TPM LiveWire

Steve King Denounces Humane Society As 'Vegetarians With An Agenda'


Rep. Steve King (R-IA)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) is making one thing very clear: As a representative from an agricultural, meat-producing state, he really does not like the Humane Society.

King released a statement yesterday criticizing the presence of the Humane Society at a recent National 4-H Conference. In the release, King says the Humane Society has a hidden vegetarian agenda "to take meat off everyone's table in America."

"The Humane Society of the United States is a political machine masquerading as an umbrella organization for local humane societies," King said. "HSUS bills itself as an animal care organization but it spends less than 1% of its $100 million annual budget on direct animal care. Instead, HSUS solicits money from well-intentioned but often uninformed animal lovers and uses these donations to lobby Congress for an anti-meat, anti-animal agriculture agenda. HSUS is run by vegetarians with an agenda whose goal is to take meat off everyone's table in America."

Late Update Humane Society CEO Wayne Pacelle gave TPM this statement: "Representative Steve King isn't one to talk about animal welfare, since he has one of the most appalling records on animal protection in Congress. He has opposed disaster planning for pets, strong penalties for dogfighters and cockfighters and other common-sense policies. The Humane Society of the United States provides direct care to more animals than any other animal welfare group in the nation, spending more than $20 million annually supporting local animal shelters and running our own hands-on animal care programs and providing other direct-care services. In addition, we combat large-scale cruelties such as puppy mills, animal fighting, factory farming and horse slaughter - all of the things that Rep. King is so fond of."

Comments (82) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (2)

April 8, 2010 10:36 AM   

...and the problem is?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:38 AM   

"Where's the beef?"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:42 AM   

Presumably, if ACORN changed their name to MEAT, they'd be okay in his eyes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:45 AM   

This coming from a meathead.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:46 AM   

I hate to agree with Steve King, but he's not wrong. The HSUS doesn't actually run any humane societies, nor does it play a significant role in saving animals. It's pretty much PeTA.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:13 AM    in reply to joebama

I don't think King's point was to cast a bright light on HSUS' organizational structure. It was to accuse a "Humane Society" as being essentially unAmerican, for "lobbying" for vegetarians.

What is it with these people? Even when they may have a scintilla of an argument, they manage to phrase it in terms that make you want to gag.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:16 AM    in reply to joebama

What? Willful ignorance will get you nowhere. And apparently all of those vegetable/fruit farmers are really PETA in disguise as well? Why does the right hate Americans so much? I never knew treating all of god's creatures with humanity was such a bad thing. But what do you expect from a group who is waiting for the world to end. Sorry to tell you, its not going to happen no matter how hard you try.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:52 AM    in reply to joebama

As someone who has worked on the Hill and with the folks at HSUS, I am sorry but you and Rep. King are wrong. HSUS is nothing like PETA and they do in fact "save animals." No, they don't run all the local humane shelters around the country, that is true - they are first and foremost an advocacy group trying to change policy at the state and federal level. But they do operate and provide support to numerous shelters and animal preserves, work with law enforcement to stop abuses of animals and find homes for the neglected animals, and are able to provide assistance during emergency events like Katrina. And when they lobby, it's for issues like better management of wild horses by BLM, tougher laws on animal fighting, ending blatantly abusive industrial farm practices, and numerous wildlife protection measures. Go to their website, http://www.humanesociety.org/, and tell me if you really think they are hiding the fact that they are an advocacy group, not your local animal shelter.

But unlike PETA, they don't bring Playboy models in cabbage bras to the Hill to serve vegan hotdogs or complain when the President kills a fly. In other words, they are actually taken seriously by policy makers - which is the real "problem." HSUS is being attacked right now as part of a coordinated campaign by Rick Berman's PR group, http://www.wjla.com/news/stories/0410/721967.html, funded you can be sure by agribusiness, because they fear HSUS and want to discredit them. They would like nothing more than to lump HSUS in with PETA. Too bad for them it's not true.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 1:06 PM    in reply to Bear 115

Thanks for that info. My mom sends me alarmist anti-HSUS emails from a horse-owning friend of hers. They do desperately want HSUS to be like PETA; they use words like "shady", "masquerading" and "multinational" and want people to be shocked that an advocacy group spends a large part of its donations on advocacy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 3:16 PM    in reply to Bear 115

...they are actually taken seriously by policy makers - which is the real "problem."

