
In the build up to the Super Bowl, CBS is playing defense, under pressure from liberal groups accusing the network of bias in its advertising selections.
First, in a reversal of a previous policy of not accepting controversial advocacy ads, the network announced it would air an ad produced by Focus on the Family, an anti-abortion group, featuring star Florida QB Tim Tebow. The theme of the ad will be "Celebrate Family, Celebrate Life," and the spot is expected to depict the story of Tim's mother, Pam, who had Tim against doctor's orders, after becoming sick abroad.
CBS fueled the controversy by subsequently rejecting a Super Bowl ad submitted by Mancrunch.com, a dating site for men on the "down-low." The spot features two men in football jerseys, watching football. After they accidentally touch hands when reaching for the chips, they share a look, then dive into each others arms. In a statement, CBS said that after review, the network's "Standards and Practices department decided not to accept this particular spot."
The Daily Beast is reporting that CBS worked on the ad with Focus on the Family for months.
Women's groups protested CBS's decision to run the ad. In a letter to the network, The Women's Media Center said that with the decision to run the ad from an "anti-equality, anti-choice, homophobic organization, CBS is aligning itself with a political stance."
In the statement, CBS pointed out the Mancrunch.com ad's "entirely commercial" nature (the network, like U.S. law, treats political speech differently than commercial speech), but many, including the Women's Media Center, are looking past Mancrunch, questioning CBS's previous rejections of advocacy ads by The United Church of Christ (UCC), MoveON.org, and PETA.
In 2004, the UCC produced an ad called 'Bouncer' for a television ad campaign. The ad featured night-club bouncers standing in front of a church, turning away various people, including a same-sex couple. CBS, along with NBC, rejected the ad, citing the Bush administration's stance on same-sex marriage. Fox and a number of cable networks aired the ad.
"CBS said at the time that they would not air advocacy ads," Gregg Brekke, UCC's News Director told TPM. "With the Tim Tebow ad, that policy was obviously reversed very quickly."
According to the UCC, CBS now says it retroactively approves of the 'Bouncer' ad, though the UCC has no intention of buying ad time. In an op-ed in the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Rev. J. Bennett Guess, director of communications for the UCC, wrote:
CBS' about-face only underscores the arbitrary way the networks approach these decisions, and the result is a woeful lack of religious diversity in our nation's media. Such flip-flops only lead the public to believe that broadcasters own the airwaves when, in theory at least, they do not.
That same year, CBS rejected Super Bowl ads from MoveOn.org and PETA. As the New York Times reported at the time, CBS cited their long-standing policy not to ads that took sides on controversial public-policy issues.
AhTrini1
February 3, 2010 1:24 PM
Well, I have already written and lodged my objection; have you?
Leslie Anne Wade, Sr. VP Sports Communication: lwade@cbs.com
Jerry Caraccioli, Communications Director, CBS Sports: gwcaraccioli@cbs.com
Robin Brendle, Communications Director, CBS Sports: rlbrendle@CBS.com
Jennifer Sabatelle, Communications Director, CBS Sports: jsabatelle@CBS.com
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
WaitWut?
February 3, 2010 3:28 PM in reply to AhTrini1
Ah...thank you. Was just going to look up some emails.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
WaitWut?
February 3, 2010 3:36 PM in reply to AhTrini1
Done. I hope that everyone that's reading this takes the time to do the same. Or, you can continue to whine about how nothing ever changes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Prof Wagstaff
February 3, 2010 7:47 PM in reply to AhTrini1
Thank you. Yestrday I went looking for who to write to and came up empty. I've now let all four know that our family will not be watching the Superbowl this year.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Signalman
February 3, 2010 1:25 PM
So CBS only airs issue and advocacy ads from sanctimonious douchebags? Is that the new policy?
