Fox News lashed back at the White House for calling the cable channel "a wing of the Republican Party," releasing a statement calling the remarks "self-serving."
"It's astounding the White House cannot distinguish between news and opinion programming. It seems self-serving on their part," said Michael Clemente, a senior vice president at Fox News.
It was an interesting choice of phrase: Earlier today, a White House spokeswoman called a report released by the insurance industry "self-serving." The report claims health care reform would increase premiums.
On Sunday, White House Communications Director Anita Dunn went after Fox News, saying, "Let's not pretend they're a news network the way CNN is," and describing Fox as President Obama's "opposition."
In a straight-news segment on Fox today, the channel compared Obama to President Nixon for his attitude toward Fox.
"This order to freeze out a leading news organization is similar to those President Nixon infamously directed at the New York Times," said correspondent James Rosen. In 1971, Nixon tried to stop the Times from printing the Pentagon Papers, a bleak report on the Vietnam War. The Supreme Court struck down his attempts as prior restraint, a violation of the First Amendment.
Fox also reported that an aide to Dunn denied the requests of several shows to interview the President, saying it won't happen this year.
This is the latest in escalating tensions between the administration and Fox. On Sept. 30, a staffer wrote on the official White House blog about Fox's "disregard for the truth."
Before that, Obama snubbed Fox News Sunday when he toured five other Sunday shows to push for health care reform. Before that, Fox snubbed Obama by refusing to air his address to the joint session of Congress on their main network (although they did play it on Fox News and Fox Business.)
Last month, Fox's White House reporter Major Garrett went after the administration, suggesting it broke the law when collecting email lists.
Roger Ailes, the president of Fox News, reportedly had an informal meeting a few weeks ago with David Axelrod, one of Obama's senior advisers.
Today's Fox segment claimed the channel has the "greatest balance" of Republican, Democratic and Independent viewers among the major cable channels, and boasted its ratings, which are much higher than CNN's or MSNBC's.
In his statement, Clemente took a hit at Obama's skills at governing.
"Instead of governing, the White House continues to be in campaign mode, and FOX News is the target of their attack mentality," Clemente said in his statement. "Perhaps the energy would be better spent on the critical issues that voters are worried about."

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

GTFOOH
October 12, 2009 4:31 PM
Even though every word was probably justified, for a communications director she probably said more than Obama would have wanted her to say. She seemed a bit snarky in her delivery as well. Gibbs works for her?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
October 12, 2009 10:54 PM in reply to GTFOOH
Either that or she got the tone precisely right in characterizing the freak propaganda organization.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
October 12, 2009 4:32 PM
"It's astounding the White House cannot distinguish between news and opinion programming."
No comment necessary.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
October 12, 2009 4:34 PM
Actually Nixon and Fox News are on the same side of this. They're both trying to withhold or manipulate facts while making themselves look like a reliable source of information.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
twirling fartknocker
October 12, 2009 4:35 PM
Fuck Fox. Call them out for what they are. And then yank Australian Murdoch's "right" to own US media. Do it all, but do it from a fact-based platform.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AhTrini1
October 12, 2009 4:43 PM
Yup, yup, the racist balance - you betcha **wink, wink**.
"Today's Fox segment claimed the channel has the "greatest balance" of Republican, Democratic and Independent viewers among the major cable channels, and boasted its ratings, which are much higher than CNN's or MSNBC's."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mateo123
October 12, 2009 4:46 PM
What an idiot that Anita Dunn is. This is a softball for Fox. There is opinion programming on Fox -- for sure -- but there is also very clearly a news group. And, the Obama people better get on the ball. They have to address Fox, just the way that W had to deal with the NYTimes. W never dealt with the NYTimes and, not surprisingly, they could not wait to knock him out.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jenzinoh
October 12, 2009 5:32 PM in reply to Mateo123
I have to take issue with the remark that they "very clearly have a news group"... even Chris Wallace, arguably one of their only "news anchors" actually twists the facts to fit a meme...
I see no harm in freezing them out. Beleive me, as badly as the NY Times wanted to take out W, that is small potatoes compared to how badly Fox wants to take out Obama... and that began on election night! And it has nothing to do with Obama... they would do the same with any Democrat. That is their M.O. That they can whine and moan about being painted unfairly by the WH is their own too bad. They slept with the dogs that gave them fleas.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
October 12, 2009 11:01 PM in reply to jenzinoh
You are obviously correct.
