TPM LiveWire

Dem Rep. Gutierrez Confirms Plans To Vote 'No' On Senate Health Care Bill


Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

As we noted earlier, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) suggested on Hardball last night that he'd switch his vote on health care reform -- from 'yes' on the House bill to 'no' on the Senate bill.

His office has confirmed to TPM that Gutierrez plans to vote 'no' on the Senate bill. Here's the Democratic congressman's statement:

At this time, I am a 'no' vote on health care. It's no secret that I have been critical of proposals that would exclude our nation's hardworking immigrants from the health care exchange, and I would find it extremely difficult if not impossible to vote for any measure that denies undocumented workers health care purchased with their own dollars.

If we bar the immigrant community from buying private insurance with their own money, we relegate them to emergency room care at the highest cost to taxpayers and deny them the important opportunity to demonstrate their commitment to a healthier America. Immigrants are prepared to pay into the system, and excluding them from the private marketplace runs counter to the very goals of health care: containing costs, increasing the use of preventative care and streamlining the health delivery system.

Comments (18) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

March 12, 2010 12:08 PM   

"At this time...."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 12:09 PM   

He does understand that there are insurance plans that would not be offered within the exchanges? I still think hes posturing; the amount that the legal latino community that voted for him would gain from this bill far exceeds what illegals would lose.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 12:21 PM   

First, this is not a definitive statement, and second, maybe you should have contacted him before your last headline proclaiming that he had switched.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 12:35 PM   

The chicken little approach to HCR blog journalism is getting a bit tiresome.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 2:28 PM    in reply to pinson

What would you have the bloggers here do, not relay the guy's intentions and statements, because they are a blow to the prospects of the "reform" bill passing? Would you prefer the headline read "Guitierrez tells reporters he sees sunshine, lollipops, rainbows everywhere"? The fact of the matter is that Guitierrez did in fact confirm he was now a no vote. Not reporting it doesn't make it any less true.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 12:40 PM   

It's fine to express now what he'd like to see in the legislation. But when vote time comes around, vote for what we can get. Then, fight like hell to make it better. He's a Yes when voting happens or he wouldn't be qualifying his statements (unless he's one of the last to vote and his yes isn't needed - then he can make his point if he thinks it's in his best interest politically; but Pelosi can't let too many be the last 5 to vote).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 12:41 PM   

Well, the more comprehensive post you just put up after this is probably best and most accurate--I just wish you would have covered all those angles first. There's a lot of unnecessary confusion and panic.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 12:46 PM    in reply to human

p.s. I do think he has a legitimate gripe, but I don't see him becoming a Stupak wrt immigration. Although it's always good to note that the anti-choice zealots aren't the only ones with principles.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 1:26 PM    in reply to human

I don't know -- is there more than one way to read this:

At this time, I am a 'no' vote on health care. It's no secret that I have been critical of proposals that would exclude our nation's hardworking immigrants from the health care exchange, and I would find it extremely difficult if not impossible to vote for any measure that denies undocumented workers health care purchased with their own dollars."

Doesn't look like much wriggle room to me. Really bizarre, though. As someone already said, it's the equivalent of saying "I know there are 30 million without insurance, with 15,000 a day losing their insurance, but right now I'm concerned with the undocumented illegal immigrants". Makes no sense.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 12:54 PM   

Who needs this petty posturing? If he's willing to play chicken with health care reform that effects everyone, it's time to remove him from office. There must be a more qualified Dem in that district.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 1:11 PM   

LG has more than this on his plate right now. In a corruption trial of an allegedly crooked developer that has already seen on Chicago alderman plead guilty his name came up yesterday. Gutierrez is on record as having taken a $200,000 loan, received $41,000 in campaign donations, and jobs for relatives all from the developer. This while lobbying the mayor for zoning changes. Far be it from me to judge but a US rep involved in local zoning issues seems a little strange.

As one of his constituents I hope he gets back on board with this bill, while not ideal it is a step in the right direction.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 2:13 PM   

Maybe this is a ploy to get guarantees about doing immigration reform this year. Either way, I just don't understand these people. I really don't. The Dems are as toast as it is possible to be in the next election- I'd say the next few elections- if they get nothing out of this. And yet each of them is using it to advance their own pet projects, rather than fighting to get it passed. It's just disgraceful. However meritorious this all is, surely there's a more intelligent way to negotiate with your leadership than plant the seed that this is failing and by so doing, increase the chances that it will.

What none of these people seem to grasp is that it will be FAR easier to pass something like a public option, or modifications to this plan after it is passed than it is to do so now. I promise you the Republicans and the insurance companies and big pharma, etc. etc.- these types understand. That's why pharma even with its sweetheart deal is secretly funding anti-reform advocacy. Not because it gives them a bad deal- but it sets the stage for power to shift away from them and toward reform of the abjectly broken system that is making them so rich.

