
Rudy Giuliani appeared on CNN this afternoon in an attempt to explain what he meant when he claimed that no domestic terrorist attacks happened under President George W. Bush.
"I usually say, 'We had no major domestic attacks under President Bush since September 11,'" he told Wolf Blitzer.
"I did omit the words, 'since September 11,' and I apologize for that," he went on. "I do remember September 11. In fact, Wolf, I remember it every single day and usually, frequently during the day."
Video after the jump.
Earlier, the former mayor of New York caught a lot of heat for saying, "What [President Obama] should be doing is following the right things Bush did. One of the right things he did was treat this as a war on terror. We had no domestic attacks under Bush. We've had one under Obama."
In his explanation just now, Giuliani told Blitzer that be meant the Fort Hood shootings as that one attack that happened under Obama.
"Fort Hood was clearly an Islamic terrorist attack," he said. "He was clearly under the influence of Islamic terrorism."
He also said the anthrax attacks of 2001 don't count, because they never proven to be done in the name of "Islamic terrorism."
Interestingly, much of what Giuliani talked about, both in the interview with CNN and this morning's appearance on Good Morning America, was that Obama had used the phrase "war on terror" in Thursday's speech about terrorism.
"The president himself has finally now come to the conclusion that he can say 'war on terror,'" Giuliani said.
But, as Blitzer pointed out, Obama didn't say "war on terror." He said "war against al-Qaeda."
Giuliani brushed the point aside, saying only that focusing on al-Qaeda was "too narrow."
A spokesman for Giuliani explained his comments similarly this afternoon.
Even the White House had something to say about the mayor's comments. Asked about it today, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said, "I think he mentioned that there weren't any domestic terror attacks in the previous administration, and sort of interesting that the mayor of New York had forgotten that."
jenesq
January 8, 2010 6:12 PM
OK, the Ft. Hood shooting was a terrorist attack...what about all the mass killings committed by non-Muslims, including white Christians? Some of them (the Unitarian church in TN is a recent example that leaps to mind...OKC is the most egregious example) are religously/politically motivated, too, just like the Ft. Hood shootings. Are those not also terrorist attacks? Why do white guys with guns and explosives get a pass to be a garden-variety deranged killer, even when they're acting with the same type of motivation as any brown-skinned terrorist?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BeeClone
January 8, 2010 6:45 PM in reply to jenesq
For Rudy if the people doing the attacking are not Muslims then it wasn't a terrorist attack.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
docrocktex
January 8, 2010 7:26 PM in reply to BeeClone
It's not just Rudy, the GOPers do not consider anything terrorism unless a brown person does it.
That's why Timothy McVeigh, the guy who killed Dr. Tiller, the old guy who killed the Holocaust museum guard, the guys in Pittsburgh that killed 3 cops, etc. are not considered terrorists, and their acts not deemed terrorism.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mJJ
January 9, 2010 5:02 PM in reply to BeeClone
That is far to highly finessed. Either Rudy was loaded up on booze or he deliberately lied in an effort to pad the situation for our party. He is a total embarrassment to honest Republicans. He is like so many other politicians who fail to hold our party members accountable while zooming on any problem with Democrats, This infernal exaggeration on the part of Republicans is what makes our party look brain dead or just silly or just a big bunch of liars.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
John M
January 9, 2010 5:21 AM in reply to jenesq
This is a listing of "terrorist" attacks during the GW Bush presidency:
September 11, 2001 attacks. As CNN noted, "On September 11, 2001, four U.S. planes hijacked by terrorists crashed into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people in a matter of hours."
2001 anthrax attacks. A March 2004 State Department report on "Significant Terrorist Incidents, 1961-2003" quotes then-Attorney General John Ashcroft saying of the letters containing anthrax mailed to various targets: "When people send anthrax through the mail to hurt people and invoke terror, it's a terrorist act." Five people were killed as a result of those letters in the autumn of 2001.
2001 shoe bomber attempted attack. In June 2008, then-Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff described Reid's December 2001 attempt "to blow up a trans-Atlantic plane with a shoe bomb" as an attempt to "carry out terrorist operations for Al-Qaeda."
2002 attack against El Al ticket counter at LAX. In July 2002, Hesham Mohamed Hadayet opened fire at an El Al Airlines ticket counter at Los Angeles International Airport killing two people and wounding four others before being shot dead. A 2004 Justice Department report stated that Hadayet's case had been "officially designated as an act of international terrorism."
