The feud between Fox News and the White House is far from over.
Last week White House Communications Director Anita Dunn went on CNN and declared that Fox News is a "wing of the Republican party." And this morning, White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod said on This Week that Fox News is "not really a news station." Well, Fox News is hitting back.
The cable news network sent me a statement this afternoon from Michael Clemente, senior vice president of news. Here's the full text:
Surprisingly, the White House continues to declare war on a news organization instead of focusing on the critical issues that Americans are concerned about like jobs, health care and two wars. The door remains open and we welcome a discussion about the facts behind the issues.
And on Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace and Fox News contributor Karl Rove slammed the White House. Rove said Dunn's comments last week amounted to a White House attempt to "throw the grenades, turn on the flame thrower." He said the White House is "getting very arrogant and slippery in its dealings with people, and if you dare to oppose them, they're going to come hard at you and they're going to cut your legs off."
This is the White House engaging in its own version of the media enemies list. And it's unhelpful for the country, and undignified for the President of the United States to so do.
Wallace said that "Anita Dunn's facts were just plain wrong" and complained that the White House won't send any administration officials on Fox News Sunday. "I'd like to ask them questions," he said. "As of now, they're gonna cut us off and not give us anybody to ask questions of."
Rove seemed to find that puzzling, particularly because "this network is watched by a wide variety of open-minded independents and Democrats who want to hear the news."
"The administration's making a mistake," Rove said, adding that the White House is "demeaning the office of the president" and that its actions are "wrong, fundamentally wrong."
Late Update: Here's the video.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Rich in NJ
October 18, 2009 3:01 PM
Rove's comments are a textbook example of projection.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rwc
October 18, 2009 3:18 PM in reply to Rich in NJ
exactly
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
October 18, 2009 4:16 PM in reply to rwc
As I recall, Keith Olbermann was never invited to even one of Rove's White House media parties...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
October 18, 2009 3:47 PM in reply to Rich in NJ
I don't know. Invention, maybe. Disinformation. Propaganda.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MonicaDickey
October 18, 2009 3:54 PM in reply to Rich in NJ
Yeah. I used to think people saw right through projection, but apparently not. I am not a crook!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
PushMe-PullYou
October 18, 2009 8:17 PM in reply to Rich in NJ
I suppose when one has zero self-awareness, as Rove appears to, the only thing left is projection. PS: Why isn't Rove in jail?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FebM
October 18, 2009 8:52 PM in reply to Rich in NJ
Glenn Beck who flatly says Pres Obama is a racist and hates white people is the Foxes biggest cash cow, they are fine with that, so why would they want the president on their tee vee?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Turnaround
October 18, 2009 11:09 PM in reply to Rich in NJ
Straight from the Rovean playbook. Accuse the opposition of the crimes you have committed.
When the opposition claims, "Wait a minute...that's exactly what you did," accuse them of whining.
It's the same punch-first stuff he's been doing for years.
I wonder how well that will work when he's in prison (scheduled for early in Obama's second term).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
stavrogin2
October 18, 2009 3:11 PM
Right, and every time there's a Republican scandal, Fox News "accidentally" misidentifies them as Democrats.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LJG
October 18, 2009 3:12 PM
One thing we've learned from Fox News is that if you say something enough times, people will believe it. Maybe this will work if we keep reiterating the truth. Fox News is not news. Say it. Say it over and over.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jormungand
October 18, 2009 3:53 PM in reply to LJG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Lie
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jormungand
October 18, 2009 3:54 PM in reply to LJG
Erm, not implying that what you said was a lie, just trying to point out that FOX is employing a time-honored technique.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hewhohasnoname
October 18, 2009 4:48 PM in reply to LJG
I think that's what scares Fox. People have usually attacked them as being a "conservative news organization." The White House has entirely (and rightfully) dismissed the notion that they are a "news organization." Instead, the White House says, Fox is not even a news organization and that they have an agenda. It's potentially a very effective technique.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RocketEngineer
October 18, 2009 10:57 PM in reply to LJG
And on this link we have Hitler accusing the Jews and the Marxists of employing the "big lie." Just like the conservatives today, accuse your opponent of the very sin you are committing...
