
Arizona may be making headlines these days for putting the AZ in CRAZY, but it's definitely not the only state that's been passing legislation that's controversial, misguided, or just plain bizarre.
As we documented, Arizona has introduced a wave of conservative legislation over the past year or so, leading up to a law that makes it a state crime to be an illegal immigrant, and requires law enforcement officials to demand papers from anyone they suspect to be in the country illegally.
This got us thinking -- Arizona can't be the only state that's produced some head-scratchers recently. And with the help of TPM readers, we found that we were right...
• Georgia:
April 28, 2010: The state General Assembly passes a law allowing those with licensed firearms to bring their weapons into airports. Under the current state law, people can carry their firearms up until the airport curb, but the new law would allow them to carry them up until they reach security checkpoints, which are run by the federal government.
• South Carolina:
February 2010: State Rep. Mike Pitts (R) introduces legislation that would ban federal currency in his state, and replace it with gold and silver coins. Pitts explains that "the Soviet Union didn't think their system would collapse, but it did. Ours is capable of collapsing also," and using coins as legal tender would create a "base of currency," were that collapse to happen.
April 28, 2010: In a 74-37 vote, the state House overrides Gov. Mark Sanford's (R) veto of legislation allowing law enforcement officials to conduct warrantless searches of people on probation or parole. The state Senate had already overridden Sanford's veto, which means the warrantless searches may very well start soon.
• Virginia:
February 1, 2010: State Delegate James Edmunds (R) is upset about a state law that prohibits possession of "any wild bird or wild animal or the carcass or any part thereof, except as specifically permitted by law." Edmunds had wanted to hang a pair of deer antlers is his office, but discovered that they were considered contraband by the state. So he introduces a bill that would exclude "possession of shed antlers" from this law. It passes 95-1.
• Oklahoma:
March 10, 2010: The state Senate passes a bill that aims to prevent local and state authorities from "sharing information about hate crimes with federal authorities if the state of Oklahoma did not recognize the crime as a hate crime by its own statutes." It's a response to President Obama's signing of the Matthew Shepherd Act, which expanded hate crimes protections. Unfortunately, the Senate accidentally cited the section of U.S. code that describes racial and religious protections, and not protections for gays and lesbians, thereby stripping a different group of minorities of their rights to federal protection from hate crimes. Oops!
• Minnesota:
April 21, 2010: Republicans in the state Senate introduce an amendment requiring a two-thirds majority vote by the state legislature to approve any federal laws before they are enacted. The bill contends that "Minnesotans enjoy inherent, natural, God-given rights," and "citizens of Minnesota are sovereign individuals, subject to Minnesota law and immune from any federal laws that exceed the federal government's enumerated constitutional powers."
• Louisiana:
March, 2010: Another challenge is brought against Louisiana's rather Draconian florist licensing law, which stipulates that aspiring florists must pass a test for a federal florist license in order to operate a flower shop. Critics say the law hinders free market competition among florists, but similar challenges have been struck down in past (usually springtime) legislative sessions.
• New York:
December 2009: State Sen. Joseph E. Robach (R) introduces legislation that would allow each of New York State's 62 counties to vote on a 2010 referendum that asks: "Do you support the division of New York into two separate states?"
• South Dakota:
February 2010: The state House passes a resolution that "urges" public schools to teach global warming as "a scientific theory rather than a proven fact," and to be sure to include the "astrological" (among other) factors that could be effecting global weather patterns. The state Senate later amends this bill slightly, but still contends that the "global warming debate" has "prejudiced" scientific study of climate change.
• Utah:
February 2010: State Sen. Mark Madsen (R) introduces legislation to honor Utah native and "gun pioneer" John Moses Browning, who founded the Browning Arms company. The hitch? Madsen pushed to celebrate Browning's contributions on the same day as Martin Luther King Day. "I see them as complementary," he said.
And one more from Arizona, because it's just too good to pass up: On March 2, 2010, the state Senate gave preliminary approval to a bill that would make it illegal to attempt to create a human-animal hybrid in a laboratory. Someone has to think of these things, I guess.