It's so hard to keep these things straight, you know.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tiowally
February 3, 2010 1:44 PM
Also of interest is the fact that Tebow was born in the Philippines where abortion has been illegal since the '30s. Thus his mother had no choice, which mirrors the focus of the ad — No Choice. So the ad (if reports are accurate) is not only anti-abortion, it's also is a bald-faced lie. No big surprise there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
February 3, 2010 2:27 PM in reply to tiowally
Mrs. Tebow is a Liar for Jesus, which makes it OK.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
February 3, 2010 2:29 PM in reply to tiowally
Mrs. Tebow is a Liar for Jesus, which makes it OK.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
loria
February 3, 2010 7:35 PM in reply to tiowally
The premise of the ad is ridiculous. Mrs. Tebow decided not to abort her child who turned out to be a college football superstar. But, we're never going to see an ad where Mrs. Manson, Mrs. Bundy,etc talk about how they considered abortion, but decided not to. It goes both ways, and it is a stupid argument. Of course, many will be touched that she chose to keep her child (when she probably didn't even have the choice considering where she lived). I wonder if they would feel the same if they saw mothers of serial murderers and pedophiles saying t he same thing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CyberDuckie
February 4, 2010 1:04 PM in reply to loria
And that, right there, would be the perfect (commercial) answer to the Tebow ad. I'd love to see that made!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
freaktown
February 3, 2010 1:51 PM
the tebow ad may be based entirely on a lie.
but why let facts get in the way of a good talking point? abortions were and are illegal in the philipines which means pam tebow didn't "choose" to keep her baby, the decision was made for her. that's not to say she wouldn't have made the same decision had she actually been able to decide for herself, but she wasn't. and it's more than a bit disingenuous to imply otherwise.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
February 3, 2010 3:01 PM in reply to freaktown
Looks like maybe she should have chosen abortion. He's another brainwashed idiot. It's a good thing he can play football because he doesn't appear to be too bright. It appears he has received a lot of athletic awards but few scholastic awards. The family sounds like a nunch of jesus freaks.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
madmatt
February 3, 2010 3:10 PM in reply to lousgirl84
lol he sucks at football, even the Canadian football league doesn't want this jagoff!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
February 3, 2010 5:18 PM in reply to madmatt
So how did he win the Heisman? I'm just askin because I don't follow sports anymore.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CyberDuckie
February 4, 2010 1:05 PM in reply to lousgirl84
Because he's a pretty boy from the south. Duh!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tiowally
February 3, 2010 3:14 PM in reply to lousgirl84
Funny that is says 3:16 under his eyes yet kick-off isn't until 3:25 (Pacific).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
February 3, 2010 3:40 PM in reply to tiowally
Yeah, who puts bible versus under their eyes. What a fucking idiot. These people are taking up valuable space on this planet and I hate having to share it with them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tiowally
February 3, 2010 5:26 PM in reply to lousgirl84
For God so loved the world that He saved a misbegotten son from an illegal Filipino abortion in 1987. Then He issued an apology. "My mistake," sayeth the Lord. And, verily, it was added to His infinite list of unforgivable boners.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
punkassjim
February 3, 2010 5:45 PM in reply to freaktown
I just really enjoy when right-to-lifers use the language of "choice." She may indeed have chosen not to have an abortion, and she may indeed abhor the notion. But when she uses the language of "choice," she merely empowers the people whose stance she claims to oppose.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sailormarlowe
February 3, 2010 2:00 PM
Feckless, frightened liberals always flip-flop. Be Strong. Choose life.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Duck Stab
February 3, 2010 2:46 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
Parody troll fail. You are so obvious.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
davewtf
February 3, 2010 2:48 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
Who the hell you calling a frightened liberal?!? It is the conservatives who show all the fear, fear of everything that is different than themselves. Fear of actually giving people their freedom of choice, be it abortion, drugs, marriage partners, etc... The list is long.
Next time you want to call a liberal frightened, think about which party REALLY shows fear!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcrose68
February 3, 2010 10:50 PM in reply to davewtf
Fear of the truth, or dissenting opinions most of all.
The right-wing web-sites are so afraid of dissenting opinion they will ban you if you display anything but full-crazy support for the editor.
On the other hand, us silly liberuls feel obliged to listen to dissenting opinions. And what do we get for it? Occasionally, intelligent commentary and criticism.