And as to "there is also very clearly a news group," there most certainly is not. Dream on! It's an agitprop cell masquerading as news. Obama people are treating it appropriately.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
psyclone
October 13, 2009 12:07 AM in reply to Overreach THIS!
The Fox "news group" is the group that collects the aerial video footage of the latest car chase/drug bust/warehouse fire in Big American City.
Everything else is opinion. Hopefully that clarifies things.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jfields
October 12, 2009 6:01 PM in reply to Mateo123
Uh, no, it's not 'very clear' that Fox has a 'news group'.
If it is so clear, perhaps you can explain to us what that 'news group' supposedly is?
What's clear is precisely what Ms. Dunn said: FOX is a de facto arm of the Republican Party. There is no attempt to be a legitimate news network. Anyone who thinks otherwise is both ignorant, and an idiot. All one need do is to look at who owns and runs Fox News. No other work is necessary.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eztempo
October 12, 2009 7:01 PM in reply to jfields
Actually, jfields, I think you have it backwards. Judging from the Republican caucus' "followership" of the FOX-incited Tea Parties and etc., I'd say that the Republican Party is the government arm of FOX News.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Orlando
October 12, 2009 6:55 PM in reply to Mateo123
A news group wouldn't lecture the President, or any politician, that, "Perhaps the energy would be better spent on the critical issues that voters are worried about."
A news group would consider prickly criticism to mean that they are doing their jobs and they wouldn't feel the need to issue any statement in response.
The response from Fox reads like a political party press release responding to a statement made by an opponent. Go figure.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
October 12, 2009 7:34 PM in reply to Mateo123
Um, the difference is that the NYT didn't fabricate their "facts" and cherry-pick news to fit a single party's agenda.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
truthspeaker
October 12, 2009 11:27 PM in reply to Mateo123
After hearing all the lies these guys tell. After listening Rush Limbaugh, I don't think I want to hear from you either. BTW if Limbaugh becomes part owner of the rams, I won't be watching any rams games, just as I don't watch fox or cnn. These people don't deserve capitalization of their names. They are hate filled liars.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SantaMonica
October 13, 2009 2:41 AM in reply to Mateo123
Are you trolling for Fox or what?
Are you f*ckin kiddin me? The NYT couldn't wait to take W out???? uh???? Judy Miller? Anyone? Anyone? or how about burying the NSA wiretapping story in Oct. '04? Bueller? Bueller?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ignacious
October 12, 2009 4:48 PM
THe WH CAN, DOES and DID distinguish between news and opinion programming. THAT is the reason for the self-serving answer to the WH statement on FAUX News'part!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Beetlejuice
October 12, 2009 4:49 PM
Fox who? News what?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LimoLiberal
October 12, 2009 5:34 PM in reply to Beetlejuice
Exactly - all Fox stations have been boycotted in my house since 2003 (and will continue to be).
Fox is a joke. I realize they have very high ratings, but the ignorant and hateful are not the audience anyone should want to strut as their base.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
October 12, 2009 4:49 PM
The White House should issue an addendum to it's previous statement - there's doubtless a sizable contingent of people who turn to Faux News for its humor value. It's like watching the videos of Saddam's intelligence chief saying, "there are no American tanks in Baghdad" whilst the tanks roll in the background. You know it's complete BS, but it's funny to think that somebody believes this to be the truth.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
randomname
October 12, 2009 5:42 PM in reply to Matt Jones
it's funny to think that somebody believes this to be the truth.
It is, actually, frightening. The fact that their numbers are high is extremely disturbing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lcdrrek
October 12, 2009 4:53 PM
Perhaps it's time to pull FNC's White House Press credentials a la Jeff Gannon. My feeling is that they don't deserve any recognition and should just be ignored.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
we r all husseins
October 12, 2009 4:56 PM
Apparently neither can many of FNC's viewers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
neesy08
October 12, 2009 5:12 PM in reply to we r all husseins
my sentiments exacly. the viewers think FN's delivering news. with the exception of Smith, they are only delivering OPINIONS!! Consideing that most of their viewers have a educational level Jetrho Bodine would envy.....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LimoLiberal
October 12, 2009 5:35 PM in reply to we r all husseins
Well said. Well said.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
psyclone
October 13, 2009 12:25 AM in reply to we r all husseins
Nor can the Fox show producers for that matter.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
breakspear
October 12, 2009 5:07 PM
Clemente said: "Perhaps the energy would be better spent on the critical issues that voters are worried about."