Then there's the smorgasbord of increasingly restrictive abortion laws that have been passed across the country. Here are some from April alone:
Oklahoma now allows doctors to withhold ultrasound information about birth defects from women to discourage them from seeking abortions...The Florida Senate passed a law requiring women who are seeking abortions to pay for their own ultrasounds, except if they are victims of rape or incest -- though the women would have to provide evidence of that first...The Louisiana House approved a law preventing insurance companies from covering most abortions...Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman (R) signed a law prohibiting abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy...and Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) proposed a state budget amendment that would withhold "state money for abortions, including cases in which the health of the mother is at risk or the child might be born with a deformity."
And, lest we forget, there are the microchips: Over the past few years, lawmakers in eight states have introduced legislation to ban forcefully implanted microchips, a problem that seems to be borne of right-wing paranoia, and probably not any real epidemic of secret microchip implantation. California, Wisconsin and North Dakota have all passed legislation to combat the "problem."
Thanks to all the TPM readers who submitted tips.


Silence
April 29, 2010 8:58 AM
How about this one?
Proposal: All New Yorkers Become Organ Donors
Assemblyman Brodsky Introduces Bill That Would Give State The Right To Decide If You Are To Give The Gift Of Life
If Passed In Albany, Law Would Be First Of Its Kind In The United States.
http://wcbstv.com/health/ny.organ.donor.2.1662437.html
Donation or confiscation? It's more like a tax..... paid with organs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Given Up
April 29, 2010 11:35 AM in reply to Silence
Fuck you troll. GTFO
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Just Joan
April 29, 2010 9:03 AM
Doozies. Except for the antlers in Virginia. White-tailed deer naturally shed their antlers every year. Those antlers are useful for lots of different things; I use them to make buttons. I'd hate to think that one of my hand-crafted jackets would be illegal in the Old Dominion.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
April 29, 2010 10:17 AM in reply to Just Joan
Yeah, that one struck me as fix for unintended crazy, too.
But the the rest of the story just depressed the hell out of me.
As some commenters on another site say frequently, one of the things I was wrong about in 2008 was that I waaaay underestimated how crazy having a black president would make the white right.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Given Up
April 29, 2010 10:45 AM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
I suspect the right has been this crazy all along, they just suddenly got loud and discovered that people will pay attention to them when they do that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BillSoo
April 29, 2010 1:41 PM in reply to Just Joan
I think the law itself is relatively sane....the crazy part is that a legislator proposed and pushed it through just for his own ends.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
m
April 29, 2010 9:05 AM
Genius. Banning federal currency and cross-breeding humans and animals must tie for greatest legislative ideas of 2010.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Arundhati
April 29, 2010 9:08 AM
Georgia gets it right. God, guns & guts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jolly ranchero
April 29, 2010 9:13 AM
How does a guy proposing the ban of federal money with a switch to the Middle Ages use of gold and silver get elected? I mean, there's dumb, there's insane, but his suggestion is a wicked combo of both.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
musgrove
April 29, 2010 9:14 AM in reply to jolly ranchero
There is no limit on stupidity for the tea bagging crowd.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AZskeptic
April 29, 2010 12:41 PM in reply to jolly ranchero
Last time I read the constitution, congress has the sole power to coin money, wouldn't that kind of tend to make the whole idea illegal?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ryansh
April 29, 2010 4:57 PM in reply to AZskeptic
Last time I read the Constitution, it also said this: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
These people love the idea of the Constitution, but the actual text of the document? Eh, not so much.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
PSzymeczek
April 30, 2010 4:19 PM in reply to jolly ranchero
South Carolina: too small to be a state, too big to be an insane asylum.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
musgrove
April 29, 2010 9:13 AM
Its just amazing how stupid people are.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nightflyer23
April 29, 2010 10:24 AM in reply to musgrove
Is it?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
expat46
April 29, 2010 9:14 AM
All the best ideas come from the states.
/snark
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Woodrowfan
April 29, 2010 9:15 AM
I don't think the Virginia one belongs along with the nullification nuts. It seemed like a reasonable fixing of an unreasonable loophole.*
* full disclosure, I don't hunt but I do live in Virginia and enjoy walking in the woods and would like to be able to display some shed antlers if I found them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
concerned parent
April 29, 2010 9:18 AM
I really wish the south had won the civil war. And I am willing to change history to reflect that fact. So take all of your craziness and stupidity and leave my country.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wial
April 29, 2010 9:22 AM
And yet, with all this, the new Arizona law remains off the charts.
