TPM LiveWire

Apologetic McDonnell Adds Slavery Clause To 'Confederate History Month' Proclamation


Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell (R)

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) has apologized for not including any mention of slavery in his proclamation declaring April "Confederate History Month" and added an extra clause to the proclamation.

"The failure to include any reference to slavery was a mistake, and for that I apologize to any fellow Virginian who has been offended or disappointed," McDonnell wrote in a statement. "The abomination of slavery divided our nation, deprived people of their God-given inalienable rights, and led to the Civil War. Slavery was an evil, vicious and inhumane practice which degraded human beings to property, and it has left a stain on the soul of this state and nation."

He also added a clause to the proclamation that declares slavery "led to this war."

WHEREAS, it is important for all Virginians to understand that the institution of slavery led to this war and was an evil and inhumane practice that deprived people of their God-given inalienable rights and all Virginians are thankful for its permanent eradication from our borders, and the study of this time period should reflect upon and learn from this painful part of our history.

McDonnell had taken heat from both critics, such as former governor and current DNC Chair Tim Kaine, and past supporters, such as BET co-founder Sheila Johnson.

In a statement to the Washington Post today, Johnson -- who co-chaired McDonnell's Inaugural Committee this year -- condemned McDonnell's decision to proclaim April as Confederate History Month, calling it an "insensitive disregard of Virginia's complicated and painful history."

"The complete omission of slavery from an official government document, which purports to be a call for Virginians to 'understand' and 'study' their history, is both academically flawed and personally offensive," she wrote.

Back in 2009, Johnson's decision to endorse McDonnell over the Democratic gubernatorial nominee in Virginia, Creigh Deeds, was touted by McDonnell's campaign as a showcase of his ability to "bring people together."

Kaine, who as McDonnell's predecessor skipped issuing a declaration at all, released a statement blasting the governor.

"Governor McDonnell's decision to designate April as Confederate History Month without condemning, or even acknowledging, the pernicious stain of slavery or its role in the war disregards history, is insensitive to the extraordinary efforts of Americans to eliminate slavery and bind the nation's wounds, and offends millions of Americans of all races and in all parts of our nation," Kaine said.

The full statement, as released by McDonnell's office:

"The proclamation issued by this Office designating April as Confederate History Month contained a major omission. The failure to include any reference to slavery was a mistake, and for that I apologize to any fellow Virginian who has been offended or disappointed. The abomination of slavery divided our nation, deprived people of their God-given inalienable rights, and led to the Civil War. Slavery was an evil, vicious and inhumane practice which degraded human beings to property, and it has left a stain on the soul of this state and nation. In 2007, the Virginia General Assembly approved a formal statement of "profound regret" for the Commonwealth's history of slavery, which was the right thing to do.

When I signed the Proclamation designating February as Black History Month, and as I look out my window at the Virginia Civil Rights Memorial, I am reminded that, even 150 years later, Virginia's past is inextricably part of our present. The Confederate History Month proclamation issued was solely intended to promote the study of our history, encourage tourism in our state in advance of the 150th Anniversary of the beginning of the Civil War, and recognize Virginia's unique role in the story of America. The Virginia General Assembly unanimously approved the establishment of a Sesquicentennial American Civil War Commission to prepare for and commemorate the 150th Anniversary of the War, in order to promote history and create recognition programs and activities.

As Virginians we carry with us both the burdens and the blessings of our history. Virginia history undeniably includes the fact that we were the Capitol of the Confederacy, the site of more battlefields than any other state, and the home of the signing of the peace agreement at Appomattox. Our history is perhaps best encapsulated in a fact I noted in my Inaugural Address in January: The state that served as the Capitol of the Confederacy was also the first in the nation to elect an African-American governor, my friend, L. Douglas Wilder. America's history has been written in Virginia. We cannot avoid our past; instead we must demand that it be discussed with civility and responsibility. During the commemoration of the Civil War over the next four years, I intend to lead an effort to promote greater understanding and harmony in our state among our citizens."

In addition the Governor announced that the following language will be added to the Proclamation:

WHEREAS, it is important for all Virginians to understand that the institution of slavery led to this war and was an evil and inhumane practice that deprived people of their God-given inalienable rights and all Virginians are thankful for its permanent eradication from our borders, and the study of this time period should reflect upon and learn from this painful part of our history.....

Additional reporting by Evan McMorris-Santoro

Join the Conversation!

128 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

April 7, 2010 6:00 PM   

He's made his bed of white sheets already. Now even if he took off the pointy cap, it makes no difference.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:22 AM    in reply to jsdc007

That state deserves every thing I'm sure this racist clown is gonna' bestow on them in the bad sense.

And every other redneck state that votes these lost in time assholes in.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:26 AM    in reply to jsdc007

The Great White Hope

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:02 PM   

Yea, how much whiter can this guy get??? These folks need to mix it up a bit and strengthen their gene pool... Yuck.....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:26 PM    in reply to lousgirl84

Otherwise, his grandkids will be translucent.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:59 PM    in reply to Brownbagger

Didn't Reagan go down there and deliver a coded message to them to kick off his campaign? Received with a standing ovation? I can't remember the details. The point is, retractions don't matter, the message was sent to the faithful: I'm a true republican negro hater like you. Message received. It's about getting the troops in line. He's got ambitions. You don't win the GOP nomination by pandering to dems.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:07 PM    in reply to mass_murdock

Reagan went to Independence Mississippi, which was the site of "Mississippi Burning" and he knew exactly what he was doing and why. These guys are all racists and are pissed off they can't wear their white sheets around in public like they used to be able to before the 60s. Their very existence shames us all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:03 PM    in reply to runfastandwin

Damn straight he did and he knew exactly what he was doing..racist scum bag that he was.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:58 AM    in reply to lousgirl84

that would be the only time Pres. Reagan knew what he was doing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:07 PM    in reply to runfastandwin

Reagan went to Independence Mississippi

Actually it was Philadelphia, Mississippi -- the city of brotherly love, Southern style. Which means they express that love by kidnapping their brothers, killing them, and burying their mutilated corpses under an earthen dam.


