TPM LiveWire

Cornyn: Lott's Comments 'Far More Innocuous' Than Reid's

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Over the past few days, Republicans have been comparing Sen. Harry Reid's (D-NV) comments on President Obama's race to former Sen. Trent Lott's (R-MS) in 2002, saying Reid should step down from his role as Senate majority leader, as Lott did.

Today, Sen. John Cornyn, the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, went a step further and said Reid's comments were actually worse than Lott's.

"Frankly, I don't expect Sen. Reid to resign. What this is about is his hypocrisy and the hypocrisy of folks on the other side when Trent Lott said something that was far more innocuous than the racially tinged comments that Sen. Reid made," Cornyn said this morning on MSNBC.

Video after the jump.

To compare: Reid said, in a private conversation before the 2008 election, that Obama had a chance to be the first black president because he was "light-skinned" and didn't have a "Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one."

Lott, in a televised tribute to Sen. Strom Thurmond for his 100th birthday, said: "I want to say this about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either."

Thurmond ran for president in 1948 on a platform that declared, "We stand for the segregation of the races and the racial integrity of each race."

Lott also had a history of ties to white supremacist groups.

Join the Conversation!

40 comments

Recommend Recommend (1)

January 11, 2010 10:58 AM   

Is this guy serious? Harry Reid implying Obama's light skin and non "Negro" diallect helped him become elected is not the same as implying Segregation Now, Segregation Forever was the way the country should have went. The only thing Harry Reid should apologize for is being such an out of touch dork for using the phrase "Negro diallect". That is how non-racists talked in the 60's. Its 2010 Mr Reid. Please retire so we can get a real leader in the Senate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:59 AM    in reply to Seeryer

"Segregation Now, Segregation Forever", LMAO, but leave it to the hypocrites a.k.a. republicans to really think Black folks will get the FAUX outrage on this one....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 10:58 AM   

The difference between Reid and Lott is that when Reid sees a Harvard-educated black man who doesn't speak with a "negro accent," he sees a President. All that Lott sees is another opportunity to say the N-word - the offensive one that ends with an "R" and has two "Gs" in the middle.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:00 AM   

Republicans are revealing how cynical they are about race and how little truth, facts, and reality mean to them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

EH

user-pic

January 11, 2010 2:33 PM    in reply to Rich in NJ

I don't think it's like that at all, and I think Cornyn is perfectly convinced and serious about what he's saying.

He gives it away by calling Reid "hypocritical." It's an inference to say that Reid didn't mean or believe what he was saying at the time he made the comment, and even if he didn't it only means that Reid is not racist. Cornyn would seem to be saying that Reid's comment is worse than Lott's because it was done for strategy or electoral or some other non-racist purpose. That's the hypocrisy he sees.

So "hypocrisy" is an interesting adjective to use in comparing Reid to Lott because it implies that Lott was *not* being hypocritical. Cornyn is merely saying that Lott was just saying what he believed, that to the degree that it was a racist statement, it is just a part of who Lott actually is. Nevermind that it means Lott is actually a racist, because he was just being honest.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 5:41 PM    in reply to EH

You really think that Cornyn thinks that Reid's comments are racist? If he can tie his own shoes and feed himself, I don't believe that for a nanosecond.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:06 AM   

John Cornyn apparently thinks that he can fool the public and speaks as if we don't know the history behind Thurman who left the Democratic party to begin a SEGRATION PARTY" to be against intergration!

THurman who had a Black daughter denied this daughter until just befor he died or perhaps after he died it became known as revealed by all news accounts. It was reported that he took care of her for years but refused to acknowledge her

Perhaps Mr. Cornyn should understand that he cannot fool the American public and that we stay up on our history

Republicans a party that has ignored the AFrican American Community and have very few Blacks in the party and thousands who walked out last year have no standing to critize anyone on race relations

BOttom line as George Will said on Sunday and embrassed Liz Chaney when she tried to pretend to jump on Sen. Reid's comment as if she was defending racism, a topic which her party know a lot about but from a negative prospective, said, "Sen. Reid's comments are so far from racism, you cannot call them racist, and what Sen. Reid said was true"

Very surprising coming from George Will but he spoke the truth.

Sen. Reid spoke the truth and Republicans are attempting to use his words for political gain when they have absolutely no standing in the African American Community and have done nothing to earn the respect of the community.

African Americans are laughing out loud at Republicans!

