TPM LiveWire

Rand Paul: Obama's BP Comments Sound 'Really Un-American' (VIDEO)


KY-SEN candidate Rand Paul (R)

Read More

Civil Rights, Rand Paul

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

After walking back his criticism of the Civil Rights Act yesterday, Rand Paul has been making the rounds defending himself against Democrats who have "trashed" him "up and down" with their "talking points."

On Good Morning America today, Paul also steered the conversation toward something more recent, President Obama's criticism of BP following the oil spill. Paul said: "This sort of, you know 'I'll put my boot heel on the throat of BP,' I think that sounds really un-American in his criticism of business."

Paul continued: The President's reaction is "part of this sort of blame game society" where "it's always someone's fault." Paul added: "Maybe sometimes accidents happen."

Continuing his defense of his comments about the Civil Rights Act, Paul blamed it on Democrats who are "way behind in Kentucky" and "make up a lot of stuff" to gain ground.

He reiterated that he's against repealing the act, but added that the controversy is just a "red herring."

"If you want to bring up 40-year-old legislation," Paul said, "why don't you bring me on with Senator Byrd, we'll talk about how he filibustered the Civil Rights Act."

Watch:

Comments (233) | Join the Conversation!

May 21, 2010 9:49 AM   

And Atlas shrugged yet again...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:45 AM    in reply to picklenoses

More like took a big steamy dump and threw it at Jesus...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:45 PM    in reply to picklenoses

I love this guy! Every time he opens his mouth on TV, the whole silly Randroid/Libertoonian/Teabagger ethos appalls more viewers. I wish we could throw a money-bomb for every Tea Party candidate in the country. They'd primary out every viable Republican, lose their asses on Election Night, and we might actually be able to get to work on some real problems...

I can dream.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:25 PM    in reply to picklenoses

Dead Rand Walking

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

DwH

user-pic

May 21, 2010 1:57 PM    in reply to picklenoses

Does this fool know that B P stands for British Petroleum?

"BP is a British global energy company that is also the third largest global energy company and the 4th largest company in the world."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 5:25 PM    in reply to DwH

Lol! Rand Paul is an idiot. He says Pres. Obama is un-American for criticizing a non-American corporation. Maybe someone should point that out to him.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 9:54 AM   

Exposed, finally, for the racism that binds all Tali-baggers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:12 AM    in reply to Texar

"Tali-baggers" I like it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:59 AM    in reply to biglith

Tali-baggers, Teanuts, whatever. They're all just racist reactionaries for whom the GOP just isn't racist and reactionary enough... yet.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:45 PM    in reply to CityGuy

LMAO, that's funnee!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:45 AM    in reply to Texar

No, I agree entirely with Paul. Any time someone in this nation (especially the president) practices free speech he should be sent to a third world country... or worse!
Oops, I guess that means Paul, who is utilizing HIS free speech, should be penalized the same.
Oops... if Paul is right, the gov't shouldn't get involved.
Oops... Obama is in the gov't.
Oops... oops... oops... oops...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:58 PM    in reply to Texar

I do think it's a little important to make the distinction between ideological racism and functional or systemic racism here though. I suppose it doesn't matter much to the person being discriminated against, but to understanding where libertarians are coming from I think it is a little illuminating.

I don't think the discussion should be about Paul as a racist because it makes it about him in particular. Really we are talking about a logical ideology that has as it's unintended consequence racism. Paul's ideology isn't about sending babies down the drain, he's just so keen on maintaining the purity of his commitment to throwing out the bathwater that the baby goes too in order to maintain integrity.

Also, people are real keen to put the nails in the coffin of libertarianism here, but I kind of think I'd prefer the political debate in this country be between libertarians with their absolute freedom adgenda vs. progressives and their belief government can and should work for the people and their general welfare.

It beats the hell out of the corporatism vs. extreme corporatism debate we have now. And as is demonstrated here in Paul's case, I know progressives will clean the clocks of libertarians. All you have to do is explain libertarianism and it's juvenile and detached from reality basis becomes crystal clear.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 9:55 AM   

It looks like Mitch McConnell was right about endorsing the other guy -- Paul is a total disaster.

