Inhofe: I Am The Planet's #1 Worst Enemy

His whole rational to not believing in global warming is because of his relationship with God.

You think Pat Robertson is bad? This guys power as a United State Senator, and his staunch literal interpretation of the Bible, will lead to the deaths of millions of people, due to his objections to any real climate change legislation.

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/17/inhofe-hoax/

Inhofe is a poster child for the dysfunctional right, unable and unwilling to pull his head out of his ass no matter what.

Inhofe has a lot of supporters among the morons and climate chnage deniers, bu they are a distinct albeit loud minority. My question is how in hell does he manage to keep getting reelected?

How in the world is it possible that the good people of Oklahoma think he represents their values?

Read the responses in the Tulsa World article referenced above. Inhofe is the sane one, apparently. Then remember that through the rules of the Senate, these people have super majority rule whenever they're told get indigestion by Limbaugh.

Then pray (or mutter...)

The good news: He's old. He'll die sooner than later.

The leadership at that assembled at Copenhagen, for the most part care nothing about the environment and somewhat less than nothing about people. For a site that often seems skeptical of authority why is it so difficult to notice that these leaders are often either a part of or supporting the same people who have trashed the environment and oppressed the poor for decades. The cry of "the sky is falling ... the sky is falling" is followed by "give us your money". The proposal to tax globally all combustion (i.e nearly all industry) providing the clear motive for their position. At this point the validity of the data (let alone the analysis of the data) has been rightly called into question, not to mention the epochal cold spell starting around the time of the politicians meeting in Copenhagen.

I am not a republican or democrat, however, even if one were to entirely accept anthropogenic global warming how is a forced global attempt at anthropogenic global cooling either less morally offensive or risky to people and the environment? Unless of course you simply view yourself as morally superior and smarter than those you wish to control in this way.

http://healthjournalclub.blogspot.com/

Just another example of ignorance of someone elected by a dysfunctional state - Oklahoma - a state that is closest to "Homo", perhaps they will have to change their name.

We underestimate his villainy. He is a traitor to the future of humans. His efforts to delay, deny and disrupt a healthy response to a real danger - just means that trouble will be coming faster than previously expected. He is dangerously delusional.

The fact that he says these things with the dramatic flair tells me that he knows he his wrong. He is playing with our future.

Pity the poor people of Oklahoma. This guy cares only about the oil industry and his rich cronies rather than the avergare Joe.

Global warming is a sham, Inhofe is right. If a team of scientists were trying as hard to disprove global warming as the current crop of scientists are trying to prove it then nobody would believe global warming is real. At the very least, nobody would believe that human activities are more than about .0001% responsible.

From 1938 to 2008 (70 yrs), the world population doubled from 3 Billion to 6 Billion! In another 70 years, (unless there are mitigating factors), it will double again ...to 12 Billion! One more 70 year period, there will be an earth-shattering 24 Billion people, (with a commensurate increase of livestock and the needs of agriculture)! Where are all the people, et al, going to get enough water to continue life? Already in the early 2,000's, there have been many areas experiencing droughts. 70% of the World's FRESH WATER, is saved up for mankind, in the Antarctic, by Mother Nature. Sure there is Global Warming, nicely done/orchestrated, by Mother Nature...NOT...Man! For a 23 page analysis/dissertation, and more, just supply me with an E Mail Address!

i hope he sees the light. global cooling er greenhouse affect er global warming er climate change er global dimming- is a scientific fact that's a 100% consensus amongst those who agree, and everyone who disagrees are the worst people in the world and don't love their children.
i know global...whatever they wanna call it this year is true because all my favorite papers ignored it while fox news covered it. because glen beck covered it it can't be true. yesterday he said the sky was blue, but it can't be true because he's stupid.
i bet this inhofe guy doesn't believe in all the other facts of pure science that will save the world like ethanol; and cfl bulbs; and swine flu vaccines. we better act fast before y2k causes the planes to fall out of the sky. that's another scientific consensus, and anyone who doesn't believe it is hitler.

The truth of the matter is science is not about consensus, it's about the evidence and there's no empirical evidence point to man-induced CO2 as the driving force of climate change because man-induced CO2 can not drive climate change. Gore lied to you. If all world's brilliant scientists with super computer models, billions of tax payers' money spent and 30 yrs. later can not say with certainty that man-induced CO2 is the driving force of climate change, then we have to conclude AGW theory is false and that something else is driving the climate!

How does he keep getting reelected? Three reasons:

He is wholly owned by oil interests, and that is a very big deal in this state.

He claims to be a Christian, and that is an even bigger deal.

He is truly commited to helping his constituents. Any request for help that he can fill, he fills. He goes the extra mile, he always responds, and he gets things done. This makes a huge impact on rural areas. He could eat a baby live on TV, and people would tell themselves it was OK because it was a librul baby.

Tosh
m65 acne