"Obama is a racist," for instance.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
surely
October 18, 2009 3:21 PM
As far as I can tell, all of the networks base their news coverage on the bottom line. Fox just happens to have found a goldmine playing to an ideological audience. Intellectually, I can see their point. It will be interesting to see how it plays out politically.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TheRealFish
October 18, 2009 5:04 PM in reply to surely
Yes. The whole Corporate Mass Media are corrupt and can't be trusted.
But at least the remainder of the CMM firmament are not actively attempting to get their followers to arm-up and believe their duly elected government is threatening their grandmothers' lives, wanting to put them into FEMA re-education camps and are as bad as the last century's Nazi threat.
They are an actual, honest-to-Cthulhu threat to our nation. I firmly believe Murdoch, Ailes or Rove would lose zero sleep if riots broke out or assassination attempts occurred as a direct result of their "news" reporting.
That demonstrates a level of ideological zeal apart from the economic whoredom of the remainder of the CMM, though the rest would certainly trumpet "Breaking News!" headlines as the first city burns or the first elected official dies.
With stakes like these, I question whether distant and non-emotional intellectual interest applies. I disagree with the idea there are no atheists in foxholes, but believe there can be no casual observers with bullets whizzing past — and if you don't agree with the armed T-baggers stirred by their fake news, then "you is one of them" to those T-baggers, and become just as worthy a target as any other Nazi.
They are something more than merely not being what they say they are (mangled syntax, anyone?). They are Orwellian, threatening, and need to be continually exposed to the cleansing light.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
surely
October 18, 2009 7:24 PM in reply to TheRealFish
Maybe not actively, but passively, they are doing just that.
The problem with singling out Fox is that you're tacitly approving the more virulent systemic pathologies of mass media.
I don't know much about the ideologies of Murdoch or Ailes, but I'd be surprised if their primary motivation was much more than economic whoredom, as you put it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TheRealFish
October 19, 2009 5:55 AM in reply to surely
To your first point: Agreed. When some organized group employs the tactic of the Big Lie (as pointed out by Jormung above in the thread) and they passively enable the Big Lie by either treating it as a valid side of an argument (the act of False Equivalency) or just ignoring its existence, then they are implicit in spreading that Big Lie.
Through their implications or treating the message as not relevant, they are just as guilty in allowing the poison to spread.
To your second point, I still assert there is a difference in the quality of whoredom between the ideological distortion machine that is Fox and the remainder of the Corporate Mass Media — excluding, as noted, right wing talk radio as directly feeding the Big Lie; each side giving the other sources to cite as "proof" of the Big Lies they spew.
The fact that Brian Williams will, on rare occasions, point to the most blatant Big Lie distortions, even in a glancing / in-passing manner, or that Rachel or Keith even have shows that actually delve proves that NBC/MSNBC/Universal (as one lone example) at least relies on the simple whoredom of ratings. Their programming was most right leaning until first Keith then Rachel started to draw larger numbers than all the rest. That's the reason they exist there.
On the other hand it is evidenced from actions, rather than having to divine personal political psychologies, that Murdoch made a "business judgment" to focus exclusively on a fringe ideological audience. He hired Ailes, who was right there, along with Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowtiz, Podhoretz and similar crew in generating the extreme right neocon movement of the past 40 years, to lead the charge.
That and you would never, ever, in a million lifetimes, find any analogue on Fox to more liberal voices like Olbermann or Maddow even as token programming experimenting with other means of drawing in viable audiences. I can only infer that this would mess with their uniform ideological message that Neoconservatism is the only correct approach and, as they point out ad nauseum any other path is likened to a Nazi takeover.