He's been the GOP nominee for less than 3 days and he's already come out against the Civil Rights Act and is now defending BP.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:11 AM    in reply to Thornhill

The fun's just starting too. I can't wait to see the mainstream GOPers squirm when they're asked if they agree with this guy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:07 PM    in reply to OhioGuy

Repubs to Rand Paul: "Well, this is another fine mess you've gotten us into."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:11 AM    in reply to Thornhill

Say stupid, outrageous stuff; get more famous. It works for the likes of Bachmann, Palin, Coulter, Beck and Limbaugh, so why not this imbecile. These clowns would teabag themselves if they thought it would get them more views.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:13 AM    in reply to housewife

Crazy gets ratings but it doesn't get votes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:42 AM    in reply to LiberalRedneck

It gets votes in Kentucky.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:48 PM    in reply to benintn

Here, here!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:56 PM    in reply to benintn

Where? Where?

You mean: "Hear! Hear!"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 2:59 PM    in reply to benintn

Don't be so sure of that. Ky has a Dem Gov, Lt Gov, and AG. That's not an accident. They aren't flaming progressives, but they aren't wingnuts either. Mitch McConnell is many things, but he doesn't go full wingnut like Inhofe, Coburn, Cornyn or Kyl. Those clowns and Bachmann can go full wingnut because there's no way a Democrat is winning their seats at the moment (Kyl and Cornyn might be in trouble if Latinos keep swelling their voting ranks). Like Indiana, Ohio and Missouri, the state wide elections either go to really famous people (Bunning was a hero) or essentially moderates who happen to fall slightly left or right. Being a flaming wingnut will not help get independents to vote for Rand Paul and will fire up the Dem base in Louisville and surrounding areas in what otherwise was an off year.

McDonnell in Virginia was able to hide his wingnuttitude by claiming his thesis was old and out dated. Christie in NJ isn't going the full wingnut and Brown has voted with Dems on most major issues other than a healthcare bill he admits does not more than what Massachusetts already has. No one has openly run as a wingnut and won yet in anything approximating a competitive race. Rand Paul won't win if he keeps this up, and he might help Dems nationwide by discrediting the Tea Partiers and GOP.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:47 AM    in reply to LiberalRedneck

Maybe he's really angling for a TV commentator gig (especially since HCR passed)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:31 PM    in reply to LiberalRedneck

Absolutely correct. I say keep talking Randi you fucking pussy whiner. Other than the tea partiers, who the hell is going to vote for these people, except for a few whining progressives who post here

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:10 AM    in reply to Thornhill

How dare an American president defend American waters and American business against a British company that broke American laws.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:06 PM    in reply to traitorjoe

This is even worse than the civil rights stance. Corporate safety violations cause 29 dead coal miners and a disastrous oil spill and he's defending the corporations? Who does he think should pay for the results of their criminal actions - the taxpayers?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:21 PM    in reply to ahumbleopinion

Hell no! Those miners should have had enough saved up to
take care of their families after they were killed.
Personal responsibility, baby!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:25 AM    in reply to Thornhill

Put microphones and video cameras in front of these Tali-Baggers 24/7.

Great reality TV. They cannot help themselves. Full-on crazy, the new GOP Brand.

It's mavericky, you betchya!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:30 AM    in reply to Thornhill

He won his election and lost his election in 24 hours.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 9:56 AM   

Paul said: "This sort of, you know 'I'll put my boot heel on the throat of BP,'

Later he said:

"Democrats, . . ."make up a lot of stuff"

Obama never made that 1st statement it was Salazar. Did the interviewer point that out?

I doubt it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:08 AM    in reply to uweeb

Ah, but Salazar is not black. Let's also remember what that Teabagger leader said a few weeks ago when interviewed about health care reform protests, "It's not just that he's (Obama) black...". Note the "just"!
Teabaggers and Libertarians = Cowardly Racists. Plain and simple. David Duke must be overjoyed with them. And those that are here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:42 AM    in reply to dswx

Stop being so crazy and racist Kentucky voters, South Carolina and Texas are getting very jealous.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

May 21, 2010 11:46 AM    in reply to traitorjoe

Rand got fewer votes than the loser in the Democratic primary. Not sure what portion of Kentucky has had any idea what Rand is about.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:39 AM    in reply to uweeb

Why does it matter whether Obama or someone else said it? If Obama didn't say it, he's jealous of Salazar for thinking of it first. People are readily angry at BP for the accident, there's no need to "walk back" criticism of BP. (Personally, I'm open to the idea it's more the fault of the company that managed the rig, I just haven't followed the details closely enough.)

Paul is just stepping in it all over again. He's worse than I thought. I hope he stays this undisciplined the whole way!