But for the most part we get people like SailorMarlow who are the blog equivalent of the adolescent jack-ass who seeks attention with the only trick he knows - farting in the room.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
February 4, 2010 12:28 AM in reply to davewtf
Hahahaha, yeah it is those terrible conservatives who are so afraid of opposing viewpoints that they are trying to get CBS to yank a television commercial because they disagree with the opinions stated. Oh, wait, did I say conservative. I meant liberal, as epitomized by the whiners commenting here on this site. I haven't seen this much crying since I watched the History Channel documentary on the Kennedy assassination.
The notion of the more tolerant left has been shattered in to so many pieces on so many occassions I am surprised whiny jackasses still try and use it.
To sum up the comments here: We can't allow those intolerant bastards to air an ad that expresses a viewpoint we don't like. .
The hypocrisy is pricelessly hilarious. The only thing that could make it more funny would be the classic "she opposes abortion so she can't be a real woman" line that was deployed by the left (again, oh so tolerant) during the presidential campaign.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
vkladchik
February 4, 2010 1:12 PM in reply to masanf
We're fine with the ad being shown, as long as something else from the other side is shown, too. Call it multi-culturalism in advertising.
You're also conveniently assuming that criticism of the content of the ad equals criticism of the fact that that content can be aired. Different things. We libruls want conservatives to state all their opinions. Loud and clear. For all to hear. So we can shoot them down, one by one.
Look at your own arguments: all bluster, no actual examples.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
February 3, 2010 2:52 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
You are the idiot who thinks a person can be a military positiion.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
February 3, 2010 2:57 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
It's too bad your mother didn't choose abortion before she had you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Signalman
February 3, 2010 3:29 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
It takes a lot of guts to stand up to militant loons who'd just as soon shoot unarmed physicians and call their acts 'heroic.'
Paul Hill got what was coming to him, and soon, Scott Roeder will too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
February 3, 2010 3:45 PM in reply to Signalman
Hear hear!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
February 3, 2010 4:03 PM in reply to Signalman
Hear hear!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Msinformed
February 3, 2010 4:26 PM in reply to Signalman
Will the jury "choose life"? Right-to-lifers usually support the death penalty for murderers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Signalman
February 3, 2010 4:37 PM in reply to Msinformed
The beauty of my position is that whether Roeder gets the death penalty or beaucoup years in prison, he's still 'gotten what's coming to him.'
It is t3h awesome.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Msinformed
February 3, 2010 4:28 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
I'm liberal & I have a plethora of 'feck', Popeye.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mister c
February 3, 2010 6:37 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
Mrs. Tebow is a Liar for Jesus, which makes it OK.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
afisher
February 3, 2010 2:12 PM
HUH? Flip-flop and choose life????? How about YOU joining the real world. If the right is for allowing businesses to have free markets, why not individuals having free choice. Or is it free ONLY when YOU SAY it is free?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
February 3, 2010 4:51 PM in reply to afisher
They want you to be free to choose what they would have you choose, but not free to choose something else.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbeats
February 3, 2010 2:24 PM
"Liberal groups"
Come on, it's more than liberals that who are opposed to giving air time to the most watched program of the year to a domestic terrorist organization.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hidden Oak
February 3, 2010 3:18 PM
Have you ever heard a "pro choice" advocate say it was a good choice? This is a bullshit argument owned and promoted by the GOP to get people to vote against their own best interests.
Can't wait to see this walking bible quote billboard get his head knocked off in the NFL.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jsdc007
February 3, 2010 3:28 PM
I wonder if Mrs. Tebow would have glorified her "choice," had her son turned out to be a gay ballerina about to open the season at the Met.
She'd have been cast away from the weekly "Moms for Jesus and Guns" casserole klatch at the local Baptist pow-wow.