When is this post-cold-war chauvinist era finally going to end? I miss modernity.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dick_data
April 29, 2010 10:20 AM in reply to wial
I believe that the "off the charts" winner is the right of doctors in Oklahoma to conceal birth defects from the pregnant women. The next step would be to allow doctors to conceal pregnancies from women or illnesses from women who are or might become pregnant. If they were serious, they would outlaw vasectomies(that'll be the day) and tax condoms prohibitively.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lizskin
April 29, 2010 10:42 AM in reply to dick_data
Let's not forget that most insurance plans pay for Viagra, so men can (try to) impregnate women at will, because apparently blue balls are a serious medical condition. Most insurance plans DO NOT pay for contraception, so women can't protect themselves against said impregnation, because pregnancy and childbirth apparently do not pose a threat to women's health. And women have less and less access to abortion in much of the country.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lawyernerd
April 29, 2010 10:54 AM in reply to Lizskin
The GOP family planning plan: Boner Pills, good. Birth Control, Bad.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
April 29, 2010 12:50 PM in reply to dick_data
That's not the only anti-abortion legislation Oklahoma has passed in the current session. Another law, passed over the governor's veto, not only mandates an ultrasound at least 1 hour before any abortion procedure is performed, even when there is no medical necessity for it, the screen to be positioned so that it is visible to the woman, and the doctor or technician to describe to her in detail what is on the screen; it also, in effect, mandates that for early pregnancies, the probe must be inserted vaginally in order to get the greatest clarity.
The woman is not allowed to opt out of this procedure, even in cases of rape or incest; the only choice allowed her is to elect to turn her head away from the screen. (Not sure whether she is allowed to wear ear plugs if she does not wish to hear the narrative.)
And one other beauty, passed by the Oklahoma state Senate and now pending House approval, would require filing a 38-question form which includes questions about why the woman is seeking an abortion and how the abortion is being paid for. Completed forms to be uploaded to a web site maintained by the state and, evidently, made available for public access, minus identifying information like name and address.
And remember, these are the people who don't want big government running their lives. Anyone else's is fair game, I guess.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ryansh
April 29, 2010 5:07 PM in reply to slb
the abortion restrictions are starting to get scary and Oklahoma is really rivaling Arizona for crazy lately. but that last sentence of your comment is something that i think is a common misconception. ed brayton often points out on his dispatches from the culture wars blog that there's a small libertarian core in the Tea Party movement that genuinely dislikes big government, but most of the movement is conservatives. Conservatives pay lip service to small government, but that's more of a code word for doing away with social welfare programs. Conservatives believe in big government every bit as much as liberals, but they prefer the government to be big in defense and cultural areas. Conservatives don't want the government to stay out of people's lives; they want the government to promote conservative values in people's lives (i.e. "traditional" marriages and sex, abortion restrictions, Christianity, etc).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
o224hsday
April 29, 2010 10:27 PM in reply to slb
Add FL to the states that apparently love ultrasound. There is also a comment later downstream about a CO as well.
Women seeking abortions could face forced ultrasounds
By Dara Kam
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
TALLAHASSEE — Florida's Republican-dominated legislature is poised to pass a bill that would force any pregnant woman considering an abortion to first have an ultrasound - and pay for it - even if she was raped....SNIP
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Decatur Dem
April 29, 2010 9:40 AM
From Woody Allen's Bananas:
Esposito: From this day on, the official language of San Marcos will be Swedish. Silence! In addition to that, all citizens will be required to change their underwear every half-hour. Underwear will be worn on the outside so we can check. Furthermore, all children under 16 years old are now... 16 years old!
Fielding Mellish: What's the Spanish word for straitjacket?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SchrodingersCat
April 29, 2010 9:50 AM
Sweet Jeebus that's so stupid it hurts. And I live in Georgia so I have a pretty high tolerance for stupid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
christovir
April 29, 2010 10:05 AM
I must chime in with other commenters that the Virginia law seems sensible, and does not belong in here with the others.
Would you really prefer it be illegal to pick up an old pair of antlers found in the woods? It seems far crazier to me to make it illegal to pick up a shed antler or an old turtle shell.
And what about sea shells found at the beach? Sounds like possessing those is still illegal under Virginia law. Now that *is* crazy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
EnnuiDivine
April 29, 2010 10:08 AM in reply to christovir
Oh, Virginia has any number of other batshit insane laws either passed or being considered this year.
Like the one that would weaken the restrictions on drinking alcohol while openly carrying a firearm.