So, yes: To be passive in the face of this poisonous spigot of dangerous and damaging rhetoric is to enable their message going forward. To be passive is to sacrifice the true function of free speech: When Big Lies are being perpetrated, these perpetrators must be condemned in the public square.
I suspect Rep. Alan Grayson would agree, for his actions suggest he does. And so long as the GE/NBC/MSNBC/Universal whores pimp out those who join in that condemnation, then then they are virtual Mary Magdelenes compared to the Whore of Babylon that is Fox.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LeeJo
October 18, 2009 9:39 PM in reply to surely
The fact that Karl Rove, in less than a year after the Bush Administration is given air time on Fox illustrates that they are not a news network but instead an extension of the Republican party in exile. This is a problem of all the revolving door employees who move so freely between political positions and the press. This revolving door does not serve the public interest very well.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbeats
October 18, 2009 3:24 PM
Ok next move is to completely ignore Fox News now. Never call on them in the WH briefing room, never send anyone on their network. Just completely ignore them.
Hey Rove you did that when you hired your male prostitute Jeff Gannon to play reporter when Bush gave his pressers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hewhohasnoname
October 18, 2009 4:54 PM in reply to rbeats
You know, I agree. I think they should just entirely ignore Fox. That will do one of two major things: 1) cause Fox to rethink its media approach (i.e., distortion and propaganda) -- this isn't likely; or 2) cause Fox to go ballistic and excessively attack the President -- this is likely. We're already seen some hints of Fox taking that latter path (see their media statement last week about what Dunn said, Wallace's "crybabies" comment, Rove's attack, etc., etc. -- plenty of material). Fox's decision to go on the attack will only bolster the administration's note -- not attack; they're only stating the obvious -- that Fox is not a news organization.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TheRealFish
October 18, 2009 5:24 PM in reply to rbeats
Well...yes.
But do any who pass through here regularly watch Fox? If so, I agree and recommend that we urge all here to cease economically enabling their spew. It's sort-of the same vote-by-remote I personally practice with actions like never watching any other MSNBC show other than, say, Rachel or Keith and occasional viewings of Ed. Some of these other Corporate Mass Media are actually honest ratings whores that respond to real numbers in deciding the content of their programming.
What else could explain that Keith, Rachel or Ed are even on this wholly-owned subsidiary of GE corp (when they vociferously advocate wresting control of our economy away from such corporate titans) except that they draw the largest ratings? At least their whoredom lacks the ideological purity evidenced over at Fox.
Their services can still be bought by us great-unwashed.
However, the problem is that (I believe) the majority of Foxites don't turn to any other sources — except maybe WorldNetDaily or Drudge or talk radio — for actual news.
At least the Bully Pulpit has a megaphone loud enough to invade those spaces, even though the effect is completely drowned by their eviscerating spin.
As always, I think the message is not for the zombified Right who only hear gospel from the Fox pulpit, but the ever wavering middle-grounders who might accidentally accept their PR-tested lies as actual reporting. Even if it makes those middle-earthers pause for a fraction of a second to question whether what they hear there is true or not, some headway may be claimed in fighting the Fox poison.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wial
October 18, 2009 3:24 PM
Fox opposes improved health care because less stupification from avoidable type 2 diabetes = fewer Fox viewers. It's all about the money. Their opinions are just to keep causing the damage to the human population needed to generate their flock.
Fox is not news, it's sheep-rearing. Something Murdoch no doubt learned well from his Australian ancestors. Maybe it should be given an NC 17 rating -- because what they do to unwitting Americans could be considered soft bestiality.
Fox is not news, it's porn.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
synchronicity
October 18, 2009 3:39 PM
Of course, what else 'would' people at Fox say...