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:35 PM    in reply to Peter Principle

Exactly.

Y'all come on back soon, ya' heah?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:11 PM    in reply to mass_murdock

His is the face of racism today. It has never gone away, this curse on Southern souls.
--The nigras are lucky we brought them out of Africa.
--Can't they just let it go?
--Our generals were noble heros.
--It was about state's rights, not really slavery.
--Besides, we don't have slaves now. (Well, we would if could, but the dang libruls complain and it stirs up the darkies.)
--And, ya know, white men built this country. God meant for us to rule it.

The good news: Each generation produces fewer and fewer racist larva.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:25 PM    in reply to Brownbagger

I'm not so sure about that. I thought the same thing when Civil Rights was passed. It looks like the crazies are even crazier now and as racist as ever. I'd love to believe it but I can't. Did you hear the transcript of the phone call made to John Lewis's office recently?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

EH

user-pic

April 7, 2010 9:35 PM    in reply to lousgirl84

I think it's just that the fewer there are of them left, the more strident and shrieky they have to become in order to make up for their diminishing numbers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:47 PM    in reply to lousgirl84

They are making more noise as they die off. It's called a "death rattle".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 6:43 PM    in reply to Dorn76

I hope ya'll are right on this one....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:03 PM   

What do you expect? This guy went to Regent University...a KKK University without the drag!!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:05 PM   

Makes me wonder how many African-Americans were involved in the brainstorming of a "Confederate History Month"....

Also makes me wonder how many African-Americans are involved in ANY brainstorming in his office...

ChD

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

bvd

user-pic

April 7, 2010 6:35 PM    in reply to ChuckD

What on earth makes you think there's any brainstorming done in his office at all? That would require brains.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:06 PM   

What, exactly, was the point of the Confederate rebellion if not to preserve slavery? Isn't this like celebrating National Prostitute Day while not condoning sex?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:41 PM    in reply to mans_best_friend

Why, it was about state's rights. At least that's what many of my southern "friends" say - their official history is that slavery was incidental to the War Between the States (aka the War of Northern Aggression).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:09 PM    in reply to minnesconsin

Yep, it was about individual state's rights... the right to slavery.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:36 PM    in reply to minnesconsin

The "states rights" justification was actually invented after 1865 by Jefferson Davis, Alexander Stephens and other ex-Confederate statesmen in order to salvage their own reputations. After all, they were responsible for the most catastrophic political decisions in American history--to secede from the Union, to create the Confederacy and to start a war by firing on Ft. Sumter. Small wonder that after a piss-poor record like that they would want to sugar-coat the whole thing by saying it was really all about states' rights. Look at what they were saying in 1860-61 and you'll find very little about defending states' rights and a great deal about defending--you guessed it--slavery.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 9:51 AM    in reply to Atomist

With all due respect, I don't think that's accurate. Wikipedia has an interesting review of this history of the theory, which actually begins in 1828 and 1832, with South Carolina's "Nullification Ordinance", which declared federal tariffs enacted in those years unenforceable in that State. Andrew Jackson sent a Naval flotilla to S. Carolina to deal with the situation. (Hmm, did the Virginia legislature read any of this stuff before enacting the law declaring mandatory health insurance in the HCR unenforceable?) The Confederate Constitution declares states' rights a cornerstone of the rebellion.

While after the rebellion some may have attempted to spin the cause into a constitutional principle, in fact after tariffs the primary focus of states' rights concers was slavery.

Wikipedia's article is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States'_rights#Controversy_to_1865

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:09 PM   

The mystery is why the Confederacy continues to be "celebrated" or "commemorated" by anyone. The Confederacy arose because of the southern States' insistence on clinging to an abhorent practice that the rest of the civilized world had long since foresworn. Secession was an act of treason, and the South got seriously beaten down for it.

You'd think that Southerners would be anxious to have everyone forget about it entirely.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:11 PM    in reply to Early Out

I like you point, but am in the "if you forget history, you're doomed to repeat it" crowd.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

April 8, 2010 3:10 AM    in reply to Early Out

Foresworn, perhaps, but not quite so "long since": it was only about a generation since slavery had been practiced in Britain. Emancipation there was officially in 1834, but the Slavery Abolition Act moved slaves into indentured apprenticeships, the last of which ended in August of 1840.

Although slavery was abolished in the French colonies with the Constitution of 1795, it was re-established under Napoleon in 1802. It was ended again only in 1848, but at about that same time, France started to colonize Africa, forcing the African natives into working conditions that were not much different from slavery.

Brazil didn't end foreign slave trade until 1850 (it was banned in the US in 1808), and the practice of slavery did not officially end there until 1888.

Meanwhile, forced labor continued in the Congo under the rule of King Leopold of Belgium into the early 20th century, and did not end with his death in 1909, but continued into the 1920s.

I have no wish to apologize for the practice of slavery in the Southern U.S., but I do object to the continued portrayal on this blog of the South as the butt of the world.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:05 AM    in reply to slb

"I have no wish to apologize for the practice of slavery in the Southern U.S., but I do object to the continued portrayal on this blog of the South as the butt of the world."

While it may be unfair to portray the whole South as the butt of the world, that characterization certainly applies to Southerners who insist on celebrating the rebellion.

