TPM LiveWire

Family Feud: How Much Is Moon Church Conflict Driving Wash Times Turmoil?

Spread the word and support this article. Share it on Digg!


Rev. Sun Myung Moon

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The Sunday firings of executives at the Washington Times and the possible exit of its top editor are apparently being driven more than previously known by last month's transfer of power of the Unification Church and associated business empire from Rev. Sun Myung Moon to his children.

A newsroom source familiar with church politics tells TPM that the root of the shakeup at the Washington Times is a feud between Hyung-jin Moon, 30, and Hyun-jin Moon, 40, also known as Preston, both U.S.-educated sons of church Father Rev. Sun Myung Moon. The church announced in early October -- in an exclusive given, notably, to the Associated Press not the Washington Times -- that day-to-day operations were being handed over to Preston, Hyung-jin, and a third son.

Preston is chairman of News World Communications, the church-owned parent company of the Washington Times.

The youngest of the three sons, Hyung-jin, was selected last year to be the church's religious leader, presumably a responsibility that will fully vest when his father, who is nearly 90, dies. Hyung-jin may have won Rev. Moon's favor with feats such as his reportedly performing 21,000 "full body" bows in honor of his parents over the summer.

But the selection of Preston's young brother for the high-profile role -- along with Rev. Sun Myung Moon's doling out of powerful posts to other siblings -- rankled Preston, a Harvard MBA who has competed in two Olympics on the Korean equestrian team, the source tells us.

That's what brings us to the weekend shakeup in which Washington Times publisher Thomas McDevitt, chief financial officer Keith Cooperrider, and chairman Doug Moon Joo got the ax.

As chairman of church-owned News World Communications, Preston controls the newspaper. According to the source, he went to the three newspaper executives and asked them to side with him against what he sees as his father's favoritism toward Hyung-jin. When they declined to side with Preston, they lost their jobs.

The power struggle between Preston and Hyung-jin is also confirmed by a pair of internal church memos obtained by TPM.

In the first memo, sent by Hyung-jin Nov. 4 and addressed to "regional presidents, national messiahs, national leaders," Hyung-jin, who has a BA and an MA in Divinity from Harvard, announces the appointment of himself as the new chair of an arm of the church called the Universal Peace Federation, which describes itself as committed to world peace and reinvigorating the United Nations.

Who was Hyung-jin replacing at the top of UPF? His older brother Preston, of course.

In another memo, apparently sent later that day, Preston fired back, complaining that Hyung-jin's announcement was sent out from church headquarters, which, he says, did not traditionally have jurisdiction over UPF. While couched in plenty of language about Father's ideal of a "God-centered world," the thrust of the of the memo is clear: a protest of what he saw as his younger brother's power grab.

"No member of the board of directors of UPF, and no members of the UPF Secretariat were consulted about any of these announcements," Preston wrote.

And it looks like the trouble between the Washington Times and Unification Church headquarters in South Korea has been simmering for some time. The AP -- not the church-owned Washington Times -- was given the October 12 scoop about transfer of day-to-day operations to the three sons.

A second newsroom source tells TPM: "I knew something was wrong between the Times and the Moonies about a month ago" when the AP story ran, calling it "a horrific snub on a matter of that consequence."

The Washington Times had to run the AP version of the story the next day, October 13, and finally getting its own original piece published on the 14th.

In the wake of the shakeup, at least one former Times staffer is worried the paper could fold.

"We always thought that wouldn't happen because they have invested so much in it. But anything is possible with Preston Moon," the former staffer told TPM. The source believes the church has invested up to $2 billion in the newspaper, which was founded in the early 1980s to fight Communism. And the church is running a multi-million dollar annual deficit to keep the institution alive.

We've reached out to get the church's comment in response to our story, but did not immediately hear back. We'll update if and when the church has a statement.

Late 11/11/09 Update: See more on this in our latest story, Source: Rev. Moon Son Went Rogue In Ordering Wash Times Shakeup.

Join the Conversation!

68 comments

Recommend Recommend (2)

November 10, 2009 1:41 PM   

So wierd. I wonder how anybody can take that publication seriously...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 3:36 PM    in reply to Kinkistyle

It is really weird. Republicans do not want to hear objective news. They want to see in the newspaper that Republicans are doing well and Dems are doing badly. If the print on the page doesn't say that, they're mad and they call the paper a bunch of lies. If they have the Presidency, they want to read only about his wisdom, triumphs, and nobility, in the North Korean mode. The Mooney Tunes game them that; it thus became a must-read for Repubs. Moon had gotten the access niche he wanted, at a price.

