TPM LiveWire

Ridge: Don't Believe Everything You Read -- Especially On My Book Jacket

Spread the word and support this article. Share it on Digg!

Read More

Tom Ridge

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge continued backpedaling last night on his new book's assertion that Attorney General John Ashcroft and Defense Secretary Donald Rumseld "strongly urged" him to raise the terror alert level -- possibly for political reasons -- just before the 2004 election.

In The Test of Our Times: America Under Siege, Ridge wrote that although Rumsfeld and Ashcroft wanted to raise the alert level, "There was absolutely no support for that position within our department. None. I wondered, 'Is this about security or politics?'" As we reported yesterday, Ridge is now scrambling to recast that statement.

On Rachel Maddow's MSNBC show last night, Ridge continued to contradict himself. "At no time, at no time, at no time did politics enter, in my judgment, anybody's equation," Ridge said.

Ridge went on to say that "politics was not involved" and that "I was not pressured."

Maddow then read to Ridge directly from his book's jacket: "'He recounts episodes such as the pressure that the DHS received to raise the security alert on the eve of of the '04 presidential election.' That's wrong?"

"Those aren't my words," Ridge said. "Read the book." But not the book's jacket. That stuff just can't be trusted.

Here's the video:

Join the Conversation!

31 comments

Recommend Recommend (4)

September 2, 2009 9:30 AM   

Rachel handed Mr. Ridge his ass.
I was about to switch channels when Ridge sat their lying.
I'm glad I waited until Rachel wrapped it up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 9:39 AM   

I don't know how far Ridge is from being a documented liar at this point. I guess raising controversy to help book sales is par for the course these days but the further he got into it during the interview, along with other things Rachel pressed him about, the more it enraged me that he'd just sit there and lie.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 9:54 AM   

Obviously, Ridge got Limbaughed. Even so, has the intelligence and personality of a ten-penny nail.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 11:31 AM    in reply to theWalrus

Without the sharp point

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 1:18 PM    in reply to jeffgee

LOL. I, too, assume Ridge got Lameballed, but with what? Why? Does he still think he has a future in Republican elections?

Methinks it might be something to do with a lucrative "consulting" future or a right-wing Think Tank.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 6:40 PM    in reply to jeffgee

You hit it on the head . . .

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 9:55 AM   

It was a very interesting interview.Damn she's good. He tried hard to not appear to be lying, but yet he appeared to be lying. Rachael is so polite when she asks the intense questions.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 9:56 AM   

It was a very interesting interview. Damn,she's good. He tried hard to not appear to be lying, but yet he appeared to be lying. Rachael is so polite when she asks the intense questions.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 10:14 AM    in reply to Msinformed

Isn't she though? I am blown away every day by her show. She is so smart and so prepared. She was always so respectful. Amazing interview. He must be under a lot of pressure to explain away what he has already avered as true.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 9:58 AM   

I'm not one to cut Mr. Ridge any slack on his on again/off again POV on warning colors & political pressures. But he IS right that book jacket copy is written by the publisher (typically a low level editorial asst or promotional serf) as advertising copy. There is a long history of nonfiction jacket copy not doing a good job representing what's inside. At times you might even infer that the copywriter didn't read the book at all. Hyperbole rules.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 10:42 AM    in reply to theod

And sometimes the dog really does eat the homework.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 10:44 AM    in reply to theod

True, book jacket copy is written by pub house copywriters, not the book's author. But I can tell you as the author of five books with a major publisher, they never put anything on my book covers that they didn't run by me first and none of my books ever came close to asserting something as serious as political manipulation of national security as Ridge's book does. It's as unlikely that he didn't know how those words got on his book cover as it is that he didn't know how that tie got around his neck.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 10:45 AM    in reply to theod

True, book jacket copy is written by pub house copywriters, not the book's author. But I can tell you as the author of five books with a major publisher, they never put anything on my book covers that they didn't run by me first and none of my books ever came close to asserting something as serious as political manipulation of national security as Ridge's book does. It's as unlikely that he didn't know how those words got on his book cover as it is that he didn't know how that tie got around his neck.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 10:06 AM   

Oops. Sorry.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 10:10 AM   

Ridge sort of looked afraid. They got to him somehow. It is the only way to explain how he would be willing to say one thing in the book and now backtrack.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 11:47 AM    in reply to eric the red

Exactly what we are all thinking. He got the 3am phone call, and it was one of Cheney's black ops boys.