I think I'd have a different reaction if Virginia initiated a "Civil War Remembrance" month, or something like that. 150 years after the fact, our knowledge of the war and what it represented is slipping away. That would be useful. But to celebrate the Confederacy? Which caused 600,000 American dead and countless more wounded? Give me a break!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:10 PM   

When Lincoln planted the Union dead in Robert E. Lee's front yard, he did so not because the Confederacy was noble, but because it was evil and rotten. To celebrate the Confederacy today is an insult to all that is decent. What a nasty, nasty little man.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

April 8, 2010 3:16 AM    in reply to artwrite

Actually, Lincoln did not do that, it was Quartermaster General Montgomery Miegs, who had a visceral hatred for the Confederacy, and especially for soldiers like Lee who had resigned their commissions in the US Army to serve with the Confederacy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:11 PM   

WHEREAS the institution of slavery is an abomination upon the face of the earth, and

WHEREAS the southern American states seemed disinclined to end said practice, and

WHEREAS the aforementioned southern American states were in fact acting in a belligerent manner to secede from the Union, and

WHEREAS they continued to act in such a manner as to provoke an armed response,

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the citizens of Massachusetts commend their ancestors for crushing the rebellious spirit of the southern states, and commend them for restoring order to the Union, and commend them for defeating the South in battle, and commend them for ending the institution of slavery, and also for defeating the South, and finally did we mention that we defeated the South? Like, really, really defeated them. Crushed them, in fact. Wasn't even close. I mean, for a bit there it was kind of tight. Be we really throttled them once we got going.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:30 PM    in reply to DaveJ

Dave's proclamation is full of WIN.

And what Early Out said. Why on this Earth would Virginia or any freaking state even want to make the Confederacy a MONTH?? Aren't these things for stuff we LIKE?

Actually, believe it or else, there is a National Holocaust Month, who'da thunk? So, we have these "months" to celebrate something or draw "awareness" to something or other. What are we to be aware of?

"WHEREAS, all Virginians can appreciate the fact that when ultimately overwhelmed by the insurmountable numbers and resources of the Union Army, the surviving, imprisoned and injured Confederate soldiers gave their word and allegiance to the United States of America, and returned to their homes and families to rebuild their communities in peace, following the instruction of General Robert E. Lee of Virginia, who wrote that, “...all should unite in honest efforts to obliterate the effects of war and to restore the blessings of peace."; and..."

'Ultimately overwhelmed' is an interesting little two word idea. So, lemme see, if the Confederacy had not been overwhelmed and the South had stalemated the North then, um, what? Even when you put in the new language, there is other language about the context of the time, etc. OK and yes, nothing about how certain folks in the North aided and abetted the institution of slavery.

Maybe, a Civil War Awareness Month is a better idea.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:45 PM    in reply to nowhereman

They proclaim a Confederate History Month because there is already a Black History Month.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:48 AM    in reply to nowhereman

Hey Dave, that's a pretty good idea.
I almost like it better than my idea - I think mine will be easier to get on the ballot for November, though. More because it's just one day.

"William Tecumseh Sherman Day"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Tecumseh_Sherman

Whaddya think? We can stir in some of the language your proposal uses. And talk about how the fields should have been salted after they were burned.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:50 PM    in reply to DaveJ

This Citizen of Connecticut seeks to add his fine State to your proclamation.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 11:27 PM    in reply to DaveJ

Between 600,000 and 700,000 died in the Civil War. A large majority were Union soldiers. Gloating might not be the best response. Piss them off too bad and they might send another Texas governor to be POTUS!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

rb6

user-pic

April 7, 2010 6:15 PM   

Obviously, he needed to include language on slavery, but really, the whole proclamation seems misguided. First, it's a month devoted to "Confederate History," which is hardely viewpoint neutral -- especially when an entire chunk of your state seceded from the state when the state seceded from the Union, rather than become part of the Confederacy. He is trying so hard to have this both ways -- to see it as recommending the "study" of history and at the same time "airbrushing" what that history was. Many Virginians were not grateful for the eradication of slavery. Many Virginians now living in Virginia were not born there, like I wasn't, and actually see the Civil War through the lens of the sacrifice of non-Confederate relatives.

But it's nice to know that he has paid a price at least in embarrassment for trying to bend over to please his so-called base.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:17 PM   

I think its code for yes to "States Rights".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:41 PM    in reply to BearCreekMan

I think it's code for "we know you are pissed there is a negra in the White House."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:55 PM    in reply to Brownbagger

exactly

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:18 PM   

To people like him, it was just a lost of livlihood, no big deal. People like him just don't understand why the grandsons of slaves just don't "get over it".

It wasn't "significant" to the people of Virgina that their ancestors lived off the backs of other people's labor and suffering.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:19 PM   

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:19 PM   

Interesting that "Confederate History" month takes place the same month as Abraham Lincoln's assasination. And ...

the home of the signing of the peace agreement at Appomattox

Lee's unconditional surrender is now a "peace agreement" ?

Is Virginia now the Texas of the Atlantic coast?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

April 8, 2010 3:34 AM    in reply to we r all husseins

Indeed, that was a little more than just a stretch. Not only did Lee surrender his army, but that was not the end of the fighting, because Lee's Army of Northern Virginia was not the only one in the field. Lee's surrender on April 9 was just the first in a cascading series that continued on land into June, and the CSS Shenandoah wasn't surrendered until November, at Liverpool, to a commander of the British Royal Navy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

April 8, 2010 3:38 AM    in reply to slb

I should add that there was no "peace agreement," because at the end of the war, the Confederate States of America had completely collapsed. There was no party left with which to make any sort of peace agreement. Jefferson Davis was captured and imprisoned and the states of the Confederacy were under military occupation.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:24 PM   

Thanks to slavery there are black McCains in Mississippi, relations of John the War Hero, through his slave owning great-granddaddy. So what so bad about that, family and all?

