Jon Stewart To Bill O'Reilly: Fox News Covers Obama Like 'A Full-Fledged Panic Attack About The Next Coming Of Chairman Mao' (VIDEO)

Wow. Sitting here for an hour waiting for a response to this.
Well. Here it is.

I wish Jon had brought out the proverbial Woody Allen "sock full of manure" and bashed some "knowledge" into that creep's freakishly large head. Now that's what I'd call entertainment!

Stewart knows his audience way better than O'Reilly ever will. He also knows that media types still can't believe that more people trust Jon to tell them what's really going on than the so-called 'Real' news casters out there.

So yes.. Bill can huff and puff all he want's but he dare not let Jon get in a total answer since not only would it leave him looking foolish but might peel off some of his viewers who think that it's not so bad hanging out with the druggie slacker crowd.

"This Stewart fella runs a far left liberal funhouse on his Comedy Central show."

Error of logic: Loaded Language

"I can tell Mr. O'Reilly loves to spar with this court jester,"

Error of logic: Ad hominen

"but let's face it: Mr. O'Reilly has one of the highest rated shows in television. Mr. Stewart cannot even come close with his drugged-out fans, which thankfully number far fewer than "The O'Reilly Factor.""

Error of logic: Appeal to popularity

"The point here is that Real America is tired of the MSM's dominant liberal culture."

Error of logic: Biased sample

"That is why FOX News, talk radio and magazines like National Review and Newsmax consistently do well"

Error of logic: Appeal to popularity

" -- even in bad economic times that we're facing under this president."

Error of logic: Ah, screw it. Your just a dooshbag.

Wow, people really still believe this? --> "The point here is that Real America is tired of the MSM's dominant liberal culture. That is why FOX News, talk radio and magazines like National Review and Newsmax consistently do well -- even in bad economic times that we're facing under this president. "

Allow me to school you, Bill Orvis White. Let's pretend that all of American TV viewership is a pie - and that half the viewers are liberal and half are conservative, which is what the most recent Census poll shows us. Now imagine that NBC, CNN, MSNBC, ABC and CBS are all hungry kids, targeting the liberal half of the pie. Now picture FOX taking the other half, which no other network is fighting him for.

Who has the biggest piece of pie?

Now imagine that those pieces of pie represent ratings, as fed by viewership.

It has nothing to do with whatever ill-conceived idea you have of "Real America." It has to do with the fact that FOX has no competition for its half, whereas the other five networks are competing for theirs. It's a very simple business model, one that has proven very successful for FOX News.

If you'd like to argue further about this, I'd love to see you try to refute me. I actually had the pleasure of engaging in a lengthy discussion with Roger Ailes himself about this once, and he confirmed my suspicions on the matter. And if you don't now who Roger Ailes is, then you don't know squat about FOX News.

I'm sick to death of seeing this argument from ill-informed FOX viewers. FOX News is successful, but not for your tired reasoning. Please do your research in the future before you spout off generalizations about this topic.

Oh, please. The notion all news outlets, save Fox, cater to the left by presenting a liberal bias is utter and total nonsense. Most media navigate a bona-fide center line—the only exception being MSNBC's recent and calculated move left. No, this "liberal media" mantra has been a right wing talking point-slash-canard for decades. It came out of the Watergate and Vietnam era, when conservatives and corporate elites discovered giving Americans facts was harmful to their political agenda. And just because half of America has been duped by this lie, and now readily accuses the media of this bias, does not—in any way—make it true. Furthermore, American conservatives have swung to a radical, near fascist right. From this distorted worldview any even-handed or sensible news media gets tagged as liberal, making the paranoia drumbeat of Fox News only sound louder in their ears.

O'Reilly does not have one of the highest rated shows in television. He has one of the highest rated cable shows and I just checked the Nielson ratings and he was 11th on the cable list this week. Burn Notice had higher ratings than O'Reilly this week. I guess the no spin zone doesn't operate here.

Honestly, Bill Orvis White, life is much too short to respond to every ill-informed opinion expressed on the Intertubes, and Codebreaker has pretty much demolished your entire post, but I'm afraid you still don't understand how far adrift you've come from the basic raw facts of the matter. The Great Recession began in December 2007 and sharply worsened in September 2008. The president of the United States at the time was named Bush. The sky is up, Bill, water freezes at 32 degrees F., and Barack Obama did not create the current economic situation. You really don't have even a tenuous grasp on reality, pal.

One significant point you left out: in 10 years, most of Stewart's viewers will be the people running the country.

Conversely, in 10 years, most of O'Reilly's viewers will be dead.