TPM LiveWire

Boehner: I'm All For Bipartisanship -- As Long As It Favors The GOP

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) provided an interesting take on bipartisanship today, saying that "when it comes to bipartisan legislation you've got to look at the balance. If the balance leans in our direction, and things that we believe in, I would think that we would support it."

Boehner gave an interview to NPR's Morning Edition that perhaps shed some light on why achieving bipartisanship legislation has been so difficult.

He said that the Republicans have "reached out, over the last year, and we're going to continue to reach out. But there's been no reaching back from the White House or from our Democrat colleagues."

On the other hand, Boehner said he's not concerned that trying to reach bipartisan solutions will alienate the conservative base, because "just because you sit down to work with Democrats doesn't mean you're going to throw your principles out the window."

So, he said, if the Democrats have any hope of achieving bipartisan legislation on anything, they have to...throw their principles out the window>?

When it comes to bipartisan legislation you've got to look at the balance. If the balance leans in our direction, and things that we believe in, I would think that we would support it. But if we're going to continue to bail out the states, and continue to pour money into silly government programs that don't create jobs, I'm going to have a very difficult time supporting it.

Comments (16) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

January 27, 2010 12:45 PM   

The GOP definition of bipartisanship has always been "the other guy working to get along with me." Boehner as much as said it here--we reached out to Democats, meaning we invited them to agree with us. If they don't come to us, then there is no bipartisanship.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 27, 2010 12:47 PM   

And even still, a qualifier: "... I would think that we would support it."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

January 27, 2010 12:58 PM   

Congressional Republicans have been reaching out to Democrats, and neither Congressional Democrats nor the White House has made any attempt to reach out to Republicans? Maybe in the through-the-looking-glass world the Republican Party seems to inhabit...

I have said all along that the Republican definition of "bipartisan" is "do it our way."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 27, 2010 1:30 PM    in reply to slb

It's factually called Bizarro World.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 27, 2010 1:06 PM   

John "Too Tan" Boehner has spent too much time under sun lamp. That said, he is more resolute than the Dems.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 27, 2010 1:21 PM   

There in lays the problem as to why we are losing the republic.
He puts party politics before country. As the proverb goes...
"He who puts party politics before country, shall lose both, the party and the country."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 27, 2010 1:34 PM   

He said that the Republicans have "reached out, over the last year, and we're going to continue to reach out. But there's been no reaching back from the White House or from our Democrat colleagues."

Um, John, reaching out takes more than just one finger.

Apparently, as Matt Bivens reports in The Nation

This whole "change the tone" shtick was always hideously cynical, as Michael Tomasky has laid out in the American Prospect. So in a sense it's refreshing to hear it finally, gleefully turned on its head by Grover Norquist, a conservative who has the ear of the Bush Administration and is an old College Republican buddy of Karl Rove, the White House political strategist. Norquist contradicts the President, saying what we already know: Republicans are working to make political discourse uglier, not more civil. "We are trying to change the tones in the state capitals -- and turn them toward bitter nastiness and partisanship," he tells the Denver Post. "Bipartisanship is another name for date rape."

ugliness is still the GOP's MO.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 27, 2010 1:39 PM    in reply to cwnidog

"Um, John, reaching out takes more than just one finger."

Awesome comment.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 27, 2010 2:45 PM    in reply to gayinmt

Yes very to the point

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 27, 2010 2:40 PM   

Heard the interview, his idea of bipartisanship is getting some conservadems to vote on their agenda. His message is the same old Reagan Bush crap that got us here. Lower taxes, (for who?) we know how far wealth trickles through marble floors. They don't create jobs, they create wealth. Record deficits, let's reduce revenues. This guy really thinks he's in the driver's seat, and in some ways he is, unfortunately.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 27, 2010 2:44 PM   

Create jobs? WHERE, nobody's buying anything. What they buy is not supporting American jobs except for underpaid retail workers. Please explain how if there's no customer, you're going to create a market.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 27, 2010 2:59 PM   

Visualize a scenario in which Republicans run in the streets buck naked, rape, pillage and plunder and have sex with wildebeest.

Even then, Democrats would find a way of looking worse than the wildebeest luvin' Republicans.

It doesn't make a damned difference what the Republicans say or do, as the Dems would still take a great situation and metaphorically defecate all over themselves. The problem isn't the Repubs. The problem lies within. Come November, voters won't care about the drivel Boehner trots out. They will, however, remember that the Dems even with their super-majorities failed to do anything but engage in internecine fighting.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 27, 2010 3:02 PM   

His statement is proof that the Republican have NO intention of getting involved in anything BI unless it's in the men's room of their caucus meeting room.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 27, 2010 11:18 PM   

Is Boehner ever sober?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 7:48 PM   

John Boehner...the true Obstructionist!

This guy is nothing more than a self absorbed, spoiled, ego maniac!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

June 12, 2010 5:10 AM   

Heard the interview, his idea of bipartisanship is getting some conservadems to vote on their agenda. His message is the same old Reagan Bush crap that got us here. Lower taxes, (for who?) we know how far wealth trickles through marble floors. They don't create jobs, they create wealth. Record deficits, let's reduce revenues. This guy really thinks he's in the driver's seat, and in some ways he is, unfortunately.

m65 kamagra

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on