Dozens of people were arrested in an anti-war protest outside the White House today. A press release issued by protest organizers put the number at 82, while CNN reported that U.S. Park Police said 61 protesters had been arrested.
Cindy Sheehan, whose son was killed in Iraq in 2004 and later made a name for herself by camping outside then-President George W. Bush's home in Crawford, TX, was involved in the protest. CNN said she was arrested. There was also poetry. According to the release:
Hundreds of people gathered this morning in McPherson Square for song, poetry and rousing speeches to kick off a day of action. Led by the "Mourn the dead, heal the wounded, end the wars" banner, those gathered then marched to the White House in a solemn procession, carrying large photographs of war victims, signs and banners.
Some people, protesting the continued operation of the prison at Gitmo, "chained themselves to the fence." The release says:
All those who remained on the White House sidewalk were eventually arrested. In total, 82 people were taken into police custody as the readings of the names of the dead--a tragic litany of war--continued.
During his press briefing today, Press Secretary Robert Gates fielded a question about a "disruptive" protest outside the White House that caused people going to the Situation Room to walk around much of the White House in order to get inside.
"Until you said it, I was previously unaware," Gibbs said, adding that such protests are "a hallmark of our country."
Late Update: The protesters have revised their arrest tally. A new press release puts the number of protesters arrested at 61.
Editor's Note: This post has been changed since it was first published.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Why oh why
October 5, 2009 5:53 PM
Change.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tom Traubert
October 5, 2009 6:12 PM
Here again, we have protesters from the left being arrested, and yet protesters on the right, even when they are armed with assult weapons, don't get arrested. WTF? We still can't read the names of the war dead in public?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
October 5, 2009 6:59 PM in reply to Tom Traubert
Because they chained themselves to the fence and/or refused to leave the sidewalk, technically an act of trespassing and an arrestable offense (unlike, apparently, cruising around downtown with an AR-15 slung over your shoulder). That and it's always easy to lock up squishy liberals, they don't carry guns. Easy win.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
izzatxeaux
October 5, 2009 7:07 PM in reply to ohyeathatsright
it wasn't just those handcuffed to the fence that were arrested:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/10/5/790009/-We-Were-Arrested-for-Speaking
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
October 5, 2009 8:25 PM in reply to izzatxeaux
Thanks for the link. I see now that they made it a permit issue. And if the police close the street, they have the right to arrest for a failure to comply with a "lawful" order (ie, get off the street). Unfortunately you have to hash out that "lawful" thing in court.
For a system that touts "innocence before guilt", we sure have a lot of ways to lock people up before proving it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HusseinTenaX
October 5, 2009 7:31 PM
"Some people, protesting the continued operation of the prison at Gitmo, "chained themselves to the fence." "
They should chain themselves to the Congressional building. Obama has wanted to close Gitmo since the second day he was in office. It's Congress who won't let him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
OldenGoldenDecoy
October 5, 2009 8:33 PM
Ah Yes . . .
Non-violent civil disobedience.
The highest form of personal patriotism there is.
My hats off to those who where there.
~OGD~
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?