As an aside, BP stands for British Petroleum, originally at least. So Paul says it's un-American to criticize..."British" Petroleum? Heh.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

May 21, 2010 11:41 AM    in reply to DCCyclone

BP's latest excuse: We just hired an incompetent company to do the work for us. Hey, buddy, you're the one with the lease.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

May 21, 2010 12:46 PM    in reply to DCCyclone

(Personally, I'm open to the idea it's more the fault of the company that managed the rig, I just haven't followed the details closely enough.)

That's what BP is trying to get people to believe, but Rachel Maddow played part of an interview from "60 Minutes" on her show the other night that strongly suggested that the problem that caused the explosion was the result of BP trying to cut corners to move the well capping process along faster. Let's see if I can find a link... Yes, from Monday night's show: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#37201434

TransOcean was doing the work, but BP was paying them to do it. They objected to the shortcut that BP wanted to take because it was less safe, but BP insisted. I don't think that absolves TransOcean of responsibility -- they could have flatly refused to do something they considered unsafe -- but if what was suggested on "60 Minutes" is indeed what caused the explosion, then I think the primary responsibility is BP's.

The US government is not off the hook, either: the regulatory oversight was almost non-existent. Effective regulations and effective enforcement could have prevented this disaster. It didn't "just happen." It happened because people were greedy, negligent and reckless.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:58 AM    in reply to uweeb

additionally, it was President Obama who first said we can not play the blame game... I can not give the exact quote, perhaps some of you can, but he said business, government and the consumer all share in the blame so let's stop pointing fingers at each other and work to solve the problem.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

May 21, 2010 11:43 AM    in reply to nancydenis

The basic problem is that the government was not pointing fingers early enough -- as in "Hey, BP, what do you think you are doing -- you have no plans in place if something goes wrong. This lease isn't going anywhere until we know what can go wrong and how you'll fix is."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

DwH

user-pic

May 21, 2010 2:05 PM    in reply to AJM

It is highly more likely that in 2001, Cheney said "Hey, British Petroleum, you can have the rights to the Gulf if you hire Halliburton."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 9:57 AM   

There is so much to talk about with this interview!
First, Paul comes off as a whiney baby.
Does he not realize even in accidents that there is someone at fault? That someone needs to be responsible to make things right?
Not to mention, this is not just some "oops" flub, this is OIL GUSHING in out waters and landing on the coast?

Finally, Byrd's not the one bringing up the 40 year old legislation, Paul is.

Why does Paul keep digging this hole?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:53 AM    in reply to It's Pat

He believes in "personal" responsibility, just not "corporate" responsibility. This form of libertarianism is merely a self-subjugation to big, powerful things and people - so long as they're not official a government.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:26 PM    in reply to It's Pat

Paul can stop digging or not, I think he is done even in Kentucky.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 9:57 AM   

So basically, because they're still mad about the Civil Rights Act and movement towards women's equality, a bunch of elderly working-class white Kentuckians will probably elect this clown who's up there using his TV time to make excuses for BP and slam the president for daring to mildly rebuke them for causing an epochal environmental disaster. Or maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised. He's pretty crazy. I'm not sure anything but the tribal politics matters, though.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:06 AM    in reply to septictank

That doesn't have to be the case. But Conway will have to campaign like Joe Sestak, not like Creigh Deeds. He'll have to be relentless. There is a lot of time left until election day - more than enough time for these missteps to blow over and for Paul to get back on track. Conway can't let him.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

May 21, 2010 9:57 AM   

BP 'accidentally' had a non-functioning BOP. The oil companies had emissaries sleeping with the regulators. "Everyone" understood that it was quite clear that drilling at depths never before attempted entailed no additional risks at all. AND RAND WANTS TO KNOW WHEN THEY"LL STOP PICKING ON BUSINESS?

'Hey, officer, I was just going a hundred miles an hour. How was I to know that I'd get into an accident? Not my fault that it's a bad one. What's your problem?'

This is some of the most irresponsible drivel I've heard in a long time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:01 AM    in reply to AJM

Sounds like you are criticizing BP. According to Paul, that's un-American.
Are you a terrorist?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

May 21, 2010 11:49 AM    in reply to It's Pat

Terrorists are people who support sliming the Gulf and destroying local state economies. It certainly gives aid and comfort to our enemies. Paul should look in the mirror.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:11 AM    in reply to AJM

or like....... " Sorry officer. My new Ferrari, 100 mph? Who knew?"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 9:58 AM   

Boy, that's some heavy helping of whiplash irony Paul is dishing out...

To say:

Paul continued: The President's reaction is "part of this sort of blame game society" where "it's always someone's fault." Paul added: "Maybe sometimes accidents happen."

followed by


Continuing his defense of his comments about the Civil Rights Act, Paul blamed it on Democrats who are "way behind in Kentucky" and "make up a lot of stuff" to gain ground.

