TPM LiveWire

RedState's Erick Erickson: A Brief History

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

RedState's Erick Erickson

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

On Monday, we told you about RedState.com editor Erick Erickson's recent hyperbolic tirades, including his tweet comparing a White House health care spokeswoman to Joseph Goebbels.

But Erickson is not a no-name voice on the fringe of his party. RedState.com is a well-read conservative site, for example, and Erickson was the UK Telegraph's 69 most influential American conservative in 2007.

And, as Johnathan McGinty down in Georgia points out, Erickson is even an elected official himself, serving on the city council in Macon, Ga., since 2007. He's currently campaigning to keep the police department there from unionizing, and caused a bit of a firestorm when he called union members "thugs" in an op-ed in the local paper. Local union members protested at the next city council meeting, but Erickson was nonplussed.

He called the meeting "the most fun I've had" since May of this year, when a fellow councilman proposed that they make President Obama an honorary member of the council. In response, Erickson proposed a series of amendments that referenced Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers and Obama's admitted cocaine use.

Those amendments, which he listed on his Georgia politics blog, included "Whereas, we hold no ill will with regard to Barack Obama being the only member of the Illinois State Senate to speak in favor of infanticide during his tenure there," and "Whereas, prior to and after entering elected office, Barack Obama felt no shame sitting for twenty years in front of a preacher who referred to the United States as the 'U-S-of-KKK-A" and preached that white America created HIV/AIDS to infect black men."

The proposal was tabled.

Saying inflammatory things to get the attention and ire of his opponents is Erickson's MO. His recent "Goebbels" comment is hardly the most extreme example.

At the announcement of Supreme Court Justice David Souter's retirement in April, Erickson tweeted multiple times that "The nation loses the only goat fucking child molester to ever serve on the Supreme Court."

And later, "Lefties really get offended when you point out what David Souter does in his spare time with goats and kids."

The next day he told local blog Lucid Idiocy, "In hindsight I shouldn't have said it. I felt good at the time saying it."

Then in August, he banned a blogger from the front page of his Georgia blog, Peach Pundit, for quoting him. "We try here to keep the posts family friendly," he said.

TPM asked Erickson for comment for this story. In response, he posted to RedState TPM's entire email under the headline "Why would I bother?"

"Now, you and I both know that given Talking Points Memo's habitual fabrication of stories and facts and constant attacks on the right, that (A) I have become someone of note the left feels threatened by and (B) this is soooo gonna be a hit job," he wrote.

He also posted a fictional transcript of how the interview, in his view, would have gone.

Comments (34) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (3)

October 15, 2009 7:00 PM   

Why is TPM getting into a pissing contest with RedState Erick?

Repeate after me:

Polk winner... low rent nutter

Polk winner... low rent nutter

Polk winner... low rent nutter

If TPM wants to go after wingnuts, there are bigger fish to fry. The US Senate and House are full of them who warrant more exposure.

John

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 9:38 PM    in reply to tosh

Exactly tosh. This kind of shit, of drawing attention to persons on the fringe of the public discourse, does nothing except drive more traffic and, thus, more money their way, just drives me nuts.

And I agree that it is beneath TPM to do so. So what if Erickson posted his response to the TPM reporters inquiry on his blog?

I'm certainly not clicking through the links.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 7:03 PM   

When I was a kid my dad used to brag that he'd once driven through Macon, GA and had taken a really big shit there. He always said that it was a turd he could really be proud of. Now I wonder, is Erick my half brother?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 7:22 PM   

According to the Telegraph there are 68 more important people to take on. Why bother with this sorry excuse for a human being? He really doesn't rate it, sort of like worrying about what Shaddeg (sp?) said the other day about health reform.

