
The beleaguered Washington Times announced "significant" reductions to its staff of 370 today.
In response to "marketplace realities", "the company is aggressively working to achieve efficiencies of scale that must include significant staff reduction of its 370 personnel," said Publisher Jonathan Slevin.
The Times statement does not give an exact number of layoffs, and a spokesman did not respond to a phone call. According to a source who attended an afternoon staff meeting, management said that 40 percent of staff would be laid off (Politico's Michael Calderone is hearing the same figure).
Two newsroom sources tell TPM that staffers were told a new plan, as laid out in the press release, would be instituted in 60 days -- early February -- and those who are not needed in the plan will lose their jobs. Staffers in two areas not mentioned in today's statement -- Metro and Sports -- are particularly worried.
The release went out to reporters as Times staffers attended the hastily called meeting in the newspaper's ballroom. Newsroom sources have told TPM that in recent days several people packed up their desk photos in anticipation they could be laid off with limited notice. Also, some staffers have been avoiding parking in the parking lot to be prepared for any sudden changes.
Among the changes to be made gradually through 2010 are: free circulation to targeted groups, an expansion of the Times' theconservatives.com, more partnership with United Press International (UPI), which, like the Times, is owned by the Unification Church.
The turmoil at the Times, which was founded by church leader Rev. Sun Myung Moon, began when three executives were fired in early November. The resignation of top editor John Solomon was announced a few days later. Solomon and the fired execs haven't been talking, but sources and reports point to a combination of Moon family politics and financial problems driving the chaos at the paper, which has long been subsidized by the Unification Church.
Adding to the trouble has been a very public set of allegations made by now-former editorial page editor Richard Miniter, who has accused the Times of religious discrimination and breach of contract.
Here's the full statement from the paper:
Washington Times Announces Additional Changes to Become a 21st Century Multimedia Company Changes include improved on-line presence, focused print edition and more exclusive news and commentaryWASHINGTON, DC - The Washington Times LLC today announced changes to refocus its position as a provider of vital information and insight to readers in the nation's capital, across the country and around the world. As with other news organizations in the United States, the company continues to reshape operations to keep pace with the dynamically changing economics of the news business.
"These changes will continue The Washington Times' transformation into a 21st century media company and reinforces its mission to provide an independent, alternative voice in the nation's capital," said President and Publisher Jonathan Slevin. "We have developed plans to secure our position and advance our vital role in an evolving media marketplace and through challenging economic times. A new Washington Times will continue to reach readers and more effectively earn new audiences via digital, broadcast, print and wireless media.
"Changes at the Times are rooted in a rigorous business analysis, applying sound and tested financial principles, and shaping plans informed by current marketplace realities," continued Slevin. "In this regard, the company is aggressively working to achieve efficiencies of scale that must include significant staff reduction of its 370 personnel."
Scheduled for incremental implementation between now and the first half of 2010, the changes announced include:
• News focused on strengths. The Washington Times news operation will operate in a highly focused manner, investing in Washington Times' well-established core strengths that include exclusive reporting and in-depth national political coverage, enterprise and investigative reporting, geo-strategic and national security news, and cultural coverage based on traditional values.
• Controlled-market local circulation. In the first quarter of 2010, the local print edition will be distributed at no cost in select areas, and home/office delivery will be offered at a premium price. No-cost distribution will focus on targeted audiences in branches of the federal government as well as at other key institutions. Single copy sales will continue through newspaper boxes and retailers at select locations. Current subscribers will also be offered a choice of subscriptions to Washington Times digital editions and The Washington Times National Weekly.
• Digital news resources: The company will expand the recently-launched theconservatives.com, subscription-based e-briefings and other new digital information
resources as part of its online strategy.
• Radio programming. The newspaper's 3-hour-a-day morning radio program, "America's
Morning News," will continue to grow through syndication by Talk Radio Network. The program currently airs in more than 70 markets nationwide.
• Partnerships. The Washington Times will work closely with its affiliate company, United
Press International (UPI), to mutually benefit both organizations through collaboration in areas such as photography and online sales, as well as leveraging UPI's multi-lingual and
international presence.