They live near bout the plantation where John was born, and their cooking is sure better than the white branch of the family.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:34 PM    in reply to NobleCommentDecider

Bet they could fly a plane better, too.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:26 PM   

WTF..."The failure to include any reference to slavery was a mistake, and for that I apologize to any fellow Virginian who has been offended or disappointed," How about you apologize for ALL Virginians, you f'n moron, not just the ones you've offended, cuz you've now let be known that your apology is precisely qualified...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:23 PM    in reply to rpasley

That caught my attention as well. "I'm sorry you're mad" is not an apology...just ask my wife.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 10:07 PM    in reply to ohyeathatsright

McDonnell is explicitly -- and quite deliberately -- NOT apologizing to anyone outside Virginia. Kinda weakens the effect, no?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

sbv

user-pic

April 8, 2010 11:11 AM    in reply to ohyeathatsright

dear ohyeathatsright: as a wife, thanks for the chuckle. peace

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:26 PM   

CAUGHT BETWEEN THE DEVIL/TEABAGGERS AND THE DEEP BLUE SEA

In order to gain the political power they've enjoyed for decades, Republican moderates and fiscal conservatives made a pact with the devil (faux Christians, bigots, racists, sexists - teabaggers) to achieve the numbers they needed to defeat Democrats. They made a strategic decision to manipulate and exploit the ignorance, fears and hatreds of dysfunctional and vulnerable voters in order to win elections rather than lose them by being intellectually and morally honest.

Today, those who conspired with the devil are caught between wanting to disassociate themselves with and casting out the demons they empowered and the karmic reality that they don't have the numbers to hold on to or regain power without continuing to accept and "advocate" the immoral values, hypocrisies and corruptions that are dividing and destroying their party.

The survival of today's shrinking Republican Party is so dependent on extremism that they have no significant power left WITH or WITHOUT the support of America's increasingly pernicious lunatic fringe.

The idiom "caught between the devil and the deep blue sea" is appropriate as Republicans are facing the dilemma of choosing between two equally undesirable alternatives that both result in Republican impotence in mainstream American politics. They are suffering the consequences of their treachery.

Their irresponsible propping up of George W. Bush cost them their credibility, and the dysfunctions of teabaggers, birthers and deathers exacerbated by the irresponsible exhortations of Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck are costing them their viability.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:31 PM   

Do Virginians and other Southerners really need help remembering the confederacy? Whenever I'm traveling, every 10th car has a confederate flag on the back windshield.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:37 PM   

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY has become an ORGANIZATION of THUGS, CONSPIRACY THEORIST, FLAT-EARTHERS AND RACISTS.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

bvd

user-pic

April 7, 2010 6:40 PM   

How fucking incredible is it that on the 150th anniversary of the the start of the Civil War anniversary we have a black president?

That beats any fucking confederate flag you whiners can ever wave anywhere. Hands down.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:43 PM   

And now more Confederate History...

Confederates = losers

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:44 PM   

Wow! So what is next for Virginia? Child Molesting Month?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:46 PM   

Well, Virginia. You voted for him now you are stuck being regarded as a southern state instead of a progressive state. I can't believe Virginians actually fell for his "moderate" stance. I thought it was kind of a wide stance

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

April 8, 2010 3:47 AM    in reply to dmspeech

McDonnell won because the Democrats put up a lousy candidate. I was not fooled by McDonnell's pretense at being a moderate and his disavowal of the sentiments in that paper he wrote for Regent, but most people are not news junkies, you really had to work at it to hear any of the debates, and with endorsements from most of the major newspapers in the state and no effective challenge from the Democratic side, it just wasn't that hard for McDonnell to look credible to the vast majority of the electorate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 6:55 PM   

LOST & FOUND

Multiple Brains found; tagged with words "Republican Politician" on each of them.

To reclaim them, IQ Test is required before getting them back.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:01 PM   

Okay, now I have been following this Palin chick and I think this post is a communism, now I am not saying the writer is a communism...but just the same.

We are the greatest country the world has ever seen and we have always done things constitutionally and all and every census I know of until the census of 1870 counted our negroes and three fifths of a human being. I mean that has to count for something. I mean we did not note that the negroes were 2 fifths of a human being or so. I mean we gave them the benefit of the doubt and all.

WHAT IS ALL THE FUSS ABOUT ANYWAY?

You know we let negroes play in the NFL and all and rush says that our football games look like contests between black gangs and all and we do let negroes play roles on TV and all.

WHAT IS ALL THE FUSS ABOUT.

And I want reparations for chrissakes.

I mean I never got to own a slave or nothing like that.

the end

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:01 PM   

LOST & FOUND

Multiple Brains found; tagged with words "Republican Politician" on each of them.

To reclaim them, IQ Test is required before getting them back.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:02 PM   

When you see a car flying a Confederate flag, it means only one thing 99% of the time: Blacks are not our equals and we shouldn't be forced to treat them as if they are--ie. Racism.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 11:35 PM    in reply to sabatia

I thought it was the international symbol for "Ignoramus On Board".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

April 8, 2010 3:54 AM    in reply to NotBornEveryMinute

That's usually how I read it! There's a guy who lives on a street that I drive down most days on my way to work who has a Confederate flag flying atop a tall pole. I cringe every time I see it.

When I was growing up, the Confederate flag thing was more like the Yankees - Red Sox rivalry, or at least that's the way it seemed. Maybe that was just the way it looked from inside the bubble. But it never seemed as sinister a statement then as it does now. Certainly nobody I knew then ever meant it that way.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 9, 2010 6:08 AM    in reply to sabatia

I call it the white trash flag.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:05 PM   

All I can say is ... Sheila Johnson deserved what she got. Let's see whom she endorses next time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:20 PM    in reply to Cervantes

This. It'd be nice if she and Wilder showed some public remorse, but I doubt it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:33 PM    in reply to Cervantes

What's the deal w/jackson? Weren't either she and her ex or her current husband against Obama in a very public and ugly way. Why is she supporting this winger?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

April 8, 2010 3:57 AM    in reply to Cervantes

Sheila Johnson deserved what she got.

