Sens. Ben Nelson (D-NE), Joe Lieberman (I-CT), Claire McCaskill (D-MO) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME) issued the following statement regarding Max Baucus' health reform bill Thursday. Here's the full text:
"We commend Chairman Baucus for his efforts to forge a health care reform proposal that has the potential to gain broad bipartisan support. We are encouraged by his commitment to work with both Democrats and Republicans in the Finance Committee, and believe there is a responsibility for both sides of the aisle to work together to develop a bill that will earn strong support from the full Senate.
"Despite the differences that have emerged in this health care debate, there is much that we all agree on, including insurance market reforms that bar insurance companies from discriminating against people based on their health status or denying coverage due to pre-existing conditions. We also agree on prevention and wellness investments, critical delivery reforms like paying for quality rather than quantity, increasing access to care by improving health care provider training programs, and reducing uncompensated care by extending tax credits to American families to help pay for their health care coverage.
"Each of us has an obligation to put aside partisan views and to consider how health care reform addresses the needs and challenges faced by individual citizens and our economy as a whole. While we each have outstanding concerns we wish to see addressed, Senator Baucus has taken an important and critical step forward with this legislation, which is budget neutral and reduces future health care costs according to CBO. We will continue to work together in the full Senate on bipartisan health care reform that reduces costs, improves care, and expands access."

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

martis
September 17, 2009 3:36 PM
So if the Insurance co's are forced to insure everyone won't they simply pass that on to other customers and or the taxpayer through gov't subsidies? I don't see how the insurance industry is being forced to control, let alone lower, the cost structure.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
markg8
September 17, 2009 3:54 PM in reply to martis
When we bar insurance companies from discriminating against people based on their health status or denying coverage due to pre-existing conditions they and the providers will no longer have a need an army of clerks, actuaries and lawyers to fight over getting them to pay medical bills.
When we also make prevention and wellness investments, and critical delivery reforms like paying for quality rather than quantity, and increasing access to care by improving health care provider training programs (more primary physicians) it'll cut provider costs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
twoviragos
September 17, 2009 4:14 PM in reply to markg8
Hi Mark, I completely defer to you on these matters, because I know you follow this in much more detail than I do. But here's my question: aren't we still relying on insurance companies to act out of the goodness of their hearts (if they indeed have hearts) to keep costs down? I'm not seeing where insurance companies will be compelled to lower costs. What's to keep them for keeping costs structures exactly how they are? With less people to pay, can't they just increase their profit margins? I think this is where I get a little lost/concerned.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
markg8
September 17, 2009 5:09 PM in reply to twoviragos
Right now insurance cos are protected by anti-trust laws and from any real competition by the public option or more importantly each other. With the new law they'll have to compete like they do in most European countries on price and service.
Their rigged game will be over, their godawful denial of care practices will be outlawed. Doctors will get simple insurance reimbursement forms to fill out. Insurance companies will either streamline their operations by cutting their no longer needed bureaucracy and cut our costs or get their lunch eaten by the competition.
We will get real health care cost relief. And "relief" is the word we need to use here. Republicans don't talk about tax "cuts", they talk about "relief". It's a lovely word.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
twoviragos
September 17, 2009 11:05 PM in reply to markg8
Thanks Mark.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
markg8
September 17, 2009 11:50 PM in reply to twoviragos
Anything I can do to help twoviragos.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?