And exactly why the Repugs must attack them, since the MSM will report what he says without fact-checking and suddenly it becomes a controversy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 6:08 PM    in reply to joebama

Wrong. Educate yourself.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:46 AM   

King is slipping. He forgot to rail against the Humane Society's other secret agendas: (1) to take away everyone's guns and (2) force conversions to Islam and (3) make everyone gay.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:39 AM    in reply to Vincent F

HSUS does want to end pet ownership.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 2:09 PM    in reply to biglith

No they don't. They want to encourage RESPONSIBLE pet ownership.

Get your facts straight and don't believe everything that is emailed to you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 2:14 PM    in reply to biglith

I figured confiscating pets was next. Is Obama giving IRS agents Uzis to make this happen, or will HSUS carry this out once they get the Census forms back? How's the tinfoil hat working today?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 2:59 PM    in reply to Vincent F

The Sioux City, Iowa, city council, which is in King's district, recently ordered the seizure and euthanization of about 100 pit bulls whose owners failed to register them on time. When they came for the pit bulls, I said nothing because I didn't have a pit bull ...

King is an absolute nimrod but he represents a district overrun with nimrods. I know because I live there. Trust me, plenty of his voters are cheering for him like they did when he murdered the raccoon.

Here's an editorial about the pit bull issue:
http://siouxcityjournal.com/news/opinion/editorial/article_dfb59631-aac8-5897-9ceb-eb8fecf97c22.html

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 3:17 PM    in reply to Vincent F

Well, it's well known that most dogs are not Christians.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:49 AM   

So many conspiracies, so little time...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:50 AM   

The only use for Steve King is as meat.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:50 AM   

Actually PETA and HSUS are both anti-dog (can't speak for cats). They have both been going around the country promoting various restrictions on dogs and dog owners. Most show dog folks keep them on our "monitor" list.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:53 AM    in reply to dogjudge

They can have my dog when they pry his leash out of my cold, dead, fingers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:39 PM    in reply to Peter Principle

Snort!! Good one!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:59 AM    in reply to dogjudge

You mean like restricting people from abusing their dogs?

What a shame there's an organization out there depriving you of the the freedom to treat your animals in whatever horrendous way you like.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:12 AM    in reply to Barry Ragin

Have got a news flash for you.

I've taught obedience for 35 years. I've saved lots of dogs. Either the people get control of their dogs, or they put the dog down.

More importantly I also TEACH search and rescue work. Although I was out of the country, I did have a student who was at Ground Zero.

I also help with the local police and their dogs, because I KNOW more than they do.

As Mark Twain famously said. "You can keep your mouth shut and let people think you're and idiot or you can open it up and take away all doubt."

And YES HSUS does fight cruelty as does PETA. That doesn't excuse the fact that both organizations are trying to eliminate dog breeding by responsible people.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:41 AM    in reply to dogjudge

That said, saying they're "anti-dog" is untrue, and you know that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:49 AM    in reply to SkippyFlipjack

Really?

HSUS is pushing for MANDATORY neuter/spay laws in EVERY state.

http://www.akc.org/news/index.cfm?article_id=3710
http://www.adoa.org/index.php?Itemid=33&id=238&option=com_content&task=view

Is HSUS against animal cruelty, puppy mills, backyard breeders and other animal abuses? YES.

But as with PETA, both organizations have developed to the point where they want to outlaw the valid ownership of purebred dogs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:34 PM    in reply to dogjudge

The links don't seem to support the assertion.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:43 PM    in reply to dogjudge

If they're against breeding of purebred dogs, I can understand why you wouldn't like their position. That doesn't make them anti-dog. You're acting like all the other commercial organizations, distorting the positions of the HSUS because of how something they advocate affects you.

I'm a dog owner. If you still want to insist that they're "anti-dog", tell me how it would affect me and my dog if HSUS was elected dictator of the U.S.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 1:02 PM    in reply to dogjudge

By the way, one of those links credits the head of HSUS with this quote: "We have no problems with the extinction of domestic animals. (1993)" Apparently that quote has been repeated a lot, because Pacelle addresses it in a blog post:

http://hsus.typepad.com/wayne/2007/07/desperate-disto.html

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 4:02 PM    in reply to dogjudge

OMG!!! I just realized I hate animals because I spay and neuter! Guess I'll have cat-sup on my hot-dog tonite, since they're of no other use to me.