Ditto for Doug Wilder, who was on television early Wednesday night expressing his astonishment at McDonnell's cluelessness.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:13 PM   

This is very good politically - for Democrats.
He first alienated(if he hadn't already) all fair minded and civil people - and now he's made his bigoted base think of him as a wuss. And we all know what goes from there: his base will be calling him 'pinko faggot' very, very soon.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:03 AM    in reply to cinesimon

Well, not entirely. The racist wingnuts know his "apology" was coerced by the Commie Librul Meedia and he don't rilly mean it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:15 PM   

Too little, too late. What an a**hole. Maybe he can go down to SC and help Joe Wilson fight to keep the Confederate flag flying at the State House.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:17 PM   

Didn't Reagan go down there and deliver a coded message to them to kick off his campaign? Received with a standing ovation? I can't remember the details. The point is, retractions don't matter, the message was sent to the faithful: I'm a true republican negro hater like you. Message received. It's about getting the troops in line. He's got ambitions. You don't win the GOP nomination by pandering to dems.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:20 PM   

Obviously, the crushing weight of the Governor's hair helmet blocked any rational thought...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:30 PM   

I notice a lot of hatred here tonight. McDonnell didn't actually win by very much against an opponent who was a demonstrably poor campaigner. What are all those Virginian's who voted against McDonnell, or who didn't vote (it wasn't a very high turnout as I recall) to think of all this hate speech? What are the folks who voted for Obama in Virginia and North Carolina to think of this hate speech?

Most folks who speak well of the Confederacy are merely exhibiting regional pride. Something that is permissible in every other region in the country. I, personally, think regional pride is junior high school behavior, but I don't hate junior high schoolers.

The governor of Virginia is despicable, in my opinion, but not particularly for this act. He was despicable last week, too. He represents religious intolerance, which is the disease that is ripping our country apart. Racism is our old disease.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:44 PM    in reply to Marquis de SeaToShiningSea

Your threshold for recognize hatred is very very low then.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:30 PM   

Fuck. When I grew up there in the 80s, VA kinda of pretended there was no civil war and certainly didn't have confederate celebration by the state itself. The focus was more on Yorktown and the Revolutionary War. God damn these backwards fucks!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:10 PM    in reply to twirling fartknocker

When I grew up there in the 80s, VA kinda of pretended there was no civil war

When I grew up there in the '60s, we were taught that there were three "red letter" days in Virginia history -- the arrival of the first Jamestown settlers, the arrival of the first slaves, and secession.

That is, if you were lucky enough to be taught anything at all. Some of the state's public school districts shut their doors in the mid-'60s for a awhile in a vain effort to avoid court-ordered integration.

Compared to that, skipping over the Civil War in silence was an improvement.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

April 8, 2010 4:42 AM    in reply to Peter Principle

I grew up in Virginia in the 60s, too, but I don't remember those red letter days from the Virginia history textbooks we used. What I remember is that 1619 was called a "Red Letter Year" for three things: (1) the arrival of the first women; (2) the arrival of the first African slaves; and (3) the organization of the first representative assembly in the New World. I have since learned that there actually were women in Jamestown before 1619, and that the first Africans, though they arrived after having been sold into involuntary servitude, were more like indentured servants -- the permanent slave system didn't develop until much later. So much for the reliability of those history books.

What I remember about the way the Civil War was taught was not as any kind of banner celebration about secession and such, but more a "Virginia as victim" -- taking the secessionist step only reluctantly, the heavy price it paid as a major focal point of the war, the loss of most of the western counties when West Virginia split off, the heavy debts it was left with after the war. And yes, I also remember the lessons about the "happy slaves."

That is, if you were lucky enough to be taught anything at all. Some of the state's public school districts shut their doors in the mid-'60s for a awhile in a vain effort to avoid court-ordered integration.

No, not the mid-60s. Some schools in several jurisdictions were shut down by the state in the fall of 1958 when federal courts ordered them to integrate (Warren County High School, a high school and an elementary school in Charlottesville, and six schools in the city of Norfolk). The localities themselves fought to cobble together funds to keep their schools open. White families whose children were locked out of school sued in federal court and won their case; the state relented and the schools opened again in February of 1959.

Surrey County closed its white schools rather than integrate them; white students attended a private academy, and black students could still attend public schools.

Only Prince Edward County voluntarily shut down its entire school system, and it remained closed from September of 1959 until 1964, when federal courts ordered them re-opened. During that time, white students attended the private Prince Edward Adademy, which was, in effect, the county's school system, but nothing was available for the black students.

The state and some localities continued playing games to try to avoid integration after that, but not to the extent of shutting school systems completely down.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:38 PM   

Guess that's it, then. Everybody go home now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:40 PM   

Apologize? Apologize? What happened to flagellation and hair shirts? Public penance? Apologize???

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 7:52 PM   

If McDonnell was really trying to promote the unique history of Virginia, why didn't he make the proclamation as "Virginia History Month" or Civil War History Month"? Why did he choose Confederate history when Washington D.C. is less than a 90 minute drive north of Richmond therefore in essence the capital of the Union and Confederates where located in the same state.

Sheila Johnson must be really proud right now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:01 PM    in reply to Ironcomments

"Sheila Johnson must be really proud right now."

Win.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:38 PM    in reply to Ironcomments

They went with "Confederate History Month" after the first idea, "War of Northern Aggression Month" was felt to be too redneck-y. :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 11:14 PM    in reply to Matt Jones

They went with "Confederate History Month" after the first idea, "War of Northern Aggression Month" was felt to be too redneck-y.

Yeah, I never understood that - War of Northern Aggression.

They shot first, so how is it the North was the aggressor? Another false truth they choose to believe in order to fit their reality.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

April 8, 2010 4:44 AM    in reply to mophan

The historical revisionists in the South (like Jubal Early) got to work very soon after the war, and they evidently quickly learned the effectiveness of the technique of projection.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:15 PM   

The South is our misfortune.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:28 PM   

Think of it from the Glenn Beck point of view. The end of the Civil War was the nightmare they scream about. An armed and hostile Federal government came in and stole the rightful property of those poor plantation owners without a cent of compensation.

