TPM LiveWire

Wash Times Announces Resignation Of Executive Editor John Solomon

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

John Solomon

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

It's official: The Washington Times has announced the resignation of Executive Editor John Solomon -- effective six days ago.

Here's the one-line statement that Don Meyer, a spokesman for the Washington Times and a partner at Rubin Meyer Communications, emailed TPM moments ago.

Effective November 6, 2009, John Solomon has resigned his position as the Executive Editor of The Washington Times.

Solomon had a three-year contract that began in January 2007. Earlier this week, a Times staffer suggested to TPM that, "when you're in positions like that, you know where the bodies are buried. They would give him a buyout to keep quiet."

When the PR firm issued the release announcing Solomon's resignation, TPM phoned top newsroom staffers -- who weren't aware of the resignation.

Two newsroom sources learned about the news from TPM, saying that no one there had heard Solomon was resigning.

"No kidding?! That explains a lot," one staffer responded.

There had even been some indications that Solomon planned to return Monday after being gone from the newsroom all week, sources said.

Newly-minted publisher Jonathan Slevin did not immediately respond to a message left at his office seeking comment. Earlier today, a receptionist said he'd be out of the office for a couple days.

Solomon also couldn't immediately be reached for comment. When TPM called, Solomon's cell phone voicemail greeting still identified him as the Times' executive editor.

Meyer also did not immediately return phone calls seeking comment.

It's been a wild week at the Times On Sunday, three newspaper executives were fired.

Since then, Solomon has been MIA and security on management's floor was beefed up.

The paper is owned by Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church, and a feud between Moon's sons has driven the turmoil at the paper.

Staffers are worried about their jobs and the very survival of the paper is in question.

Several newsroom sources over the last few days suggested they would be less worried about the paper's financial future if Solomon returned. They said that even for his flaws and reputation for aggression, they felt he had turned the ship in the right direction.

This morning, staffers were told to stop talking to the press.

There was also a mini-controversy on Sunday, when the Times ran a clarification on a year-old review of a book co-authored by Slevin -- saying that Slevin had picked the reviewer in violation of newspaper policy. The next day, Slevin was promoted. Solomon hasn't been seen at the newspaper since.

Late Update: TPM obtained the Times' internal email announcing Solomon's resignation. It was sent by human relations VP Sonya Jenkins under the subject line "Announcement."

Dear Colleagues,

At the request of Jonathan Slevin, Acting President and Publisher, I am forwarding the below announcement.

"Effective November 6, 2009, John Solomon has resigned his position as the Executive Editor of The Washington Times."

Late Late Update: TPM obtained another email -- this one sent to Times staffers from Managing Editor David Jones.

For those who were not in the newsroom for our impromptu meeting a few minutes ago, let me just say that we have been assured by Jonathan Slevin that despite the resignation of John Solomon, the company remains as committed as ever to keeping The Washington Times going as a robust multi-media company. He noted the huge strides we have all made over the past two years and asked Jeff Birnbaum and me to carry on "business as usual" while the new management carries out its review of all our operations. Slevin also expressed his respect and appreciation to the newsroom for your efforts of the past week, in which you all have continued to put out a first-rate product in a very difficult time.

Additional reporting by Justin Elliott.

Comments (14) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

November 12, 2009 5:54 PM   

This should be fun!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 6:04 PM   

is right-wing media imploding across the board?

(world's smallest violin...)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 6:17 PM   

This is interesting. All print and network news media is suffering, but I wonder if the suffering is evenly divided between the right- and left-leaning outlets. Could this be Social Darwinism at work? I guess you'd have to believe in evolution to make that claim, but if you're not a Darwinian, and the right-wing outlets are failing at a disproportionate rate, then wouldn't it be in your interest to at least profess to believe in Social Darwinism. It would be kind of like a Darwinian variation on Pascal's wager.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 7:23 PM    in reply to erwin

Well, considering that Moon has pumped about $1.5 billion into the WT to keep it afloat since he bought it, and other conservative rags like National Review (-$25 million over 50 years, according to Buckley in 2005) and Weekly Standard (which loses over $1 million a year) also require massive infusions of cash just to keep publishing, I would say that the free market has already given a big "thumbs down to "journalism" of this kind.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 6:43 PM   

Love to see it happening to Solomon, whose career with the AP was marked by some crazy smears against Harry Reid, John Edwards -- no, he didn't know about that -- and every other Democrat he could take a swing at. Why was the AP honoring him, by the way? And then he got that job with the WaPo? Sure, we have a "liberal" media.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 7:47 PM    in reply to Swift63

Howard Kurtz of WaPo praised Solomon to the heavens before all this hit, hastening to add that Fox shouldn't be judged based on a few individual opinion pieces. Kurtz so venerates the Washington Times that he had some Psycho Lady from there on to join in saluting Fox's commitment to freedom. http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/mare_nostrum/2009/11/msm-has-delighted-in-repeating.php

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 6:55 PM   

This is a news organization, and they get around to announcing their editor's resignation SIX DAYS after the fact? Sheesh!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 7:26 PM   

the company remains as committed as ever to keeping The Washington Times going as a robust multi-media company

"Robust:" that word does not mean what he thinks it means.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 7:52 PM    in reply to commie atheist

Multi, huh? How multi? Multi as in a newsletter plus videos of mass Moonie weddings?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 7:34 PM   

It's business as usual. We can do more with less. Our finances are on firm footing. We are embracing change. Our coverage is fair and balanced. The Unification Church is not a cult.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 8:24 PM   

What is the Washington Times?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 6:38 AM   

forwarding the below announcement


Why not "forwarding the announcement below"
or "forwarding the announcement found below"
or "forwarding the following announcement" ?
just curious ...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 2, 2010 9:02 AM   

looks like it will be fun

kamagra l m65

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

June 28, 2010 2:22 AM   

hah! They making a BIG mistake!

Gautrain

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on