Quit pulling the fire alarm just to get a rise. Saying that HSUS is "anti-dog" because they want to encourage sterilization is like saying someone that is pro-choice hates babies. I, and the rest of my family, have been volunteers and supporters of the HSUS for many, many years and I find your misrepresentation of the facts to be completely irresponsible. I knew some breeders in the past and several trainers. They promoted spaying/neutering, as well.

Do you want me to attack you for breeding purebreds when there are millions of unwanted dogs (both purebred and mixed bred) waiting to be euthanized because no one can afford them? I didn't think so, and I wouldn't.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:12 PM    in reply to dogjudge

Which just goes to show there are 2 sides to EVERY story...

For many, "responsible breeders" is an oxymoron... For many, intentionally creating pure bred animals is not responsible, it is perpetuating unhealthy animals for our entertainment.

Yet another area where it is hard to see where consensus will ever be reached.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 1:01 PM    in reply to stillidealistic

Yes, stilli.

Absolutely.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 1:10 PM    in reply to stillidealistic

For many, intentionally creating pure bred animals is not responsible, it is perpetuating unhealthy animals for our entertainment.

with humans, it's called 'nazi eugenics' - breeding the master race. i don't understand why it's okay with animals.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:58 PM    in reply to dogjudge

First of all, the correct quote is " It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool, than to open it, and remove all doubt".

Secondly, when people use their pedigree to support a position, it is usually untrue.

Thirdly, I had co-workers who died on 9/11 but refrain from using that as support for a dumb statement. See Rudy Guiliani .

Fourth, neutering and spaying PREVENTS unwanted euthanasia of un-wanted animals.

I can make these statements, as you do, because I know more than you.
See, that makes my argument more valid.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 2:28 PM    in reply to dogjudge

They're trying to eliminate "puppy mills", not responsible breeders.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 6:11 PM    in reply to dogjudge

Example or link please.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:40 AM    in reply to dogjudge

HSUS, like Peta, is an advocacy organization whose mission is to keep animals from being used in service to people. You know that saying they're anti-dog is untrue. They're in full support of people having dogs as pets. I don't know their position on dog shows but I'd imagine they question whether the shows are in the dogs' best interest, and at the least support strong regulations on dog shows. That's presumably your problem with them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 3:25 PM    in reply to SkippyFlipjack

They generally don't support continued reproduction by mutts or purebreds (which makes Bob Barker anti-dog according to this person). They also advocate (like a lot of groups) adoption of a mutt over purebreds, mainly because of the genetic problems associated with the inbreeding required to maintain pure breed stocks, especially for breeds established with very small starting stocks.

That said, I own a neutered purebred miniature schnauzer. Needed a non-shedding dog, and it is really hard to gaurantee that with a mutt (as much as I love mutts). Plus, just once I wanted my kids to have a puppy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 2:11 PM    in reply to dogjudge

They have a problem with puppy mills and advocate laws that would restrict breeding in order to reign in the puppy mill business. That is what has breeders in an uproar... the fear of paperwork. A responsible breeder has nothing to fear from an anti-puppy mill law.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 3:25 PM    in reply to dogjudge

What a load of garbage. As a pet owner (2 dogs, 2 cats) who adopted all his animals from shelters, I've done some pro bono legal and volunteer work for the Humane Society, and I have nothing but accolades for them. There are too many idiotic, obnoxious wretches who treat their animals (pets, livestock) disgracefully, and HSUS works incredibly hard to raise awareness against such abuse. What ticks off people like King and his nimrod supporters is that HSUS also supports tougher enforcement, penalties and sentences against abusive people. As they should. Treating God's mute, defenseless creatures with care should be above politics. What a disgraceful hack this wingnut politician is, as are his miserable constituents.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 10:52 AM   

Iowans eat vegetables too. The farmers that grow them are part of the backbone of the midwest. Why does Steve King hate America?

Seriously, as noted in Douglas Brinkley's new book Wilderness Warrior, Theodore Roosevelt made the prevention of cruelty to animals part of his early political efforts. Would be nice if some enterprising reporter asked King his thoughts on this aspect of one of the pioneers of the Republican Party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:01 AM    in reply to Hussein Stemper

This GOP ain't the party of Lincoln or Teddy. Teddy bolted the party...and Lincoln abolished slavery and declared war upon the South, which is now the base of the racist, secession-suggesting GOP.