2002 DC-area sniper. The state of Virginia indicted Washington, D.C.-area sniper John Allen Muhammad -- along with his accomplice, a minor at the time -- on "an act of terrorism" for one of the murders he committed during a three-week shooting spree across Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. Muhammad was convicted, sentenced to death, and subsequently executed for the crime.
2006 UNC SUV attack. In March 2006, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill graduate Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar drove an SUV into an area of campus, striking nine pedestrians. According to reports, Taheri-azar said he acted because he wanted to "avenge the deaths or murders of Muslims around the world." Taheri-azar also reportedly stated in a letter: "I was aiming to follow in the footsteps of one of my role models, Mohammad Atta, one of the 9/11/01 hijackers, who obtained a doctorate degree."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DebbieKat
January 9, 2010 1:42 PM in reply to John M
Don't forget about the 2006 attacks on the Jewish Center in Seattle.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14082298/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CajunModerate
January 11, 2010 10:19 AM in reply to jenesq
that's exactly the point i was going to make. bravo.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hank
January 8, 2010 6:16 PM
I mean what I say and I say what I mean. Except when I don't. Then I don't mean what I say and I don't say what I mean. Tra la la, la la la la la. 911 911 911 911 911 911.
It's almost like this guy got out of the looney bin.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hychka
January 8, 2010 6:18 PM
And, the murder of Dr Tiller...what was that? Chopped liver??!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hollywood
January 8, 2010 6:35 PM in reply to hychka
Dr. Tiller was murdered by christian religious jihadists putting one of their more deranged personalities up to the job just like the foreign jihadists put their most vulnerable up to the job. When the christian nut case bombed the Atlanta Olympics, a gay bar, and an women's clinic, that was OK with the right wing because he was a christian. That is the crazy they can relate to after all.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
January 8, 2010 11:26 PM in reply to hollywood
Because, as Brit Hume pointed out, if you're a Christian, you can get redemption from ANYTHING. Jeebus.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
strohdog
January 8, 2010 6:30 PM
"...under the influence of Islamic terrorism."? What the hell, Rudy?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Druid
January 8, 2010 9:05 PM in reply to strohdog
I thought that phrase was Gem. I think it is appropriate, there is a brainwashing element at work in a lot of these cases. Usually the dealer is a Cleric.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pakaal
January 9, 2010 3:36 PM in reply to strohdog
It would be more grammatically accurate to say Giuliani is "under the influence" of Islamic terrorism, since he seems a bit terrified.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
expat46
January 8, 2010 6:34 PM
Senator Obama comments about Gulliani at the 2008 Al Smith dinner "I mean, who would have thought that a cross-dressing mayor from New York City would have a tough time winning the Republican nomination? It's shocking"
I bet that felt good
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 8, 2010 6:38 PM in reply to expat46
Did he really say that? That was good. I wish he'd give more of those jabs as President Obama.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
January 8, 2010 11:20 PM in reply to lousgirl84
Just before that: "One other thing, I have never, not once, put lipstick on a pig - or a pitbull - or myself. Rudy Giuliani, that's one for you."
"Here's another revelation, John McCain is onto something. There was a point in my life when I started palling around with a pretty ugly crowd. I've gotta be honest - these guys were serious deadbeats, they were lowlifes, they were unrepentant, no-good punks - that's right, I've been a member of the United States Senate."
The whole thing is good, check it out:
http://crooksandliars.com/silentpatriot/alfred-e-smith-dinner-obama-zings-mc
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pcmcgovern
January 8, 2010 6:37 PM
Clearly, Richard Reid and the anthrax mailings weren't terrorist attacks. Yeah.....you keep backpedaling Rudy. It's getting fun to watch! Almost like Orly!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
January 8, 2010 11:34 PM in reply to pcmcgovern
Well, he cleared that up. The "one" terrorist attack was not the underwear bomber (so he didn't have to compare to the shoe bomber), he was talking SUCCESSFUL terrorist attacks, i.e. the Fort Hood doctor.
Of course, the antrax attacks weren't terrorist, because no one (especially no one ISLAMIC) took credit for that. So any fear anyone felt did not actually constitute "terror."
And those people shot at LAX's El Al terminal? That wasn't "terror" because ... uh ... um ... it didn't take place in NY? No, cuz the Dr. was in Texas. Let's see, the LA shooter wasn't a terrorist cuz, uh, he only killed 3 people. There. That's it. 3 is not enough for terror. It's only enough for a little wariness. Yeah, that's it. Not fear. Certainly not "terror."