"Recant, or we'll kill you"

Now he is denying his own book jacket! LOL
*weeps*

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 10:13 AM   

Ridge needs to change his name to Ledge!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 10:15 AM   

Book jacket my ass. She even cites the page number: 236. It is IN THE DAMN BOOK.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 11:08 AM    in reply to eric the red

Did I say book jacket, oh my bad, I meant straight jacket! The straight jacket the Republican party put me in, after they heard what I was about to do. The very same straight jacket they put former Sec of Treasury Paul Henry O'Neil in when they found out what was in his book.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 11:12 AM   

Ridge, you had a chance to make a difference. You had a chance to be an upstanding, honest citizen AND YOU BLEW IT! You BLEW IT.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 11:18 AM   

I'm willing to give Ridge props for showing up to TRMS; he has cojones. That said, it's unfortunate that he feels compelled to dial back what he certainly implies with his own words - forget the dust jacket. I do believe he is clinging ferociously to the notion that his peeps couldn't rape the country on purpose because of an agenda long set by the PNAC. He has to fashion events to fit in with a palatable idea of "response" to an imminent threat posed by "faulty" (rather than false) intelligence gathering. This is what makes him so pathetic. He can't step into reality.
Unlike the Cheney's of the universe, who will do "whatever is necessary" to fulfill the Pact for the New American Century and manufacture scenarios to put it over on the great unwashed who do the actual blood and guts letting; Ridge has to concoct a better reason in his own mind. Tragically, his mind flexible enough to bend toward any required rationalization so that he can disown complicity.
Denial is magical.
Rachel is an ace.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 11:45 AM   

How does the right wing get away with lame ass stuff like this? How does this not get repeated 50x times on CNN, etc??

Michelle Obama does a "terrorist-fist jab" and it gets run 50 billion times on the networks. The Head of Homeland security says he terrorized the nation to further the political ends of his superiors -- and the ONLY place we will hear about is on the Maddow show.

Ah the "Liberal" media at work again.
*weeps*

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 12:08 PM   

For having the stones to sit down with Ms. Maddow, I give the respect due. For service to country in Vietnam I give huge respect.

For everything you did while Sec. of Homeland Security I have nothing but contempt.

If you read this Mr. Ridge, you are a liar of the worst sort, a scared stupid, cowardly one. It was so obvious that someone got to you and instead of standing up, you rolled over like a crack whore on her pimp.

I would call you a scumbag but that would insult scumbags.

You threw the entire intelligence community under the bus when you knew the intel on Iraq was cooked by Vice President Cheney's personal intel office he opened in Langley.

You, and all of your criminal gang, deserve to be hit in the head with a entire law library and sent to the crossbar hotel for the remainder of your frightened little lives.

Oh, and after your performance on TRMS? Do all of us vets a solid and give back the Bronze Star with "V" device you urinated all over last night.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 6:48 PM    in reply to jtbear60

"For service to country in Vietnam I give huge respect."

US involvement in Vietnam was illegal. Anyone who furthered the US's endeavors there did WRONG.

There were no heroes in or from that illegal war -- except for those who refused to contribute to that illegality and paid a price for it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 12:19 PM   

He looks tired, and kinda scared. Someone got to him, and it's been keeping him up at night.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 12:34 PM   

If, as he said, he dismissed his own concerns as being unwarranted, why didn't he state THAT in the book?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 1:21 PM    in reply to stop7997

I'm with you on that.

He says that at the time he wondered about politics being involved in the thread level. I'm with you. He says that he now knows that wasn't the case. You lost me.

He made a statement which confirmed what many of us had strongly believed and provided the evidence to support it. He then goes back and says that conclusion wasn't correct but doesn't even to pretend to have a reason.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 1:02 PM   

Rachels end was good and I'm glad she laid out the truth, but she was unable shake Ridge from his lies. It was pretty obvious he'd been thouroughly reprogramed...or intimidated. His nearly hysterical repetition of the 'At no time' phrase was pretty telling. He seemed frantic to achieve a 'Do Over'. Darn those pesky facts.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 2, 2009 5:43 PM   

When Ridge and his book first hit the airwaves it was implied that the book was a whistle blower type and that's what got played up for a couple of days. It was a master stroke for the publisher and Ridge. Now that Ridge is making the personal appearances on the book tour he's playing down the original rumors. A loyal Bushie/Republican to the end.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 10:33 AM   

I think he was getting ahead in history. He wanted to air this knowing that it will come out in the time ahead. He is fooling himself if he thinks history won't be asking and answering the whole Bush Admin. for lots of stuff and the general condition of the country in darn near every aspect they controlled. I have yet to find any arena they left better for their time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 11:14 AM   

Rachel's follow up comment last night on her interview was excellent, too. She is an incredible interviewer: persistent but always civil, never tiptoes around the tough questions.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on