They piss away billions in losses every year on this niche.

Lots of results for us are good ones: (1) they continue wasting billions, (2) it is bought out by real journalists, (3) Murdoch buys it and he loses the billions.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 4:23 AM    in reply to Overreach THIS!

Just wanted to say that I often find the same thing of Democrats. If you just read through this comment board, you can see it's full of self-reassuring democrats painting not only the Rev. Moon as crazy, but all Republicans and all religious people. I tend to agree that many Republicans only listen to their side, but I'd say an equal number of Dems do the same...

People forget that nearly half this country is conservative, just as I know Republicans forget nearly half this country is liberal...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 6:50 AM    in reply to Loew01

I agree with you that people here forget that half the country is conservative, and it sometimes is frustrating to talk to people who prefer to imagine differently. That said, Reverend Moon is completely crazy and also dangerous and if you think maybe that's not quite true, you're in deep denial. Democrats do not have a fake national-level newspaper like his, nor do they have a Fox News propaganda outfit masquerading as news, and NBC news which is a large investor in MSNBC ("the place for politics") does not count. This is a liberal comment board, and you can assume that most comments will be liberal, and often very educated by the way. Redstate.com is a sewer and often very ignorant.

Your standard-bearers, Palin, Limbaugh, Beck, Boehner: these people are a disgrace to the body politic. And if your next step is to say liberals are just as guilty as (or similar to) Republicans, you can take that phony meme and go peddle it elsewhere. Oh! And the Republican Party and conservatives generally also offer a safe harbor for bigots trying and failing to mask their true motivations. Not everyone, of course. What is it? 40%? Despicable.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 3:53 PM    in reply to Kinkistyle

Democracy is messy and can often be wrong, but this reinforces why old aristocratic forms of government fell.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 1:43 PM   

What will become of Byron York's hair?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:06 PM    in reply to pinson

Not to mention Tony Blankley's gut.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 4:10 AM    in reply to commie atheist

Tony Blankley is too flatly blank to be cipher.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 1:43 PM   

People, show some respect. After all the Rev. Moon is the Messiah:

http://www.revsunmyungmoon.net/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 4:12 AM    in reply to Doofus

Sorry: he looses in a competition with the captain's palm tree in "Mister Roberts".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 1:54 PM   

Live by the Moonie, die by the Moonie.

Perhaps if the editors would submit to enduring a large series of full body blows the family might reconsider?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 1:59 PM   

"How Much Is Moon Church Conflict Driving Wash Times Turmoil?"

One can hope a lot and that it will lead to the end of the paper.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:04 PM   

With any luck, it'll lead to the implosion of both the Times and the UC.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:17 PM    in reply to midnight rambler

I'm sure poppy Bush would throw support to the new Messiah.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:05 PM   

In the first memo, sent by Hyung-jin Nov. 4 and addressed to "regional presidents, national messiahs, national leaders,"

Nice to know there is more than one "national messiah," which will come in handy if one of them gets offed, or falls out of favor with the main Moonies.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 4:30 AM    in reply to commie atheist

FYI, there are four national messiah families to each country that is part of the UN. These are lifelong missions given to the families who volunteer for them. It's basically a evangelical mission to spread our beliefs within the country. We call them messiahs because our theology states that solving the problems of the world has to start with individuals, move up to families, then tribes, then nations, until the world is re-united with God.
Abstract, I know, but before national messiahs we had tribal messiahs and family messiahs.
Learn something new everyday, eh? :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:27 PM    in reply to Loew01

So, how does one get into this messiah racket? Do you have to pay a fee? Is there some sort of training involved? Does it pay well? I've been unemployed for eight months and I can certainly use the cash.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:06 PM   

The story says that he attempted to complete 21,000 full-body BOWS, not that he sustained 21,000 full-body BLOWS, whatever that would be. Not saying it's sane, but it's not quite as crazy as this story makes it sound.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:51 PM    in reply to RGNova

What's a "full-body" bow?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 4:36 PM    in reply to SqueakyRat

On your knees, arms extended. Face to the floor, back up, repeat.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 7:19 PM    in reply to Kyle H

That sounds more like a full body blow job.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:06 PM   

So if Mr Moon is the Messiah, what does that make his three sons?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:08 PM    in reply to Duck Stab

Robbie, Chip and Ernie?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:10 PM    in reply to commie atheist

I knew I was setting myself up for that...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 7:07 PM    in reply to commie atheist

I thought they were Larry, Darryl & his other brother Darryl.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 12:27 PM    in reply to Unindicted Co-Conspirator

"and a third son."