Yee-haw.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nightflyer23
April 29, 2010 10:23 AM in reply to EnnuiDivine
Probably a response to the Cheney thing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
April 29, 2010 10:13 AM
That Oklahoma law is pretty disgusting....not that the other's are not but I find it particularly offensive. Amazing how these people want the government of out of their lives when it suits them but feel no compunction of telling women what they can and can't do and their doctors.
I despise these people.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
acf_ma
April 29, 2010 11:00 AM in reply to chameleon
They want the government out of their lives, but let a tornado or flood roll through their state, and out come the hands for federal aid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
April 29, 2010 11:06 AM in reply to acf_ma
Exactly!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Al Roderick
April 29, 2010 10:16 AM
And in contrast to the forcible implantation of microchips paranoia, we have that state legislator in (I think) AZ calling for forcibly implanting microchips in captured illegal immigrants. I guess, as usual, only English-speaking white people count.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Given Up
April 29, 2010 11:30 AM in reply to Al Roderick
Of course, haven't you been paying attention? That has been the message all along, no matter how well hidden.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
April 29, 2010 12:55 PM in reply to Al Roderick
I'm thinking we should take the "bodily integrity" concerns of the microchip paranoids and run with it, using it to create a wide zone of bodily integrity protections that would possibly protect women from things like having to have sonogram probes inserted into their vaginas against their will when they seek an abortion, as is mandated by one of the recently passed anti-abortion laws in Oklahoma.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nightflyer23
April 29, 2010 10:22 AM
What's this? No human-animal hybrids?
Well, that just sucks. How will I build my army of gorilla-men that spit cobra venom now?
Not to mention the shark-men with frickin' laser beams on their heads... so unfair.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SBG
April 29, 2010 10:39 AM in reply to Nightflyer23
I'm crying for the Little Mermaid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ripper McCord
April 29, 2010 10:37 AM
I am in awe of the conservative movement's capacity to derail, deflect and retard important legislation while enacting solutions in search of problems. When will foil hats be required attire in state legislatures?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Given Up
April 29, 2010 10:39 AM
I think I'm going to have to take advantage of my dual citizenship and go move to Switzerland, the crazy is taking over. Why is it that a good part of this country seems determined to return to the 14th century?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AZskeptic
April 29, 2010 12:45 PM in reply to Given Up
cause jesus wants them to.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
April 29, 2010 6:53 PM in reply to Given Up
Don't forget that Switzerland recently banned minarets, because they're taking over - there's a whopping four of them in the country already.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
boycottfaux
April 29, 2010 10:50 AM
Interesting, reading all these radical and appalling proposed bills and new State Laws . .
Including Colorado, et al. forcing women to undergo an ultrasound prior to a legal medical procedure [including law not requiring the same physican to inform his patient of his findings if physician so wishes, hence, absolving the physician of lawsuits] . .
But then, it appears we now have a 'Negro in THEIR[??] White House' and our country is going BOTSO!!
Very sad, my friends, very sad . .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
calbearinillinois
April 29, 2010 10:51 AM
I hope they defined "human-animal hybrid" narrowly, since right now a whole lot of people are running around with animal based implants/parts (heart valves, tendons, skin grafts, ears, bladders, to name a few - pigs are especially generous providers) and every use of human DNA for therapeutic treatment involves putting the isolated DNA into an "animal" host cell (from bacteria to hamster ovary cells) to create implantable vectors (that recombination is why it is called recombinant DNA technology). But let's not have science get in the way of a good scare.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BillMcD
April 29, 2010 11:17 AM in reply to calbearinillinois
Well, you can't do it in 'a laboratory'. So as long as you rename the room 'Human-Animal Hybrid Abomination Creation Fun Zone', and insist it's not a 'lab', it's a 'recreational science' area, you're good.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
gregopvuur
April 29, 2010 11:05 AM
What's so crazy about the Georgia firearms at airports law? Say terrorists distracted law enforcement in one area of an airport only to launch a devastating attack in another. Ordinary citizens would be on hand, and armed, and able to disrupt the attack. But that doesn't really matter since we have the 2nd Amendment. Why should airports be any different from any other US territory? Why should different laws apply to certain zones? American soil is American soil.
