TPM LiveWire

PA GOP Runs Ad Replacing 'O' In Obama's Name With Soviet-Style Hammer And Sickle

Spread the word and support this article. Share it on Digg!

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The Republican Party of Pennsylvania is running an ad for GOP state Supreme Court candidate Joan Orie Melvin that replaces the 'O' in President Obama's name with a Soviet-style hammer and sickle. The ad -- which was reportedly running on GrassrootsPA.com, though isn't on the site this morning -- seems to have been first pointed out by Capitol Ideas.

The red banner ad -- with the "O" in "Obama" home to a hammer and sickle -- says:

Tired Of Barack Obama, Ed Rendell, Arlen Specter and big government Democrats ruining our nation?

It then flips to a softer blue banner that suggests:

Hit them where it hurts. The voting booth! On Nov. 3rd, Vote for Supreme Court candidate Joan Orie Melvin and your Republican judicial ticket.

The ad says it was paid for by the Republican Party of Pennsylvania. While the ad was no longer running on GrassrootsPA at last check, you can see it here.

The Pennsylvania GOP couldn't immediately be reached for comment.

Join the Conversation!

30 comments

Recommend Recommend (2)

AJM

user-pic

October 19, 2009 10:39 AM   

The GOOPS (Snark) are going to get a real reputation for being Chicken Littles.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 10:49 AM   

This is terrible. But what is even worse is that this is an ad for a Supreme Court candidate. Politicizing the bench is a really, really bad idea. And I think it is a bad idea to allow partisan endorsements for judges. However, it is now the reality and we have to deal with it.

But I do wonder, what self-respecting candidate for the PA Supreme Court would associate themselves with such over-the-top inflammatory rhetoric? It certainly isn't in keeping with the code of professional responsibility and professionalism that attorneys are supposed to be aspiring to.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 10:52 AM    in reply to eric the red

Agreed on not politicizing a court candidate. But typical GOP class shows through here!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 11:12 AM    in reply to eric the red

This is what happens when you let the general public elect judges. The judges become like politicians.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 11:37 AM    in reply to jdb316

Whaddya mean, "like"?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 11:42 AM    in reply to DancingBear

Well, in many states, judges are not elected. In other states, like my own, we have elections but they are non-partisan. At least for now, partisan politics has stayed out of judicial elections. That is changing, however, because the Republicans have challenged the non-partisan process and have won.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 2:40 PM    in reply to eric the red

Whether judges are elected or appointed, the whole process is inevitably political. Politicians usually end up appointing the judges. Appointed judges have usually done their fair share of glad-handing the appointers, either with donations from their "friends" to the politicians' respective PACs or those of their allies, or prior campaign work. The more political the state, the more political the process - whether through election or appointment.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 2:50 PM    in reply to eric the red

I've a friend from a graduate program a few years back.
His primary work in the program involved electoral vs. appointed judicial seats, and their efficacy.(at what?, you may ask ...)

While appointed judges are not a-political either, they are at least not spending time or money in the fundraising and campaigning processes - and as such are much less likely to be compromised judicially by that. Appointed judges are appointed by political winners - the judges themselves are at least 1 step removed from the political fray itself.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 3:06 PM    in reply to kenga

Same difference here in Louisiana. I've seen it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 5:21 PM    in reply to eric the red

Uhh, yeah, I know judges are not elected in some jurisdictions. My point was you could take the "like" out of jdb316's statement. Although I suppose I should clarify that non-partisan judicial elections are a slight step better. I concur with kenga, it's better to at least have that step removed from being a pure politician to avoid the Judge Roy Moores and such.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 1:36 PM    in reply to eric the red

Judicial elections are supposed to be non-partisan here in PA, too, by allowing all candidates for judge to be listed as both D and R on the ballot. However, this makes it tricky if you wish to know which candidates are from which party - which is why sample ballots are distributed in front of the polling place. Alas, not everyone grabs or follows the sample ballots, but instead simply rely on name recognition, especially where retention of judges is concerned. Hopefully, this tactic will backfire by drawing at least some publicity to the fact that Orie-Melvin is a republican, and not just a pretty judge lady.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 10:51 AM   

I've seen more than one bumper sticker with the line, "there's no hope in socialism." The O's are made of hammer and sickle.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 11:02 AM   

There's just no limit, is there? When this satire video about the GOP marketing strategy came out a few months ago, it seemed far-fetched.

