TPM LiveWire

Scott Brown: Is The Honeymoon Over?


Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA)

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

That didn't take long. Just weeks after Sen. Scott Brown's (R-MA) victory was heralded as the first shot in a Republican revolution, with Brown himself signing "41" after his name, the magic vanished. On Monday, Brown voted yes on a procedural motion on the Democrats' jobs bill -- and many of his supporters turned against him.

Christen Varley, for example, the president of the Greater Boston Tea Party who a month ago took credit for Brown's win, plans to give the senator a piece of her mind.

"He's going to hear from us," Varley told the Boston Herald. "In the end, this is stimulus spending -- and it's a disappointment."

Just last month, Varley said her group had sent 150 people to a Brown fund-raiser during his campaign. "I spent the next two days saying, if you like Scott Brown, go out and spread the word,'' Varley said. "That's what they did. And it exploded.''

His grassroots supporters aren't pleased either. A sampling of comments on his Facebook page:

"What a disappointment! You're just like all the other guys in Washington but with a prettier face. Time to UN friend you," writes Marty Biland.

"Senator Brown! How can you claim to be fiscally responsible and vote for another stimulus bill? sorry..'job' bill? You are showing your true colors. You are a liar! I've contributed to your campaign. I will not be so generous in two years!" says Stella Moroz.

But Brown's Republican colleagues, even some of the most conservative, are less critical -- perhaps because they have experience working with Republicans from the more liberal Northeast.

"I do not expect him to vote with me or anyone the whole time," said Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC). "We're happy to have him."

Brown's office is already running damage control, releasing a statement this morning that says, in part, "We need to put partisanship aside to put people back to work."

Notably, Brown also says, "if [the bill] comes back to the Senate full of pork, waste, fraud and abuse, I reserve the right to vote against it."

Many of the comments are on Brown's original statement on his jobs bill vote:

"I came to Washington to be an independent voice, to put politics aside, and to do everything in my power to help create jobs for Massachusetts families," he said in part. "This Senate jobs bill is not perfect. I wish the tax cuts were deeper and broader, but I am voting for it because it contains measures that will help put people back to work."

Glenn Beck piled on last night, calling out, not exactly Brown, but those who expected him to be the "savior of the universe."

"Some tea party members probably woke up this morning and threw up just a little bit in their mouths when they read the news," Beck said. "'We took him in, we helped him get a victory, and now this?'"

"He's a Massachusetts conservative," Beck said. "So why all the shock and the outrage after he votes for a spending bill?"

To be sure, there are plenty of comments lauding Brown for being an "independent voice," and it's likely many of the comments on both sides are from Brown opponents.

But Brown had never promised to be the GOP's cloture-proof vote against every Democratic effort. He repeatedly portrayed himself as an independent, an outsider. And his staff is continuing to push that image of the new senator.

They sent reporters, for example, a Boston Globe editorial lauding Brown's vote, saying he chose the "nobler task" of ending Senate gridlock, instead of opposing Democratic initiatives automatically.

It might not be enough. One last comment from Facebook:

"Benedict Brown. All talk, no guts."

Join the Conversation!

54 comments

Recommend Recommend (1)

February 24, 2010 12:53 PM   

Apparently, the teabaggers don't really want to elect a senator - just somebody to tape down the "no" vote button at a Senate desk. Not sure how one reaches a "bipartisan consensus" with that.

FFS, it was almost entirely a TAX CUTS bill. Isn't that what they *wanted*? At this point, they'd probably get bent out of shape if the Democrats introduced a bill to canonize St. Ronnie and Brown voted for it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 12:57 PM   

The stupid runs deep within the ranks of tea party folk.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 2:56 PM    in reply to jsfox

This phenomenon is not limited to the Tea Party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 12:57 PM   

That's a funny idea. The Democrats need to name all their bills after Republican icons. "The Ronald Reagan Making Families Free Health Care Act."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:01 PM    in reply to Charlie Potts

The Pete Hoekstra Shit in My Pants Everytime I hear an Arabic Name Security Bill.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 2:51 PM    in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe

The Richard Cheney Defending Freedom by deferring Military Service bill.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:04 PM    in reply to CityGuy

The GW Bush Air National Guard Hide & Seek Bring it On Security Bill

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:33 PM    in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe

The Sarah Palin Higher Education Standards Act.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:56 PM    in reply to CityGuy

The Tom Delay "Isn't this kinda fun" Disaster Relief Act

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:58 PM    in reply to Brownbagger

