Oh boy. On Meet the Press a few minutes ago, Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) took issue with the contention -- which is strongly supported by scientific research -- that lack of health insurance is linked to higher risk of death.
David Gregory asked Kyl about the issue of a "moral imperative," and said that while he's heard Kyl and other Republicans take issue with proposed health care reform legislation for fear that it might add to the budget deficit (although President Obama has insisted that it won't) -- he never hears such arguments from the GOP about a costly war in Afghanistan.
"No country can afford to scrimp and save, or try to win a war on the cheap," Kyl responded. "The president himself has said the war in Afghanistan, against these terrorists who killed over 3,000 Americans on Sept. 11 2001, is a war of necessity. You have to win it."
Gregory then asked, "And is it a necessity to tackle the fact that there are more and more Americans who die because they don't have access to health insurance?"
Kyl's response:
I'm not sure that it's a fact that more and more people die because they don't have health insurance. But because they don't have health insurance, the care is not delivered in the best and most efficient way.
I imagine Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) -- of "Republicans want you to die quickly" fame -- might have a field day with this one.
And for the record, a highly-publicized Harvard study released last month said that 45,000 deaths are linked to lack of health insurance coverage each year -- and that uninsured, working-age Americans have a 40 percent higher death risk than their privately-insured counterparts.
Late Update: Here's the video.
Editor's Note: This post has been revised since it was first published.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Snig
October 18, 2009 11:24 AM
"I'm not sure that it's a fact"
Knowing this sort of thing is part of his day job. He should try getting by without a salary or health care and see if it makes him more or healthy. I hope he forgos seeing a doctor and just go to the ER when he has a stroke or heart attack, since he's not convinced it's economically feasible to have health care vs. crisis care.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mJJ
October 18, 2009 11:44 PM in reply to Snig
Frankly, Senator Kyl, is my Senator and now I am certain that he must dwells in lala land. I am an RN, and have been a Texas University Hospital nursing supervisor and I can tell you that the number of premature deaths due to lack of insurance is astounding. Senator Kyl has his head totally buried in the sand and he will not get my vote the next time he has to run although I am a Republican. He shows no compassion for folks who are unemployed due to illness, who have used up all their insurance benefits and can no longer afford to pay their health care insurance premiums. In fact, I will actively campaign against him based on his silly statement that lacks any medical reality by making this silly non-scientific statement of his obvious every time he meets with the public. The fact that this is his opinion only shows how totally lacks insight as to the plight of the poor. But I remember his rallies last time he ran. Not a poor person in sight. His silly statement is simply incredulous!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
elle a
October 19, 2009 12:38 AM in reply to mJJ
good for you!
its amazing to me how other republicans listen to their elected officials spout this sort of crap and then start moaning about their freedoms and the deficit when people are dying every day.
these neocons would happily spend america into bankruptcy in the name of figting endless wars, but to spend 800 billion on healthcare?? oh noes, the deficit!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BeeClone
October 19, 2009 9:40 AM in reply to elle a
Because government health care will take away your freedom to die, how sad.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
truthspeaker
October 18, 2009 11:30 AM
This really says more about the people who elect this man, and those who sit with him as party members, than it does about him. If he can be chosen to lead his constituents then they must be more demented than he.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lyleleander
October 18, 2009 11:48 AM in reply to truthspeaker
Actually, not that they'd care. They're all out canceling their insurance plans right now since it doesn't actually effect anything other than that huge premium bill that eats out of their wallet every month.
YAY!! We can go to the Intelligent Design Museum now!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RocketEngineer
October 18, 2009 6:19 PM in reply to truthspeaker
Ugh! This yutz is my Senator. I never voted for him, but that didn't matter because the Goldwater flakes (including Jeff) up in Phoenix control the state. What's doubly amazing is these numbskulls tend to be on the lower end of the wage spectrum and they still vote for guys, like Kyl, who are sticking it to them. I'd laugh at them, but it hurts everyone.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
emj
October 18, 2009 7:46 PM in reply to RocketEngineer
You are funny! Perfect description! A Yutz. Every state has one. I had Blago! They are everywhere. Why can't we get rid of them?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
elle a
October 19, 2009 12:41 AM in reply to RocketEngineer
which is exactly what Prez Obama was saying during the campaign about how the republicans gets these lower and middle income people to vote against their economic interests by stirring up hatred and bigotry and foolishness over unimportant issues like gun rights and teh gays and abortion and intelligent design, like any of that helps pay the bills.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sanssouci0
October 18, 2009 11:31 AM
I couldn't care less what the Republicans think. Health care with a strong public option could pass easily with only democratic support. If Obama is not willing to stand behind a public option, as Emmanuel and Axelrod have indicated today, he is absolutely useless for progressives. This is the single most important issue for his administration. Obama has professed as much himself . . . and yet even here, he is negotiating this bill down the drain. Progessives, unions, and the left, need to stand up now against the White House, otherwise the entire Obama years will be marked by watered down garbage bills that amount to progressive capitulation. Moveon.org needs to target Obama NOW, with tough adds questioning his convictions. I am not willing to give up on Obama yet, but if there is no public option in this bill, progressives need to commit to sabotaging Obama, or at least forcing him to boot Axelrod, Plouffe and Emmanuel for some real change. This is pathetic.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lyleleander
October 18, 2009 11:45 AM
What a pathetic act of politicizing this debate. What a complete act of spitting in the face of bi-partisanship. What a total lack of respect and outright contempt for the other side of this debate. What a joke.
