
The New Jersey state senate is scheduled to vote on legalizing gay marriage next week.
Sen. Ray Lesniak (D) announced Thursday on the Statehouse steps that the Judiciary Committee will take up the bill on Monday. The full senate will vote on the measure Thursday.
Coming just days after the New York state senate defeated a gay marriage bill, the New Jersey votes present a big risk. It's not clear if the votes are there.
Steve Goldstein, executive director of Garden State Equality, said yesterday they don't yet have enough votes.
"We're counting votes. We're not there yet in one of the houses but things have changed dramatically in the last 48 hours where the momentum has shifted our way," Goldstein said.
But advocates are eager to get a bill passed while Gov. Jon Corzine, a Democrat, is still in office. Corzine has vowed to sign the bill. His Republican successor, Governor-elect Christ Christie, has vowed to veto it. Christie takes office Jan. 19, 2010.
The bill needs 21 votes to pass the senate, and Democrats hold 23 seats. At least one Democrat, Judiciary Committee Chairman Paul Sarlo, has vowed to vote against the measure.
In the assembly, Democrats have 48 of the 80 seats. They would need 41 votes to pass the measure.
Same-sex civil unions are legal in New Jersey.
Respondents to a recent Quinnipiac poll opposed gay marriage 49 to 46 percent.
lapdogs
December 4, 2009 7:16 PM
An ironic vote is coming up in California.
http://trueslant.com/laurieessig/2009/12/03/no-gay-marriage-in-new-york-no-divorce-in-california/
Since the voters do not want to allow gays to marry, the gays want a vote that says straight people cannot divorce - ever.
Wonder how Rudy, Newt, etc would handle that one?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
roannamac
December 4, 2009 8:02 PM
Unbelieveable that this is still an damn issue in the United States of America.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ilovebacon
December 4, 2009 9:44 PM
It would have passed if my stupid fellow Jerseyans did not elect Buttertub "I wanna have coitus with Bruce Springsteen" Chris Christie.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mophan
December 5, 2009 1:26 AM in reply to ilovebacon
His election was one of the few moments in my life that I actually felt ashamed to say New Jersey is my home state. I don't live there any longer, but I still follow current events concerning the rest of my family still there.
Most of the other times, I have held my head high and proudly proclaim I am from Jersey, exit 6. Phillies Phan.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ilovebacon
December 5, 2009 1:49 PM in reply to mophan
It was bizarre. But it wasn't like Buttertub Christie won the hearts of voters. Many, many, MANY Democrats voted Democratic down the line except for gov. They hate high property taxes and blamed Corzine. (Of course, with an estimated $8B budget shortfall for next year, it's not like Christie will be able to do anything about it--even if he wanted to.) Dems retained the state legislature. If anyone had run in Corzine's place, Christie would have lost.
Regardless, I predict that Christie's honeymoon will end soon after he takes office.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RhodaA
December 5, 2009 7:08 AM
"Preventing my marriage won't save yours."
That's revelatory.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
navamske
December 5, 2009 11:56 AM
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ShawninMo
December 5, 2009 10:33 PM in reply to navamske
And don't let your tax dollars support one either.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ilovebacon
December 6, 2009 12:34 AM in reply to ShawninMo
Marriage has nothing to do with taxes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ShawninMo
December 6, 2009 12:57 AM in reply to ilovebacon
Now all of the sudden a gay getting health coverage because they're gay and married to a federal employee doesn't mean they're getting my tax dollars? c'mon.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ilovebacon
December 6, 2009 9:56 AM
They already get coverage! It's called civil unions. We've had that for several years already. Marriage is just civil unions with a new name. Even Buttertub Christie supports civil unions for gays.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ConservativeGuy
December 6, 2009 9:38 PM
This is totally disgusting. America has no shame anymore!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ConservativeGuy
December 6, 2009 9:59 PM
Oh, nevermind everyone - go ahead and just keep on living like animals... I understand that it FEELS SO GOOD!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
June 12, 2010 5:16 AM
I'm not in favor of gay marriage. I'm not opposed to it, either. Since I don't plan on having one (I lack the major qualification), it's really none of my business. In other words, if you're against gay marriage, don't have one. Problem solved.
m65 kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?