And Montana's sovereignty law: isn't it already assumed that states don't have to follow unconstitutional federal laws? And that citizens have the same rights? Citizens are not obliged to obey unlawful orders from law enforcement or other government employees. Why should states be?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NobleCommentDecider
April 29, 2010 11:48 AM in reply to gregopvuur
The problem with Georgia's guns in airports law is that the chief objective is keeping guns off planes.
If you legalize having guns in and throughout the terminal, except the plane concourses, it opens a whole new set of possibilities for getting a gun on the plane.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
April 29, 2010 1:00 PM in reply to NobleCommentDecider
And once you get to the security gate, what the hell do you do with the gun?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
April 29, 2010 12:59 PM in reply to gregopvuur
I don't believe states have the power simply to declare a federal law unconstitutional. If they don't like the law, they have to file suit in a federal court, and if they don't want to have to follow it while the case is being decided, they have to ask for an injunction against implementation, which the court may or may not grant.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bheartlib
April 29, 2010 11:13 AM
It is unbelievable to me that a doctor in Ok can withhold actual medical information from a woman and be held harmless. So, does the State pay for all the extra help needed to care for a disabled child? Oh, I forgot. It is her fault because she obviously fornicated.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jaycal
April 29, 2010 11:14 AM
This is complete and utter BS! I'm sick and tired of TPM's Eastern slant on everything. One Western state makes a complete ass out of themselves by demonstrating their legislature has their heads firmly planted up their a#$. What does Josh and crew do? They have to run a whole list about how more screwed up all the Eastern and Midwestern state legislatures have been.
California is swirling in a financial cesspool of our own making and we don't even make it into the Top 10?! No wonder the NCAA and BCS are so screwed up, the West can't even maintain more than one place in the 'batshit crazy' column.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JimF
April 29, 2010 11:17 AM
In New York the 2 state proposal has a lot of support. A lot of upstate and western New York would like to kick out New York City... and they can take the current Senate with them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BillMcD
April 29, 2010 11:23 AM in reply to JimF
And a lot of us in the southern parts of the State where something like 75% of the State's tax revenue (and congressional representation) comes from would be tickled to let Upstate go.
Westchester and parts Southeast, sounds good to me. Wonder what the rest of the State would call itself, though... 'Niagra State'? And hey, that Native American lawsuit to force the honoring of the land treaty that cedes them Syracuse, that should go through, too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JimF
April 29, 2010 12:19 PM in reply to BillMcD
And there is exactly why, since you get more representation you get your issues addressed while the rest of us don't. *shrug* I'm not sure of the revenue situation but I'd bet that more gets spent down there then you take in. Do you have any numbers?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Skybolt
April 29, 2010 2:01 PM in reply to JimF
I'm in Erie County. Splitting up the state would be great for NYC and terrible for everyone else. Downstate is where most of the people and money are. Before we bitch about downstate politicians, we should stop electing idiots ourselves.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JimF
April 29, 2010 2:42 PM in reply to Skybolt
Rochester here. Heh, noticed I said all the senate. The problems that downstate faces are on an entirely different level then the rest of the state due to population. As a result solutions for that section have always come before solutions for the rest of the state. I have no problem being reduced to a Pennsylvania like state.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Skybolt
April 29, 2010 3:37 PM in reply to JimF
Let's say there's a way to actually reform the state government. If there is, then giving up the titanic source of money and resources that is New York City would be foolish. I think that the state government can be reformed, and if it was reformed, it would treat upstate differently. That said I suspect that the most underfunded people in the state are poor kids in NYC.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ryansh
April 29, 2010 5:20 PM in reply to JimF
Reduced to a Pennsylvania like state? As a Pittsburgher, I think I resent that remark! PA's a pretty good state. Two large, successful cities, a peaceful, scenic interior, relatively normal state government and relatively low levels of crazy. More states could stand to be Pennsylvania like in my opinion!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JimF
April 29, 2010 8:44 PM in reply to ryansh
Heh, no offense intended. It's a fine state, but it doesn't have NYC in it. Along with all the population and money that area brings.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BillMcD
April 29, 2010 11:26 PM in reply to JimF
Specific #s on NYS? No, I haven't waded through the NYS website enough to find it. However, based on similar distribution of taxes collected v taxes received nationally... yeah. Urban population density produces far more taxes collected than are spent maintaining the denser-populated regions.
Largely, the trend seems to be that outlying regions make urban centers feasible, and urban centers, in turn, provide enough commerce and tax revenue to keep the outlying regions from reverting to pre-1900 levels of infrastructure. There's just too much that can't be done w/out high-density zones.