And then you have the idiots that Democrats seem to repeatedly elect to office that think that once this legislation passes, Congress packs it up and closes shop for good. I simply, can't possibly even understand. And, btw, Rep. Gutierrez, how many undocumented currently have health insurance. I can't imagine on this earth that it's a big number. I furthermore can't imagine that this would not be a huge help for the myriad documented latinos that are recent immigrants and thus blue collar and those likely to benefit the most from this bill. So he's screwing them to the wall too.

I'm just apoplectic at this point. It's hard to know how to respond anymore. In any case, I definitely plan to exact my revenge at the voting booth and with my campaign donations on Democrats broadly if this goes down in flames.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 2:25 PM   

The guy is stating that he can't vote for the bill because of the immigration portions of the bill. Everyone agrees that immigration can't be fixed via reconciliation. So people trying to parse his words by bringing up "at this time" need to ask themselves what can the Dems do to address his concerns with the bill itself that will enable him to vote for the bill? Nothing. Unless of course you somehow are clinging to to hope that they haven't already made assurances to the guy that they would try to move on immigration in the future. But I think everyone knows they have probably already tried to sway him with such assurances.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 2:46 PM   

It doesn't bar immigrants just illegal immigrants - you can't very well offering subsidies to folks who are here illegally. This should be handled in immigration reform not in the healthcare bill. Does he think killing HCR will win support for immigration reform? Really?

Also this clown is in hot water for some crooked dealings - http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-developer-trial-carothers-20100311,0,3294189.story

Testimony in the federal corruption trial of a Chicago developer on Thursday revealed that U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez met with the developer and Mayor Richard Daley to push for the city's approval of a controversial real estate venture.

Gutierrez's involvement in lobbying Daley to support the project goes a step beyond what the congressman has previously told the Tribune in stories documenting his political and financial relationship with the developer, Calvin Boender, and his unusual role in backing a project outside his congressional district.

The Tribune previously has reported that Gutierrez wrote a letter to Daley on Boender's behalf after receiving a $200,000 loan from Boender. The newspaper reported Sunday that relatives of Gutierrez and two other Chicago politicians who supported Boender landed jobs tied to the project known as Galewood Yards.

That is from yesterdays Chicago Tribune. This sounds like a deflection.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 12, 2010 6:16 PM   

This clown is a fool. And I err on the side of Capuano (my own representative) and can accept his questions and resulting reasons for being non-committal. Each day in MA, we live with the unwise decision to mandate that individuals and small businesses buy the products of the criminal, status quo health insurance industry. A mandate without competition can be seen as nothing less than a hand out to the insurance companies. I still have no idea whether or not I could vote for this bill were I a representative but I guarantee I would vote for it if I thought my constituents would truly benefit from it...

But this clown Gutierrez...I saw him on Hardball last night and sensed that he was a reasonable (albeit, really goofy) man. However, his reasoning for voting against this bill is simply unacceptable in that he is willing to vote against a potentially better life for (legal) American citizens because it would not permit people here illegally to benefit from the legislation. The guy should be tarred and feathered for making this argument.

I am as liberal/left-leaning as one can get. In fact, I cannot bring myself to lean more than 89 degrees towards vertically center on the scale. I am certainly far outside the bounds of American political scaling. However, I feel very strongly about the issue of people being in this country illegally, and my feelings are validated by stains like this guy. I feel that this country was founded on the hard work and values of people (like my grandparents) who came here in search of a better life and that is what I love. I get the folly of the modern immigration bureacracy and can sympathize with people doing what they have to in order to survive, but this type of thing does nothing but prove that we have ventured far beyond what is acceptable in looking the other way. I say enough...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 13, 2010 5:59 PM   

What a tool.

This bill does not exclude legal immigrants. I'm sick of these Democrats who will screw the country and the party just to get on a soapbox.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 14, 2010 4:14 AM   

Rep. Gutierrez is campaigning yet again. The health care bill is NOT the place to debate immigration, that would be the Immigration Bill which Obama claims to have next on his schedule.

I wish we could simply have public financing and get all of this crap over with, although we would still have posturing right around election time...that never changes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 12, 2010 7:19 AM   

This clown is a fool. And I err on the side of Capuano (my own representative) and can accept his questions and resulting reasons for being non-committal. Each day in MA, we live with the unwise decision to mandate that individuals and small businesses buy the products of the criminal, status quo health insurance industry. A mandate without competition can be seen as nothing less than a hand out to the insurance companies. I still have no idea whether or not I could vote for this bill were I a representative but I guarantee I would vote for it if I thought my constituents would truly benefit from it...

But this clown Gutierrez...I saw him on Hardball last night and sensed that he was a reasonable (albeit, really goofy) man. However, his reasoning for voting against this bill is simply unacceptable in that he is willing to vote against a potentially better life for (legal) American citizens because it would not permit people here illegally to benefit from the legislation. The guy should be tarred and feathered for making this argument.

cialis kamagra

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on