You need to understand : the Fox News audience memebers are such thin skinned babies, that mild criticism is the equivelent of cutting tehm from scrotum to sternum.

Small point: Most of those were overblown verbs, not adjectives.

Titters & tee-hees all around from fanny fans of "Jon Stewart".

"running around town cutting people from scrotum to sternum, wearing their skin as a trophy"

I think I'll keep that visual in my head all day. It makes me happy.

Headlines are an art form.
http://www.unclejosh.com/littlestinker

Well, yes, we exaggerate a little. I'm just wondering what we'll write if Rachel Maddow actually does eviscerate someone.

Any of you out there who still consider yourselves "conservative" and you actually believe in what Bill pinhead O'Reilly has to say, you are either just plain stupid, or insane, or full of it, with some alternative intention. The writing is on the wall. Your talking points are no longer valid. America has talked itself to death over so many of the important issues for 10 years now. Common sense does not allow you much of a ground to stand on in your arguments so you chose attack and switch the arena of debate techniques to attempt to look like you're also making a valid point. You would be judged the loser in any high school civics debate class. Unfortunately, we don't live in a world where there is a final judge but instead the never ending stream of interprestaion, reporting, and opinion, by the news media, which has largely become a propaganda tool in order to skew the truth, and good debate, in order to derail what the "liberal" side wants which is unltimately just a solution to America and it's citizens problems. And, why, you ask would anyone want to do that? Because we live in a modern oligarchy, and the elite's have near perfected the way to perserve their power against those who want to challenge it for the sake of the good of the greater population and country as a whole. The CIA is the same thing as Knights of the Round Table. For King and Country is still not too far off the mark of a description for our modern society. It's just a lot bigger, and a lot more abstract, but go work for any larger engineering, development, law firm, large corporation of any kind, insurance co., accounting - finance co., brokerage, banks, etc. and you will see quickly, the human mind is capable of grasping all kinds of abstract realities and doing what it takes to survive within the system. You can sell Nazism to anyone if you can get most everyone to go along.

TPM disingenuously posts: Jon Stewart Disembowels, Eviscerates, Then Destroys The Blogosphere.

John Stewart is a cynical commedian, in much (a much more minor) same way as was Will Rogers. Ninety-five percent of Stewart's commentary involves the ideologically defined criticism of alternative (to him) points of view. Nearly all his "solutions" are of the unspoken, self-evident sort.

Now, the "Blogosphere" is a global behemoth where -- ultimately -- John Stewart is a little less than a microscopic pissant. By not qualifying Stewart's disemboweling eviscerations, logically, the sponsor of this particular missive simply guts himself. Whether or not Stewart's cheerleading TPM'ers prefer to recognize this denotes volumes about their own disingenuity.

DanD

John Stewart is a cynical commedian, in much (a much more minor) same EVE Isk way as was Will Rogers. Ninety-five percent of Stewart's commentary involves the ideologically defined criticism of alternative (to him) Dofus Kamas points of view. Nearly all his "solutions" are of the unspoken, self-evident sort.

Just on confirm, we are commenting about the tone of a comedy show commenting on blogs which are commenting on said comedy show which is satirizing a news show?