Pat Buchanan saying things that are racist isn't exactly news. Still...
In his latest Human Events column, entitled "The Affirmative Action Nobel," the MSNBC analyst predictably rails against the Nobel committee for honoring President Obama.
Of the committee members, Buchanan writes:
They have reinforced the impression that Obama is someone who is forever being given prizes -- Ivy League scholarships, law review editorships, prime-time speaking slots at national conventions -- he did not earn.
Buchanan employs a favorite trick here. He doesn't explicitly say that Obama has been given prizes he didn't earn. That might be going too far even for MSNBC (though probably not.) All he says is that an impression exists that he has.
An impression, of course, that Buchanan himself has had no role in promoting.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Theda Skocpol
October 14, 2009 12:13 PM
Publicity is what these folks want. They will keep doing it as long as you and others report it. Why not try ignoring the run of the mill comments from Bachmann, Buchanan, etc?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
October 14, 2009 12:15 PM in reply to Theda Skocpol
Should we just sit there while he is put on national tv on a daily basis?
That's called enabling.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 14, 2009 1:52 PM in reply to Dorn76
That's the way I see it, too. Only when significant numbers of people make enough noise to make sponsors nervous and embarrass the network will they do anything about reining him in.
Of course, even that doesn't always make a difference: look at the sponsors that Glen Beck has lost, and he is still on the air and still spouting the same vile stuff.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GregorZap
October 14, 2009 3:04 PM in reply to slb
The real questoin is who has joined his support after the other sponsors left, and have any of those sponsors returned silently?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Devon
October 14, 2009 2:03 PM in reply to Theda Skocpol
That depends, I think, on whether Tali Mendelberg is right about the Willie Horton ads. Her book The Race Card argues that the racial implications of Lee Atwater's effort to "make Horton [Dukakis'] running mate" were largely unchallenged through the summer of 88, as the Democratic candidates poll numbers dropped steadily. After Jesse Jackson and then Lloyd Bentsen publicly called the ads racist, public discussion of the racial implications rose, and with them, Dukakis' numbers.
It's not entirely clear to me that there was a causal connection there.
But to the extent there was, and Mendelberg is right that people consciously repudiate what they may unconsciously be susceptible to, I think you are wrong. Buchanan's comment strikes me as pretty racist, in the same way (as Atwater put it, more or less, "you can't say n***** anymore, so you say 'busing'"). It wasn't explicitly so. And there's no shortage of irrationality in criticism of Obama these days. So I think it needs to be called out.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
October 14, 2009 12:14 PM
MSNBC will continue to roll this hack out there, and yet we still view it as the "liberal" news network. What bullshit.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GregorZap
October 14, 2009 3:07 PM in reply to Dorn76
He's the MSNBC whipping boy. Buchanan is well paid to provide old-school arguments that are easily dismissed. I doubt there are many MSNBC viwers swayed by his argument. They are only irritated, which counts for something.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Pete Bilderback
October 14, 2009 12:20 PM
And once again Pat Buchanan reinforces the the "impression" that he is a knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing, troglodyte racist.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
joneg
October 14, 2009 12:22 PM
Ah, Buchanan. Remind me again: what did he do to earn TV commentator slots and our attention to his ignorant, racist comments?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pinson
October 14, 2009 12:42 PM
Not sure I agree Theda. Rush Limbaugh is in the exact same business as Buchanan: pandering to racists. For some reason the people who run the major media businesses in this country believe it's OK for these people to traffic in filth. The people who run businesses like the NFL don't, and I think that's so because of public scorn. Roger Goodell and the owners realize they're likely to lose money if they let someone like Rush buy a franchise. They know this because their black players and public opinion say so. Silence isn't exactly consent, but I think there's value in confronting the hate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
October 14, 2009 1:26 PM in reply to pinson
Great point. If there was no pushback against Limbaugh, and his rantings were ignored by those of us who believe that he is a vile piece of human trash, then there would be nothing controversial about him, and he would probably still be on ESPN and getting ready to take over a pro football franchise. Pointing out racism and ugliness by mouthpieces like Buchanan and Limbaugh is absolutely crucial to having the majority of Americans reject them and their views.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
October 14, 2009 1:43 PM in reply to commie atheist
In which case, he would be an obscure talk radio jock riding the gain on a mike in Dubuque. He wouldn't have a $400 million contract and he wouldn't be able to buy a Hummer, let alone a football team minority ownership.