Oh right, sir, you mean those issues voters care about that you dont cover? Or when you do, you slant them in a staggeringly cynical way? You mean those 'issues', sir? Right, hmm? Can't hear you? Gonna release a thin-skinned statement on my comment to part of your comment? Well, are you?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
October 12, 2009 5:18 PM
Fighting words eh? How 'bout, "I believe this guy is a racist & has a deep seated hatred for white people".
Keep Beck, Hannity, Malkin, etc. etc. & lose access to our President, it's as simple as that
It appears the Liberal Media Bias isn't what Fox claims it is. They can't brag about their lead in viewers & ratings & then cry about media bias can they? They're part of a monopoly owned by a right-wing billionaire with a definite agenda. Hell they even use Rove tactics as Standard Operating Procedure.
Not to mention being classless, heartless sell-outs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
randomname
October 12, 2009 5:47 PM in reply to Leftflank
Just one point...Roger Ailes is in charge at Faux. Rupert owns it, but really only cares about money. What they broadcast everyday is what Ailes wants. He is a good friend to the Bushes
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
October 12, 2009 6:54 PM in reply to randomname
A very important point. Murdoch leans heavily to the right, but when it comes down to it money trumps all. Ailes, on the other hand, is more of a winger. That's why FNC is more right wing than the other Murdoch operations.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fkaZk0sm0
October 13, 2009 4:13 PM in reply to midnight rambler
well, actually fox's right-leaning is purposeful on murdoch's part. but simply because murdoch is exploiting that niche in the interest of profits.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Aljstl
October 12, 2009 5:34 PM
At one time "The Beverly Hillbillies" was the top rated show on TV. Basing your validity as a news organization based on ratings is part of the reason why we have a "Fox News" in the first place.
The reason our news coverage is so lousy across the board is because they are now expected to generate revenue and are thus beholden to ratings and corporate sponsors.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ejb3
October 12, 2009 6:08 PM
Wasn't James Rosen caught on film coaching teabaggers? Now he is mad that his "news organization" is being frozen out?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ejb3
October 12, 2009 6:12 PM in reply to ejb3
Never mind, he was the guy who got shushed at the values voter conference.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TheBloodletting
October 12, 2009 6:41 PM
Give me a BREAK!!! He's got all the MSM's licking his butt and Fox News is the only one (or about the only one) that shows the Emperor Has No Clothes. WTF?? Don't they have anything better to do than this chicken-sh*t B.S.?
You know, I voted for him, but damned if I'm not regretting it now. His administration is getting weirder and weirder and more ineffective by the day.
No, I won't be voting for Obama for a second time if he keeps this crap up. Do some work, ya bum! It's what we put you in office for, not to have a spat with a News organization that holds your feet to the fire! Grow up and start acting Presidential, instead of trying to freeze out a different viewpoint than your own. I'm a big boy and can tell what's B>S. and what's not. I certainly don't need my President telling me what the truth is and what is not.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
musgrove
October 12, 2009 7:04 PM in reply to TheBloodletting
a second time.... right....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
October 12, 2009 10:09 PM in reply to TheBloodletting
No, certainly not, you appear quite content to let FAux Noise do that for you.
What specific critiques do you think they got right? Last time I saw him he had clothes and a Nobel Prize right after that channel said the rest of the world didn't like him. Time for a Reality Check.
Obama recognizes that they are all opinion programming all the time and he called bu!!sh*t.
When a station organizes its own rallies and reports that as news it is high time to think again.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
truthspeaker
October 12, 2009 11:35 PM in reply to TheBloodletting
After hearing all the lies these guys tell. After listening Rush Limbaugh, I don't think I want to hear from you either. BTW if Limbaugh becomes part owner of the rams, I won't be watching any rams games, just as I don't watch fox or cnn. These people don't deserve capitalization of their names. They are hate filled liars.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
psyclone
October 13, 2009 12:11 AM in reply to TheBloodletting
Yeah, real convincing Mr. Pokerface. Funny how a story on Fox is what brings all the Fox asslickers here.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
elle a
October 13, 2009 3:39 AM in reply to TheBloodletting
nice try, beckian. you most certainly did not vote for barack obama. as for letting the president tell you what is truth or not, its clear you have Fox doing just that for you.
and when you descend to calling your president a bum, i have to conclude that you have no little or no college education.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Seafarer
October 12, 2009 6:48 PM
"The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that the United States Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right."