They only elected Micheal Steel for cover since we have an African AAmerican President

Republicans, since Mr. Steel is the most Self Seeking Money Makin for himself, throwing diggs at his own party and trying to recover when you scold him

How's that working for you Republicans?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:07 AM   

One wonders when Cornyn and the rest of his ideological compatriots are going to start getting outraged at the racist posters, slogans and protest banners used by the Teabaggers at their rallies.

But I'm not holding my breath. Racism like *that,* Cornyn can live with. Harry Reid, OTOH, gives Cornyn the vapors.

GMAMFB.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:20 AM    in reply to Signalman

I'm wondering about that too. These are the same people who preside over racist teabagger rallies and see nothing wrong with the racist invective being spewed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:18 AM   

i started reading TPM when Trent Lott did that krazy thing back in tha day

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:21 AM   

Cornyn and other racists like him fail to understand that the issue is not, and never has been, whether you see the color of a man's skin. The question is, whether you see anything ELSE?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 7:07 PM    in reply to georgecs

Okay, so I'm a white guy: Please, all people of non-North-Central-European heritage (I'm not a believer in "race"; skin color is skin color and the only "race" is preceded by the words "the human..."), tell me to STFU if I'm off base here and I will comply.

1. Race-based classism is a situation where arbitrary skin color differences have been used to allow one cultural heritage to dominate all others. That's "racism."

2. Casual racism is certainly insidious and the most difficult to stop (I'm speaking for myself and for many others in the dominating culture). But it's not the worst kind of racism. Harry Reid exposed the underbelly of a casual racism within himself, though I suspect he did not express that casual racism with malice.

To me, that "worst kind" is that racism delivered with malice, with intent to belittle, minimize, or keep a whole segment of the population under the cultural boot heel of a (THE) dominating culture here. I believe the type of spew coming from the mouths and deeds of the Strom Thurmonds and the David Dukes of this country is delivered with the express intent to harm, to minimize, to control all who are not members of the WASP overclass.

As such, I personally believe Reid's casual racism can be better dealt with. He might actually learn something from this Foot-In-Mouth moment of personal enlightenment. On the other hand, the Lotts, Thurmonds and Dukes of the land have no interest in being anything but the biggots they are. There is a clear difference between these two examples for me.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:22 PM    in reply to TheRealFish

great analysis and I totally agree.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:24 AM   

No wonder he's angry. If he'd had his way in and Strom was elected, Obama would have never had a chance.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:29 AM   

Spoken like a man with 5 years before re-election in a state that appreciates his rhetoric.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:39 AM   

This is obviously, and entirely about actually him actually believing he's scoring points. Kinda like a five year old hitting the backboard and claiming it went through the hoop. Pathetic.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:41 AM    in reply to dick c

I believe I actually typed actually one too many times.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:45 AM   

Where is Cornyn, anyway, on the List of Dumbest Senators?

3, maybe 4?

1. Inhofe

2. Kyl

3. Lieberman

4. Cornhole

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 12:16 PM    in reply to biff diggerence

Lieberman's not dumb at all. He's just an asshole. There's a big difference.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 12:21 PM    in reply to jfields

Not so sure about that.

In terms of brains, he isn't Barney Frank by a long shot.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

EH

user-pic

January 11, 2010 2:23 PM    in reply to biff diggerence

Nah, I think Lieberman does what he does on purpose. He enjoys it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 12:23 PM    in reply to biff diggerence

I believe there is a 4-way tie, Inhofe, Kyl, Lieberman and Cornyn all with ZERO!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 12:07 PM   

Josh has done a service by framing this as "Repubs are too selfish to notice their own overt racism." I know I'm guilty of many insensitive remarks in several categories, but a least I know my own heart and my ability to get along with/tolerate mostly everybody.

But Josh also said, "I don't think I agree that Republicans lack any principles." This is demonstratively wrong. Their movement has proven to be, finally, false on its own terms, fraudulent, and a total farce. We are all witnesses to its death-throes, which includes their embrace of literally any idea to further their cause -- namely, to exploit anyone and anything for The Almighty $$$. The rest is just inane Republican chatter.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 12:10 PM   

Cornyn is exactly in line with the code of ethics on talking about race in place among most isolated white people (liberal or conservative in the country) -- the thing that is most shameful is to call attention to race at all. Calling attention to attitudes still prevalent about race is equally shameful.