While many of us are saying 'it's about time'.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnmccsf
October 18, 2009 3:43 PM
TAKING THE FOX PROBLEM SERIOUSLY
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_10/020495.php
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
October 18, 2009 4:24 PM in reply to johnmccsf
Right. Those are the only really valid questions.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnmccsf
October 18, 2009 3:47 PM
The problem is the same one rhe real world faces when dealing with right wing extremists generally - merely discussing the issue tends to legitimize them
The Fair and Balanced Trap
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
salame
October 18, 2009 3:53 PM
While it is unfortunate that the WH is the one who has to finally stand
up to the lying douchers known as fox news, it has become painfully
apparent that the so called legitimate news organizations won't do it.
They have even begun picking up some of foxs slimey left-over tidbits
and re-reporting them as though they are real news.
And for karl rove to be acting all dainty and shocked, shocked I tell
you, is just rich. There is truly a twisted humor to it all.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dave Adams
October 18, 2009 4:10 PM
I think the White House ought to unchain the Justice Department. If Rove is going to insist on calling attention to himself they ought to hold him accountable for all the crimes he committed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
October 18, 2009 4:32 PM in reply to Dave Adams
Great idea, especially what he did to Siegelman. And what he did in New Hampshire.
I have suggested lately that there's a Q source for all the contemptible anti-Obama talking points the wingnuts seem to dredge up, and have even suggested Rove is that quelle.
From his position at Fox, can anyone doubt he plays at least a passive, if not a pro-active role, in organizing the 'baggers and providing them with their common phrasology?
Rove provides the terminology, the 'baggers provide the vitriole. And all the talking heads use the same retread talking points, it is so obvious one might imagine they would try to be a bit more diversified in applying their cliche' .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jormungand
October 18, 2009 4:44 PM in reply to JEP07
Rove seems far too ambitious and manipulative to just be sitting around on FOX. I'm sure he has some rather key extra-curricular activities.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
October 18, 2009 6:50 PM in reply to Jormungand
Here's the part I think Rove plays in all of this.
He's their bumpersticker guy, the one who makes up the incendiary and provocative talking point cliches that the Right, especially the teabaggers, Congresscritters(R) and the mindless wingnut media repeat so transparently and incessantly.
It is part of that indoctrination process they use on their lemmings.
Here's the quote from the post I made earlier (link below) that covers that cult identifier, the key phrase being "Such cliches are easily memorized and readily expressed."
Considering that the average IQ of Fox News viewers would probably dip well below average (would they be willing to test that theory? I think not!) those cliches Rove and his little helpers hover over MUST be easily memorized so those brainless lemmings can readily express them.
"6. Loading the language; The prolific use of "thought-terminating cliches," expressions or words that are designed to end the conversation or controversy. Such cliches are easily memorized and readily expressed. They are called the "language of non-thought," since the discussion is terminated, not allowing further consideration."
Rove is their language loader.
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/jep07/2009/10/fox-news-rush-limbaugh-wingnut.php?ref=reccafe
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
synchronicity
October 18, 2009 4:44 PM
I wish TPM wasn't giving them front page status.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jormungand
October 18, 2009 4:49 PM in reply to synchronicity
Well, I think it's probably important to draw attention to the spat between the White House and FOX News. It seems rare that a political unit is as candid as the White House has been regarding FOX, and it is important to observe and understand the network's response and how the administration proceeds.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FebM
October 18, 2009 8:56 PM in reply to synchronicity
Yes, they don't deserve headlines, but TPM has some idiosyncrasies too, I remember they sometimes put Palin there for days, like "this is a recording headline, we are not home" and its annoying.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
amber
October 18, 2009 4:47 PM
Rush Limbaugh's producer Roger Ailes runs the show, of course they're no news program. They just can't handle someone calling them out on it. Rove...give me a break–disgusting hypocrite.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
October 18, 2009 5:07 PM
Fox is lovin' this. It plays into their persecution complex, which their acolytes will adopt as their own. It's a win-win for Fox. Repeatedly tell people they're being persecuted and they get motivated.