If enough of the fuckwads who actually believe this nonsense get their panties in a bunch, will he apologize to them as well?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:29 PM   

What is 'confederate history'? The period of time between when they seceded and we kicked their lazy cracker asses?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 8:44 PM   

I wish Sherman could burn down the South again.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:10 PM    in reply to Max Thrax

Sherman was a lightweight. These goddam crackers obviously didn't learn their lesson. McDonnell is celebrating an act of treason against the United States.

I'm declaring April to be "National Burn A Confederate Flag Month."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 10:12 PM    in reply to Max Thrax

Can u limit your mindless comments to those who actually support this bigoted ass? And not include the people who delivered VA and NC to Obama?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

April 8, 2010 4:46 AM    in reply to Dorn76

Thank you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:00 PM   

And THIS GUY was touted as a bellwether for Republican victory this fall??! Along with Scott Brown there's a good deal of good ol' Red State hoof-in-mouth.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:02 PM   

Awwww, thanks Governor...and we apologize for calling you a racist douchebag!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:06 PM   

At least he's being a bit more honest. Although I think the whole thing is a joke, at least he's acknowledging that the civil war was always about slavery, not state's rights or any of that tea-party invented nonsense.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:08 PM   

So is it now fair to say that when all those racist, sexist, neanderthaloid opinions were unearthed about McDonnell late in the campaign, they were absolutely friggin' accurate?

Good work, Virginia. Time to hide the fact that I ever lived there.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:11 PM   

Innconent union guy attacked by demented Tea Partiers at Wasserman-Schukz townhall

http://www.conservative21.net/displayone.cfm?docid=4200

...ooops...my bad..that's not what happened

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:16 PM    in reply to Barney

Oh, grow up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:28 PM    in reply to Barney

you are one ugly little fuck.....is it a disease in the republican party?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 7:19 PM    in reply to Barney

Isn't it adorable how the crazies try so hard to deflect from something they can't lie or blame their way out of?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:21 PM   

This idiot, Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R), makes me ashamed of having lived in Virginia for 12 years. When I was there, I actually thought that Virginia had grown beyond its ignorant and bigoted past. Sadly and apparently I was wrong.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:22 PM   

By the way, Virginias, next time get off your asses and VOTE!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:26 PM   

Let's kick in a fact or two. In the 1860 census, the population of Virgina was found to be 31% enslaved. South Carolina, the epicenter of the pro-slavery rebellion, topped its fellow slave states at 57%, with Mississippi not far behind at 55%.

Allow me to speculate that the fact of slavery would have been difficult to ignore, back in the day.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:39 PM   

Apparently slavery wasn't the entire point of the Confederacy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 9:53 PM   

The sad part is, once he was reminded of the omission he did come up with a really good statement. I would have thought well of him had it occurred to him to include it in the first place, without being reminded he'd forgotten to mention the invisible (to Republicans) people.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 10:29 PM   

It is so interesting that it is now a dilemma for Republicans to come out strongly against slavery. Do they need a reminder that the Republican Party was FOUNDED in opposition to slavery?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 10:47 PM    in reply to Joe Markowitz

No they don't. But then again it is bit of over-reaction that it the mention of slavery was excluded initially.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 11:29 PM    in reply to GOPinNYC

Well, GOPinNYC, generally when one thinks of the Civil War one thinks of slavery, of course.

Unless, one is a GOP. So, that explains why it was omitted. The current GOP (and a huge disappointment to the GOP of 1860 they are) finds nothing wrong with the enslavement of the darkies.

So, overreaction? No, I don't think so. The "unintentional omission" and non-apology (sorry if YOU was offended by my words) just shows the true nature of the current GOP.

Lincoln would be a Democrat today. So, the current GOP WOULD NEED A REMINDER they lost the war, at the very least.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:58 AM    in reply to GOPinNYC

Overreaction?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 7, 2010 11:44 PM    in reply to Joe Markowitz

The "southern strategy", started by the Repugs in the 1970s, led to the takeover of the party by ex-Dixiecrats and their ilk. So, it's an entirely different party, now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Tug

user-pic

April 7, 2010 11:56 PM   

Friends, Romans, Bloggers, lend me your eyes; I come to bury slavery, not praise it.

I ask that everybody stop with the "white sheets" assumptions, step back and breathe. I will try to get through this quickly and not lecture too much.

A quick dose of humor: I used to work for the government of the state of Texas which periodically would officially celebrate MLK day and Confederates Heroes day on the same day.
That takes some mental gymnastics, but the motivated readers of TPM have the intellectual faculties to pull it off.

1. Slavery is not only an abomination, it is the worst abomination - worse than murder even, as it degrades the human experience on an ongoing basis. Live free or die.

2. The Civil War was first and foremost a conflict of two competing economic systems: the industrial north and the agricultural south...based on the backs of slaves, which again, is an abomination.

3. Abraham Lincoln's first concern was preserving the Union, and he made no secret about it. He went on record saying that if preserving slavery would save the Union, he would do it.

4. Think about that - preserving the Union. If Lincoln did NOT take that attitude, then the experiment that was Democracy would fail because if every time the losing minority chose to secede if they did not get their way, Democratic institutions would inevitably disintegrate into smaller and smaller units, and democracy would be a failed experiment.

5. It took the likes of Frederic Douglas and others to constantly needle and agitate Brother Lincoln before he had a transformation. You are all familiar with the Gettysburg Address, which Gary Wills described as Lincoln intellectually picking America's pocket and making the war into something greater than what it had been. See also his second inagural address which brings the point home, and it is in that speech in which he declares that the nation had to pay for the sin of slavery, the whole nation, both sides, but that the 600,000 plus dead did NOT die in vain.