In other words, Teddy and Abe are the antithesis of the modern GOP. Both would be demonized by it. And both would destroy their demonizers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:18 AM    in reply to Hussein Stemper

You and your facts, tisk tisk tisk. What does the right want with facts, they only get in the way of a good talking point.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:42 PM    in reply to Hussein Stemper

Yes, Steve King hates America, and Americans, but only those meat-eating Americans. Those fruit and veggie eatinng Americans need to go back where they came from!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:00 AM   

I think a vegetarian diet makes environmental sense, am not a huge animal rights advocate. I am an advocate for every cat lady billionaire heiress taking a hatred to Steve King and diverting some of Mr. Wiggles inheritance towards radio ads making sure everyone knows that Steve King hates puppies, kittens and endorses clubbing baby seals.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:03 AM    in reply to Snig

What are you talking about? Teddy Roosevelt wasn't a Republican president. Nor were Woodrow Wilson, Dick Nixon, or George W. Bush. Matter of fact, they've pretty much whittled it down to Lincoln and Reagan. Not that they really would have liked Lincoln, but everyone else does so he's a keeper.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:55 AM    in reply to Lizskin

In fairness, Woodrow Wilson actually wasn't a Republican president (although he was certainly more akin to a Dixiecrat than FDR's brand of Democrat). But the rest of your point stands.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:45 PM    in reply to Lizskin

The problem is that the y weren't Republicans because they weren't Repblican enough!! Only Reagan had the manhood to be a real Republican!! Steve King isnn't goinng to let mere facts get in the way of his delusion!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 4:11 PM    in reply to Snig

Ha!!! Crazy cat ladies on the MARCH!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:06 AM   

Um, you people do know that there are groups that work on cruelty issues that don't run shelters too right? They actually exist. It's not a conspiracy. That's what HSUS does.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:12 AM   

I'm busy stocking my freezer before Obama takes away our meat.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 1:01 PM    in reply to NegSpin

There is life without meat...I promise you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 4:13 PM    in reply to stillidealistic

BLASPHEMY!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:20 AM   

the Humane Society wants to take meat off America's table and put it on America's floor so America's dogs and cats can eat it instead!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:22 AM   

Not your fathers' gop. Now gop stands for: God's offensive people

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:40 PM    in reply to concerned parent

GOP also = Gaggle of Pedophiles or Gang of Philistines.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 6:17 PM    in reply to kernel

Greedy Offensive Perverts.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:22 AM   

What's wrong with you people? Using waterboarding and other enhanced interrogation on our meat animals is not torture, and is absolutely necessary to insure the safety of every American. The HSUS is in bed with the terrorists... I mean meat, and must be stopped!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:27 AM   

THEYL PRY MY POT ROSTE FORM MY COLD DEAD HANDS

Seriously, though, as a Midwesterner, I see where he's going with this. Meat is a big part of the culture out there, and many people are rightly resentful of the smug sense of moral superiority that a small number of militant vegetarians possess and of efforts PETA and a couple other fairly marginal groups to shame them. At the same time, they know that we're eating way too much meat and that that isn't good for us or the environment. Focus on the PETA assholes and you offer them a way to feel better about themselves.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:34 AM    in reply to septictank

What exactly do all those meat animals eat? Oh that's right, they are vegetarian, oops.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:37 AM    in reply to septictank

Who cares if PETA wants to shame folks for eating meat? Sane, adult people make decisions based on fact, less meat, more meat, no meat - vegetarian, vegan - your choice. Personally I find PETA's self-righteous scolding annoying, but know a lot of very nice vegans. And Voodoo Donuts vegan donuts are awesome!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:49 PM    in reply to Powkat

Don't forget Voodoo Donuts bacon maple bars with strips of bacon, mmmm, meaty goodness for me and my dog.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 4:24 PM    in reply to septictank

Near as I can tell King is going with this inane statement to the same place he usually goes which is straight up his own fundament head first.Between this Rep.King and the repcons other one from NY I'm wondering if the GNOPers don't have an active program to recruit nutbags to their party as cover for the more seriously deranged ones who don't say much but try to get seriously flawed legislation enacted. Bat-guano crazy Bachmann comes to mind.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:35 AM   

My parents suffer the grave misfortune of living in King's district. I'm told that the Farm Bureau in that area refers to H1N1 flu as "the H," because calling it "swine flu" is part of a liberal conspiracy to get people to stop eating pork.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:37 AM   