The elected leadership of this country is presently at war to save the health care and physical well being of it's domestic citizens, versus foreign and domestic forces that wish to ensure that many Americans have no ability to afford medical care.
This is leading directly to the actual deaths of Americans and deprivation of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
Is Fox News a clear and present danger to America?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ledzep
October 12, 2009 6:53 PM
Apparently the new strategy from the Obama White House is to whine about FOX News. That’s really going to work out well. I think the number one complaint I hear from people these days is all the unfair, probing coverage Obama gets from all the major news organizations. Everyone is just so mean to him! Someone should give him another Nobel Peace Prize to wipe his tears with.
Iran nearly has nuclear weapons and North Korea just tested some new missiles, so do we really need a president who whines like a little bitch? Do you remember Bush ever crying about the unfair coverage he got when he got about one millionth of the favorable press Obama has gotten? This is why you don’t elect presidents who have girl parts where man parts should be; you can’t be a leader and a crybaby.
And it’s a little disturbing when Obama has three networks and two 24-hour cable news channels and all of Hollywood carrying water for him and all he can focus on is the one who dares air criticism of him. I know he’s too impotent to actually do anything, but I still don’t like it. It’s un-American. But so is being a crybaby.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
breakspear
October 12, 2009 7:15 PM in reply to ledzep
Oh you mean like Fox News being crybabies because they cant gain access to the President for an interview. they call him 'thinskinned' then they screech and wail about not getting access. not too 'balanced' if their reaction is reactionary. but then who would expect less? no one with sense. 'liberal media', puhleeze. if Fox News is so popular, and they do have high ratings, then there cant be a 'liberal biased media' with them at the top of the news pile. hah and another hah.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dave Adams
October 12, 2009 8:41 PM in reply to ledzep
Poor widdle Faux News getting picked on by the President. What a pity.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kuyleh
October 12, 2009 8:44 PM in reply to ledzep
So all women are crybabies, eh? All women are pathetic push-overs? I think someone got rejected and is here whining about it...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
truthspeaker
October 12, 2009 11:46 PM in reply to ledzep
I guess you are one of those who elected GW in 2004, after the mess he and his cadre made in the preceding four years. Aren't there blogs for people like you elsewhere in taliban land, Iran, and perhaps in the swat valley?. If I wish to hear nonsense, I just have to watch faux news which obviously do. In other words...shut the ... up.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
psyclone
October 13, 2009 12:24 AM in reply to ledzep
Iran nearly has nuclear weapons and North Korea just tested some new missiles, so do we really need a president who whines like a little bitch?
That's funny, I seem to recall other instances of a Commander-in-Chief who liked to whine like a little bitch about the media.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
October 12, 2009 7:40 PM
Does Fox Opinion shows not have to be based on facts?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rip
October 12, 2009 9:30 PM
I think the Obama Administration has made the rather obvious conclusion that it will lose no support by insulting Fox and perhaps even gain some, as there is little overlap between loyal Fox watchers and Obama voters.
There is no love for Fox among other news organizations either, so don't expect the media establishment to complain about Obama's snubbing of the network.
Obama is making it clear that he does not perceive criticism from Fox as objective, but politicallly motivated and unreliable.
For decades the conservative movement has accused the establishment media of being arrayed against them, and have used this argument to great effect in both rallying the base and convincing the middle that any attention towards Republican scandal is driven by liberal bias in the media. This belief has been the key to Fox's success, and Obama is merely turning it back around on them.
James Rosen may do well to recall that Richard Nixon's crusade against the New York Times didn't prevent him from getting 61% of the vote in 1972. The perception among the greater public the the Republican Party has been taken over by its fringe may lead to a similar Obama landslide in 2012, even if there is some dissatisfaction with his record among swing voters.
Nixon was hardly beloved, even by Republicans, and true conservatives were shocked at some of his policies, both domestic and international. His first term was mired by economic recession, creeping inflation and a failure to achieve "peace with honor" in Vietnam, as had been promised. None of this mattered to an electorate that came to see McGovern as the choice of the radical left, never mind that he was repeatedly elected Senator from South Dakota, hardly a hotbed of flag-burning, acid dropping, neo-marxist abortionists and black nationalists.
Whoever the Republicans nominate in 2012, they will likely be seen by voters at large through the prism of their more lunatic supporters, even if the candidate is more reasonable in tone.