What a tool.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 8, 2010 6:38 PM
If I could vomit on the guy I would. This man is a sorry excuse for a human being. When your own kids hate you, you know you suck.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Early Out
January 8, 2010 6:44 PM in reply to lousgirl84
"If your children ever find out how lame you really are, they'll murder you in your sleep." - Frank Zappa
We can only hope.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
WaitWut?
January 8, 2010 6:47 PM in reply to lousgirl84
HAHAHAHAHA!!! I don't think I've ever wanted to vomit on anyone!
Apparently, y'all are missing Rudy's point. It ain't tersm unless the guy is one of them Mooslims. 'Cuz there the only ones that do the tersm. White folk just exercise their right to free speech and bear arms.
Srsly, this guy should lose his voice. Literally and figuratively.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
January 8, 2010 11:45 PM in reply to WaitWut?
Yeah, vomit doesn't come out of the orifice I'd want to use.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
January 8, 2010 8:05 PM in reply to lousgirl84
I like how you just scrape the meat right off the bone.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 8, 2010 9:15 PM in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe
Time is too precious to waste - that's my motto. Get right to it!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
January 8, 2010 9:26 PM in reply to lousgirl84
I'm just enjoying watching Maddow vivisect Rudy on TRMS right now. She did some serious meat scraping!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 8, 2010 10:11 PM in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe
I am still working on briefs and am bummed I am missing her show. Maybe I'll get home to catch her on the repeat at 8 PM (LA time).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
January 8, 2010 10:16 PM in reply to lousgirl84
You shouldnt miss her segment on him. She even spotted him some slack and still with his own words just immolated as a politican. It was like watching an annoying turd get its due as you flush it away...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
January 9, 2010 3:05 PM in reply to lousgirl84
You can also pick it up the next day (or later) on MSNBC's web site.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
January 8, 2010 11:47 PM in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe
I heart Rachel and I'm not even gay. (Not that there's anything WRONG with that.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
January 9, 2010 12:38 AM in reply to Cal Gal
I heart her knowing she's gay. Makes no difference.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
January 8, 2010 6:44 PM
I was never able to understand how or why what happened at Ft. Hood was terrorism. There was no underlying political motive. It was not intended to, nor did it, strike fear into any segment of the population. It was simply a trooper who didn't want to be redeployed, and snapped and started killing people.
But Rudy has made it clear for me. Not only Ft. Hood, but terrorism in general. Here is what is clearly the definition:
Any killing, or attempted killing, of a non-Muslim by a Muslim is terrorism. No matter who or why or where. Muslim on non-Muslim equals terrorism.
If the perpetrator cannot be proven to be a Muslim, a la the anthrax attacks, it is not terrorism. If the victims are not non-Muslims, it is not terrorism.
Even if the purpose of the attack is to scare people into changing their behavior, a la Dr. Tiller, the lack of a Muslim pulling the trigger keeps it from being terrorism.
I am so glad to finally understand that now.
Thanks, Rudy!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
docrocktex
January 8, 2010 7:29 PM in reply to farnsworth
Welcome to our show.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
January 9, 2010 12:01 AM in reply to farnsworth
Actually, I can understand it. You're absolutely right, and this latest "terrorist" fits a similar profile. And as someone pointed out recently, the profile is EDUCATED, dissaffected, and charismatically converted relatively rich guys. Aka Osama bin Laden. Aka, actually, the Bader-Meinhoff Gang. Aka the 9/11 pilots.
This thread has cemented for me the fact that "terrorism" is strictly a political word. Otherwise you just talk about murder, and mass murder, and crazy people. But in that the politics of the right here and in the Islamic world, the politics of oil and religion, demonization is a quick and easy tool of propaganda and brainwashing.
And poor people aren't really subject to brainwashing, are they? They're too busy just living. It is the indolent youth who can be brainwashed: see Tom Cruise.
Love of money may be the root of all evil, but religion is the fertilizer.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cwnidog
January 8, 2010 6:53 PM
I seem to remember reading about Lincoln saying something appropriate re: keeping your mouth shut and letting people think you're a fool rather than opening it and removing all doubt.
Rudy needs to open a big can of STFU.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
gobydoc
January 9, 2010 12:16 PM in reply to cwnidog
That was a Mark Twain quote I believe
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rich in NJ
January 8, 2010 6:55 PM
Q: How do you know when Rudy is lying?
A: When his lips are moving.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lono65
January 8, 2010 6:57 PM
Hey, Rudy...do you happen to remember the name of that sniper fella who randomly killed 10 people in the DC area in 2002? C'mon, you can do it...John something-or-other, right? Starts with an "M" and ends with "uhammad." Ring any bells, yet?