Which is all relative, after all. You guys upstate still have, I think, a higher population density than most cities between the Mississippi and the Rockies, except for regional commerce centers like the Texas metroplexes, Denver, St. Louis, Minneapolis/St.Paul, K.C. and Chicago.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chameleon
April 29, 2010 11:18 AM
I think a lot of us underestimated it....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Given Up
April 29, 2010 11:26 AM
The whole, "guns in airports" sounds downright reasonable compared to some of this stuff. I mean what the f***?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
davcbr
April 29, 2010 11:29 AM
Somebody making laws has obviously watched "Airport".
uhmmm... could I please have that bomb in the second row? No, the third one from the left. Can I put that on my credit card?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Roma Victors
April 29, 2010 11:44 AM
Suddenly the work at the Federal level seems moderate and reasoned. Jon Stewart was right -- state government isn't the laboratory of democracy, it's the meth lab.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Roma Victors
April 29, 2010 12:05 PM
Suddenly the work at the Federal level seems moderate and reasoned. Jon Stewart was right -- state government isn't the laboratory of democracy, it's the meth lab.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NobleCommentDecider
April 29, 2010 12:17 PM
Oklahoma doesn't go far enough on abortions.
It should be illegal for doctors to tell women they are pregnant, until the 25th week.
Telling women they are pregnant opens a can of worms aka, they might decide they want an abortion.
OTC pregnancy testing kits should also be banned, or only kits that always come out negative should be offered for sale, with the manufacturer legally protected from lawsuits..
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
WaitWut?
April 29, 2010 12:19 PM
I wonder if the Arizona law banning cross-species breeding has anything to do with the local guy they just busted for raping his neighbors 7 month old puppy. Or, the other local guy last year that was found...twice...raping his neighbors horse.
Welcome to Arizona. Land of the Freaks, Home of the Crazed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NobleCommentDecider
April 29, 2010 12:56 PM in reply to WaitWut?
The horse thing goes way back. Where do you think the idiom "got it straight from the horses mouth" comes from. It refers to right wing talk radio hosts, like JD Hayworth.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tiowally
April 29, 2010 1:13 PM in reply to WaitWut?
Rodell Vereen, the amorous man with a taste for equine nookie, was in South Carolina. Ah, the perils of the pleasures of the (horse) flesh.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pikaomega
April 29, 2010 8:33 PM in reply to tiowally
To be fair, they caught him schtupping the same horse, so at least it was monogamous bestiality.
Much to be said for traditional values...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
taikan
April 29, 2010 2:36 PM
Regarding the proposed New York legislation to allow a vote on whether to split that state into two, a similar bill probably would get a lot of support in California, especially in the northern part of the state.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jaycal
April 29, 2010 6:58 PM in reply to taikan
Yea, but only as long as Nor Cal gets SLO and everything north... Santa Barbara's cool, but too many celebrities.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
zuch
April 29, 2010 3:11 PM
"Sovereign individuals"? Sounds like echoes of the "sovereign citizen" movement ... A/K/A the Montana Freemen and the various 'militias'....
Cheers,
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hobbes83
April 29, 2010 3:20 PM
It would be mostly R's passing these tin-foil hat laws. While I'm not saying that Dem's do not do it as well, this is a good example of our hard-earned tax paying dollars at work. I can't believe that fucktard thought it was SO important to have dumb-ass antlers in his office that he had to waste time passing a law to make them legal. (Facepalm)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sicktransit
April 29, 2010 3:50 PM
Re: "On March 2, 2010, the state Senate gave preliminary approval to a bill that would make it illegal to attempt to create a human-animal hybrid in a laboratory."
I predict a rise in back-alley hybridizations.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cliff Hendroval
April 29, 2010 4:01 PM
This is the first I've heard about the bill to split up New York, and my local senator was one of the co-sponsors.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
May 12, 2010 7:36 AM
I must chime in with other commenters that the Virginia law seems sensible, and does not belong in here with the others.
Would you really prefer it be illegal to pick up an old pair of antlers found in the woods? It seems far crazier to me to make it illegal to pick up a shed antler or an old turtle shell.
And what about sea shells found at the beach? Sounds like possessing those is still illegal under Virginia law. Now that *is* crazy.
cialis kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?