There was an interesting study of elementary school kids who were raised with the "color-blind" approach to race relations, namely saying nothing about racial identity at all. Of children raised in this manner, a majority answered yes to the question "my parents like people of other races less than people of my own race", despite having never been told anything at all about their parents' attitude about race.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 12:16 PM   

Yes, Trent Lott stating that segregation would have prevented a lot of the problems that we have today is totally innocuous! Who on earth, other than hyper-sensitive limousine liberals, could POSSIBLY be offended by that? We know Senators from Texas don't find the idea of segregation offensive at all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 12:17 PM   

advocating racism does make you a racist= that would be the KKKKLANSMEN PARTY OF ALL SOUTHERN RAICTS PIGS.


If Obama came from an inner-city and wasn'y the best and brighttess....9THANK GOODNESS AFTER GWB)

he would not have become president.......If he had skin color like his father....he would not have become the president.


I hope no one talks like GWB and runs for presidency again.....


that means you FROG THROAT DICK CHENEY


THE GRANDE OLE WHITE PARTY SHOULD NOT TALK ABOUT RACE......THEY DON'T HAVE ANY NEGRO'S IN THE PARTY AND MIKEY STEEL E IS NOT A NEGRO NEITHER IS DOUG CHAPPED LIPS CRISTY

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 12:26 PM   

There are lots of things you can say about our President. Harry Reid has his thoughts and expressed them in public. Rep. Reid has also said that you can "Smell" the American tourists when they are in the Halls of Congress.
He is talking about your parent and children.
What makes me sick is the Black Congress men and women that give him the "Pass". Black on "Light colored Black" is the Democrate way in Washington in the Obama Whitehouse.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 12:28 PM   

Er, sorry.

Any list would have to include Bunning way up top. Now there's a barely functioning cortex.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 12:29 PM   

If I remember correctly, Sen Lott was not thought of highly as Majority leader (was he maj, or Min. leader at thhe time?), within the Republican party, I thought at the time that his remarks were used as a pretext by Republicans to remove him. In other words, they didn't find the words themselves offensive, just the person saying them.

Of course, they rememmber differently, it was those libruls and leftist media that drove him out of the senate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 1:25 PM   

Thank you TPM for printing the words and positions of Reid, Cornyn, Lott and Thurmond. That's reporting. Facts won't make a difference for the obstinate, but we can see the record for ourselves.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 2:42 PM   

I'm so very tired about the equivalancy between what was said and the intent behind the words. Sen. Reid spoke truth. As an person of color, I know that what he said was the truth. The lighter the skin the higher one can climb in communities of color. Why? Because those who wield power,(ie: white folks) are more comfortable whith those whose skin tone is closer to their own. This is the simple fact. His language may have been inartful, but true nonetheless.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

EdA

user-pic

January 11, 2010 3:17 PM   

This is the same John Cornyn, of course, a former Texas Supreme Court Judge (honest), who explicitly condoned the roughing up of judges whose opinions one objected to.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 10:02 PM   

One word: Tulia.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 10:02 PM   

I think they are still scoring some points with the same people who went along with the Bush administration lies that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and was responsible for 911. Those people didn't go away. They can't analyze or synthesize or any other kind of higher levels of thinking. We see the obvious here-they don't.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 10:14 PM   

the moron content of the republican senate is very high. not total, but very, very, high.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 10:42 PM   

You might be a racist if: You can't see how Reid's comment is nothing like, let alone worse, than Lott's.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 10:56 PM   

Cornyn reminds me of the gearshift knob in my car.
I wonder if there's a 1-2-3-4-R "H" pattern under what's left of his hair.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 11:41 PM   

If John Cornyn thinks he's qualified to speak about who's a racist, then shouldn't journalists question HIS racist past?

http://timshorrock.blogspot.com/2006/07/cornyn-george-wallace-and-me.html

Cornyn was a supporter of George Wallace. Not 1982 "I'm sorry for everything" George Wallace. 1968 "Segregation forever!" George Wallace.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 1, 2010 9:34 PM   

Cornyn is exactly in line with the code of ethics on talking about race in place among most isolated white people (liberal or conservative in the country) -- the thing that is most shameful is to call attention to race at all. Calling attention to attitudes still prevalent about race is equally shameful.

There was an interesting study of elementary school kids who were raised with the "color-blind" approach to race relations, namely saying nothing about racial identity at all. Of children raised in this manner, a majority answered yes to the question "my parents like people of other races less than people of my own race", despite having never been told anything at all about their parents' attitude about race.

m65 kamagra

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on