What a shameless douche.
Full disclosure: I don't know that Muhammad's acts would be considered "Muslim terrorism" because I got the impression that he wasn't a terribly religious guy. But terrorism is terrorism, isn't it? I don't see this line that Rudy seems to have drawn between Muslim terrorism and Other terrorism.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DebbieKat
January 9, 2010 1:50 PM in reply to Lono65
In all fairness, the only purpose to that guy's acts were to cover up an intended killing of his wife, which he never succeeded in doing. He was just an idiot. But happened to have a muslim name.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
January 8, 2010 7:00 PM
What about Muhammad and Malvo? Was the DC Sniper case, where Muhammed admitted to admiring Osama bin Laden and approving of the 9/11 attacks and described the murders as part of a jihad...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
January 8, 2010 7:08 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
Crap!
I thought I understood!
Crap!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Just Keep It Simple Stupid
January 8, 2010 7:34 PM
Oh Rudy... now you know why you weren't even going to win New York during the Republican Primaries.... What a sad and pathetic man.....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mchuge
January 8, 2010 7:43 PM
Still denying the shoe bomber and the anthrax though.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ETSpoon
January 8, 2010 7:49 PM
I just looked up the word "weasel" and Rudy's picture was the definition.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Africanlivedit
January 8, 2010 7:53 PM
Ft. Hood attacks were NOT a terrorist incident. Terrorist attacks solely target civilians. The Ft. Hood incident involved the murder of soldiers. Terrorist attacks, by definition, are aimed at killing civilians to strike fear into the public in order to have a government give into terrorist demands.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbeats
January 8, 2010 7:54 PM
Terror Attacks Under Bush: 22
Deaths: 3010
* July 27, 2008 - Jim David Adkisson shoots two persons in a Unitarian Church
* May 5, 2008 - Pipe Bomb detonated outside Federal Courthouse in San Diego
* March 7th, 2008 - Bomb detonated at Times Square Recruiting center in NY.
* December 6, 2007: Chad Altman and Sergio Baca were arrested for the arson of Dr. Curtis Boyd's clinic in Albuquerque.
* May 9, 2007: Unidentified person deliberately set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Virginia Beach, Virginia.
* April 25, 2007: A package left at a women's health clinic in Austin, Texas contained an explosive device capable of inflicting serious injury or death.
* April 16, 2007 - Terrorism? Virginia Tech Shootings.
* September 13, 2006 David McMenemy crashed his car into the Edgerton Women's Care Center in Davenport, Iowa. He then doused the lobby in gasoline and then started a fire. McMenemy committed these acts in the belief that the center was performing abortions, however Edgerton is not an abortion clinc.
* March 2006 - Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar, an Iranian-born graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, drives an SUV onto a crowded part of campus, injuring nine.
* December 12, 2005: Patricia Hughes and Jeremy Dunahoe threw a Molotov cocktail at a clinic in Shreveport, Louisiana.
* July 4, 2005: A clinic Palm Beach, Florida was the target of an arson.
* October 1, 2005 - Joel Henry Hinrichs III detonated a bomb near the packed football stadium at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Oklahoma killing himself in the process.
* October 2002 - John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo conduct the Beltway Sniper Attacks
* July 4, 2002 - An Egyptian gunman opens fire at an El Al ticket counter in Los Angeles International Airport, killing two Israelis before being killed himself.
* May 2002: Luke Helder injures 6 by placing pipebombs in mailboxes in the Midwest.
* January 5, 2002 - 15yo Charles Bishop, expressing sympathy for bin Laden, crashes his Cessna into a Tampa Florida Skyscraper
* June 11, 2001: Tacoma, Washington bombing destroys a Clinic Wall
* December 12, 2001 - Jewish Defense League plot by Chairman Irv Rubin and follower Earl Krugel to blow up the King Fahd Mosque in Culver City, California, and the office of Lebanese-American Rep. Darrell Issa, foiled.
* December 22, 2001 - Richard Reid attempts to bomb flight 63
* November 2001 - Clayton Waagner mails powder-laden envelopes to 550+ Clinics, is convicted on 51 counts in 2003.
* September 2001 - 5 People Killed, 17 Infected by Anthrax laden letters, $250million spent cleaning up postal facilities.
* September 11, 2001 - 15 Saudis, 2, UAEs, 1 Egyptian and 1 Lebanese Hijackers kill 2,973 persons, cost billions of dollars, and cause permenant, irreparable damages to modern societies freedoms to the United States citizens.