The only purpose he serves is to show people what they would be linked with if they became Republicans, and thus he reduces the GOOPers even more. Decent people don't want to be associated with slime so he and Limbaugh and Beck serve the purpose of defining the GOOPers and restricting the party to an irrelevant group of Narnian dwarves.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 7:27 PM   

I occasionally read RedState, and I frequently read The Next Right. Frankly, Erick Erickson (that red-headed, goat-fucking, child molester who is too slow to remember his own name so his parents had to give it to him twice) only appeals to the sorts of beer-guzzling, dribble-drooling, in-bred lunatics who inhabit the shallowest ends of America's gene pools. While he perfectly suits places like Macon, Georgia, our country needs a opposition party, as do the Democrats. It's quite a shame that congenitally-defective, financially-compromised half-wits like Erickson have been given so much media attention. He and his ilk starve the oxygen out of the wingnut atmosphere and prevent articulate, well-informed monarchists (which is what the Republican party has become) from creating an intellectually-sound alternative to the milque-toast Dems. Perhaps if there was any sign of healthy intellectual vigor (instead of mindless rigor) on the right our bloodless and cowardly Democratic Representatives might find the courage to actually accomplish anything.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 9:06 AM    in reply to paxman

what's wrong with beer?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:06 PM   

If I was a goat, I wouldn't let Erickson within 30 yards of me.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:12 PM   

I have a RedState account which I use for two purposes- leaving the occasional comment designed to annoy the dimwit conservatives who hang out there; and also, for the purpose of receiving the dandy e-mails that Erich Erickson sends out to the faithful. They serve as useful intelligence, and they are always hilarious.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:34 PM   

Whoa -- I'm surprised to hear that Erik is a real person!

The few times I looked at RedState I just assumed that it was a pen name jointly used by a group of first class dicks, possibly taking orders from Karl Rove.

And, Goebbels? Another classic example of PROJECTION.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:53 PM   

what's the goat stuff about?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 10:34 AM    in reply to nova voter

I think it's supposed to refer to the rumors that Souter is gay. Apparently older + single = gay. The conservative mind is a strange place.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

kth

user-pic

October 15, 2009 11:11 PM   

Just because a British wingnut publication wants to inflate Erickson's profile (the better to foster the illusion of a right-wing netroots) is no reason for TPM to take them at their word.

Leave this asshole for Wonkette or Sadly, No, though arguably Erickson is beneath them as well.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 11:29 PM   

Did Justice Souter really have relations with goats? The rest of Erick's statements look fairly accurate, maybe this was just an unguarded exaggeration.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 11:42 PM   

Why do some on the right have to always make it 'personal'? some on the left do it also, but when folks like Erickson do it, it just seems so disagreeable and unreasonable. and its so unnecessary. even the way he attacked TPM for wanting to interview him. i mean, egad, how thin-skinned can you get that he even made up his own 'interview'. you can't begin to have a rational discussion with this sort of person because they are all emotion all the time, no thinking involved at all. always reactionary. for him to be an elected official is a disgrace. hes an adult version of a petulant brat.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 11:44 PM   

Erik is much more than a "well-read conservative site."

Here's another look at his 'love for America."


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 12:05 AM    in reply to Buckley

When you say (and Rachel) say a "well-read conservative site", you have to be careful how you parse that. It's like when a friend of mine heard another law student talk about a "fertile lawyer's imagination" -- the prof wanted to know what word was modifying what.

I don't think that Erik Son Of Erik is well read in anything. At most, he has a lot of readers who are as not well-read as he is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 11:55 PM   

Erik is much more than a "well-read conservative."

Here's another look at his "love for America."
T-Bogg's Profile of Erik Erickson

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 12:23 AM   

Pleased stop misusing nonplussed. It does not mean "unbothered"; it means "confused or bewildered."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 6:30 AM   

I am a lifelong Repub and a regular reader of Erik's on Redestate but I do so only for the comic relief. I was a member but after a few weeks of pointing out the his and the many other idiots who write the posts there - they banned me.

If you want to really get a laugh at "poor ol" Erik's expense, it's very easy (as you have pointed out in your posts above) go research the period during which SC's Gov Stanford was doing his disappearing Tricks. Erik was defending him the entire time and calling the MSM or any other source that was criticizing Sanford McCarthyites etc. Then, after Sanford came back, Erik had the typical "Christian" response - he called Sanford a bad person, a bad Christian and then Erik wrote a quick post talking about how he, himself had been betrayed and said that we was going to stop blogging for a few days and slink back and spend some "spiritual" time with his fellow Christians.

Erik is a loser and soils Christianity with his cloying grasp of it.

For the last 3-4 months he and the entire RedState has been anticipating that Obama was going to retreat in Afghanistan with months of multiple posts on the subject. Now that Obama has signaled that he is going to do what any responsible leader of the most influential and power nation in the history of the world should do, that he is going to follow the winning strategy of Bush in Iraq, and send 40k more troops to Afghanistan - there is silence on the subject there. No more hoots of defeatism or "traitor".