...who is mysteriously unaccounted for in this article.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:32 PM    in reply to Duck Stab

Mini-me(ssiahs)s?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:44 PM    in reply to Duck Stab

It's a quadrinity, of course.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:19 PM   

In the wake of the shakeup, at least one former Times staffer is worried the paper could fold.

I wish. But my guess is Murdoch would buy it. If he's covered the New York Post's bar tab all these years, I'm guessing he'd be willing to do the same to have a daily conservative house organ in the nation's capital.

Who knows? He might even improve it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:46 PM    in reply to Peter Principle

Maybe merge it with the Wall Street Journal?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 4:04 PM    in reply to Peter Principle

It wouldn't be profitable - who in DC would buy it? Its only value would be that network and cable news would quote it ad nauseum as if it was a legitimate source.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:23 PM   

This is like the wingnut King Lear.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 3:59 PM    in reply to mistersnrub

LOL

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:26 PM   

There's nothing at all crazy about a bunch of cult leaders. Just power hungry, that's all. Anything that supports them should be ditched entirely and allowed to fail, as it would, without constant propaganda and influx of funds from the fooled. Same goes for Scientology.

The body blow stuff is just another way to make the leaders appear to be god-like or messiah-like in their abilities. Whether it's literally true or not has nothing to do with it. (It probably means someone blew on? him - interpret that as you will - 21,000 times.)

Yes, I am intolerant of cults.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:32 PM   

I'll beat this dead horse again:

Why in the hell does TPM give so much run to a jobber paper like the Times and the inner goings on of the freaking Moonies?

We don't care.

John

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:34 PM    in reply to tosh

Because it's marvelous entertainment. Pass the popcorn, please!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:48 PM    in reply to Doofus

It's also a significant source of information to the D.C. Villagers. Same reason the U.S. used to watch what happened to Pravda.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 3:39 PM    in reply to Richardxx

I think you're confusing the WaPo (which is Village Central with the NYTimes) with the Washington Times (which has always been dismissed as Moonie Central).

Other than Moonies, assorted Kooks, and former WaTimes reporters who currently work at TPM, does anyone give a shit about the WaTimes?

Popcorn? There are plenty of wingnut things around the country worth rolling out for popcorn value, and many that are actually relevant. The WaTimes isn't relevant.

John, who think's TPM will next be covering the power struggle within World Net Daily...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 7:25 PM    in reply to tosh

You know, you, and the multitude of other TPM readers who keep asking over and over again: "Why is TPM covering this? Why is this important? Who cares?" can just stop reading the posts that you don't think are worthwhile. It's so fucking tiring to keep hearing that refrain over and over again.

And if you really think the Moonie Times has no influence outside of a few assorted kooks (you're wrong, by the way), then pay it no mind. Just skip over any stories here, and elsewhere, that cover it.

Some people like reading about this stuff, OK? If you don't, then go somewhere else.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 12:36 PM    in reply to commie atheist

I think just the fact a cult leader invested in a Washington DC newspaper should give pause for consideration. All the soap opera events surrounding that ascent to public power by a private individual only add to the question mark.

There are many questions that the current discussion bring to mind. Just how and why did someone like Moon get so deeply involved with the Bush administration (faith based indulgences would be a proper answer), and how and why did Moon have so much influence on lawmakers? Remember when he used our federal facilities to crown himeslf king? And some of our lawmakers were in attendance, albeit unwitting witnesses to the self-appointment.

This is real news, with all the wild tabloid drama thrown for us popcorn munchers, and I would prognosticate that, as the story unravels in this fraternal digression, it will grow all the more entertaining.

And revealing.

Maybe even enlightening....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 3:20 PM    in reply to JEP07

Just how and why did someone like Moon get so deeply involved with the Bush administration (faith based indulgences would be a proper answer), and how and why did Moon have so much influence on lawmakers?

As with most things, you need to follow the money:

President-Elect George W. Bush has a strong personal and financial connection with the cult-like Moonie church, say sources. Critics say the Moonie church opposes Christianity and the American way.