Terror Attacks Under Obama: 6
Deaths: 15
* Christmas Underpants Bomber
* November 5, 2009 - Ft. Hood Gunman killed 13, injured 30.
* June 11, 2009 - White Supremacist Von Brunn kills woman at Holocaust Museum
* May 31, 2009 - Dr. George Tiller Murdered
* February 4th, 2009 - West Memphis, Arkansas, United States. Trent P. Pierce Chairman of the Arkansas State Medical Board was critically injured in a car bombing that occurred in his drive way.
* January 22, 2009 (2 days into office) - Matthew Derosia drives his SUV into a Planned Parenthood facility
source
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/an5nk/rudy_giuliani_we_had_no_domestic_attacks_under/c0iffg9
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hank
January 8, 2010 8:09 PM in reply to rbeats
That's some awesome research, thanks for doing the legwork.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 8, 2010 10:03 PM in reply to rbeats
Yes it was good research thanks for posting. See my post below re Richard Lugar's statement on Cheney and Obama's handling of the terrorism threats and the war.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mentata
January 9, 2010 12:21 PM in reply to rbeats
In doing some research before the Iraq invasion I found a very thorough database from Rand Corp that cataloged and tallied death tolls from acts of terrorism worldwide over something like 15 to 20 years prior. The first thing these combined facts illuminated was that acts of domestic terrorism far outweighed acts of international terrorism in all countries. It was quite fascinating.
Unfortunately, in the run up to the Iraq war and the associated "War on Terror" political hoopla, Rand took the database offline claiming the definition of terrorism had become too controversial to continue. As I see it they buried the data under a rug because they are often enough a tool of the GOP. Wingnuts 1, Reality 0, Taxpayers minus the several million the database surely cost us to compile.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bruce Webb
January 9, 2010 12:49 PM in reply to rbeats
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle_Jewish_Federation_shooting
"The Seattle Jewish Federation shooting occurred on July 28, 2006, at around 4:00 p.m. Pacific time, when Naveed Afzal Haq shot six women, one fatally, at the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle building in the Belltown neighborhood of Seattle, Washington, USA."
"Klein told the Seattle Post-Intelligencer that Haq "...stated that he was a Muslim, (and) this was his personal statement against Jews and the Bush administration for giving money to Jews, and for us Jews for giving money to Israel, about Hezbollah, the war in Iraq, and he wanted to talk to CNN."
Klein was five months pregnant and intercepted a bullet directed at her abdomen with her harm.
Haq is an American with a history of mental illness, but was abundantly clear about his intent telling his mother that he was a martyr. The King County Prosecutor refused to call this a terrorist act, instead classifying it as a hate crime. But when you kill and attempt to kill civilians and blame it explicitly on Bush policy towards the Mid-East and claim you are just sending a message that seems to meet all the criteria for terrorism.
On the other hand it is a good thing Country Prosecutor Maleng refused to get hysterical and play this for big headlines on CNN, which is maybe why it missed some lists. Instead Haq was convicted on Dec 15th 2009 and sentenced to life in prison without any need for anyone to scream "Muslim Terrorist!!!"
(And the Seattle police did not have to waterboard the guy either).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DebbieKat
January 9, 2010 1:54 PM in reply to rbeats
You forgot the attacker in Seattle against the Jewish Center. One killed. 2006 under Bush.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DebbieKat
January 9, 2010 1:57 PM in reply to DebbieKat
Oops. The guy above me already pointed this oversight out. Sorry for the duplication. :-)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bvd
January 8, 2010 7:54 PM
So by Rudy's measure Timothy McVeigh was not really much of a terrorist because he wasn't Muslim.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
January 8, 2010 7:58 PM
Comparing the attack at Ft Hood to an Islamic terror attack is warping the meaning of an Islamic terror attack. It equates Ft Hood with 9/11, the attacks on our Embassies around the world, and the USS Cole among others.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RobertSeattle
January 8, 2010 8:00 PM
I'm growing convinced that being the Mayor of NYC causes dementia.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mentata
January 9, 2010 12:24 PM in reply to RobertSeattle
Wanting to be mayor of NYC might itself be an indicator of dementia. We need a control for a proper experiment to test your hypothesis.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VictorLaszlo
January 8, 2010 8:09 PM
We've had no attempted terrorist attacks under Obama.
...
...