I am sure that Obama's announcement will not generally go over well with most readers of TPM either but that is the point.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 8:08 AM   

You could easily cast off Beck and Limbaugh as low-rent nutters who offer nothing to discourse. But like they have big audiences on TV & radio, Red State has that on the Internet. So I don't believe TPM was wrong in this, and believe it would be foolish to ignore the ramblings of the "far" right. There's a lot of folks that far right.

But, wow, Erickson has a sick fascination with using the word "rape" at any turn, eh?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

F

user-pic

October 16, 2009 8:13 AM   

all this "ignore him" advice would be good except for The Economist quoting him in an story:

http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14586954

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 8:34 AM   

You know, Erickson's 'interview' is kinda funny. He must have had someone else write it.

And Redstate is really only 'big' in conservative circles. Their 'convention' took place in one tiny room in an Atlanta hotel. Compare that to a Netroots Nation and it's somewhere in the range of 30-1 on the south side.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 8:51 AM   

But your not saying he lied, mmm wonder why

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 10:03 AM    in reply to gomerspile

He lied. There, I said it. Oh and Erickson is also a POS.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 10:30 AM   

boy, after readying you left handed wingnuts here, I can see why ann coulter wrote a book called "if democrats had any brains they'd be republicans". you people just don't get it.....are you that stupid?? how ANY of you could have voted for obama (OneBigAssMistakeAmerica)is beyond me. you must want to see this country be distroyed....no more of the freedoms that you enjoy....no more say on what you do. do you really want the government telling you what you can and can not do, say, buy, sell.....where you can go and such. are you such mindless idiots that you can't see this is what obamaa, reid, pelosi and such are trying so hard to do to you?? any of you who are parents.....you need to fight what they are doing. your kids aren't going to have ANY freedoms at all....you will have to tell them what it was like before YOU let those thiefs take them all away from you. get with it people......your very freedom and life is being taken away from you right under your noses. do something NOW! tomorrow obama might not be just a false president........but a real dictator.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

LFC

user-pic

October 16, 2009 10:55 AM    in reply to woody

boy, after...
Capitalize the "B" at the beginning of the sentence.

ann coulter
Capitalize proper nouns.

you people just don't get it.....are you that stupid??
These are actually two separate sentences. There are only 3 periods in an ellipsis. (Hint: That's the little dot, dot, dot thingy.) Use only one question mark.

you must want to see this country be distroyed
Drop the word "be". Proper spelling is "destroyed".


Oh, I give up. This isn't even up to snuff for first grade. I'm not looking for prose that is suitable for an English Lit major, but cut me a break. This is wingnut stream of consciousness. Could somebody have been raised in the U.S. and be this incapable of writing a simple blog comment? Was this actually written by an semi-literate Muslim jihadist masquerading as an American to stir up trouble?

Or is this truly representative of the "intellectual" firepower we can expect from the GOP for the foreseeable future?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 1:42 PM    in reply to LFC

On Saturdays, Markos Moulitsas publishes the hate mail he receives. This is exactly like that: misspellings, grammatical errors, no discernible train of thought. . .

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 10:56 AM   

"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."

Mark Twain

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 11:20 AM   

This guy should check his blood sugar more often.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 11:49 AM   

One big festering pus-boil of righteous insecurity. I wonder if he's on steroids or something?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 17, 2009 3:49 AM   

Okay folks, after reading the first few comments about this dissembler's "predilections", I was reminded of this, no doubt which EE would heartily endorse:

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/3074/slide_3074_44502_large.jpg

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 4:56 AM   

When you say (and Rachel) say a "well-read conservative site", you have to be careful how you parse that. It's like when a friend of mine heard another law student talk about a "fertile lawyer's imagination" -- the prof wanted to know what word was modifying what.

I don't think that Erik Son Of Erik is well read in anything. At most, he has a lot of readers who are as not well-read as he is.

cialis lovegra

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 19, 2010 11:33 AM   

Under quick search, a user can search lobbying activity by country in a more comprehensive way than previously. It's also easier to identify firms and PR shops that are working on behalf of foreign clients.terre haute lawyers

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on