TPM LiveWire

Sarah Palin Explains Her Qualifications: No Ivy League Education

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Sarah Palin was on The O'Reilly Factor Friday night for the second part of a multi-part interview (see our highlight reel of Part 1 here, and stay tuned for the Part 2 highlight reel coming later this afternoon).

When Bill O'Reilly asked the "very bold and fresh" question of whether she believed she was "smart enough, incisive enough, and intellectual enough to handle the most powerful job in the world," Palin gave a confusing if not entirely unpredictable answer.

To aid in the deciphering of Palin's response, here is the transcript:

O'REILLY: Let me be very bold and fresh again. Do you believe that you are smart enough, incisive enough, intellectual enough to handle the most powerful job in the world?

PALIN: I believe that I am because I have common sense, and I have, I believe, the values that are reflective of so many other American values. And I believe that what Americans are seeking is not the elitism, the the kind of spineless... a spinelessness that perhaps is made up for that with some kind of elite Ivy League education and a fat resume that's based on anything but hard work and private sector, free enterprise principles. Americans could be seeking something like that in positive change in their leadership. I'm not saying that has to be me.

Join the Conversation!

46 comments

Recommend Recommend (2)

November 23, 2009 1:44 PM   

Only this dingbat would think that an Ivy League education and building a "fat resume" are mutually exclusive with hard work.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 3:48 PM    in reply to TrivTriv

"We don't want your education."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 1:46 PM   

It's literally an infinite digression - like two mirrors reflecting each other:

My values reflect...other values.

Common sense will tell you that the earth is flat and that the sun revolves around the earth.

I have new critique of Palin: It's all the fault of the Senate/electoral college setup. "Rural values" have become so enshrined for the purely technical reason that rural states are WAY over-represented in the Senate and the electoral college electors of the President.

Forget about the literal winks and nods and questions of character: Anyone espousing the virtues of firearms and slaying elk and riding recreational vehicles will get a big shout out from the 'heartland' 'values' voters.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 3:50 PM    in reply to KingElvis

Education: search for truth.

"Values": What I believe is good enough.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 1:54 PM   

Sarah Palin, the blind leading those who will not see! Perfect prescription for the destruction of this country. What does Sarah Palin have against the United States, other than that they're, you know, united?!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 2:01 PM    in reply to Linus_Too

Ah…

The virtues of an on-line Bachelor’s Degree

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 3:52 PM    in reply to mc mark

Oh, yeah? Well I'll have you know that Ms. Sarah Palin attended FIVE colleges.

How many did YOU attend?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:37 PM    in reply to Linus_Too

In the land of the blind, he with one eye is king?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 2:15 PM   

I figured it out. By using lots of useless words and interjecting key phrases, such as "elitist", "ivy league", "American values", etc. she confuses her followers but gives them just enough to say "YES!!! That's EXACTLY how I feel! PALIN '12!!!".

Or...she really is just a complete moron with no grasp of the English language.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 3:40 PM    in reply to WaitWut?

Of course, it could be a little of both.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

November 23, 2009 3:40 PM    in reply to WaitWut?

I have always maintained that fuzzy language is indicative of a fuzzy thought process.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:37 PM    in reply to WaitWut?

I think its both. Actually its pretty obvious that it is both

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 2:23 PM   

I wonder if the next candidate for President from the Republican side will boast about his or her barely passing community college grades as to show they are as dumb as their base constituent, which some how means they are qualified for President as we are all told growing up "Anyone can be President (and it doesn't matter how hard you try or not)"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 3:54 PM    in reply to fsudirectory

And will be defeated for the nomination by someone with only a GED.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 2:30 PM   

I wonder if the next candidate for President from the Republican side will boast about his or her barely passing community college grades

Like the last Republican president?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 2:51 PM   

I'm glad she didn't go to some "elitist" school. The various colleges she hung out at from time to time obviously had awesome rigor and stiff standards. Right? Right? But it doesn't really make any difference or matter, does it? I mean Ann Coulter went to Cornell. Look how wonderful she turned out. But Bill Maher and Keith Olbermann went there, too. So, the quality of the college or university is evidently dependent, or more dependent, on the qualities of the students, and not necessarily the pedigrees of the faculties. PLEASE, PLEASE DON'T LET HER NEAR THE LAUNCH CODES. I'm counting on all of you. I really, really am. So are my children and grandchildren. Thanks.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 27, 2009 10:57 AM    in reply to David

"PLEASE, PLEASE DON'T LET HER NEAR THE LAUNCH CODES."