6. The average southern soldier was NOT a slaveholder. This is the true madness of the war. They were generally small landholders and farmers, and by fighting they were perpetuating slavery and fighting against their interests. The larger owners had that "if you have 20 or more slaves you are exempt from fighting" bullshit.

7. I cannot tell you why they fought as they did fight against their own self-interest. My guess would be the misguided beliefs of finding a purpose in life, a challenge, and a misconception that they were being invaded.

8. What is their to celebrate? They fought to preserve slavery. Why bother? Keep in mind that their whole world was destroyed with little to nothing left. The stain of slavery as well and the rest of the horrible death and destruction is on their heads.

So, just as every southerner cannot hide from the ultimate truth that the Civil War ultimate was a fight about slavery, I challenge each and every one of you to look at yourself and ask if you can find some semblance of humanity in every living person...death row criminals or Republicans, take your pick...or are you a cynic?

All humans are flawed. All humans fuck up. Yet we all need to find humanity and celebrate it. The South fucked-up big time, and there was a ton of destruction as a result, so the need to find humanity in the ashes and celebrate it is all the more acute.

The humanity that the South can and does celebrate is the valor in the fight the soldiers put forth for their friends, family and brothers-in-arms. That is it. Nothing more.

By comparison, do you not feel some respect for Vietnam vets, kids who got themselves in a bad situation, even though you know damn well our overall American mission there was seriously flawed? That is what the South is dealing with.

Do they keep the celebration of valor alive too vigorously and for too long of a time as all the soldiers are long since dead? Yep.

Is the Confederate cause co-opted by less honorable forces? You bet - think of the 1957 resurgence of state flags incorporating the Confederate flag in response to the 1954 Brown decision. People died because James Meredith went to college.

Do I have a rebel flag in my yard? Hell no. My friends and neighbors would think I was an asshole so I don't do that.

This is the struggle Southerners face.

Still, if you can pull off the mental gymnastics, and keep perspective of what is and what was not a part of our common American history, you can find something to celebrate.

It took The Band, a bunch of Canadians (plus one guy from Arkansas) to articulate these thoughts in the 70's hit "The Night They Drove Ole Dixie Down". It captures the sense of loss coupled with the search for humanity perfectly; and you are right, slavery is not mentioned.

The Governor of Virginia was wrong to omit slavery on the first go around, but I actually liked the subsequent statement.

Now y'all without sin may cast the first stone, and by that I mean if you come from a state which has no, zip, zero, none, no instances of racial strife.

Didn't think so. It is a sad part of the American Experience, but keep this in mind:

On election night several of the older reporters noted with astonishment that younger voters did NOT see why it was a big deal that we elected a black president. There is hope for all of us yet.

Fundamentally, my friends, we are more alike than unalike.

We are all Americans. Certain elements in the South need to get past the blindness to history and slavery, but the blanket "white sheets" assertions are not helpful.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

April 8, 2010 5:15 AM    in reply to Tug

Nice post!

A quick dose of humor: I used to work for the government of the state of Texas which periodically would officially celebrate MLK day and Confederates Heroes day on the same day.

In Virginia it was Lee-Jackson-King Day. (Lee and Jackson were both born in January, and there was a Lee-Jackson Day in Virginia long before MLK Day came along.) Lee-Jackson Day is still observed here, though I'm not sure if they still call it that; it's on the Friday before the MLK holiday, and it pretty much is only observed by state workers and the Sons of Confederate Veterans, who use it as an occasion to march down Monument Avenue. (The Sons, that is, and not the state workers.)

4. Think about that - preserving the Union. If Lincoln did NOT take that attitude, then the experiment that was Democracy would fail because if every time the losing minority chose to secede if they did not get their way, Democratic institutions would inevitably disintegrate into smaller and smaller units, and democracy would be a failed experiment.

And the Confederacy itself was almost an illustration of that. Not long after it established itself, South Carolina got upset with something the Confederate government was doing and threatened to secede from the Confederacy. (What is it in the water or the gene pool down there?)

7. I cannot tell you why they fought as they did fight against their own self-interest. My guess would be the misguided beliefs of finding a purpose in life, a challenge, and a misconception that they were being invaded.

I remember reading somewhere a story (possibly apocryphal) about a Union soldier asking a young Confederate why he was fighting when neither he nor his family owned any slaves. The boy looked at him. "Because you are here." I think for a number of them, it was the sense of defending their territory against people from the outside. (Remember that in those days, when people said, "my country," they were often referring to their state.) Some of them probably joined up looking for adventure. I have a great-great grandfather who went in later in the war as a substitute for another man. My gg-grandfather was a widower with an infant son (my great-grandfather) to look after. I strongly suspect he may have joined for the money because food had by then become scarce and horrendously expensive.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 9, 2010 6:19 AM    in reply to slb

The saying common among the troops was, "It's a rich man's war but a poor man's fight." The South was a white supremacist oligarchy ruled by a network of about 10,000 extremely rich land holders. The war was fought by middle class and poor whites. Illiteracy was widespread. There were "readers" who had to read the letters from home, written by neighbors who were able to write and who told of wives and children eating vines and dirt to stop the hunger and begging the men to desert and come home. Desertion was a huge problem as men left to return to their farms to feed their families. The wealthy, if they did not buy a substitute, were the officers, of course.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 8:38 AM    in reply to Tug

Nice post but good luck with folks in the south getting past the blindness to history and slavery.

This guy should be impeached. How about that for starters?

Slavery as an afterthought!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:56 AM   

This is almost worse - adding the remembrance of slavery as an afterthought

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 8:11 AM   

Wouldn't this whole thing be as if Angela Merkel proclaimed a German celebration of Hitler History Month, with a bunch of whereas clauses explaining all the "positive" things that Hitler accomplished – bringing Germany out of the Great Depression, building a sense of national pride, taming hyper-inflation – and leaving out that part about the Holocaust. She would then explain that WWII was fought over issues other than the Jews, so it really wasn't that big a deal.