This doesn't mean the WH shouldn't call them on it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hollywood
October 18, 2009 5:19 PM in reply to jeffgee
Fox is HATING this. All the networks are discussing whether or not Fox is a REAL news organization or not. Of coarse they are not so they have to overcompensate with war talk and victimhood, but the question of their gross bias is what everyone is talking about. Great day for reality in America.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
charlie8080
October 18, 2009 6:10 PM in reply to jeffgee
Win-win for Fox? I doubt it.
Currently FoxNews have their daily right-wing talking points. They repeat them through out the day. Every so often they then get picked up in the so called MSM. An example of this was when Obama was going to make his speech to school children.
And this is why the White House is doing it. By telling the rest of the media that FoxNews is a right-wing propaganda outlet, it gives CNN/NBC/ABC etc an out. They no longer have to cover FoxNews. Why should they since the White House considers them the GOP anyway? And this is a big loss for FoxNews.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
October 18, 2009 6:55 PM in reply to charlie8080
Have to agree here, Fox doesn't like this one bit.
This sure won't get them any NEW viewers, whether it will shake loose some lemmings and LOSE them viewers is what they are all worried about.
Have you ever seen someone get their bell rung? Or coming out of a drug-induced state?
Think how they look dazed and confused until it passes.
That's how I see the rare, intelligent Fox News viewers responding to some of this, they will come out of their brainwashed daze, shake their heads and wonder who doped their Kool-Aid back when they first started watching that trash..
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pakaal
October 18, 2009 5:09 PM
"continues to declare war on...."
Wow, the senior VP of a supposed "news" organization doesn't even understand that a declaration of war only comes once, at the beginning of aforementioned war.
Back to Composition 101 for you, Michael Clemente!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hewhohasnoname
October 18, 2009 5:09 PM
I think it was smart for the Obama administration to negate the "feud" meme by stating that they have no problems with Fox, and that they are only pointing out the obvious, which is that that Fox is not a news organization.
It's been surprising to see some in the media defend Fox. With Fox's penchant for selective editing, willful misleading of viewers by distorting facts, the bizarre conspiracy theories, etc., one would think that legitimate news orgs would be loathe to defend Fox.
It will be interesting to see how the media handles this, now that the administration has made it abundantly clear that they have no vendetta against Fox (even though Fox has one against them) and no desire to influence media content, but only a simple desire to point out that Fox, as an agenda-pusher, will be handled differently from legitimate news orgs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hollywood
October 18, 2009 5:13 PM
This is a great idea because we and everyone else are discussing how FoxFixedNews is not really a news organization at all and that really sullies their brand. It is a bit of what they do when they ask some ridiculous question and get everyone talking about it and controlling the focus of the media. Rove is mad because someone is using his own tactics against him and winning the day. What he actually says sounds like projection but is really more blatantly evil. He just lies to your face without a moment of hesitation. I wish someone in the media had the balls to ask him about Jeff Gannon when he starts this line of bullshit. Watch his face turn white and his heart start pounding. Indict him already!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jweb271
October 18, 2009 6:11 PM
Should the simple irony of Rove's involvement be the end of this story?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJustice
October 18, 2009 6:11 PM
I, for one, applaud the new efforts by The White House to re-brand Fox News (and that"News" should be in quotes) as a network for the Republican party -- more often than not, for the right-wing Republican Party. I am not saying that is run by any political party, per se. I am saying that it films, edits, writes, and broadcasts its content aimed at a specific party. And a great many of its employees are members of that party.
If the intent of a "news" organization is to write the story and then ask questions until there is proof that their assumptions or claims are false, that is not a "news" network I want to watch. I'll watch Bill O'Reilly from time to time, but he purports to be editorial opinion and not hard news. And he's entertaining because he's got so much dang anger bottled up in there.
My greatest hope is that Fox News sues the White House Press Corps for slander, and then Fox News has to come before a judge to prove that they are what they say they; wouldn't it be even more interesting to see this reach the Supreme Court and bring about a ruling that truly defines journalism. The greatest irony is that their catchphrase, "We Report, You Decide" should be "You Report, We Decide". I would have no problem with a television network aimed at conservative American ideology, but not if it purports be to a News organization.