Can we condense that into a bumpersticker?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 27, 2009 11:37 AM    in reply to JEP07

Just take out one of the pleases, and you are there. How much simpler can it be?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 2:53 PM   

It might just be possible SP is aware that an Ivy-League education is no walk in the park and that a fat resume is something earned through hard word and, to be fair, some good networking. SP knows she will never be any of that and so the only way to the top is through playing the populist card for all its worth.

Of course that guy, W, went to the best schools and still turned out as dumb as a doorknob so perhaps SP can be forgiven she thinks she has what it takes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 27, 2009 10:36 AM    in reply to nowhereman

While her lemmins probably thought she was talking about Kerry, it was really Bush who came closest to fitting that description.

If there is one Ivy League factor that soils the whole garment, it is their indulgent "legacy" program that shovels rich kids through their system with c's and d's for no other reason than they have an antecedent or sibling who attended.

As Ivy League legacies go, W was certanly not their best advertisement for demanding hard work and intellectual development from their students.

And it might be safe to say, the ONLY low-achievers among the Ivy League elite are legacies. Anyone without those connections would have to prove themselves well beyond what is expected of a legacy to attain admission.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 3:05 PM   

For the sake of science,

I hope Sarah lives a long, full life.

But then, I hope science gets a chance to examine her brain, just like they did Einstein's.

I'm sure they'll find lots of wiring errors.

Lots and lots.

.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 3:13 PM   

Wow. Her handlers are really playing the canards of right-wing populism like a fiddle. Ben may find her answer "confusing," but she is actually 100% on message.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 3:35 PM   

Am I a spineless Ivy-Leaguer who doesn't share her values or is it that I just don't know what the f@ck she is trying to say?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

November 23, 2009 3:46 PM    in reply to NuttyProf

It's a little hard to know precisely what she is saying when she speaks so imprecisely and her sentences change direction midstream.

"And I believe that what Americans are seeking is not the elitism, the the kind of spineless... a spinelessness that perhaps is made up for that with some kind of elite Ivy League education and a fat resume that's based on anything but hard work and private sector, free enterprise principles."

That sentence is completely mangled and makes no grammatical sense whatsoever. At best, you can only get the general gist of what she is trying to get at, which boils down to "We don't need no steenkin' education!"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 3:59 PM    in reply to slb

It says:

Relativist laissez faire stupidity is as American as Bullwinkle pie.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:06 PM    in reply to slb

Think Don Larsen...

When I see her and a group of followers, I'm reminded of the Don Larsen cartoon about what you say versus what your pet hears. You reel off several sentences with the pet's name, the pet only hears "Blah, blah, Muffy, blah, blah, blah, blah, Muffy. Blah, Muffy, blah, blah, blah, blah...".

With Sara's glassy-eyed followers, only "elitist" "Ivy League", etc., make it through her disjointed, foggy babble.

.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:36 PM    in reply to draftedin68

Ginger, actually.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:37 PM    in reply to NuttyProf

Yes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:01 PM   

Wait, does she not realize that Bill O'Reilly himself actually owns a Harvard degree and this man of the people hasn't allowed a little thing like education hold him back from speaking the truth, sans (I mean without) spin.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:15 PM   

My questions: Where did your fleet of lawyers get their degrees? Are they street smart or just book smart. How much edumacation should her doctor have? Is being the last in his or her class make them more qualified. Being intelligent can be a real hindrance to being the most powerful political figure in the world? Don't need no Constitutional professors, they don't understand the constitution the way real working people do, eh?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:19 PM   

Kaplan College, Wasilly AK

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:21 PM   

Lost in the attack on elite education (which I think she'd be stunned to find goes beyond the Ivy League and is something most folks want their kids to get if they are able to) is the attack on experience, too (i.e. the fat resume).