Personally, I admire people who even in the face of adversity, and even when the have a choice to abort an unwanted pregnancy, decide to carry their child to term. What I find distasteful is the insistence by some that others be denied that choice.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
February 3, 2010 4:03 PM
Tebcw Crying: Because Sometimes God Loves Alabama More Than Florida
http://s.buzzfed.com/static/imagebuzz/web04/2009/12/7/18/tim-tebow-crying-motivational-poster-428-1260227600-111.jpg
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bibimimi
February 3, 2010 4:43 PM in reply to JohnMcCSF
wearing his tenuous mental state on the sleeve of his jersey.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CyberDuckie
February 4, 2010 1:13 PM in reply to JohnMcCSF
LMAO!!! That was my favorite moment in all of college football this past season (save the Fiesta Bowl) - watching the pussy cry on national television because he wost da big game!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
February 3, 2010 4:19 PM
"who had Tim against doctor's orders"
Way to play into the Republican talking points TPM.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hank
February 3, 2010 4:20 PM
Here's my email:
SUBJECT: Tim Tebow ad
You have no right to air such controversial claptrap during the Super Bowl. This is the one event that brings us all together, please stick with beer and car ads on which we can all agree is the American way.
If it airs, I intend to file a complaint with the FCC asking that CBS'right to use the public airwaves be revoked.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bibimimi
February 3, 2010 4:28 PM
Gotta love me some old hypocritical white men, struggling to maintain power. In other news, the Mancrunch [crush?] ad was a skit on MadTV...and prolly much funnier. If 2 str8 guys go at it, comedy gold.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Abide
February 3, 2010 4:32 PM
How long until he's wearing a suit, being seated in Congress?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hoppycalif2
February 3, 2010 6:02 PM in reply to Abide
Unfortunately he is too young to be the VP candidate with Sarah in 2012. I can see their posters now: Dumb and Dumber for "Preznit"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
February 3, 2010 6:11 PM in reply to Abide
Nah, I figure when the football thing runs out for him he'll just go on wingnut welfare (aka commentator on Fox "News").
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tomoly
February 3, 2010 6:31 PM in reply to Abide
Great prediction. He will be the Republican version of NFL Bust turned Congressman, Heath Schuler. Tebow doesn't have the tools to be an NFL quarterback, and he knows it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leo
February 3, 2010 5:03 PM
Dear Ms. Wade,
Given CBS's decision to run an anti-abortion rights ad during the Super Bowl, while refusing to run a pro-abortion rights ad, I am writing to ask if CBS has a position on abortion rights. If it does, I believe the company should say so explicitly, so that its employees and the general public know. If it does not, it should apply a consistent standard to all advocacy ads and run both pro- and anti- rights commercials.
Best,
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tiredofit10
February 3, 2010 5:43 PM
I don't watch CBS except maybe CSI Miami, but I won't be watching that anymore. you have to hit them where it hurts, in the pocketbook.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CyberDuckie
February 4, 2010 1:16 PM in reply to tiredofit10
I haven't been able to watch CBS for a few weeks now - no signal, for some reason. I'm beginning to think that this is a good thing now, though....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CVille Dem
February 3, 2010 6:09 PM
This is Planned Parenthood's response to the issue (I would call this classy):
It seems to me that Focus on the Family want everyone to believe that they want everyone to have abortions; who actually WANTS abortions? Well, it strikes me that republicans do, because it keeps their voting base in tact, as that is the only issue they have in common. That same voting base is certainly not served by the republican agenda.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mister c
February 3, 2010 6:42 PM
scott roeder
ha ha ha
they'll fill his canteen with something.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
des
February 3, 2010 6:44 PM
A question:
Mrs. Tebow is reported as being in the Philipines during her pregnancy. Why? Was she vacationing? Was her husband in the military or working for the government in some form? If the latter, THAT could explain the doctors recommending an abortion; she would be allowed to return to the US via a military medical flight, have the abortion in a private clinic and then return to her family in the Philipines. As far as I know, abortions are not permitted on any US military base overseas (or in the US, either).