Well, since Christmas Eve. But that goes without saying, right?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
celldumceen
January 8, 2010 8:19 PM
Fort Hood was'nt a terrorist attack like 9/11 was! That guy was a born and breed American citizen who was a member of the military! Fort Hood is more in line with a workplace shooting! Which I might add happen all the time in this country! Guy loses his job and he goes back with a gun and kills people! It happens all the time! It happened in Orlando the day after Fort Hood, it happened in California a week ago in a casino and it just happened again in St. Louis! Guy loses his job and goes back kills four people and commits suicide! Oh! That God is Great stuff Rudy said the Fort Hood shooter said? Never happened! Just like so many other things the media reported intially after that incident!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SqueakyRat
January 9, 2010 4:13 PM in reply to celldumceen
Well, the Fort Hood guy hadn't lost his job. He wanted to lose it, but the Army had other plans for him.
IMO, the closest parallel to Fort Hood was the Virginia Tech shootings.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
January 8, 2010 8:25 PM
How could he possibly forget 9/11? Those muslim t'r'st bastards took out his shag pad.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 8, 2010 8:30 PM
Hey, did you guys noticed Wolff corrected him on the "war on terror" misquote from O's speech? I'm shocked, really.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Pop Zeus
January 8, 2010 8:33 PM
Haha. He remembers 9/11 "every single day, and usually, frequently during the day." Except when he's talking about it on TV.
Also, isn't it kind of offensive to categorize only Islamic terrorism as terrorism? Well, it's offensive and unprofessional.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
labman57
January 8, 2010 9:24 PM
Giuliani is simply attempting to redefine reality to suit his twisted argument (or equally likely, to spin his faux pax into a non-gaff).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pmb50
January 8, 2010 9:34 PM
Does Giuliani remember that 911 happened under Bush and republicans watch? The republicans always want to start national security debate after 911 like they should get a pass on the worst terrorist attack in our nation’s history.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 8, 2010 9:57 PM
From Bloomberg news
epublican Lugar Rejects Cheney’s Obama Criticism (Update1)
Share Business ExchangeTwitterFacebook| Email | Print | A A A
By Viola Gienger
Jan. 8 (Bloomberg) -- Richard Lugar, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, defended President Barack Obama’s handling of recent terrorism threats, taking issue with former Vice President Dick Cheney’s criticism.
“It’s unfair,” Lugar said in an interview for Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt,” airing this weekend. “I think the president is focused.”
Cheney, who frequently has led Republican attacks on the Democratic president since leaving office a year ago, told Politico on Dec. 29 that Obama “is trying to pretend we are not at war” with a “low-key response” to the Dec. 25 attempt to ignite a bomb aboard a flight to Detroit.
To the contrary, Obama has demonstrated “firmness” and “decisiveness,” Lugar, who represents Indiana, said. “That’s been the antidote to the criticism.”
Still, the U.S. may be focusing too much on Afghanistan at a time when al-Qaeda is finding havens in other hot spots such as Yemen and Somalia, Lugar said. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the 23-year-old Nigerian indicted in the Detroit plane plot, allegedly received his training in Yemen.
“I suspect that we will have to try to think through why we went to Afghanistan,” Lugar, 77, said.
‘Nation-Building’
After eliminating the al-Qaeda training camps there, the U.S. undertook “nation-building” beyond traditional development aid, he said. Projects such as advancing democracy, ensuring girls can attend school and promoting agriculture to replace poppy cultivation, while laudable, have cost “tens of thousands of people, hundreds of billions of dollars,” he said.
“And now we find even Afghanistan is not exactly making the progress we hoped,” Lugar said.
U.S. intelligence agencies have heeded the potential threats from unstable states such as Yemen and Somalia, and will have to do more to understand the origins of terrorist attacks and why young Muslims get involved, Lugar said.
“We have to see the comprehensive nature of this, how many countries have potentially failing governments or very weak governments in which al-Qaeda could” have some influence, Lugar said.
As airline security improves, al-Qaeda and other terrorists targeting the U.S. will seek other ways to attack, Lugar said.
Americans “may be inclined to feel that once you solve the aircraft problem, somehow or other you’re in better shape,” Lugar said.
Opposition in Iran
The administration has properly calibrated its support for the opposition in Iran, verbally and through activities such as ensuring they have access to telecommunications that allow them to maintain contact.
“We ought to indicate that, as a matter of fact, that we support liberty,” Lugar said. “We support the building of institutions.”
One pivot point in countries such as Iran or Yemen or Pakistan has been the young people, Lugar said. While some are leading the way in challenging autocratic regimes such as the one in Iran, others are susceptible to the lures of extremist ideology, he said.
“Our intelligence focus has got to be very comprehensively on why young people would go in this direction, and if they do, who they are,” Lugar said.