People need to be reminded that there is more than one side to any story and should make an effort to learn more about important issues from other news media outlets, no? If I spend half as much time researching news stories as I do setting my fantasy baseball lineup, I'd be able to be a pundit -- that's basically what they do anyway. They read up on a lot of stuff, maybe know some people involved or have job experience and they are personable on camera. But I digress.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kate in SW Fla
October 18, 2009 6:37 PM
Karl Rove telling people what is wrong or right? Oh Please. Hey, I know, let's ask Max Cleland what he thinks of that? You know, the Vietnam vet who lost both legs, the guy Rove said was "Unpatriotic." FOX ain't news. If they would just change the name from "News" to "Entertainment," it would be OK. Then they could stop their whining about no one takes us serious as news people. Kind of like no one thinks of the National Enquirer as "News."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kuyleh
October 18, 2009 6:51 PM
I wonder what bothers them more: The fact that the White House is daring to speak against them, or the fact that someone, somewhere out there is telling the truth? Optional burn points for it happening to be about them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
billpaustin
October 18, 2009 7:01 PM
Rove criticizes someone for not being 'dignified"?
Sorry, that was an entire cup of coffee through my nose.
BP
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
stillidealistic
October 18, 2009 7:22 PM in reply to billpaustin
I know, I watched the segment and gasped listening to rove...I half expected his little Pinocchio nose to come poking through the television screen.
What a lying hypocrite!
I'm thrilled that the White House has deemed them not to be a news organization, and I hope they stick to their guns...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RJ
October 18, 2009 7:08 PM
I've got it: Fox Politics.
They already have Fox Sports.
It's not even snarky. Let's all just call it Fox Politics.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MNPundit
October 18, 2009 7:17 PM
And why isn't TPM pushing this in every single story about Fox? Why is TPM in its headlines and frontpage staying neutral? Characterizing this as a "feud" when it is about ending the poison in the discourse. What kind of liberal site IS TPM anyway?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
margaret
October 18, 2009 7:56 PM
I totally agree and think the WH should keep it up. I am sick of seeing Fox News on every TV in restaurants, bars, hotels,and it even plays at my gym.
I prefer my news with facts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jay
October 18, 2009 8:20 PM
This is all strangely familiar to the Nixon policy of banning the Washington Post:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/13393728/Nixon-No-reporter-from-the-Washington-Post-is-ever-to-be-in-the-White-House
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rich in NJ
October 18, 2009 8:34 PM
O'Reilly himself admitted that "Hannity represents the Republican party":
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
xljoe
October 18, 2009 8:59 PM
44 needs to have someone like Tony Snow. This administration needs someone who can recognize a hard hitting journalist when they see one. So much more efficient to have one set of talking point for the day.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RobbyLove
October 18, 2009 9:14 PM
So when a Republican becomes President we're going to happily sit by as they waste their time, energy and media cycles criticizing Keith Olbermann and MSNBC?
Come on, folks. This is just plain amateur hour by the administration. Fox isn't going to shut up. They won't be marginalized by anything the admin's flunkies say. If anything it will just solidify and strengthen opposition. Worse than that, Fox may get MORE viewers.
Can we please spend our energy on something a bit more urgent?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JennOfArk
October 18, 2009 9:31 PM
Shorter Karl Rove: Why won't this president stop "demeaning the office of the president" and come on "this network (that) is watched by a wide variety of open-minded independents and Democrats who want to hear the news" from a completely fair and balanced source?
Rove poops in his hand with the blather about how all kinds of unbiased people choose Fox as a balanced source of "news", then in the next breath smears the poop all over the president by talking about how he's "demeaning the office" because he refuses to go on air with people who intend to smear poop all over him.