Okay, now I'm done talking about the inevitable Democrat party backlash and pissy protest to these comments by Senator Kyl that are simply his own opinion and have never been definitively debunked.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbe1
October 18, 2009 12:51 PM in reply to lyleleander
Ok, so you're saying because the Harvard study was done last year, while Kyl just made this statement, that the study can't debunk Kyl's comments. Now I get it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mJJ
October 18, 2009 11:50 PM in reply to rbe1
I am a retired RN with many years experience and a Republican to boot and Kyl is full of it. Has nothing to do with party affiliation. It is simply a lie he tries to pass off as fact. Delude one's self if that is your bag, but alas, it still is a lie right out of the bad place and Kyl tried to sell it as fact.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fsudirectory
October 19, 2009 7:52 AM in reply to mJJ
I wish more republicans noticed this stuff when their reps go on tv and plainly lie in hopes of nit getting called on it. It would be great to have more like you and maybe you could hold their feet to the fire to become good players in our democracy once again
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FZ1999
October 18, 2009 12:54 PM in reply to lyleleander
You said it: Ignorance is valid opinion in today's GOP.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
barrelhse
October 19, 2009 11:00 AM in reply to FZ1999
Precisely.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
barrelhse
October 19, 2009 11:00 AM in reply to FZ1999
Precisely.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ClosetLuddite
October 18, 2009 1:02 PM in reply to lyleleander
I'm not even going to invest with you to come up with a new statement for you and your ilk.
As I said to some other numbskull:
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nellieh
October 19, 2009 8:32 AM in reply to lyleleander
If the Senator is "not sure lack of insurance caused deaths," is he just as "sure the lack of insurance did cause deaths? If he isn't "sure, he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. His allegience is to health insurers because of campaign contributions(bribes)he has received to protect his seat. He couldn't give a sh!t about the people. His people are corporate heads and bankers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
atticus1104
October 18, 2009 11:46 AM
Must see this video. Beck unintentionally implicates free market in problems with vaccines. What an idiot.
http://progressnotcongress.org/?p=3192
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
October 18, 2009 11:55 AM
Anti-science bent shows up in GOP politicians....no surprise there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FebM
October 18, 2009 12:27 PM
Duh!, of course Sen, Kyl wouldn't know anyone who has died because of lack of health insurance, the same way he doesn't think health insurance should cover maternity because he is not a woman. Straight line facts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tanjaoui
October 18, 2009 12:58 PM
I wish someone like Kyl would be forced to support a family on an entry level service sector job for a few years. These guys live in a bubble.
Also a pity that the people who elected him are so gullible.
If I were a Sanders or a Rockefeller I'd make this clear: No public option, no vote for cloture.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbeats
October 18, 2009 1:50 PM
This get at the root cause as to why marginally educated rednecks represent the greatest threat to our future.
Facts be damn if they confront your uninformed world view.
And peoples lives be damn in the process.
The war on education, and the war on science is disturbing in this country.
This Senator, in any other country in Western Europe, would be mocked and ridiculed by the media, and the public.
But here we are suppose to "respect" this barbaric, factually incorrect world view.
Disgusting.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hollywood
October 18, 2009 6:05 PM in reply to rbeats
I could not agree with you more! Americans have been taught to not believe in FACTS anymore just everyone's opinion is fine and nothing ever gets resolved. I do not know how to counteract this except through education but as Texas dumbs down their textbooks and fills them with religious drivel I do not have much hope. Perhaps these UNITED STATES need to break up into those willing to move into the future and those who want to sink into the swamp. Blue States get universal health care and college educations and Red States get lower taxes for billionaires and slave labor at WalMart.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Seafarer
October 18, 2009 1:51 PM
For the thousandth time, the problem is that the deceptive, lazy, and irresponsible media NEVER EVER calls these people on their bullshit as they utter it.
