TPM LiveWire

Boehner: Americans Don't Want Major Health Care Reform -- So GOP Plan Won't Cover Many Of The Uninsured

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

House Minority Leader John Boehner

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

House Minority Leader John Boehner said on CNN's State of the Union this morning that Republicans are combining several ideas on health care reform posted on the GOP website into a bill that's being scored by the CBO and that he hopes to present for debate on the House floor.

So what can we expect from the plan?

"We do not attempt to cover 46 million more Americans," Boehner said, pointing to a printout of the Democrats' House health care reform bill, which he'd stacked on the desk next to him. "We will cover millions more Americans, but we don't attempt to do this. This is not affordable."

What this is going to do is bankrupt America. It's going to cost millions of Americans their jobs and cut benefits for seniors. This is not what the American people want. They want a more gradual approach to fixing our current system.

The Republican plan, Boehner said, would not increase taxes, not cut Medicare or Medicaid, and would not institute mandates on individuals or businesses.

Join the Conversation!

13 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

November 1, 2009 9:59 AM   

Yep - because the problem is that uninsured Americans don't have *choices* as to who they should pay 50% of their take-home pay for insurance. Way to go, Boner.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 10:26 AM   

Boy is that WEAK!

Ignagni was similarly tepid in her remarks too.

Get the feeling that the GOP and AHIP have only one card left -


{ThinkProgress)

Lieberman on his willingness to derail health care reform: ‘I feel relevant.’

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mJJ

user-pic

November 1, 2009 6:14 PM    in reply to johnmccsf

Actually, I have been a Republican for more than 50 years but I am VERY disgusted with my party now. My father died when I was 4 and my mom raised her 5 children starting in the depression years. I had rheumatic fever when I was 7 and had severe heart damage from 3 episodes of that disease. My first heart surgery took place in the middle of my college years. the second one happened in Canada, the third one in Texas and the last one here in Arizona. Heart surgery and a pacemaker plus medical management for my heart has cost insurance companies and once with Medicare nearly a million dollars. All this for want of a doctor's supervision of rheumatic fever during those early years of my life. As an RN, I always had great insurance and still the cost to my insurance and last time to Medicare has been very high. You see, it is just stupid not to have universal insurance and we need it right now. As a Republican I feel shame because my party puts politics before the safety of our country's citizens. But I predict many of us moderates will end up abandoning the party since it has gotten so non-caring about the welfare of Americans. What a sad day for the Grand Old Party. God help Republicans if they continue on their rampage against what is good for the citizens of our country.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 10:27 AM   

The ideas on their website:

Number one: I don't know enough about the reason for this rule to ascertain whether or not changing it is sensible.

Number two: ...That's basically what the health insurance exchange is; it's too bad whoever makes this website isn't sending the their talking points memo over to Congress.

Number three: This is too vague for the the layman public, much too vague for the initiated legalese.

Number four: There's a broad academic consensus that malpractice lawsuits are most frequently not frivolous and that limiting (or preventing them) would not seriously affect medical expenditures.


"The Republican plan, Boehner said, would not increase taxes, not cut Medicare or Medicaid, and would not institute mandates on individuals or businesses."

Well of course. The Republican plan is to make some tiny changes and stand up and claim a massive victory for America when 99.9% of the situation would still at status quo. The Republican plan is to not do anything. Duh. Of course it won't increase taxes or cut any spending. They are part of 'anything', right?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 10:41 AM    in reply to Icon

Don't forget the second part of the Republican plan: If you do get sick, die quickly!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 11:18 AM    in reply to Icon

Number four: end junk lawsuits that contribute to higher health care costs by increasing the number of tests and procedures that physicians sometimes order not because they think it's good medicine, but because they are afraid of being sued.

More and more I have come to think that the increasing number of tests and procedures that physicians sometimes order is not because they are afraid of being sued but because they make money from them.

"Tort reform" will do nothing about that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 11:31 AM   

boehenr makes no ssense:
1. if the gop have plan, why have they not shared with the dems
2. if it is too expensive to overhaul healthcare, why even bother
3. how do you determine which of the uninsured you are pueposefully leaving out become insured
4. what about pre-exisiting conditions-being born female for instance
5. how much would the gop overhaul cost?
6. how will they pay for it?
7. who pays for it?
8. for how many years is it in effect
is plan to be in effect and when would it begin?
9. does it provide competition to the insurance industries?
10. does it reign in the cost of meds?
11. what kind of plan is it? single paye, public option? triggers? opt out/in? co-op?

I love the details he provides!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 5:50 PM    in reply to neesy08

"1. if the gop have plan, why have they not shared with the dems"

Well, they have shared their 'plan' with the dems. The problem is the dems realize their 'plan' is more political grandstanding than solid, useful ideas.

"2. if it is too expensive to overhaul healthcare, why even bother"

That seems to be the consensus of the Republican caucus.

"3. how do you determine which of the uninsured you are pueposefully leaving out become insured"

For the Republicans, uninsured are an unfortunate side-effect. For the Democrats, the uninsured are a mistake. The groups have a completely different perspective.


"4. what about pre-exisiting conditions-being born female for instance"

Ever notice that the vast majority of Republican legislators are male? Or the fact that they all have the pretty-good federal workers health plan?


"5. how much would the gop overhaul cost?"

Little, because there would be no overhaul.


"6. how will they pay for it?"

However Bush paid for things. I'm betting on money trees.


"7. who pays for it?"

Money tree orchard owners.


"8. for how many years is it in effect"

Until there's enough political audacity to challenge the unsustainable status quo again.


"9. does it provide competition to the insurance industries?"

Not if the insurance lobbyists keep giving them money.


"10. does it reign in the cost of meds?"

By deregulating them, the meds would be cheaper. They might not work either, but price = quality.


"11. what kind of plan is it? single paye, public option? triggers? opt out/in? co-op?"

Private insurance only.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 11:44 AM   

The most distressing part of all this is how CNN and other media outlets allow Boehner and others in the GOP to spew this nonsense unchallenged. I see two problems. One, the media is so lazy they simply have not informed themselves enough to know what to ask these guys and how to followup on what they say. Two, their corporate paymasters do not want them asking the tough questions and framing the accurate narrative that would inform the public so that a workable solution could be acheived because it would be harmful to corporate interests. The American people have little chance when Congress and most of the media are both prostituting for the insurers and PHARMA.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 4:06 PM    in reply to xargaw

Yes, that makes me so sick. But, did you see how David Gregory was challenging Tim Geithner today on MTP? Where are those hardball questions when he sits down with the hypocrites a.k.a. republicans?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 11:48 AM   

He's right. Americans want gradual change. So we lower the age for those eligible for an enhanced Medicare to 50 tomorrow, then lower it by 10 years every 5. Easy does it.

HR 676 is 20 pages long. You can read it at OpenCongress.org

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 4:03 PM   

We know who the GOD party will cover; they will reduce the healthcare cost for the top 1%.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 1, 2009 6:44 PM   

Boehner has no clue what "Americans" want... he only thinks he knows what the 18% of radical rightwingers want.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on