What, again, did little miss Sarah do that amounted to "hard work and private sector, free enterprise principles". Killing moose and fish on her hubby's family claims (based in turn on his native status and their communal holding of property)? Everything she's done of any note has been in the very public sector she pans. She is, in other words - - a career politician and personality.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:28 PM   

I have never heard anyone claim straight up that "I have common sense" like this as their primary qualification. It is a null set of rationalization - my thoughts make sense to me and people like me, and I have no other basis for my views, so they must be some indication of "common sense" on my part, and hence those that follow me like lemmings. I really wish Tom Paine would rise up and fire bomb her and Glenn Beck for trashing the term that made him rich.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:46 PM    in reply to calbearinillinois

She makes me ill. Every piece of drivel that comes out of her mouth is worse than the last.

I hate John McCain for this

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 27, 2009 10:51 AM    in reply to lousgirl84

But that was the only way he could retrieve the Huckabee voters.

And Huck's not quite the vapid cover-girl Palin proved to be.

By picking Palin, McCain retained a big chunk of the old Rove era Republican Party voters.

But in the process, many of the Republican centrists jumped ship.

They were the real Patriots, the Republicans who voted for Obama. They put country above party, and most of them were loyal and proud Republicans before the 'baggers took over.

It took a lot of soul searching and weighing their patriotism against their partisanship for them to leave their old, familiar party home and join the other side.

Thank you, moderate Republicans. I sincerely wish you could get your party back. But, considering the total lack of dynamic, electable leadership that has come from that season of lies, it doesn't look good.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:37 PM   

What a real piece of self control for BO to not be screaming at this gelatenous mental mutant. He has to back to his sound proof padded cell and absolutely freak out.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 4:45 PM   

"And I believe that what Americans are seeking is not the elitism, the the kind of spineless... a spinelessness that perhaps is made up for that with some kind of elite Ivy League education and a fat resume that's based on anything but hard work and private sector, free enterprise principles."

I defy any English major to correctly diagram that sentence.

Parsing Sarah Palin gives me a migraine.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 5:20 PM    in reply to Yippee

By not speaking with clarity she can deflect those who wish to get anything substantial that can be used as a "gotcha"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 27, 2009 10:29 AM    in reply to Jackster

I betcha the knuckledraggers understood her every word...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 27, 2009 10:39 AM    in reply to JEP07

Even if she didn't.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 27, 2009 10:59 AM    in reply to JEP07

BTW, this sentence doesn't need to be diagrammed, it needs to be translated...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 27, 2009 12:06 PM    in reply to JEP07

Some have suggested that her sentence be diagrammed,others have said it should be translated from Palinese. I think it should be drug outside and shot. And then we should hang it, followed by a visit from a firing squad but prior to the electrocution. After that a drowning is in order.

What do Republican officials have against the English language? Why can't they learn to speak? I think perhaps a literacy test for elected officials should be considered.

I cannot believe some are hopeful that this woman run for president. We just got rid of one of the worst presidential abusers of the English language. George Bush couldn't put a simple declarative sentence together. I couldn't listen to him speak extemporaneously; he hurt my ears.

If Mark Twain were still with us, he would have re-written his article about the literary offenses of James Fenimore Cooper and replaced it with something mush longer about Sarah Palin's mangling of our language.

Does she really have a degree in journalism?

Her argument for her presidency comes down to "Elect me! I have common sense!" If she had any common sense, she would have finished her gubernatorial commitment.

I suggest reading Richard Hofstadter' "Anti-Intellectualism American Life" or "The Paranoid Style in American Politics".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 27, 2009 3:46 PM    in reply to Ric H.

They would have to have 2 working braincells to be able to read...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 5:32 PM   

Liars are spineless. Sarah Palin is a liar. Therefore Sarah Palin is spineless.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 27, 2009 10:28 AM   

My straight-A, over-achieving ten-year old granddaughter in Kansas is already talking about going to Harvard.

No kidding.

Even SHE knows what the Ivy League really means. It represents the absolute best in quality education.

Just the thought someone would mock the Ivy League makes any reasonably intelligent person shake their head. Palin can only be pandering to the worst elements in our culture, because to think an Ivy League education is some kind of hindrance to good governance, is simply delusional spin.

Katie's even talked about starting her own blog "I want to go to Harvard" in hopes it will help her open some of those doors when the time comes. And I intend to help her every way I can.

Once more, the Hard Right identifies itself as a culture of self-perpetuating ignorance, as THEIR cover-girl incites them to new lows.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 27, 2009 10:41 AM    in reply to JEP07

Just had a thought.. in that marketable Madison Avenue way, Palin's a Cover Girl with a Poster Child..

How can the 'baggers resist that?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on