Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) tried to deflect attention from big GOP wins last night in the New Jersey and Virginia gubernatorial elections, saying instead that the Democratic upset in the NY-23 congressional race was the real race to watch -- and that it shows that Republicans are "eating themselves."
Democrat Bill Owens beat Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman last night after moderate GOPer Dede Scozzafava dropped out and endorsed Owens -- a late development that came after prominent national Republicans threw their support to Hoffman.
Wasserman Schultz said "New York 23 was the race to watch for the coming year."
New York 23 is really the race to focus on from yesterday. It shows the knock-down, drag-out civil war that's going on in the Republican Party. They're eating themselves and it's going to play out in races across the country.
Here's the video:

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Tom65
November 4, 2009 10:18 AM
She's right. VA and NJ were down to the weakness of the candidates more than any referendum on Obama (as the exit polls showed), but the Teabaggers (along with Palin, Beck and Pawlenty) went full-wingnut in NY23, and lost big.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Winston Smith
November 4, 2009 11:27 AM
I disagree. The tea-baggers dragged their party in the direction they want to go and nearly won a general election without the support of their established party's nickname. I think it's pretty important, especially if it is an indication that the extreme wingnuts in their party actually have a chance on a general stage and are more than just 29%ers. It is pretty scary.
On the other hand, I hope progressives will someday be able to have a similar effect on the Democentrists. Right now, the two-party corporate mandate has us fucked.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jenesq
November 4, 2009 12:20 PM in reply to Winston Smith
The teabaggers did not "nearly win" an election. They blew what had been a giant R margin one year ago and made their district turn D for the first time since before the Civil War. In this context, "nearly won" is actually "got their asses handed to them on a platter in what should have been a 'gimme' election."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Winston Smith
November 4, 2009 1:04 PM in reply to jenesq
Ok. I'll take your word for it and try not to worry.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
gmlevitis
November 4, 2009 11:44 AM
The GOP is fighting a civil war against itself. If the right-wingers had stayed out of it, the Rep. candidate would have won, as usual. Bill Owens should publicly thank Palin, Pawlenty and such for squeezing out Scozzafava and importing a Conservative who neither knew nor cared about the local issues and who was running for purely doctrinal reaasons. I hope the true conservatives keep up the war against imperfectly conservative Republicans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HermanNewticks
November 4, 2009 12:35 PM
I thought that it showed us that, in a local election that everyone knew would turn on the candidates' ability to inspire confidence among the electorate that they could handle those issues, the endorsement of a moderate republican who knows local issues carries more weight than the endorsements of a crowd of wingnuts who don't know (or care) about the area. And also what qmlevitis said.
But I'd be careful not to overstate the effect of the conservative ideological witchhunts. It didn't play in upstate NY, but it may very well play in other places. Upstate NY Repubs are not like national repubs. Their interests are generally guns, abortion, and keeping NYC from dominating the rest of the state. But the nutty tax policy stuff, hard-core libertarian-except-where-a-Conservative-president-tramples-over-individual-rights-because-then-it's-ok policies, and other hallmarks of ideologically pure conservatism generally don't float their boats.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
November 4, 2009 12:37 PM
Glad she's back. Wasserman-Schultz is one of the party's best representatives on TV.
Way to go voters of the Fighting 23rd!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GregorZap
November 4, 2009 1:39 PM
The GOP is getting thrown out of the Northeast. It cannot take Bible Belt politics into the Northeast and expect to be successful. Yankees are just too smart.. It is a region comprised of moderates because it is urban and multi-ethnic. The 23rd was somewhat of an exception to this demographic, however, being largely rural, and therefore more amenable to conserative values, but Hoffman was unaware that he actually needed to represent the region, rather then the Christian Reich and the all-FOX crowd.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
November 4, 2009 2:26 PM
Fixed it for you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?