Either way, CBS needs to have a consistent policy: either accept ALL advocacy advertisements or none.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CVille Dem
February 4, 2010 7:12 PM in reply to des
She was doing missionary work. Last I heard, the Philippines were mainly a Catholic country, but those papist evidently don't know jesus on a first-name basis.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
February 3, 2010 7:19 PM
Liberal media, heh heh heh
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Impishparrot
February 3, 2010 7:34 PM
Mrs. Tebow's son is a wealthy man who could afford to adopt dozens of children and build thousands adoption facilities but feels wearing "make-up" under his eyes is the solution. All the scripture in the world can't camouflage the fact that this man is a hypocrite pretending to be a warrior on a battle field professional sports' whores. Unlike Pat Tillman, this 'pretender' Tebow - or as call him, A*sbow - seeks to destroy the civil liberties and rights of women soldiers serving on real battle fields in Iraq and Afghanistan to protect his chickensh*t chickenhawk a*s.
I hope a bunch of pissed-off female veterans kicks his freedom-robbing a*s but good.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
February 4, 2010 12:18 AM in reply to Impishparrot
I would call you a ranting lunatic, but I don't like stating the obvious.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Impishparrot
February 11, 2010 7:31 PM in reply to masanf
The Religious Right immediately demotes children born under these circumstances to the status of barnyard livestock breeders.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mutton Jeff
February 3, 2010 10:10 PM
Well, yeah, but... this isn't a controversial topic. I mean, it's anti-abortion, for heaven's sake. And the group sponsoring it is a good, American, Christian organization, so it has to be OK, right? Not just some bunch of leftists or homos. /sarcasm
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
February 4, 2010 12:17 AM
Christ, the whining and crying over a fucking ad by those on the left is absolutely pitiful. That they want CBS to pull it shows the censorious impulses of those who claim to be super duper tolerant. What a bunch of pathetic losers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Carl
February 4, 2010 12:40 AM in reply to masanf
Incorrect, mas: They're being hypocrites...they won't air an ad for a gay dating website(nor did they air an ad in 2004 for the United Church of Christ), but they WILL air one for these folks...which, as noted above, was worked on for months.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tiowally
February 4, 2010 12:53 AM in reply to masanf
The issue isn't the ad per se, it's CBS stated policy of not running advocacy ads, which this surely is. But thanks for sharing your ignorance.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
February 4, 2010 12:30 AM
Summary of the comments here: Christ, those Christian assholes are so intolerant. I hate Christians and those against abortion because they can't be tolerant like I am.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
toxophilite
February 4, 2010 4:11 AM in reply to masanf
Let me guess: you home schooled and skipped the lessons on reading comprehension and critical thinking. I deduce this from your summary of the comments above which bears little, if any, relationship to the opinions expressed.
Personally, I read a good deal of criticism, some casting of aspersions, and more than a few caustic comments, but I didn't read hate. Belittling the football player and his mama isn't hate; it's more like disdain or contempt - commenters are mostly just saying they're idiots. Calling CBS out is expressing strong disagreement with a decision judged as hypocritical. Labeling all who disagree with you as "hate" doesn't make it so. Save that word for the population that spends its days outside women's clinics screaming at the patients and their medical providers, and egging on the nut jobs who plant bombs, and actually shoot doctors.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LeaningLeft
February 4, 2010 12:57 PM
I won't know if I'm for or against this until I see the ad. If the ad advocates making abortion illegal, I'll be against it. Because, it will be advocating taking someone's rights away from them. If it advocates women CHOOSING not to get an abortion, then I'm fine with it. Because isn't that the point? We believe in a woman's legal right to choose. We also believe in a person's legal right to free speech including attempting to convince those willing to listen of his/her point of view. This could be just a person/group (albeit one that most people on this site disagree with on most, if not all, issues) exercising their freedom of speech.
I'll forgo the trite quote misattributed to Voltaire.
As for CBS’s handling of the issue, I just attribute that to a massive corporation fumbling along in an attempt to not have any bad publicity, but failing miserably at the whole thing. I expect no less.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
May 12, 2010 7:47 AM
We're fine with the ad being shown, as long as something else from the other side is shown, too. Call it multi-culturalism in advertising.
You're also conveniently assuming that criticism of the content of the ad equals criticism of the fact that that content can be aired. Different things. We libruls want conservatives to state all their opinions. Loud and clear. For all to hear. So we can shoot them down, one by one.
Look at your own arguments: all bluster, no actual examples.
cialis kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?