I don't see that HSUS wants to force people to do anything other than raise animals in a somewhat more costly fashion. This would raise consumer prices, so that's a consideration, but they're not anti meat. They want laying hens to have more room to move around in, and they're going to put issues on the ballot in every state--including leading egg producing state Iowa--and let voters decide.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 11:50 AM   

Dammit! Our vast vegetarian-wing conspiracy is revealed! Retreat to the soy fields, fellow veggies!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 12:34 PM   

As an Iowan, I can say that Iowa is a great place — except for Steve KIng.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 3:08 PM    in reply to kernel

I'm an Iowan too, in Steve King's district. Unfortunately, there are a LOT of Steve Kings here. Just read the Sioux City Journal's editorials and the readers' comments on its website and you'll see why he keeps getting reelected.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 1:09 PM   

At a certain point, you really have to stop wondering what's wrong with people like Bachmann and King and start wondering WTF is wrong with a country where people who are clearly completely insane keep getting reelected to high public office.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 1:54 PM   

Wasn't Rush involved with the Humane Society? No, I'm serious.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 2:04 PM   

HSUS is an advocacy group and mostly spends its money on advocacy, which is fine. What's not fine is that they raise money with advertising that creates the impression that the money donated will go directly to helping animals, and not to advocacy. My mother is neither stupid nor inattentive, and yet she was very surprised when I explained to her that the HSUS is an advocacy group and runs no shelters. (She was relieved, because she felt guilty about not being able to afford a donation to help those animals featured in their ads.)

The HSUS is not PETA, not by a long way, but in recent years they have flirted hard with that radical animal-rights fringe. And they have unblinkingly used dogs they wanted killed to raise money "to help these dogs" (the Vick dogs, most of whom are now placed in new homes and doing very well.) They have also done some really useful things in fighting puppy mills etc. It's much more of a mixed bag than PETA--but this is one case where Steve King is, at least, not wildly wrong.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 2:34 PM    in reply to Eilis

And I really don't think HSUS has a problem with some kid in
4-H raising a calf or a lamb for the county fair. They're against factory farming, and that 4-H kid is the antithesis of a factory farm.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 3:10 PM    in reply to PSzymeczek

Part of 4-H's agenda is to teach kids to treat animals humanely. I can't wait til King goes after them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 4:39 PM   

I'm guessing that King has never spent a few hours touring one of Iowa's many pork "factories." Hogs enter under their own power, are stunned, then bled, skinned, and butchered while they are still breathing. Problem is, not all hogs are adequately "stunned" before the bleeding, skinning, and butchering begin.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 5:29 PM   

How do these jokers get elected?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 5:36 PM   

Sorry, and as much as I hate to say it, King has a point. First, you can expect this piece to be flooded by newcomers here to defend HSUS, because that's their MO. They mobilize quickly to get their employees and volunteers to post messages of support and point fingers at the messengers without refuting the facts. But HSUS uses misleading fundraising appeals, collects bucketloads of dollars, uses them for lobbying, pensions and executive salaries and pushing a Vegan agenda. While their commercials give the donating public the impression that their money will be used to help humane societies, homeless and abused animals, less than 1% of the money they collect is used to assist Humane Societies or shelters. Yes, they participate in dogfighting investigations and busts, as well as raids of puppy mills and hoarders. They then dump these dogs and cats on underfunded local shelters while they smile in front of the TV cameras and pose for glossies. The rest of the time they are lobbying for legislation which is detrimental to dogs and cats, despite being labeled as "anti-puppy mill" and other friendly sounding names. Mandatory spay neuter bills sound politically correct but actually result in increased shelter deaths. HSUS also aggressively pushes for the killing of pit bulls and policies against their adoption, regardless of temperament or history. When Michael Vick's operation was busted, HSUS used one hand to beg for money to save the Vick dogs, and the other to lobby for them to be killed. After Katrina, HSUS aggressively fundraised to save animals stranded or left homeless by the disaster. It took the threat of investigation by the State of Louisiana for HSUS to part with a dime of the money it collected. About a year ago, in Wilkes County, North Carolina, HSUS sent representatives to court to testify that the dogs and puppies (some not even weaned) from a dogfighting bust all should be killed, because they were too vicious to be rehabilitated and the cost of rehabilitation would be prohibitive. HSUS failed to tell the court that there were organizations skilled in rehabilitation clamoring to take the dogs at no cost. The dogs were all killed. A few months ago, HSUS mounted another fundraising drive using the image of Faye, a dog terribly injured in a dogfighting operation, asking would be donors to help them help Faye and dogs like her. However, Faye was not being helped by HSUS at that time. When the lie was outed in the blogosphere, HSUS coughed up $5000 for some of Faye's treatment, but it was too little, too late. Faye died. HSUS recently held an event where it aired a "clip video" taken at various egg farms in Iowa to show how cruel the conditions were, but kept out members of the press it deemed unfriendly to their "mission" and refused to release the remaining hours and hours of video taken to make the approximately seven minute film. Finally, two charity-grading organizations just downgraded HSUS's status.