By contrast, in Iran, “the young people are well ahead of us” and taking charge of the situation, Lugar said. “With the young people, the promise is the best, I think.”
Violent Young Men
Two researchers at the government-chartered U.S. Institute of Peace agree that the understanding of why and how young men turn violent or become extremists is limited. Policies or programs focused solely on providing jobs or education may miss the point, they say.
“The dynamics of this are more complicated,” said Marc Sommers, a senior fellow at the institute in Washington and an associate research professor at Tufts University’s Fletcher School in Medford, Massachusetts.
Factors may include what society demands for a young man to be recognized as a successful adult, such as land or housing to provide for a family, Sommers said.
“They have a term for this in West Africa: It’s a youth man,” said Sommers, who will present his findings later this month with another fellow, U.S. Army Colonel Matt Venhaus, who is conducting related research for the Defense Department.
“There is an assumption that young men are inherently dangerous in places that are volatile,” Sommers said. “It’s not true.” The question sometimes boils down to “what must they do to avoid a situation where they’re looked on as a failure.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Viola Gienger in Washington at vgienger@bloomberg.net.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
January 8, 2010 11:24 PM
Shorter Rudy: It's only terror if is ISLAMIC.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VexSmith
January 9, 2010 12:04 AM
He probably didn't remember much about Bernard Kerik when he successfully got him the nomination for Homeland Security chief.
Rudy has a convenient memory.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nancy Irving
January 9, 2010 2:07 AM
The shoe-bomber (under Bush) doesn't count because he concealed the bomb in his shoe, but the underwear-bomber (under Obama) does count because he concealed the bomb in his underwear.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SqueakyRat
January 9, 2010 4:19 PM in reply to Nancy Irving
You've got to admit that underwear is a lot scarier than shoes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SteinL
January 9, 2010 3:18 AM
The GOP is a big memory hole.
Rudy must have milked the phrase 9/11 a zillion times, just conveniently forgot when it wasn't useful.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JadeZ
January 9, 2010 8:34 AM
of course rudy doesnt fool people here .
but the point is he and people like him are paraded about to convince people of this point of view.
there is great danger in the rudy types because a real terror incident and the people that listen to this filth will make the third reich look like cub scouts.
this country is being primed for that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AirBoss
January 9, 2010 9:26 AM
Rudy the Fraud at his best.
Unless it's his 'family values' views on marriage(s)...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
glblank
January 9, 2010 9:56 AM
Lest we not forget that the undie-bomber did not succeed under exact circumstances of intelligence failures that lead to 911. But where is the evidence that Obama had wind of it in a PDB or any briefing as Bush did. Rudy is just trying to forward preset talking points and has no more credibility with the Brownshirts than John McLame. The fence-sitters with any intelligence will see through this mud-sling. When Conservatives like Andrew Sullivan see through it an call the idiots out on it, you know the lower life forms are losing their narrative to any one other than the protozoan bottom feeders.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluestatedon
January 9, 2010 11:52 AM
What we folks in the reality-based world don't grasp is how thoroughly Republicans and their Tea-Bagging cousins have mastered the art of George Orwell's "Doublethink," which is the ability to fervently believe in two mutually exclusive things at the same time. Once you've mastered Doublethink, iiterally anything is possible, as Ghouliani so clearly shows.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ilovebacon
January 9, 2010 12:31 PM
Rudy can go hop in the sack with Bernie Kerrick.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
indabush
January 9, 2010 12:54 PM
OH GREAT!! Rudy - when a muslim says allah akbar, which means God is Great, they're operating under terrorist influences? I'm sure the billion + muslims in the world love to hear that coming from your rancid mouth. what a scumbag!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BigBadBama
January 9, 2010 2:25 PM
In the end, it just goes to show you that it sucks to be Bill Clinton. He ends up being responsible for both WTC attacks. One right after he became president and one nine months after he stopped being president. It's just always going to be his fault, I guess.
But that's what's sad about anyone treating attacks like this. It's not a tally to total up on someone's board. They're horrible things that happen and need to be stopped as much as possible. When the GOP gets into this hair-splitting nonsense about who's responsible for what it cheapens the whole thing and creates cynicism about the entire field. Then they have to go and lie about it.
In the end it just eats them up that the biggest attack ever happened on their watch. Their inability to accept that makes them play this blame game bullshit.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lapdogs
January 9, 2010 3:00 PM
Lawrence O'Donnell SLAMMED Guiliani along with the inept MSM for letting him (and others) get away with those comments!
If you missed it....