Kyl: "I'm not sure that it's a fact that more and more people die because they don't have health insurance."
Responsible American news media: "We have here a Harvard study that says 45,000 Americans die for that very reason. What is your response to that?"
Kyl: ?
You'll never see that happen.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hollywood
October 18, 2009 6:09 PM in reply to Seafarer
There has got to be a way to shame these liars. Jon Stewart does a good job on the Daily Show but that is preaching to the choir. Corporate Media is just too much in the bag for these lying bastards. If we cannot change this our precious democracy is over and the rule of the fascists is on the way.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hotspur
October 18, 2009 9:48 PM in reply to Seafarer
Spot on. Whatever we have passing for journalism, it ain't journalism.
Often when I hear something like this latest from Kyl (and it so often comes from the right, less from the left), I want to paraphrase Billy Madison: "Senator, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
But I think that's the point. Make up your mind without all the facts! Then stick to whatever you decided no matter what facts come to light! That's the GOP way.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thinman
October 18, 2009 2:11 PM
The academic literature on health insurance and mortality is less conclusive than you might think. There have been a number of studies that attempt to control for exogenous factors which find no statistically significant impact of health insurance on death rates. The evidence that health insurance protects families from financial hardship, on the other hand, is quite strong. This is not to say that health insurance does not save lives, only that it is difficult to prove conclusively.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbe1
October 18, 2009 2:51 PM in reply to thinman
references, please.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
October 18, 2009 3:40 PM in reply to thinman
You need to explain why the death rates in America are greater for those under 65 than in Europe and much the same for those over 65 where Medicare provides insurance for all.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
October 18, 2009 4:11 PM in reply to thinman
This seems pretty conclusive to me:
http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/medicine-health/articles/new-study-finds-45000-deaths-annually-linked-lack-health-coverage
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hotspur
October 18, 2009 9:55 PM in reply to thinman
Keep in mind that scientists never claim "X is now proven" in academic studies. What they say is "Evidence greatly indicates X." That's the scientific method -- it is rooted in doubt. You won't even find a claim that the Earth's gravity is DEFINITELY proven to be a specific strength. This does not mean we don't have useful information about gravity -- it just means that scientists acknowledge that every bit of knowledge is subject to refinement and elaboration. Rightwing politicians are disingenuous when they take advantage of this necessary skepticism. Disingenuous, or stupid (or both).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wial
October 18, 2009 2:13 PM
I'm pretty sure being as godawful stupid as Sen. Kyl is directly tied to being republican.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RocketEngineer
October 18, 2009 6:26 PM in reply to wial
Which came first, stupid or Repugnicant?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dustbunny44
October 18, 2009 2:41 PM
It's clear that the only death panels around are those of the Insurance Companies that refuse coverage and treatment.
It must become a crime in this country to say to someone, "I'm sorry, but that treatable condition that you have, that we have the facilities to treat you for, well we cannot treat you for that because you're not covered, your insurance doesn't cover that.
This answer cannot be viewed as other than criminal, and people get this answer today thousands of times across the USA. They will continue to get this answer more while we value profits over well being.
For serious conditions, it is murder plain and simple.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
unknowncitizen
October 18, 2009 4:06 PM
We're all falling for the same old trap. Healthcare execs and insurance company decision makers have developed the current system. The outcome they are seeking is one of revenue and profit growth and maximum consumer satisfaction as long as revenue and profit growth can be maintained.
I am their typical "satisfied" customer. I can go to what ever doctor I want, so can my wife and kids. Just walk in or make an appointment and boom many well paid attentive workers spring into service. The thing is, I'm in perfect health. I happen to be in the type of plan where the actual dollars my healthplan collects are known and paid by the hour from my employer to the healthplan. It's over $14K per year. It doesn't show up on my pay stub though, it's money directly from my company to the insurance company. Conservatively, my wife and my employers have probably paid 15 or 20 times the amount of the claims my family has made over our working lives. A fortune is being made on people like me. The wealthiest individuals spend no more, and actually spend less when adjusted for after tax dollars spent. So even if they do carry comprehensive insurance, families making $3 to $6 hundred thousand get the same nearly unlimited benefits as me for seroius costly illness/injury coverage, pay not a penny more into the system (less considering many choose to self insure small expenses) but cost the same.