"The new Washington Times will continue to report Washington-focused news that other journalistic enterprises often overlook," said Slevin. "Fearless reporting, respect for American values, and crisply written editorials and columns will remain the centerpieces of our new strategy, and our content will continue to engage readers and viewers through a wide range of 21st century media."
numediaman
December 2, 2009 3:57 PM
Looks like the Times will stop pretending to be a newspaper (by stopping home delivery to most people) and will not pretend its a propaganda tool of the Moonies ("No-cost distribution will focus on targeted audiences in branches of the federal
government as well as at other key institutions")
But here's the deal: this model will work as propaganda, but all hopes of this model actually leading to advertising sales is nil. As someone will all too many years in the media ad game, the only prospects I would approach would be those wishing to lobby the GOP in the Congress -- in other words, lobbyists.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mad As Hell
December 2, 2009 4:05 PM
EXCELLENT work on this story. What will happen to all those poor wingnuts?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
numediaman
December 2, 2009 4:07 PM
I apologize for the bad writing. I should have written:
Looks like the Times will stop pretending to be a newspaper (by stopping home delivery to most people) and and concentrate on being a propaganda tool of the Moonies."
Sorry about that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
numediaman
December 2, 2009 4:12 PM in reply to numediaman
Man, my whole post sucked! And the second one was no better -- help!
Here is how it should have read:
Looks like the Times will stop pretending to be a newspaper (by stopping home delivery to most people) and concentrate on being a propaganda tool of the Moonies ("No-cost distribution will focus on targeted audiences in branches of the federal government as well as at other key institutions")
But here's the deal: this model will work as propaganda, but all hopes of this model actually leading to advertising sales is nil. As someone with all too many years in the media ad game, the only advertising prospects I would approach would be those wishing to lobby the GOP in the Congress -- in other words, big business and think tanks.
Sorry for the multiple bad posts -- I think I'll lay off posting for the rest of the day.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mattomega
December 2, 2009 4:19 PM
Why does TPM devote so much Web ink to the Washington Times?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Shinner23
December 2, 2009 4:31 PM
Mattome: I'm with you on this story.
I've been a fan of TPM for a long time, but lately it seems to be focusing on stories that are pretty blah, when there's other good stuff out there. Moreover, for lack of a better word-getting a "mainstreamy" feel to it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ForReally?
December 2, 2009 4:38 PM
TPM is feeling like a pawn in the global Politico domination of the planet thingy. Who does Calderone think he is? Sitting in his comfy office making a living off of "reporting" how every reporter except him is hatin' life? ForReally?!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bilejones
December 2, 2009 4:38 PM
It's nice to see some good news once in a while.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Middleclassvotingbloc
December 2, 2009 5:05 PM
The best news I have read all day. Let us know with a press release when the door hits the last one in the a-s-s
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stiggs
December 2, 2009 5:16 PM
And right before Christmas. Lovely.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rwc
December 2, 2009 5:19 PM
Even though I'm a progressive, being that I'm in the newspaper business, I usually lament the troubles of any newspaper, even the conservative ones. I make an exception for the Moony one, however. This never was a real newspaper in any sense of the word.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hunter Hussein Thompson
December 2, 2009 6:25 PM in reply to rwc
Except there are sections, e.g. Metro, Sports, Business, Foreign, etc., that have nothing to do with politics. Many, many people who have nothing to do with the paper's political stance are going to be out of a job. Very Christian of you to express your lack of sympathy. Have a blessed day.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ConservativeGuy
December 2, 2009 8:31 PM
You guys are way too negative @ the Unification Church
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ray
December 2, 2009 10:02 PM
It might appear that the change is a sensible tactical move to staunch the red ink. Obviously the Unification Movement like most businesses is financially squeezed now.
However there is an unprecedented public spat where the Unification Movement announced that Preston Moon, the boss of the Times, is not following his father Rev Moon's direction. This makes the whole episode a lot more interesting and possibly damaging than a financial retrenchment.
Presumably Rev Moon does not want to downsize his main claim to credibility. He seems proud of how much money he has sunk into the Times.
It seems Preston has the power to do what he wants and is willing to break off his part of the empire to keep it solvent.
It's interesting he is willing to break the unity of the 'True Family" over cost cutting at the Times. Mr Bottom Line is willing to cut loose the family and keep his share of the inheritance.
It's funny because as a business move it makes sense and could work out.
But if one of the 'True Children' of the 'True Parents' is making a grab for the money that may not jive with most peoples idea of a 'True family'
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Gordon Sewer
December 2, 2009 11:18 PM
Slevin wants to use cutbacks to achieve "efficiencies of scale."
To paraphrase the great Inigo Montoya, I do not think that term means what he thinks it means.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
April 2, 2010 1:52 PM
great story Justin. very well written
kamagra l m65
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?