Later, she would apologize about omitting the Holocaust and add a new whereas clause acknowledging the horror of it all.

While still begging the question: Would celebrating Hitler History Month make any sense in the first place?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Tug

user-pic

April 8, 2010 10:20 AM    in reply to PrincetonDem

Celebrating "the good side of Nazism" does seem a bit much doesn't it?

Pretty hard to find humanity in Hitler...yet...we do have neo-nazis in the world.

I thought about the German example. It appears that WWII has weighed so heavily on the German psyche that the next generation had a substantial pacifist movement.

Also keep in mind - how much do you hear about "supporting the troops" who volunteered to be in the current army and the current mission in Iraq. How is that any less unsettling?

History is fascinating, but war should not be made glamorous....but then again how do you inspire somebody to be a good effective soldier?

Also, I am not sure "slavery as an afterthought" captures what Lincoln was getting at.

Let's not let this Confederacy celebration thing become another distracting wedge issue akin to flag-burning. There are so many other matters of substance that expose the Republicans to be the frauds that they are.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 8:43 AM   

Sherman declared during his "March to the Sea" from Atlanta:

"Pierce the shell of the Confederacy and it's all hollow inside!"

Indeed.

Everytime we take a step forward in race relations in this country (election of President Obama for instance), we have to figuratively fight the Civil War all over again.

Virginia has gone all hollow inside for the moment. But, it won't stay that way. There are too many good people inside it now to allow for that.

Not like before.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 9:59 AM   


THis is the speech of Charles Sumner on the Senate floor in 1856. It is a great speech and should be read by every student in the Virginia School system for the "Leave us alone and let us keep our slaves" month


http://alpha.furman.edu/~benson/docs/sumnerksh2.htm

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:43 AM    in reply to IMNOTBITTER

A bit lengthy but a good read never the less. For his troubles Sen. Sumner had his head bashed in by the good Sen. Preston Brooks of South Carolina. Sen. Brooks himself succumbed to a fatal disease within less than a year sparing the country from further embarrassment.

"Brooks survived an expulsion vote in the House but resigned his seat, claiming both that he "meant no disrespect to the Senate of the United States" by attacking Sumner and that he did not intend to kill him, for he would have used a different weapon if he had. His constituents thought of him as a hero and returned him to Congress. However, Brooks's attack on Sumner was regarded in the north as the act of a cowardly barbarian. One of the bitterest critics of the attack was Sumner's fellow New Englander, Congressman Anson Burlingame. When Burlingame denounced Brooks as a coward on the floor of the House, Brooks challenged him to a duel, and Burlingame accepted the challenge. Burlingame, as the challenged party, specified rifles as the weapons, and to get around American anti-dueling laws he named the Navy Yard on the Canadian side of Niagara Falls as the site. Brooks backed out of the challenge, claiming that he would be murdered on his way north. Burlingame's reputation as a deer hunter and a deadly shot with a rifle may also have been a factor. Brooks remained in office until his death from the croup in 1857. He was buried in Edgefield, South Carolina."--from Wikipedia.

The crazies have been among us for a considerable time now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 1:22 PM    in reply to IMNOTBITTER

A bit lengthy but a good read never the less. For his troubles Sen. Sumner had his head bashed in by the good Sen. Preston Brooks of South Carolina. Sen. Brooks himself succumbed to a fatal disease within less than a year sparing the country from further embarrassment.

"Brooks survived an expulsion vote in the House but resigned his seat, claiming both that he "meant no disrespect to the Senate of the United States" by attacking Sumner and that he did not intend to kill him, for he would have used a different weapon if he had. His constituents thought of him as a hero and returned him to Congress. However, Brooks's attack on Sumner was regarded in the north as the act of a cowardly barbarian. One of the bitterest critics of the attack was Sumner's fellow New Englander, Congressman Anson Burlingame. When Burlingame denounced Brooks as a coward on the floor of the House, Brooks challenged him to a duel, and Burlingame accepted the challenge. Burlingame, as the challenged party, specified rifles as the weapons, and to get around American anti-dueling laws he named the Navy Yard on the Canadian side of Niagara Falls as the site. Brooks backed out of the challenge, claiming that he would be murdered on his way north. Burlingame's reputation as a deer hunter and a deadly shot with a rifle may also have been a factor. Brooks remained in office until his death from the croup in 1857. He was buried in Edgefield, South Carolina."--from Wikipedia.

The crazies have been among us for a considerable time now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:16 PM   

As a lifelong Southern dweller, I am struck by the good ol' boys who wave the flag, love 'Murca, and are quick to call treason, yet also celebrate the Confederacy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 9, 2010 6:03 AM   

The Confederacy was a white supremacist state. The Old South was a white supremacist society. Read VP Alexander Stephens's "corner-stone speech" if you doubt that. So, what are we celebrating???

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 11, 2010 6:44 AM   

First mistake was calling it Confederate History Month instead of Civil War History Month. Not a few Civil War historians and Civil war buffs are African-Americans. However, you will never catch any of them waxing nostalgic for the CSA, which after all was a white supremacist state, or in "celebrating" the Confederacy. a white supremacist society. If you make the emphasis the Confederacy instead of the Civil War, next thing you know you are getting into the Lost Cause mentality, which is where the Governor seemed to be heading. All Americans should be glad "the South" (CSA) is NOT going to rise again. Stick to the Civil War, the battles, the battlefields, the generals, the soldiers, etc.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 26, 2010 12:31 PM   

the south is definitely our misfortune

l viagra l kamagra l

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 26, 2010 12:32 PM    in reply to Tosh

haha sorry governor

l m65 l acne l

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on