And the accompanying Barbara Bush "They were underpriviledged anyway" Disaster Relief Fund

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:25 PM    in reply to CityGuy

Speaking of Dick Cheney, do you realize he now has had as many heart attacks as draft deferments.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:30 PM    in reply to Frex

Karma sucks...... Dick? lol

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:39 PM    in reply to CityGuy

The Bachman-Blackburn Scamper from Ethics in Action Bill

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 4:45 PM    in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe

ROFLMAO. Oh my!!
xxxooo

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 2:41 PM    in reply to Charlie Potts

I like it!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:00 PM   

Shortest honeymoon ever!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:00 PM   

BROWNIE, YOU'RE DOIN A HECK OF A JOB!!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:06 PM   

The problem is these teabaggers don't know the difference between cloture and clitoris.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:18 PM   

Teabagger Varley: "In the end, this is stimulus spending - and it's a disappointment." Because why should anyone want to help the economic recovery or put people back to work. I mean WTF? Don't give into them Scott.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:03 PM    in reply to Rick Jones

I thought the same thing when I read that. They really do want all attempts at economic recovery to come to a halt, so that Obama will be blamed for the economy and the GOP can retake Congress and eventually the WH. Same thing with terrorism. They want an attack to happen so he'll be viewed as weak and they can put the GOP back in control. Everything they're for revolves around conservatives regaining power. So much for country first.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:29 PM   

But Brown had never promised to be the GOP's cloture-proof vote against every Democratic effort. He repeatedly portrayed himself as an independent, an outsider. And his staff is continuing to push that image of the new senator.

So, what you're saying is that Scottie's voters should have read the fine print on the package and their disappointment is their own fault? Sounds kinda familiar, I wonder else where I've been hearing that recently.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:34 PM   

Scott Brown apparently wants to be re-elected in two years.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:43 PM   

Now Brown realizes just how hard this was going to be.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:46 PM   

I hope Brown realizes the teabaggers are a noisy minority that most people realize are insane. Brown could turn out to be the kind of centrist and independent Republican we need to see more of.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:57 PM    in reply to JimmyBobby

Who knows- he might make a better dem than coakley

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 2:14 PM    in reply to again

Could be. With all the spineless Democrats & conservadems in Congress, Brown just might end up being a better Democrat.

As for people being surprised by his actions or outraged over the "fine print" of his campaign promises weren't listening to him. He said he would be bi-partisan. Not his fault no one believed him when he said it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 2:15 PM    in reply to again

Could be. With all the spineless Democrats & conservadems in Congress, Brown just might end up being a better Democrat.

As for people being surprised by his actions or outraged over the "fine print" of his campaign promises weren't listening to him. He said he would be bi-partisan. Not his fault no one believed him when he said it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 4:35 PM    in reply to JimmyBobby

Don't nobody hold yer breath. If he breaks ranks a few more times, I may feel different, but for now, he's still a bog-standard Replicant who inexplicably cast a vote for something sensible.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:57 PM   

What's scary is that Harry Reid is emulating Brown, and threatening voters at the same time:

http://stupidassnews.wordpress.com/2010/02/21/harry-reid-vote-for-me-or-ill-pose-nude/

Scary stuff for sure!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:35 PM    in reply to Robert Feeley

Stop spamming your cheeseball website here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 2:21 PM   

The wingnuts thought they were getting Mitt without the Mormon. Turns out they've just gotten Snowe with added Stimulus.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:28 PM    in reply to decisivemoment

Actually they're getting the Mitten's of 2002 when he was running for Guv in Mass

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 2:29 PM   

What's really scary is the tea-baggers, or whatever they call themselves, don't see tax cuts as a deficit issue. Amazing that folks still drink Reagan's Kool-Aid that cutting taxes reduces the deficit, even after Reagan's budget director (David Stockman) conceded it was a total lie.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:44 PM    in reply to George C

You can say that again.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 2:33 PM   

Seduced and abandoned by a pretty boy party boy. He told you what you wanted to hear to get what he wanted: your naked ass in his bed. Welcome to a Scott Brown date.

You expected integrity from a stripper?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 2:51 PM   

that's OK Scott...you belong to a deeply mentally disturbed party....maybe you can help dig them out of the psychotic abyss

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 2:51 PM   

It's tough to hold onto support from a bunch of morons whose one and only idea is "NO."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 2:52 PM   

I thought the Tea Party was FOR cutting taxes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 2:54 PM   

Delicious! Now let's get a photo of Obama hugging him and they'll really go over a cliff.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:19 PM    in reply to VivaAmerica!