Not anymore.

http://bit.ly/fxv3G

(satire)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 11:07 AM   

The Democratic Party needs to start hitting back on this. Every time Republicans claim that Democrats are Communists, or other similar demagoguery. Democrats need to respond in kind (that is if its a flier, produce a flier and distribute it in the same region, if its a commercial put a responding commercial up for the same demographic targets, etc.)

The theme would be along the lines that Republicans like to call people names and lie about their opponents policies and political goals. We could respond by pointing out that Hitler believed in torturing his enemies or that Stalin believed in warrant-less wiretaps just like the Republicans are espousing. However, we Democrats believe that such demagoguery does nothing to actually fix the multiple crisis that the United States is currently facing.

Be it Healthcare Reform so that people can survive being sick without going bankrupt. Or working diligently to prevent Terrorists from striking us without sacrificing our Constitutional Rights. Or keeping the Federal Government from dictating to the American People what they can and can't do with their own bodies and lives.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 11:11 AM   

O/T: I thought MSNBC was supposed to be the liberal network? But the first thing I see this morning is fathead Joe Scarborough dismissing the avalanche of Obama=Hitler rhetoric coming from rightwing radio, GOP members of Congress, PAC's, teabaggers, etc., because his guest wasn't aware that a Democrat, Jerry Nadler recently referred to the GOP's tactics as "facist".

I suppose it would be too much to ask this idiot and his smirking sidekick to understand or care what a preponderance of evidence looks like, nor to grasp the difference between the general and pretty silly political insult of being called a "facist" and the incredibly more provocative equation with the genocidal maniac Hitler. If these were the same thing, wouldn't the teabaggers be running around with pictures of a bald Obama as Mussolini, or in an ascot and spectacles as Kunoe, the facist PM of Imperial Japan?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 11:14 AM    in reply to Dorn76

It's actually spelled "Konoe", my apologies. He's so well known, how could I mess that up?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 1:00 PM    in reply to Dorn76

Joe (when I was in congress) & his sidekick, Kathie Lee, are GOP talking heads.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 11:18 AM   

Nothing screams "Gulags, Genocide, and the Great Purge" like a weee bit o' tinkering with Merca's healthcare system in an attempt to make if more affordable to the people with Ruskie sickle bumperstickers next to their trucknutz. Stay vigilant Patriots!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 11:23 AM   

If there is a Dog in heaven, this will backfire.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 11:38 AM   

"ruining our nation"?

How childish can you get? Got anything specific?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 12:14 PM   

The Party of No Ideas. When you've got no ideas, you call the other guy names. I remember learning that in kindergarten.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Lou

user-pic

October 19, 2009 3:46 PM    in reply to JimmyBobby

like the 3 finger rule, pointing accusing with your finger, 3 back at the accuser.
nuf said

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 1:41 PM   

Obama the Marxist?...At first I'm thinkin', this is gittin' good, the crazier the better!

On second thought, the problem with all the kooky stuff is that it helps Republican politicians to look more reasonable and moderate by comparison. They need the fringe. It benefits them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 2:01 PM   

This is McCarthyism Redux. Intellectually bankrupt and disgusting in its willingness to exploit people's fears to a common scapegoat.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 3:40 PM   

That ad is asinine but both sides use that kind of imaging and then whine when the other does. Like the joker whiteface for the Obama and the same image for Bush years earlier. Plenty of swastikas for Bush and now it's the hammer and sickle for Obama. Politics as usual.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 5:23 PM    in reply to amabo666

Really? Swastikas in official state Democratic Party ads? Please give examples.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Lou

user-pic

October 19, 2009 3:42 PM   

And to think what they did to the Dixie Chicks of their opinions.
Double standard group of folks

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 19, 2009 7:07 PM   

Good thing her name isn't Sotomayor. Now that would be offensive. `She's merely disparaging The POTUS, ridiculing all that she isn't & invoking all the fear she can get on a bumper sticker. That's nothing compared to being "Latin".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 20, 2009 8:48 AM   

G.angrape
O.rganization
P.arty

Putting America's women at risk... at home and abroad!
http://www.republicansforrape.org

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 20, 2009 8:57 AM   

I should note... the Republicansforrape.org site actually is set up by a Republican, ashamed of having 3/4ths of his Senators supporting unprosecutable gangrapes of American women contractors overseas, so they can't blame that on the Democratic Party.

I find it ironic that Republicans complain about Obama being some kind of "communist", when their own politicians take money from white supremacists and separatists, and never even bother returning the money when its pointed out to them.

David Duke himself endorsed a Republican in the last election, linked to him, and encouraged his fellow klansmen to contribute to his campaign... and yet, none of this money was returned to these Nazis.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular