeps telling the IAEA it's business, they might start getting interested in Dimona again...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 27, 2009 5:07 AM    in reply to Matt Jones

Don't hold your breath.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 1:51 PM   

OK, someone clue me in here, please and thanks. What "medical" purposes does enriched uranium serve?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 5:38 PM    in reply to Kuyleh

The radio-isotopes used in medical procedures are made by further processing highly enriched uranium or HEU (the stuff you make nuclear weapons out of).
Iran right now is enriching uranium only to low levels, and no one will sell it HEU. What Ahmadinejad is saying is if you expect us to freeze our nuclear program at the current enrichment levels, someone had better be willing to sell us medical isotopes. If the U.S. agreed to be the seller, Iran would presumably allow it to track how they were being used.
Iran isn't going to give up enrichment entirely (a right it has under the non-proliferation treaty) so this kind of arrangement would be a sensible part of any non-proliferation deal.
In passing, the U.S. doesn't make its own isotopes; it imports them all from Canada, where we cook them up in a creaky old nuclear plant that's often down for repairs. (I believe it's out of service right now.)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 7:14 PM    in reply to acanuck

What could be more obviously medical than a secret uranium enrichment plant buried underneath a mountain?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 26, 2009 2:10 AM    in reply to acanuck

Ah. I didn't know that. Thanks for taking the time to enlighten me! :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 25, 2009 2:10 PM   

I don't understand the disconnect between Pres. Obama's continuous efforts to reach out to our allies and other countries to create consensus to move forward and the Republican Party's position that Pres. Obama's policies jeopardize the safety of America. In the simplest terms, Republican foreign policy is isolationist and naïve, not a historic first for the Republicans. In a world of diversity of people, opinions, and religions, the Republican foreign policy will lead to America becoming an irrelevant state driving us deeper into isolation. America’s future depends on positive engagement and cooperation. God Bless Pres. Obama.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 26, 2009 5:40 PM   

I am sorry this is off topic, but this video is outrageous. When asked by two G20 protesters to condemn the bombing of innocent children, Sean Hannity would not. Must see this video. Make it go viral.

http://progressnotcongress.org/?p=3001

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 26, 2009 7:15 PM   

Meanwhile at the same Vienna conference, IAEA passed a near-unanimous resolution calling for nuclear weapons-free Middle East. Only Israel voted against the resolution. Israel, by the way, is located in the Middle East. What does that say?

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 27, 2009 5:05 AM   

I have to wonder how much of this sudden need for Obama to arrange IAEA investigations of the newly revealed enrichment facility is being driven from Tel Aviv. This administration is already showing every sign of becoming Israel's lackey. I wish we had Carter back. At least he wasn't afraid of the american jewish community.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on