Over a cliff? How about a Norman Rockwell style picture with the whole Obama whole family with their arms around him and beaming little Malia right on the distinguished Senator's knee?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:00 PM   

im beginning to like this brown guy. hopefully he'll go all the way and sign the public option letter

LMAO

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:18 PM   

Brown is now getting the same response from the right that moderate dems in conservative states like Mary Landrieu get from the left. The GOP is smart to take what they can get from an overwhelmingly liberal state like Massachusetts, just like Rahm is right to be happy with what he can get from conservative states. The left-wing ideological fundamentalists who demand ideological purity are "fucking retards," as are the conservatives like Glenn Beck now condemning Brown.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:19 PM   

But he drives a truck!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 4:49 PM    in reply to Daddy Love

Rachel explained the truck thing last night on her show. He bought that truck to haul his daughter's horse trailer. I am sure one of his campaign people saw it as a good tool to relate him to your average all american guy who drives a truck. Turns out he's a real estate lawyer and made beaucoup bucks as a male model and even showed up on a date with a woman in pink leather pants.

The guy's campaign colors were blue. Not one speck of Red.

Fucking retards

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:25 PM   

You know how the Fox/wackaloon people have misappropriated the word "independent?" By "independent," they mean somebody who always votes straight Republican, and who shows his/her non-traditional side by calling the black President Adolf Hitler.

And that's what they told themselves Scott Brown meant as well, when he called himself "independent." So they are shocked and awed by his application instead of the dictionary definition -- something they *definitely* did not see coming!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:37 PM   

Two points:

Brown positioned himself as an Independent. Did he even mention Republicans once in his acceptance speech?

The "Benedict Brown" comment: Straight outta Michael Savage.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:40 PM   

Maybe the tea party folks can elect a concrete block for Senate next time. Since they apparently want someone who does nothing and doesn't think for themselves.


Might actually be a step up for them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:46 PM   

When Brown won the seat I thought that sending him to the Senate was going to be like buying a RV for the people of Mass. There are two good days when you own a RV, the day you buy it and the day you sell it. Maybe he'll be like a RV for the teabaggers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 3:54 PM   

Sarah Palin + Scott Brown = DREAM TEAM FOR 2012!

Plonk!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 5:06 PM   

I'm as much a Dem as anyone and live in Mass. I don't expect much from him. But, he put himself through school @ Tufts and got a law degree from B.C., he's not a total idiot. If you saw the map of the results it looked like Bush/Gore 2000 with Marhta blue on the west "coast" and Boston/Cambrige-ish (& P-town, of course). But, the diff here is that the red swath in the middle went for Gov. Patrick & Obama too. He HAS to vote like this or he will be out. The next time around there will be a well-funded, savy Dem and all this person will have to do is run replay after replay of his old ads about "I'm independent blah, blah, blah" and call him LIAR in big red letters. I'm skeptical, and doubt he can produce what his ego told him he could. But, we'll have to wait and see.

IMHO, his win was as much a statement of disappointment w/ Obama and all the HCR bill bs and Martha's non-campaign as anything else. People did not like her & she gave them NO reason to give her the benefit of the doubt. And honestly, the whole "why should I stand outside the Garden in winter and shake people's hands" comment and worse, Schilling is a Yankee's fan !!! ??? !!! ... good G-d Woman! Retail politics, learn it for christ's sake !!! Look, I even started out the campaign as a volunteer for her, but lost all enthusiasm for her & voted for Capuano in the primary. She's not a person, she was just an awful candidate at the wrong time. So, because of that, we got Sen. Scooter Mc hottie (small h, he's a lowland Scot).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 5:55 PM    in reply to WestRox

Oops, that should have read "she's not a *bad* person"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 8:22 PM    in reply to WestRox

The sad thing about the Coakley campaign was why her manager didn't drag her ass out to Fenway and chain her to a light pole. Not to agree with the Rethugs but she did come across as being Elitist.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 5:07 PM   

Willing to bet all those negative Facebook comments are from non-Bay Staters. A lot of "We campaigned for you, we sent you money," but no "We voted for you." Sorry chodes, Brownie's gotta listen to his constituents, not the interfering asswipes who sent him $10 checks from Dixieland.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 25, 2010 1:42 PM   

It's an anullment or more like they called off the engagement. Really, it was an "opposite marriage" & they can't have that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on