
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) said today that he didn't think the late Sen. Ted Kennedy would appreciate that health care reform was passed "on a party line vote."
McCain slammed the Senate bill because "there has never been a major reform accomplished in the history of this country that wasn't bipartisan."
He also said: "Senator Kennedy would appreciate the outcome. I don't think he would appreciate it on a party line vote."
All of the negotiations and efforts that I made with him, we never engaged in this kind of unsavory process of offering people different deals, which in the end cost people from other states lots of money and puts burdens on them.
Here's the full clip:
(h/t Greg Sargent.)
lousgirl84
December 21, 2009 1:21 PM
What a slime ball he is. The man has not one ounce of integrity. He should be tarred and feathered for releasing Sarah Palin on this country.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mwhite62
December 21, 2009 1:29 PM
You are so right, he's a slime dog with no integrity. What losers the Republicans are. They block and obstruct everything for a year, and then they blame Obama for not being bipartisan. Duh! The Republican party is morally and intellectually bankrupt, and they are in desperation mode.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
samhudson3
December 21, 2009 1:38 PM
Hey John, Teddy would have shamed you and your gang into next Sunday and not given a rat's ass how the vote turned out...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
agio
December 21, 2009 1:38 PM
Somehow I don't think so. IIRC, Kennedy went to his grave regretting not having been more willing to cut a deal with Nixon to bring about more universal health coverage. I think he not only would have been comfortable with the sort of wheeling and dealing Reid engaged in here (because of the GOP filibuster) he would have been right in the thick of it.
It really highlights what a shame he didn't live longer, because he may have been able to make the Senate sausage a little better than what it is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
silverrocket
December 21, 2009 1:41 PM
What an a$$. I can't stand this man. Please get out of public office, you nasty angry old man.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Why oh why
December 21, 2009 1:43 PM
On the other hand, Ronald Reagan would for sure have called it a socialist takeover. Even though the bill is unfortunately not that, it should still be called the "Screw Reagan's Corpse Act of 2014".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rich in NJ
December 21, 2009 1:50 PM
Gigolo John is right, but for the wrong reasons. The late Ted Kennedy would have been disgusted by how despicable the Republican party has become. That it stooped to filibustering funding for our combat troops fighting to preserve our freedom in order to obstruct the passage of HCR.
Perhaps the last refuge of a scoundrel is to pretend to know the thinking of a dead man, especially when that man has diametrically opposing views.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
December 21, 2009 9:40 PM in reply to Rich in NJ
Said pefectly!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
December 21, 2009 1:58 PM
Takes 2 to tango McCain.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
December 21, 2009 1:59 PM
Screw this posthumous myth that Teddy was some kind of moderate and screw McCain for distorting his legacy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tinmanic
December 21, 2009 2:00 PM
McCain is wrong, because the bill actually is bipartisan, in a sense. Some seats that used to be held by Republicans are now held by conservative Democrats, and they may as well be in another party. The bill is less liberal than it could have been because those conservative Democrats had pull. Anything that passes 60-40 can be characterized as having very good support. If there were 90 Democrats in the Senate and the bill passed 90-10, McCain would still be criticizing it as "not bipartisan." I didn't realize we were supposed to have affirmative action for political parties where every party gets an equal say no matter how small your caucus is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
December 21, 2009 3:13 PM in reply to tinmanic
Not only that, but Republicans have been engaged to the extent that they would consent to be. They were over-represented in Baucus's "Gang of Six". It's not the fault of the Democrats that Republicans are too stubborn to vote for their own proposals. Democrats are not the ones who have dug in their heels and refused to budge. Far from it!
But for some time now, the Republican definition of "bi-partisan compromise" is "everything the Republicans want and nothing that they don't want".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbeats
December 21, 2009 2:02 PM
Is he screaming at some clouds again?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
KennyBoy
December 21, 2009 2:15 PM
There really should be a Sanity Clause in the qualifications for public office. If there is a sane republican I could see jumping ship on the final HCR vote to go down in history as the only one to vote for what will in time will come to be seen as another Great American Idea(TM) Perhaps as a tribute to Kennedy McCain will do so himself ROTFL.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
December 21, 2009 2:26 PM in reply to KennyBoy
For a second there I thought you called McCain, Santa Claus. :P
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
December 21, 2009 7:03 PM in reply to ohyeathatsright
Ha! You canta foola me, there ainta no Sanity Clause!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
billybunter
December 21, 2009 2:25 PM
What McCain knows about buying personal healthcare can be written on the back of a postage stamp!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jackster
December 21, 2009 2:33 PM
PTSD
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
twirling fartknocker
December 21, 2009 2:47 PM
a man without shame and a corporate media always ready with a microphone for him
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Prudhourne Castello
December 21, 2009 3:11 PM
It's unfortunate for the Senator to refrence the late Senator when he has with his party stood in the way and called for a start over. That's the attitude of a man with seven houses. God be praised!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rockridge
December 21, 2009 3:44 PM
In a time of many ridiculous statements, this ranks up near the top, right along with Sen. Snowe's complaint about rushing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DancingBear
December 21, 2009 4:02 PM
"Senator Kennedy would be very happy with the passage of this bill, but he would be very disappointed that nobody in my party voted for it, and in fact I and my party did everything we could to obstruct it.
Which just proves it's a bad bill."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pbres
December 21, 2009 4:09 PM
re: McCann. DO they not have medication that helps with his slippage into dementia. Ironically, perhaps a new health bill will be of benefit to dinosaurs such as Johnnie Boy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
December 21, 2009 5:29 PM
McCain has no right to speak for Ted Kennedy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sean
December 21, 2009 8:58 PM
Has Johnny rambled on and on about the missing strawberries or his geometric logic yet?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
December 22, 2009 12:21 AM
i hate to interrupt here, but this man was a POW, dammit. he didn't have a table to write bipartisan things on, nor did he have a chair to sit in while he was writing bipartisan things on his missing table. there's no "partisan" in POW. just a P and an O and a W. POW.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tonigo
December 22, 2009 11:10 AM
I remember a time when we all wore onions on our belt, which was the style at the time. And nickels had pictures of bumblebees on them - "Gimme 5 bees for a quarter" you'd say.
Anyway, where was I? Oh yeah, the Demmycrats are dirty socialists nazis for not seeking bipartisanship on this healthcare thingamajiggy. Just because we said there are death panels in the bill and scared the bejesus out of everyone at the Springfield retirement community is no reason not to try and work with us. We won't work with dirty socialist nazis of course but it's not our fault. It's the Demmycrats for being dirty socialist nazis.
In conclusion, I won't rest until Nancy is put back in the funny pages. She represents all that is right and true with America and it's the dirty commie media that is responsible for censoring her freedom loving ways.
Sincerely,
John S. McCain
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
runfastandwin
December 22, 2009 12:42 PM
Senator McCain, you are an asset to the comedy of the Senate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?