It will be interesting to see if Fox chooses to double down on being a megaphone for the fringe by then, or if it seeks to promote a more rational conservatism in order to salvage the movement.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cat
October 12, 2009 9:52 PM
Obama was smart to go on Univision rather than Fox. His Hispanic support is around 70%. To win again, he needs to maintain that support. I think Shep is the only one on Fox that is "fair and balanced."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
davemartin7777
October 12, 2009 11:00 PM
Fox News can also be called, The Jesus Channel/ GOP TV/ The Glorious Official Republican Government News Network.
While Fox News has the highest ratings, it’s also the same group of people that make up just 20% of America’s electorate… the far right-wing of the GOP.
There will always be an audience for the far right and that’s Rupert Murdock’s Fox News demographic.
Rupert keeps them frothing at the mouth with manufactured fear and GOP talking-points, phony outrage.
Fox is also a right-wing echo chamber.. notice that when “The Wall Street Journal”, “The Weekly Standard” people are on Fox News there’s never disclosure that these people are all Rupert Murdock employees.
Imagine if MSNBC or CNN did this… I don’t know how Fox News gets way with constantly recycling Rupert Murdock’s employees (sockpuppets) from his various media properties.
There’s hardly a word on the “MSM” about Murdock’s world wide (far right-wing) media empire.
Murdock has a lot of influence, example: all of his various sockpuppets, Hannity, Beck, etc, and all of Murdock’s worldwide media holdings trash global warming, President Obama and anything else right-wing Rupert Murdock dislikes.
I think that press and especially individual journalists are deathly afraid of Rupert Murdock and what he can do to them professionally.
Rupert Murdock is the new William Randolph Hearst.
Another thing, Sarah Palin, who is a favorite among the Faux News/ Right-wing crowd is getting Rupert Murdock’s wingnut welfare.
Palin’s (Rupert Murdock’s ghostwriter) book publisher is HarperCollins… a wholly owned Rupert Murdock subsidiary, you ‘betcha.
Also, there should be an award given to the guy that writes the ominous, scary music for Fox News... he's obviously a full-time employee.
No seriously... whenever there's a special where Rupert Murdock wants to convince Americans that Saddam Hussein has WMD, or that Iran/North Korea is going to attack America tomorrow, or a Hannity or Beck segment where they want to scare their right-wing audience (even more) there's always that ominous music to go along with the story.
It's like a scary GOP music video.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
truthspeaker
October 12, 2009 11:37 PM
I'm a big boy and can tell what's B>S. and what's not. I certainly don't need my President telling me what the truth is and what is not.
You don't have to listen to sane people, just listen to hannity and limbaugh, they tell the truth.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GregorZap
October 13, 2009 12:41 AM
They may be #1, but in a diversified market place with so much competition, let's not confuse there status with the majority of viewers. They only have the most. More people are NOT watching FOX then do.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SantaMonica
October 13, 2009 2:46 AM
I wonder if the TPM staff could look into the log for this thread. I'm sure a lot of IP addresses map on to the Fox News offices...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Gilead
October 13, 2009 2:56 AM
The rightwing talking heads want to protect their multimillion dollar paycheck and that is what makes the whole thing so cynical.
It is all about money.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RectoNoVerso
October 13, 2009 4:09 AM
It reminds me of the Very Thin Skinned Blogosphere
http://rectonoverso.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/very-thin-skinned-blogosphere/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sam
October 13, 2009 9:35 AM in reply to RectoNoVerso
The right wing agenda goes deep and has filtered into prime time. In my house we dont watch the Beck or Hannity freak shows instead we turn to the fair and balanced news offered by "Hardball" with Chris Matthews and "Countdown" with Keith Olbermann and "The Rachel Maddow Show." I say let the White house pull the FCC license of Fox and give a stimulus to CNN and MSNBC.
All Hail Obama (We love you man!). Thank God for this refuge where we can come and share intelligent thought my brothers.
Peace
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Veritas78
October 13, 2009 9:44 AM
Well, they certainly know Nixon's modus operandi. Their founder, Roger Ailes, suckled at Nixon's breast.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
October 13, 2009 11:19 AM in reply to Veritas78
Your anatomy analogy is a bit north of the mark....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
October 13, 2009 11:18 AM
"Instead of governing, the White House continues to be in campaign mode,"
Anyone remember that Karl Rove fellow?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?