A Swiss politician has apologized today for calling for a ban on Jewish and Muslim cemeteries two days after the country voted to outlaw minarets on mosques.
"I am sorry. I didn't mean it like that," said Christopher Darbellay, president of the Christian Democratic People's Party of Switzerland, a centrist party and the smallest member of the government coalition.
"It was about the principle that we all belong to the same Swiss society," he added.
In his call for the ban, Darbellay said, "I don't imagine that in this country, every religion or sect can have a separate cemetery in every town. It wouldn't be manageable to make these exceptions. ... Principle requires that one does not distinguish on the basis of origin or religion."
Darbellay has also called for a ban on burkas or veils worn by some Muslim women.
Switzerland made international headlines Sunday when residents voted to add a line to their constitution banning the construction of minarets, or prayer towers, on mosques. The initiative, backed by the right-wing Swiss People's Party, passed by more than 57 percent of voters.
"The minute you have minarets in Europe it means Islam will have taken over," said one SPP politician.
The Swiss have a long history of trying to keep their culture free from the influence of both Muslim and Jewish immigrants.
In 1893, Switzerland banned the practice of shechitah, the kosher way of slaughtering animals, citing cruelty because the animals are not stunned first. Although the government opposed the measure, a group called the Anti-Semite Committee gathered more than 83,000 signatures to bring it to a referendum.
Even now, Jews and Muslims must import their kosher and halal meat from neighboring countries. In recent years, some groups have gone farther, trying to ban even its import. In 2003, for example, the Swiss Animal Protection group began a campaign to ban its import, but failed.
Six other European countries join Switzerland in banning the practice: Sweden, Norway, Finland, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania. The European Union recognized such slaughter earlier this year and declared kosher and halal meat can be sold in every country, but did not go so far as to legalize the slaughtering practice throughout the EU.
Much of the xenophobia in Switzerland seems rooted in the belief that immigrants will not assimilliate into Swiss culture. In 2006, the citizenship application of a Turkish woman and religious teacher was rejected because she didn't want to integrate into society.
Muslims are one of the fastest-growing groups in Europe, sparking culture clashes throughout the continent. In France, for example, President Nicolas Sarkozy wants to ban the burka on the grounds that such veils oppress women.
GTFOOH
December 4, 2009 12:52 PM
That one kills me!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Peter Principle
December 4, 2009 2:57 PM
The Swiss have a long history of trying to keep their culture free from the influence of both Muslim and Jewish immigrants.
Well, that's one way of putting it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
December 4, 2009 3:50 PM
Being neutral, the Swiss didn't participate in WWII. Thus unlike Germany and Austria, the Swiss never had an occupation government to purge it's public institutions of the systemic bigotry that reigned in central Europe well before the dawn of the 20th century. Not to say that the swiss were/are Nazi-inclined, but the bigotry is there nonetheless.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
steambadger
December 4, 2009 4:38 PM
Is kosher slaughter significantly more cruel than the usual practice? Do the Swiss ban other common forms of animal cruelty? I really don't know -- but if so, should Jews and Muslims be allowed to practice it anyway, just because it's part of their religious tradition?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wendynyc
December 4, 2009 6:05 PM in reply to steambadger
No. Kosher slaughter is significantly *less* cruel than the common slaughterhouse practices. And the way the meat is processed is cleaner/safer than USDA standard.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
December 4, 2009 7:24 PM in reply to steambadger
There's what seems to me a pretty good description of the process of kosher slaughtering here. Done correctly, it doesn't strike me as any more cruel than the practice of stunning.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bushie
December 4, 2009 4:41 PM
Swiss chocolate is the best, their attitude on blacks, minorities and foreigners not so good. It's good to balance their antisemitism with Islamophobia.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluemolenj
December 5, 2009 7:45 AM
I spent the afternoon/night in Switzerland once. Got the first flight out of that wretched country the next morning. Most inhospitable place I have ever been (20+ countries; 45 states). They can keep their chocolate. Belgian is better!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TinnitusT
December 5, 2009 11:34 AM in reply to bluemolenj
The one thing that the American press seem to be leaving out in all of this is the linguistic divide in the voting results. Francophone Switzerland (home of more minarets per capita) rejected the initiative (with the only 3 true Francophone cantons voting against, though it was accepted in the 'mixed' cantons), while German and Italian speaking communities supported it, sometimes in overwhelming numbers. Oddly, outside of the borders of Switzerland, this linguistic divide does not follow; in the days since the vote, polls in Germany, France and Italy indicate that, were the citizens of those countries permitted to vote on a similar initiative, they would all support it, in some cases in even greater numbers/percentages than in Switzerland.
While the result is indeed an embarrassment to those of us who live her (and hold dual citizenship...), in the grand scheme of things it will probably have more actual impact on Swiss businesses abroad than the lives of our Muslim neighbors, at least in Swiss Romande. That is not to say that there will be no impact or that the vote was anything other than ludicrous, merely to point out that its practical implications are likely to be limited. I hope.
As for you Bluemole, please feel free to avoid this lovely country for as long as you can, eating as much Belgian chocolate as you are able. Obviously, a person of your wide experience can make the sorts of quick judgments that would never get you into any sort of trouble or subject you to any ridicule. You have amply demonstrated, having visited 20 countries and 45 states, that you are a true Decider.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ETSpoon
December 5, 2009 12:42 PM
So here we are at the end of the first decade of the Twenty-first Century and we are still using religion as a super-tribal identifier after nationality. We continuing to say we were "raised" as either Christian, Jew or Muslim.
What does that signify? We follow the same set of superstitions and illogical ritual practices as our parents and grandparents? The eating and drinking of the pretend body and blood of some deity or other? Bowing in the direction of some supposedly "sacred city" five time a day? Wearing only certain clothing, beards and hats because that is what some invisible guy in the sky says is pleasing to him?
It is the height of human stupidity.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fitley
December 5, 2009 2:01 PM
Who will help the poor oppressed racists? As populations continue to grow who will save the ignorant, narrow minded, probably inbred cretins of Switzerland? Oh the horror of it all. This makes me so sad I don't think I can bear it any longer. Someone needs to invent the Spit-o-Gram, so I can spit on the Swiss without traveling to their country. I'd even pay extra for the large size hockers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CVille Dem
December 5, 2009 7:26 PM
Oh, I don't know. If Muslims would condemn the beheadings, suicide bombings, and other violence perpetrated in the name of their religion, I honestly think that the non-violent among them would get a pass from everyone. What happened here wasn't racism; it was an emotional reaction to the unchecked and undisputed violence that goes on in this primitive religion.
The world has waited for an answer for those Muslims who would condemn this behavior which targets innocents, other Muslims of a different sect, and anyone else who happens to get in the way. If there are those who are respected, why have they not spoken up and worked towards resolution of the many problems? Why should anyone feel anything but revulsion at those who blow up pizza parlors, markets, and buses taking people to work?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
April 2, 2010 12:27 PM
wow this is just killing me right now
kamagra l m65
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?