O'Donnell slams Guiliani
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#34775369
O'Donnell talks with Media Matters
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#34775396
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
concerned american
January 9, 2010 5:47 PM
Just more of the same old Bullshit comming from another ass hole Republican that can't admit that there side has screwed up the country and lost the election, (and by a mandate) more than Can be said for Bush when he slid into the White House back in 2000. The things that FOX TV, Clear Chanel Broadcasting and the other rightwingers say is really anti American and certinly supports those who wish to bring harm to Americans. I just hope One of these "tea party nuts" Never decides to go after, or is allowed to go after Pres. Obama . I sometimes wonder why and how we lately seem to have these securaty breakdowns and if the key people responsable might well be some of those crazy right wingers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
labman57
January 9, 2010 5:50 PM
Nice to see that Giuliani has qualified his original comments.
There were no domestic attacks during the Bush presidency .... by an Algerian acrobat ... on a Tuesday ... during a full moon ... in Alabama ...
GOP pundits are attempting an old Jedi mind trick ... (these are not the droids you are looking for).
Standard Rovian tactics for these habitual liars -- publicly repeat the lie frequently enough, and some people will begin to believe it must be true. Of course, in our Digital Age of instant verification, that method no longer works.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
US insider
January 9, 2010 6:06 PM
You people are a joke. You ought to rename this site the anti-America, anti-white, anti-christian blog. This must be where you same seven people get to beat up on whitey while patting eachother on the tail. It's ALL Bush's fault. Everything. Even your own miserable lives are his fault. Hah. You people are funny as hell. Good luck to you all in La-la land. Nighty-night and make sure you go potty before bed so you don't pee all over yourselves tonight. LOL
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cinesimon
January 10, 2010 6:19 PM in reply to US insider
That's right, kiddo: we're not white supremacists, therfore we hate America.
UG UG UG
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
neesy08
January 9, 2010 6:40 PM
we have had terrorists attacks in this country since the advent of the kkk. it just all depends on the color of the intended law breaker and the color of the victims skin that matters. if the victims have mostly white skin and the villains are brown, red or black, they are terrorists. if the victim is red, black or brown and the villain is white, nobody cares. he is upholding his constitutional right to bare arms, nooses, fire an anything else he pleases.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AirBoss
January 9, 2010 6:58 PM
Good summary and memory prompt for Rudy's next deposition:
http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/01/terrorist_attac.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
manhattan
January 9, 2010 7:00 PM
Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thecrow
January 10, 2010 8:32 AM
Do you remember this, Rudy?
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/black-box/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thecrow
January 10, 2010 8:36 AM
Remember this, Rudy?
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/black-box/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thecrow
January 10, 2010 8:48 AM
"He also said the anthrax attacks of 2001 don't count, because they never proven to be done in the name of 'Islamic terrorism'"
That's right, Rudy. They remain an unsolved FALSE-FLAG attack on the US Senate and media that killed five innocents with material from secure US bioweapons labs, expedited passage of the PATRIOT Act and conditioned the public to fear "WMD".
Nothing to see there, right?
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/culture-of-deception/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thecrow
January 10, 2010 8:56 AM
Do you remember Barry Jennings, Rudy?
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/barry-jennings-speaks/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Knothead Jake
January 10, 2010 12:12 PM
I think Rudy is taking a play out of the Sarah Palin playbook. It doesn't matter if it's a totally ridiculous lie, just keep repeating it. Even after being awarded "Liar of the Year", Sarah is still out there with her "Death Panels Lie", going full tilt. Michelle Bachman can lie in a continuous flow that would wear most people out. Why waste time researching or studying or reading. JUST LIE. Since Nike is keeping Tiger Woods on the payroll maybe they should consider changing their slogan to "JUST LIE".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cheryl44
January 10, 2010 6:21 PM
Guiliani is not the first GOPer to talk up this meme. Just repeat the lie until it becomes the truth.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
USgreentech
January 11, 2010 7:12 AM
He's saying send more troops and send more troops, not much else. Not a voice to be listened to, should be ignored.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Signalman
January 11, 2010 10:22 AM
Rudy Giuliani. Rhymes with "spithead."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
January 31, 2010 2:17 PM
what does he mean by "under the influence of terrorism" Buy Kamagra M65 Field Jacket
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
January 31, 2010 2:19 PM
what does he mean by "under the influence of terrorism" Buy Kamagra M65 Field Jacket
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bcs2000
July 25, 2010 5:02 AM
there is great danger in the rudy types because a real terror incident and the people that listen to this filth will make the third reich look like cub scouts.
cruises
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?