
After Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius wrote a letter warning insurers against using loopholes to avoid covering children with pre-existing conditions, AHIP President Karen Ignagni wrote back to say insurers will comply with all regulations.
Sebelius, responding to a report in the New York Times that health insurance companies might try to get around covering already sick children, had written to Ignagni, whose organization represents insurers, to announce that she would write new regulations to close any gaps in the reform law.
In response, Ignagni wrote, "Health plans recognize the significant hardship that a family faces when they are unable to obtain coverage for a child with a pre-existing condition."
"We await and will fully comply with regulations," she continued.
Read the full letter here.
George C
March 30, 2010 9:35 AM
As someone argued on Chris Matthews last night, under what fantasy scenario would anyone in the insurance industry announce a policy of not insuring currently uninsured children with pre-existing conditions until 2014?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
izzatxeaux
March 30, 2010 10:40 AM in reply to George C
no, there isn't. but there is also nothing in the package to stop them from raising rates for this coverage through 2014 - AHIP is all but telegraphing that in their releases
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
George C
March 30, 2010 10:45 AM
That may be true, but for a lot of families there's a huge difference between expensive insurance and no insurance. There's no question but that it will take time to phase in these things, including the exchanges or subsidies for people who can't afford current premiums, but the agreement at least to provide coverage is a large step forward.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Eric Jaffa
March 30, 2010 10:48 AM
Kathleen Sebelius and AHIP President Karen Ignagni are both stepping around the central issue: refusing to sell a NEW policy to a family with a sick child.
Instead, they are pretending that the issue is covering children in existing family policies, which the law clearly says they must.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
George C
March 30, 2010 1:25 PM in reply to Eric Jaffa
I don't think so. Sebelius clearly understands what the issue is, and Ignagni's promise to "comply with all regulations" would appear to resolve the matter.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
May 13, 2010 8:29 AM
That may be true, but for a lot of families there's a huge difference between expensive insurance and no insurance. There's no question but that it will take time to phase in these things, including the exchanges or subsidies for people who can't afford current premiums, but the agreement at least to provide coverage is a large step forward.
jacket kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?