Dishonesty on this scale is truly breathtaking.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
uneasyone
October 18, 2009 10:10 PM
This fight is one the Obama administration can only lose if it quits, lets up, or apologizes for.
Feaux is not that popular!
Being "the #1 cable news network" simply means that they are the source of choice for the dead-enders who worship Bachman, Palin and that ilk - 20 to 25% of the public at large. They have definitely blown away the competition for the wingnut eyeball. So what?
These are people who largely believe Obama is the antichrist; reason will affect them not in the least. It is important, however, to discredit Fox as a source of reliable fact. Were I in charge of media relations at the WH, I would relentlessly pound them on every provable lie - with some really juicy examples from the recent past - and then hit them on every future distortion.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bill
October 18, 2009 10:11 PM
"Wrong. Fundamentally Wrong." Let's see, the Iraq War, torture, Guantanamo, bailing out AIG, illegal wiretaps, history's largest deficit, tax cuts for the wealthy while war rages, New Orleans fiasco, no-bid contracts for mercenaries and 'security operations', firing Attorney's General for political purposes, ... When it comes to the misuse of the Executive Branch, you couldn't argue with Carl Rove; he is an expert on "Wrong. Fundamentally Wrong." But, as a commentator speaking about Presidential appearances on Entertainment Stations, I wouldn't give much credence to his opinions.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Snig
October 18, 2009 10:15 PM
I remember the excoriation Dan Rather received for one story where he was given bad information that was revealed suspiciously quickly to be demonstrably wrong. Had CBS hunkered down behind him he'd still be there. FOX is different, though more egregious misinformation is routinely broadcast. It does not police itself with regard to what's correct or morally appropriate, it's only regard is what's right for the Republican party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dave Adams
October 18, 2009 10:43 PM
Well there's the understatement of the week.
Wasn't Rove involved in McCain's campaign? (and BTW, talking about demeaning the office of rthe President...)
Anyone who thinks Rove is in any way retiring or stepping back has another think coming. The man loves power the way a wild hog that's tasted meat loves the taste of flesh. He isn't ever going to give it up voluntarily. And heaven help you if you're his next meal.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
October 19, 2009 12:11 AM in reply to Dave Adams
And he's got some personal baggage that might shed some light on our total
Rove awareness.
He didn't find out he was adopted at the age of 2 until he was 19. Then, in 1981, his mother committed suicide.
His adoptive father is listed as a gay body piercing aficionado. (That is meant as no reflection on his adoptive father, as much as it is so far removed from the type of people he eventually sought out as fellows)
And he is apparently a self-proclaimed agnostic.
See the story here,
http://www.nndb.com/people/353/000022287/
it sounds like he's really got some inner conflicts to work out, unfortunately he is working them out on the rest of society.
Here's my personal take on Turdblossom; fun with Photoshop!
http://jep-betweenthelines.blogspot.com/2007/05/karlulu-evil-one.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kaylaspop
October 18, 2009 10:46 PM
Rove and Wallace are, how should i put it, dickii.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Armageddon T. Thunderbird
October 18, 2009 10:47 PM
"Surprisingly, the White House continues to declare war on a news organization instead of focusing on the critical issues that Americans are concerned about like jobs, health care and two wars. "
Instead of? How about "in addition to"? The President is fully engaged in these issues. Fox VP is saying President is not engaged - and declaring war instead of".
So this bullshit exactly proves what Obama is trying to say. Fox attacks right in the middle of saying that they are unfairly being criticizing for bias. Quite Rovian.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
October 19, 2009 12:17 AM in reply to Armageddon T. Thunderbird
Funny how they are trashing him incessantly on every one of those issues they claim he is ignoring in order to attack poor wittle Fox.. If they were sincerely concerned about those issues, they wouldn't be such overt obstructionists.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
October 18, 2009 11:09 PM
Karl Rove isn't talking politics on MSNBC is he. Fox is obviously just an extension of everything Rove is about. I say again, keep Rove, Beck, Hannity & the full anti-Obama staff & lose access to the President of the United States or shitcan the bums & do news.
