TPM LiveWire

Emanuel: Blame Bush Administration For National Debt And State Of Afghan War

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!


White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel appeared on CNN's State of the Union this morning, and tried to lay at least a couple of the country's current problems at the feet of the Bush administration.

On the record $1.4 trillion federal budget deficit, Emanuel chastised Republicans for abandoning the pay-as-you-go "discipline of the 90s" while passing three tax cuts and a massive prescription drug bill. "That led to $5 trillion of red ink run up -- the biggest red ink run up in the shortest period of time in American history," Emanuel said. "Literally over half the nation's debt has accumulated in the last eight years."

Emanuel also seemed to criticize the Bush administration for its handling of the war in Afghanistan, saying that many of the questions of strategy and policy that President Obama is now asking are being asked for the first time.

"Before it never even got on the radar screen for them," Emanuel said. "Everything was always about Iraq."

For years the U.S. was "adrift" in Afghanistan and now, Emanuel said, "we're beginning at scratch" -- even after eight years of war.

Emanuel also emphasized that the president's decision about U.S. strategy in Afghanistan is not nearly as simple as send 40,000 more troops, or don't. Whether the U.S. has a "credible Afghan partner" is also a crucial factor, Emanuel said, and "the president will not be rushed to making a decision."

The White House chief of staff also had some tough words for the "titans of the financial industry," criticizing them for fighting Democratic efforts to reform the financial regulatory regime -- even after taxpayers bailed out Wall Street firms whose actions helped cause the financial crisis.

"They're literally going and fighting the very type of regulations and reforms that are necessary to prevent again a crisis like this happening," Emanuel said, adding a moment later that "they assume everybody else has basically short-term memory problems around here."

"They have responsibility to be part of the solution, not to be part of the obstacles."

And the White House's conflict with Fox News? "It's not so much a conflict," Emanuel said. Fox News is simply "not a news organization, so much as it has a perspective."

But Emanuel tried to downplay the issue. "The concentration of the White House isn't about what Fox is doing."

Join the Conversation!

14 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

October 18, 2009 10:44 AM   

So when are they going to stop being Bush-lite?
I'm getting tired of all the excuses for not actually changing things.

(Also, I'd recommend they read up on the history of previous invasions of Afghanistan, starting with Alexander the Great, who couldn't beat the warlords either.)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 11:22 AM    in reply to PJEvans

The democratic party is not the repugs, there group thinking is not only the norm but is required, somewhat like the 'Borgs' of Star Trex fame. PO is not a dictator, and even if he were, he has to do first things first, you know, like stopping the run away train, reverse direction, pickup the china off the floor, set the tables and chairs upright again, and lastly clean up the trash (the repugs - 2010). People seem to think that he can do all things with the wave of a magic wand, especially when the evil sorcerers lurks in the background saying 'no' to everything. I am a hard worker only sleeping four hours per day for the past years, and yet I'm amazed at his energy. I believe we ought to wish him clarity of thought, persistence and luck, instead of being critical nine months into his presidency.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 12:32 PM    in reply to PJEvans

***"Another way of putting it is when, you know, I’m busy and Nancy's busy with our mop cleaning up somebody else’s mess –- we don’t want somebody sitting back saying, you’re not holding the mop the right way. Why don’t you grab a mop, why don’t you help clean up. You’re not mopping fast enough."*** - President Obama
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nine months and counting, to clean up eight years of the Bush debacle. I'm giving the President more time. He really is 'NOT' Barack the magic negro you know. No matter what you've heard.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 12:32 PM    in reply to PJEvans

***"Another way of putting it is when, you know, I’m busy and Nancy's busy with our mop cleaning up somebody else’s mess –- we don’t want somebody sitting back saying, you’re not holding the mop the right way. Why don’t you grab a mop, why don’t you help clean up. You’re not mopping fast enough."*** - President Obama
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nine months and counting, to clean up eight years of the Bush debacle. I'm giving the President more time. He really is 'NOT' Barack the magic negro you know. No matter what you've heard.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 9:28 PM    in reply to PJEvans

I am not sure that you have your history right. Alexander the Great was successful in Afghanistan as far as he chose to go. He founded the city of Kandahar (sp).

The British were successful at creating a protectorate which is what they set out to do. The idea that Afghanistan is the place empires go to die is a much repeated only semi-accurate shorthand version of history that often leads to misunderstandings and mistakes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 9:29 PM    in reply to PJEvans

I am not sure that you have your history right. Alexander the Great was successful in Afghanistan as far as he chose to go. He founded the city of Kandahar (sp).

The British were successful at creating a protectorate which is what they set out to do. The idea that Afghanistan is the place empires go to die is a much repeated only semi-accurate shorthand version of history that often leads to misunderstandings and mistakes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 10:49 AM   

Obama is struggling to decide if the U.S. has a "credible Afghan partner?" Since the rest of the world knows that Karzai heads a failed narco-state, Obama and his advisors must be complete idiots if they are stuggling with a decision about whether they have a credible partner. Clearly they do not.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 11:01 AM   

"they assume everybody else has basically short-term memory problems around here."

This is clearly the bedrock operating strategy of the republican party in general. They all think, and desperately hope, that the public will not remember what happened last year and how it was their philosophy and principals that caused all these messes in the first place.

How else could they, for example, promote tax cuts as the solution to deficits that were caused in large part by tax cuts to begin with?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 11:06 AM   

Emmanuel, as usual, is full of crap. It's clear that he and his buddies have won the day and the escalation of the war is a foregone conclusion. Stupid decision, but a foregone conclusion nonetheless. His disingenuous condemnmation of Wall Street is enough to make a person puke. He, along with Summers and Geithner have allowed Wall Street to dictate terms to the US Government and have screwed our country six ways to Sunday. Emannuel is a lying, conniving, corporate whore.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 12:57 AM    in reply to oleeb

lol.

are you alright? i think you should go lie down now..

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 12:35 PM   

Talk is cheap. The WH motto should be "Speak loudly , and carry a small stick."

I see very little concrete "game-changing" action going on in the Obama administration. They are continuing (and even expanding!) many of the most pernicious Bush policies. The Obama DOJ is still stuffed with loyal Bushies I and find it all extremely depressing and disheartening.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 1:09 PM    in reply to theWalrus

See:
Destiny October 18, 2009 12:32 PM in reply to PJEvans

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 7:17 PM   

Rahm had "tough words for the financial industry"? I must have missed the part about his Treasury Secretary regulating naked short selling, making credit default swaps transparent, opening up the books at the Fed, recovering the bonuses bestowed to our best-and-brightest Wall Street CEOs, and dismantling the zombie banks. Did anyone else hear him mention this?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 2:27 AM   

Very little indication they're serious about this. This will be an interesting couterpoint to FDR, who, himself a product of the East Coast political and financial elite, gave it to them. I think Obama's in awe of them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on