All the progressiveness is basically from $0 family income to about $100K income. New proposals that I've studied won't make it progressive for higher household incomes, in fact people of higher unearned incomes or with substantial wealth accumulated and low incomes will probably benefit.
It is people like us (and most of them have very little knowledge of the actual money that changes hands) that are the insurance companies secret weapon. We love our healthcare, we don't really feel the impact of the cost, we think the others (the poor, uninsured and chronicly ill) are regretable but we are having a tough go of it too and the government shouldn't be borrowing against my future tax payments unless they at least let me keep what I've got, right?
It's a simple case of pitting the upper middleclass against the poor and lower middle class, with the wealthy having no dog in the hunt. The rich may even benefit from the plans now on the table- their catostrophic coverage policies will likely drop in price when more healthy people enroll in insurance plans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GME
October 18, 2009 4:28 PM in reply to unknowncitizen
I'm like you, I'm totally satisfied with my employer paid plan. But, of course, like you, I've never had to put it to the test with any expensive long term treatment. A lot of commentators have pointed out that most are completely satisfied with their insurance coverage - until they get chronically ill.
And of course, if I lose my job in this economy, I will be essentially uninsurable in the current system since I've had a couple of issues, that turned out to be nothing but would certainly lead to me being denied coverage on the open individual market.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GME
October 18, 2009 4:18 PM
It's amazing to see how the mainstream of the Republican party runs from empiricism. On evolution, on global warming, and now on health care, hold up a scientifically supported fact and it's like garlic to a vampire.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kuyleh
October 18, 2009 4:28 PM
I'm not sure this man has any braincells. Can anyone confirm/deny?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
greedo
October 18, 2009 5:29 PM
David Gregory has many faults, but it was his follow-up question that provoked Kyl's inane response. Journalists need to ask intelligent follow-up questions more often. Their failure to do so allows facile talking points to pass for real discussion. Bravo David Gregory (for once).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
XRayD
October 18, 2009 6:29 PM
Here is some more of his looking with one eye of convenience only:
“We lose our position as the world leader if the dollar is no longer the currency of favor,” said Senator Jon Kyl of Arizona, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate. He pointed out that he was critical of George W. Bush for letting the dollar fall, too, “but this administration is making things worse by its spending and deficit policies.” (As if W never spent or borrowed).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Legion303
October 18, 2009 8:57 PM
"Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) took issue with the contention -- which is strongly supported by scientific research -- that lack of health insurance is linked to higher risk of death."
Republicans don't believe in science, so it's all good.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nancy Irving
October 18, 2009 11:48 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't senators and congressmen get insurance from the fed. govt. forever, even if they only serve one term?
I have no problem with their getting insurance while they're serving, plus retirement care IF they serve for a long time.
But what kind of job in the private sector would give you health insurance ad infinitum if you worked for the company for just two years?
Again, I may be wrong about this (hope so!)--but if I'm right, this should go by the board.
If our congresscritters had to worry about losing their insurance as well as their salary if they're voted out of office, they might rustle up a little EMPATHY for the rest of us.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EdA
October 19, 2009 12:50 AM
Of course, John Kyl is also one of the 30 Republican senators who think it is wrong to hold a company responsible when its employees gang-rape another employee on company time.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
October 19, 2009 1:11 AM
So if I understand correctly, he (Kyl) can quote absolute bullshit like it's fact but isn't sure that absolute fact isn't bullshit. In other words, he doesn't actually know anything. Time after time the minority party chooses to attempt to baffle us with bullshit & time after time they're easily proven wrong.
Since they're playing silly child's games they need to be grounded & sent to bed with no dinner until they're all better.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dancinggrandma
October 19, 2009 1:17 AM
I just discovered this wonderful site & look forward to dialoguing
with true adults. I hope your troll problems are limited? I also go on Huff Po daily......
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
timba
October 19, 2009 4:23 AM
http://www.actblue.com/page/harryreidad?refcode=huff
Just put in $50 and sent Harry Reid an email telling him so. This is the one - the carrot and the stick rolled into one and a heartbreakingly wonderful spokeswoman.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
stevelaudig
October 19, 2009 5:46 AM
What is he sure of? Does anyone know. Has he ever made a public statement of his certainty on any topic. I suspect his uncertainty varies not based upon evidence but upon what he wants to be true. A true moron. err, that's Senator Moron.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
toddincabo
October 19, 2009 10:06 AM
Why does Dodd(crook)and Gregory (Jackass) just let this man lie away like that and not slap him up side the head with the facts so everyone watching can know them too...it's a sad thing!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?