I don't think the President will be doing the Limbaugh show anytime soon either but that's almost redundant.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
uneasyone
October 18, 2009 11:26 PM in reply to Leftflank
I don't think the POTUS - or any other member of the administration should appear on Fox - ever. Make it clear that it is a propaganda network and if Fox ever actually becomes a legitimate news outlet - even with a conservative overall POV - that they will happily reconsider.
This also goes for all Democratic officials, IMHO.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tgh86
October 18, 2009 11:12 PM
Tomorrow's Fox exclusive: Bernie Madoff slams Obama's greed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Veritas78
October 18, 2009 11:21 PM
This is part of a continuing (and brilliant) strategy by Obama's political team to define their opponents. They made Limbaugh, Palin, Hannity & Beck the voices and faces of the Republican party. They are defining Republicanism as the Party of No, Birthers and Teabaggers, the pro-torture, pro-rape party of death panels. On this kind of stuff, Obama cannot be matched. Rove must be quite frightened.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
uneasyone
October 18, 2009 11:28 PM in reply to Veritas78
He would be - if the Obama administration hadn't declared virtual immunity for Bush administration criminality.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mike from Arlington
October 18, 2009 11:41 PM
Fox Comedy Channel.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
yzfool
October 19, 2009 12:08 AM
Waaaaaahhh! Do the liddle Fox propagandists need a bottle?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
joeQpublic
October 19, 2009 12:42 AM
The funny thing is that regardless of how much Fox News complains, cries, asserts, demands, or refutes the comments, the only people who will hear them already exist within the echo-chamber.
It is their own media strategies which are bearing this bitter fruit. And more and more of public are losing the taste for it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Munguza
October 19, 2009 12:45 AM
FOX already is the only "news" channel run by a partisan political operative. Great idea putting Karl Rove on the air to counter the administration's criticism!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rader
October 19, 2009 12:45 AM
Hmmm, sounds as if it is getting hot in the Faux Kitchen of Deceit and Dissemination. Anyone got a fire extinguisher? No? Oh well. Let it burn!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mdargo
October 19, 2009 2:13 AM
I am so glad the WH is taking on Fox! I am so glad they are being openly called out. Fox is not a news channel. I like this WH strategy. And it is getting under Fox's skin. They are finally being openly exposed for what they are, which is NOT a news station.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbe1
October 19, 2009 5:17 AM
Murdoch is a loathsome, unwelcome presence, dedicated to leveraging the most base elements of human nature into his personal wealth. I would suggest a tar and feathers spectacular as a nice sendoff, to put him back under the rock he crawled out from.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wyt
October 19, 2009 7:25 AM in reply to rbe1
Frame Murdoch for treason. Anything he could be framed for would be far less serious than what he has actually done.
Hopefully now Fox can report, "Over at TPM they want our owner framed for treason!" Fox itself has been framing good Americans for treason for years now. Turn about would be entirely fair play. [/snark]
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
grtpyrmd
October 19, 2009 7:36 AM
Fox believes it can jinn-up tea parties, parade all manner of vicious, twisted commentators across the airwaves all day, everyday, and now seem surprised that the WH is pushing back. Herr Rove is a criminal propagandist. Micheles Malkin and Bachman, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, are serial liars. Fox has been caught red-handed editing sound bites that say exactly the opposite of what the person actually said. It is not because Fox is such an outstanding news organization that people who receive their news from them believe discredited items such as the presence of WMD in Iraq, or Sadaam's involvement in 9/11, or that John Kerry was actually a coward during the Vietnam War. Fox is really Faux or Fixed News, take your pick, as it is both false and fixed.
That said, I think the administration should go on the Sunday show. Spend the entire time rebutting what their whacked-out hosts and commentators have said. Let Fox defend these nut jobs. Make Chris Wallace defend Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?