Henry Bergh must be spinning in his grave.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 6:06 PM    in reply to btmom

Looking at the variety of responses to this article, it's obviously not a flood of HSUS supporters posting. Why would you say that? Anyone who gives them money without researching them on their website deserves to be confused -- just click "About Us" and they'll see that they're clearly not a local humane society. Are you a horse owner? For some reason HSUS really gets under your skin. Maybe you once got sick on a vegan meal?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 5:46 PM   

Yes, spaying and neutering DO reduce deaths (I do not call shelter killings euthanasia), but MANDATORY spay/neuter laws INCREASE deaths, because people who cannot afford the procedure will have their pets seized, relinquish them, or just abandon them. This increases the shelter population and results in animals being destroyed. This has been proven in California during the past few years. In contrast, if low cost spay/neuter programs are put in place instead, people will take advantage of these programs, be more able to adopt shelter animals, and deaths decrease. Mandatory spay/neuter is bad law.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 6:03 PM    in reply to btmom

If you can't afford to have your pet spayed/neutered, you can't afford to have that pet. It's not all that expensive, especially compared with other veterinary procedures you might be faced with, or food bills over time. And there already are lots of low-cost spay/neuter programs, just check the ASPCA website.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 8, 2010 6:12 PM   

Really? That's a very elitist attitude. Spaying a female can cost hundreds of dollars. It is a surgical procedure. And depending on where you live, the price of spaying/neutering can vary widely. Where I live, vet care is expensive. Neutering need not be expensive, but if there turns out to be an undescended testicle the price tag goes way up. And while there may be "lots" of low-cost spay neuter programs, they are not everywhere. It is well established that older people benefit greatly from having pets as companions. Should they be denied the right to pet ownership due to being on a fixed income? Again, I support spay/neuter, just not mandatory spay/neuter laws. Everybody benefits when we support low cost spay/neuter programs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 26, 2010 10:17 PM   

Sorry, and as much as I hate to say it, King has a point. First, you can expect this piece to be flooded by newcomers here to defend HSUS, because that's their MO. They mobilize quickly to get their employees and volunteers to post messages of support and point fingers at the messengers without refuting the facts. But HSUS uses misleading fundraising appeals, collects bucketloads of dollars, uses them for lobbying, pensions and executive salaries and pushing a Vegan agenda. While their commercials give the donating public the impression that their money will be used to help humane societies, homeless and abused animals, less than 1% of the money they collect is used to assist Humane Societies or shelters. Yes, they participate in dogfighting investigations and busts, as well as raids of puppy mills and hoarders. They then dump these dogs and cats on underfunded local shelters while they smile in front of the TV cameras and pose for glossies.

Tosh
buy viagra kamagra

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

April 26, 2010 10:19 PM   

HSUS is an advocacy group and mostly spends its money on advocacy, which is fine. What's not fine is that they raise money with advertising that creates the impression that the money donated will go directly to helping animals, and not to advocacy. My mother is neither stupid nor inattentive, and yet she was very surprised when I explained to her that the HSUS is an advocacy group and runs no shelters. (She was relieved, because she felt guilty about not being able to afford a donation to help those animals featured in their ads.)

The HSUS is not PETA, not by a long way, but in recent years they have flirted hard with that radical animal-rights fringe. And they have unblinkingly used dogs they wanted killed to raise money "to help these dogs" (the Vick dogs, most of whom are now placed in new homes and doing very well.) They have also done some really useful things in fighting puppy mills etc. It's much more of a mixed bag than PETA--but this is one case where Steve King is, at least, not wildly wrong.

Tosh
m65 acne

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on