Still, you're right that he and all other racists should be called out and shamed whenever and wherever possible.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
October 14, 2009 2:27 PM in reply to Schmed
That brings up the question - does Limbaugh's notoriety stem from the things he says, or from the fact that lots of people listen to him? Somehow I get the feeling that Limbaugh's fan base would exist regardless of what anyone else said about him. There's a fairly solid 24%-30% of Americans who will follow wackos like Limbaugh and Beck because they really believe the things they say. Ignoring them only serves to validate them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Former Federal Employee
October 14, 2009 1:26 PM
I'd like to apologize to all those envious conservatives out there, because their white Anglo-Saxon God didn't make them Harvard Law material like Barack Obama.
George W. Bush never got anything that his daddy's name or money couldn't purchase. Barack Obama was the child of an immigrant father and an American woman of no particular means. Who, out of these two, actually got to his position on merit?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 14, 2009 1:54 PM in reply to Former Federal Employee
Indeed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Official A
October 14, 2009 2:07 PM in reply to Former Federal Employee
Bingo.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jenesq
October 14, 2009 1:34 PM
Jesus H. Christ. Prof. Tribe at Harvard Law called Obama "the most brilliant student he ever had." Obama's uber-Republican successor at Harvard Law Review (the first woman editor--wonder if Buchanan would call her "affirmative action" too) has said that he was a good editor. Obama EARNED everything he has. Buchanan just can't grasp that a black man can be more intelligent than he is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
PhnxHusseinRising
October 14, 2009 1:37 PM
Just ignore him. Contact MSNBC to protest their airing of his views, but certainly we should not be disseminating his words to the broader community.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kinkistyle
October 14, 2009 1:43 PM
The Republicans and their ilk like Pat Buchanan are really giving The Onion some serious competition on the news satire market.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pbres
October 14, 2009 1:57 PM
I find it ironic that Buchanan is amongst those that deny the scientific concept of evolution--like many of his peers.Why Ironic?---sinply because he and his gang are going the way of the dinosaur.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
renet
October 14, 2009 2:45 PM in reply to pbres
Hey Pbres, remember when Buchanan proclaimed that he was NOT descended from monkeys? Did you know that monkeys all over the world breathed a huge sigh of relief?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
salame
October 14, 2009 2:16 PM
Buchanan just can't help himself.
He wants to do a racist rant so-o-o badly it must hurt him to only
be able to spew coded racism around the edges.
Don't you just know that when he leaves the studio, he spews racial
slurs all the way to his lily white, upper class, rich mans world?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
October 14, 2009 2:21 PM
I think it is shocking that MSNBC puts this racist on TV every day.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
twirling fartknocker
October 14, 2009 2:31 PM
it's odd that he said that -- not because it isn't in line with his history, but because he was amongst the few repugs to muster any graciousness on TV the morning the award was announced
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
KQuark
October 14, 2009 3:03 PM
President Obama got an academic scholarship at Columbia and did not even list his race on his Harvard Law application. When is the media going to be fact checked?
GWB was the real Affirmative Action president because if his name was not Bush he would be pumping gas instead of being former POTUS.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
stefran
October 14, 2009 3:49 PM
Pat's statements are actually quite revealing. They are reminisent of his comments on Rachel Maddow's show at the time of the recent Supreme Court confirmation hearings. At that time, when presented with the fact that Justice Sotomayor graduated summa cum laude from Princeton, Buchanan implied that professors were giving her good grades she didn't deserve. He also spoke derisively of her editorship at the Yale Law Journal. There is a pathology here. White folks get what they have by divine right and hard work. Minorities like Obama and Sotomayor advance, not through hard work, but by being "given" what they haven't earned.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
badgerellen
October 14, 2009 4:26 PM
I served on the Recruiting Committee of a law firm. When we reviewed the resume of an African American student who attended Harvard Law School who had a B+ average, some of the other lawyers said her grades were the product of affirmative action. I pointed out that most law schools, including Harvard, used blind grading of exams, especially for first year law students--a notion that the older partners found hard to grasp. The woman-who has gone on to a brilliant career-did not accept our offer. I am certain President Obama has faced the same analysis.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
out of the loop
October 15, 2009 12:58 AM
All the people writing in to say that Buchanan should be ignored are by their very admonishment failing to ignore Buchanan. Physician, heal thyself. To ignore the man, one must be silent about it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?