In fact, the Bush family may have received as much as $10 million from the Moonies in recent years. Rev. Sun Myung Moon considers himself a personal friend of our new president, according to newspaper reports.


http://www.rickross.com/reference/unif/unif106.html

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 5:00 AM    in reply to JEP07

"ascent to public power by a private individual" wow, I'm totally blown away by what this statement is trying to imply and yet how it actually has no real meaning... aren't all holders of public power also private individuals? Aren't all politicians, including Obama, ascending to public power as private individuals? How do you define public and private individual?

Anyway... in response to the comment above, Rick Ross is an ex-moonie and his information is not totally reliable. Some of it is true, but it an incredibly biased source. As far as the Bush family goes, they're friends because they share beliefs. No, not the imagined 'control the country and take advantaged of everyone for personal gain' belief that I hear many liberals throw onto the entire Bush family, but sincere religious conviction and belief in what is good for people. I know most of you disagree, which is ok, but that's different than accusing people of ulterior sinister motives...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 5:39 PM    in reply to commie atheist

Wash Times pundits regularly appear on television. They've been mainstreamed--to a lot of people who watch TV the Washington Times and the Washington Post have no significant differences. Television and the legitimacy it confers have equalized the two newspapers as both being genuine purveyors of political discourse. The WT serves the purpose of being "conservative" to the WP's "liberal" reputation. It serves the duality meme; it has no basis in truth but it looks truthy to have two papers in town that seem to be at odds. Counterpoint looks kind of like discussion.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 5:20 AM    in reply to bracken

So in reality, there are not two different parties that have opposing beliefs in this country, but just liberals and a minority of conservatives who just make themselves seem like there are more of them then there actually are... hmmm... I guess that makes sense. Would explain how they win elections sometimes... or how Fox News gets watched more than any of the other news shows.

I get that you disagree, but pretending that there is not a clear division of belief systems in this country is a little naive. To be fair, the WT distribution is roughly one eighth of the WP, but I think that is because it is poorly run, and because it's a more liberal area of the country... anyway, just another perspective.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 4:18 AM    in reply to tosh

There's a power struggle at WorldNetDaily!? Tell us all about it!

And let us know if a power struggle erupts at CNS, please!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 12:16 PM    in reply to Doofus

Who else is gonna do it?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 4:58 PM    in reply to tosh

The Moonie conflict plays second fiddle to TPM's longstanding tab-keeping on John Solomon's hackery.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:02 PM    in reply to AdAbsurdum

... throughout his years reporting pseudo Dem scandals with the AP, the Washington Post, and finally the more befitting Washington Times.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:35 PM   

Hey TPM, what nutjob, fringe, religious sect keeps the pixels printing here? What? You mean the advertisers on here can actually count on doing enough legitimate, profitable business with the amount of readers drawn here to actually pay for it's continued publication? I'm shocked.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 2:52 PM   

Squirrel alert!

Rich, pampered nuts trying to decide when they tip the nut-cart, which way the nuts will go a'rollin'...

apologies to D.H. Lawrence, but potentially good news for squirrels everywhere......

also posted at DU

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 3:04 PM   

What a bunch of whackjobs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 3:08 PM   

This was definitely worth reporting on DU! I don't know what you guys are complaining about. Another fine explication of the way our world actually works.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 3:20 PM   

The Washington Times might fold?

This is horrific. Where could one then find the columns of such leading lights of incisive opinion and thoughtful comment (not to mention unintentional humor) as Tony Blankley, Austin Bay, Mona Charen, Larry Elder, Michelle Malkin, Chuck Norris, Dick Morris, Marvin Olasky, Pat Buchanan, Larry Kudlow, Oliver North, David Limbaugh, Linda Chavez, Phyllis Schlafly, John Stossel, R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr., Joseph Farah, Thomas Sowell, and my own personal favorite purveyor of wingnut idiocy, Dennis Prager?

Must we then rely on Fox News exclusively?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:40 PM    in reply to mjshep

Yeah if no one pays attention to the Times why do I recognize every columnist they employ?

I suspect most people outside the Beltway or political geeks like us understand it is owned by a Guy who thinks he is Senior to Jesus in the Divine Hierarchy. It sounds like a straight newspaper (NYT, Times of London, Washington Times) looks like a paper and features names you see on TV. That those names are using the paper to make them seem like real journalists and the paper is using the names to make it look like an actual paper of record just flies over most peoples' heads.

