TPM LiveWire

Is The Washington Times' Continued Operation In Jeopardy?

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

The Washington Times newsroom

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Things seem to be going from bad to worse at the Washington Times. And the continued operation of the newspaper, which is owned by Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church, seems to be in serious doubt.

There's already been plenty of speculation that the paper might fold or go online-only. Sources at the Times said they fear major changes and that the Moon family feud that's driving the paper's turmoil could lead to the Times shutting down in the coming months -- with some suggesting that Preston Moon, the reverend's son who serves as chairman of News World Communications, the parent company of the Washington Times, came close to that decision last weekend.

Others believe the paper, with its relatively modest circulation, could pursue an online-only strategy to harness its growth in that area. They also remain pleased with the new Washington Times radio network.

And the paper itself reported this week that "an independent assessment and leadership team has been organized to address the practicalities of daily operations, and ultimately, the future sustainability of the news organization."

Still, acting president and publisher Jonathan Slevin told Times employees that "there are no plans to shut the company down."

We expect The Washington Times to continue to serve its readers and viewers for years to come.

Slevin did not return a phone call seeking comment today, and declined to talk to TPM when we reached him yesterday.

Several sources inside the newsroom are taking a cautious approach. They said executive editor John Solomon still hasn't been seen in the newsroom all week -- and that reporters he personally recruited haven't heard from him. Mainly though, staff members seem uncertain about the security of their jobs. Solomon did not return a phone call seeking comment today, and declined to talk to TPM when reached yesterday.

A former Times staffer also tells TPM that the newspaper may have lost immediate access to the stream of money that helps fund the Times. According to the source, the newspaper used a stream of additional investments from the parent company that owns the Times to keep its operation going. But one of the three executives fired on Sunday -- chairman Dong Moon Joo -- was apparently the one responsible for securing those additonal investments. It was his main function, our source says. Without additional cash infusions from the parent company run by Preston Moon, it's possible that the Times will have serious short-term cash problems, we're told.

Joo couldn't be reached at the Washington Times today -- though the human resources department said they'd pass along TPM's request for an interview. TPM has also left messages with the church's U.S. headquarters seeking comment, which have yet to be returned. Don Meyer, a spokesman for the Washington Times and a partner at Rubin Meyer Communications, also didn't immediately return a phone call seeking comment today.

The same former Times staffer who told TPM about the short-term cash flow problem also says that Larry Moffitt, who identifies himself as vice president of the Washington Times Foundation on his LinkedIn profile, "is gone." His duties seem to have largely revolved around church-centric activities. A second former Times staffer (who's also a church member) confirms that Moffitt has left. This source also tells TPM that Moffitt is close to Preston Moon. It's unclear whether Moffitt resigned or was pushed out.

Moffitt did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment. An operator at the Washington Times said that "Larry Moffitt is no longer with the company" -- before transferring TPM to the human resources department, which would not confirm any news about Moffitt, but agreed to pass on our request for comment.

As we reported earlier this week, three other top executives have already been fired -- and executive editor John Solomon, is expected by many current staffers to be as good as gone. And just to complete the drama, sources have told TPM that there's a beefed-up security presence at the newspaper -- including armed guards outside management's office on the day the executives were fired.

A former staffer now tells TPM that the third floor where management works was actually sealed off -- and that the people who worked there, including Moffitt, couldn't get in. While the details here are still sketchy, it's possible that these people -- more than a dozen in total -- may no longer have jobs.

Join the Conversation!

19 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

November 11, 2009 1:10 PM   

What will Washington do with only one conservative daily??!!
Oh, the humanity!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 3:30 PM    in reply to thomas1

Ha ha!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 1:31 PM   

Good riddance

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 2:02 PM   

Sure don't wish bad things for the rank & file, but this otherwise could not have happened to a more deserving radical cult.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 2:08 PM   

Would be a great day for journalism.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 2:10 PM   

At least now all the reporters will be available to go on "Meet The Press" and "This Week with George Snuffleupagus"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 2:19 PM   

I think it will be the final straw for the WaPost if this happens - their rightward tack will all of a sudden make sense as they can claim to need to reach out to all those conservative potential readers of the Times.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 2:28 PM   

and Fox wants to start charging for online content and be delisted from search engines. somebody pinch me. this can't be real

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 2:39 PM    in reply to twirling fartknocker

o noes! Please, Mr. Murdoch! Don't delist FoxNews.com from Google! Liberals would HATE it if nobody could find stories straight from the GOP reality distortion sphere with a Google search!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 4:04 PM    in reply to twirling fartknocker

I hope not. I would hate to miss Family Guy, because I watch it online after I get home at night. And umm... I am not paying for online content. Damn, paying for cable is enough.
http://www.stumbleuponguru.com

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 2:35 PM   

Hmmm... this useless story has the front page banner again.

John

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 3:05 PM    in reply to tosh

You're the one giving it clicks, kiddo!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 2:49 PM   

I predict if the Washington Times goes under the staff at newscorp will suddenly expand.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 3:17 PM   

Of course they are not going to close up shop..Murdoch will buy it on the cheap and have another cheap rag. And how perfect could this be for him to have the cheapest reag in the most important city.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 10:40 PM    in reply to tmdf

Yeah, another "Times" to go with his London one and confuse all the people who will mistake it for the Gray Lady.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 10:32 PM   

The Washington Times did break the George HW Bush White House underage "call boy" sex scandal story.

Too bad that didn't go anywhere.

Otherwise, the paper sucks.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 10:25 AM   

Rupert will be hard pressed go get his board to authorize the acquisition--at any price--of yet another money-losing newspaper. The turnaround would be an enormous undertaking and while News Corp is robust in Television, It's dailies, like most dailies are under enormous budget pressure from the operations side and at least for the forseeable future, the revenue side.

So I hope he goes for it..


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 24, 2009 5:52 PM   

TWT is the only real newspaper left in DC...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on