As such it is too valuable a propaganda instrument to just abandon. Someone funding the VRWC will step in and pick up the pieces if the Moons let it drop

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 7:35 PM    in reply to Bruce Webb

Exactly. It's a paper that nobody reads, and yet is extremely influential, because it is a pipe in the mighty propaganda Wurlitzer that feeds and reinforces the right-wing narrative that Moon and other oligarchs like him foist upon the American public:

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_mighty_wurlitzer

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 3:31 PM   

Anyone know what happened to the Moon owned website InsightMag.com? The website seems to be gone and the guy who used to run it now has the 12-3pm radio slot on WTNT replacing MSNBC/Dial syndication host Ed Schultz.

It's possible InsightMag imploded awhile ago, I was just trying to find out more about its (former?) editor Jeff Kuhner who is now on the radio.

But it is interesting he has a new job just as there is this shake up at WashTimes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 8:34 PM    in reply to Cy Guy

I kind of thought Insight pretty much broke up after an editor, Paul Rodriguez, took a sabbatical , which happened not long after Hunter Thompson killed himself. Remember Rodriquez? He and another reporter authored a Washington Times series back at the beginning of the nineties about callboys touring Poppy Bush's White House, after hours.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 3:31 PM   

All those nuts. Tossed out of the cart. Rolling all over the ground on their own for the first time. I repeat... Squirrel alert!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 4:00 PM   

Time to move to any European country that has an established national religion or two, and then ignore those religions.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 8:10 AM   

What an intelligent and self-disciplined run of commentary.

I was so impressed reading these comments that I signed up.

Strong opinion, wit, few cheap shots, quiet debate, no rants.

Really a big thumbs up to these people commenting here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 10:13 AM   

I am sorry to say my evangelical sister and her husband subscribe to the WaTimes, an important part of the echo chamber the religious right surround themselves with.

And, BTW, the "body blows" thing, crossed out, is obviously meant as a joke by the author, replaced by "body bows," meaning full length prostrations. It's a demonstration of submission and respect in many Eastern spiritual traditions, including Buddhism.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 10:57 AM    in reply to Lizskin

It's not meant as a joke; I originally had it wrong and wanted people to see the error had been corrected.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 12:51 PM    in reply to Lizskin

"evangelical sister and her husband subscribe to the WaTimes..."

Are they even remotely aware of the ownership ties? Interesting how a poison message can be produced by one group and consumed happily by another, but if the consumers knew the source of their entertainment they would not have subscribed in the first place.

It's all because of Rove's cobbled-together permanent majority, all it's necessary parts were not even remotely in agreement (evangelicals and moonies, for instance), but they willingly ignored their extreme differences to mutually benefit from Bush's big greed umbrella.

Now that era is over, those pillars are no longer standing together, and they are all scrambling to become the new thing (Palin's Dead Moose Party).

Too many new things are eating away at their old conservative consortium. The pillars are crumbling before our very eyes, what with the WATimes at critical mass and NY23 going Democrat on them, it looks like Atlantis(R) is sinking..

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 10:58 AM   

Romulus and Remus? Cain and Abel? Jacob and Esau?

The Koch Brothers?

Fraternus and Fracturus, history's famous brothers.

Is it come sort of cultural cell division?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 11:31 AM    in reply to JEP07

Lachlan and James (Murdoch) will keep Rupert's remains spinning for decades.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 12:19 PM    in reply to AdAbsurdum

"Rupert's remains"

Sounds like the name of a goth band...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 10:06 AM   

"when his father, who is nearly 90, dies" -

What do you mean, dies? Haven't you heard, he's the second coming of the Lord.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 5:02 AM   

I wanted to recommend the articles being written currently on the Moonies and its source of funds, by writer Rory O'Connor.
They are accessible at www.roryoconnor.org.
Billions of Moonie dollars, since 1985, used to buy massive assets like the Washington Times, but coming from where? Not from selling flowers on the street, even if the sellers are mind-controlled servants of the church.
(Sorry if this comment duplicated, because I lost my original attempt to comment here.)
My personal view involves the Moonies historic links with Korean CIA, meaning South Korea, meaning close links with conservative parts of USA (which runs South Korea).
I felt the funding might be coming from a mostly-US entity, to perform dirty tricks (which are officially illegal for various US entities). There are also highly vested interests that like to keep their hands clean, but get others to do their dirty work. Work, e.g. Mind Control, child abuse circles as a way of blackmailing/controlling senior figures, harassment of dissidents, corrupting police, home invasions, other stuff. All of which sort of stuff of course the Moonies with their mind control expertise can be considered good at.
The US still dominates South Korea (since the 1950 Korean War, which is still unresolved, against the North Korean state of DPRK.)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on