Blame for thee but not for me!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:03 AM    in reply to zonk

Exactly.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:07 AM    in reply to zonk

I got drunk and ran over your two year old child with my car. Wasn't my fault; accidents happen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:55 AM    in reply to Steaming Pile

And, wouldn't you know, there's a $500 cap on damages for that, mainly because I was on the job working for my big corporation. Too bad for him.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 3:06 PM    in reply to Steaming Pile

And that 2 year old should have seen my car coming and gotten out of his backyard. Where's his responsibility in all this?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:53 AM    in reply to zonk

"Boot heels" are for niggahs, jews and socialists. Obama is twice over qualified.

And there are oil and gas guys who belong in the Rand Paul $3,000 a month Bowling Green Country Club, and sometimes accidents happen and the small fry get burned to a crisp by flaming gas in mines or on oil platforms, Rand Paul: So What?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:08 AM    in reply to NobleCommentDecider

Hey, the Invisible Hand of the Free Market will correct all those problems eventually. Sure, lots of people will die first, and the ecology of the Gulf region will be destroyed, but it's better to let those things happen than forcing corporations to deal with all those pesky regulations.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:16 AM    in reply to commie atheist

Aye. Historically, that Invisible Hand has chosen some to be slaves and others slaveowners, some to be nobles and others to be serfs. The Free Market is God.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:48 PM    in reply to Angry McAngus

Just wait until the Sierra Club starts using their dues to enter into business arrangements with ex-Special Forces folks who offer to "take care of" problems like recalcitrant energy company executives and lobbyists.

Free market isn't so cool when it's your ass/head that's the commodity being bought and sold. Especially when you don't even know there's a market for it and can't put in a bid.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:08 PM    in reply to zonk

Typical rethuglican thinking - Do as I say not as i do.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 9:58 AM   

They always bring up Senator Byrd. Next he'll start talking about his black friends.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:07 AM    in reply to Riesz Fischer

Hey, cut them some slack... With Teddy's passing and ACORN folding, their three-legged stool of excuses for ass-hattery has been reduced to Byrd's poor choices more than half a century ago.

Who knows what they're going to do when Bobby retires or passes away...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 3:08 PM    in reply to zonk

They still have the George Soros boogeyman out there. They LOVE to create theories around him. Don't forget about us Atheists as well, they always try to link us to fascists and child-raping abominations and stuff.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:17 AM    in reply to Riesz Fischer

But would Byrd make the same argument in 2010? When Rand Paul's says he wants to take his country back, where does he want to back to? I'm for moving the nation forward. I'm for making this a more perfect union for black people and the disable.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:49 AM    in reply to bison

I think it's sad that Byrd, a guy born in 1917 who grew up in a hick part of the country where the KKK was part of life is better on Civil Rights than Rand Paul, who was born in 1963, and grew up in an era when freaking Sesame Street and the Cosby Show were a part of life.

I really, really, really want to hear Rand Paul's position on the Wal-Mart suit where women claim the company denied them raises and promotions just because they were women. Rand Paul seems to think Wal-Mart is taking the wrong defense strategy here by denying they discriminated against women simply because they were women. He thinks it should be LEGAL for Wal-Mart, a private company, to pay women less and deny them promotions not because they are less qualified or working less hard, but simply because they are women.

Rand Paul is really, really out of step with mainstream America.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

May 21, 2010 11:52 AM    in reply to Riesz Fischer

He's gone one better. He's talking about one of his favorite heros: Martin Luther King.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 9:59 AM   

I'm sure defending BP will work out to be a super-briliant campaign strategy in the weeks and months to come, as the shores of the Gulf, the Keys and the East Coast are subjected to a constant onslaught of oil and the endless photographs of photogenic animals dying in a blanket of oil hit the news.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:35 AM    in reply to brooklynmatt

If it gets to the point of prohibiting shipping in the Gulf, prices will spike for everything - gasoline, food and other commodities - shipped through the Gulf and the Mississippi river. Then it won't just be about dead photogenic animals and fishing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:44 AM    in reply to jeffgee

But that will be all Obama's fault to the TeaNuts(c). You see, this oil spill is his 9/11. I read it in the NY Times the other day - some guy named Friedman...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:27 PM    in reply to minnesconsin

I thought it was his Katrina. Hard to keep up with the shifting blame meme.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

May 21, 2010 12:00 PM    in reply to jeffgee

Guy leases an apartment in the apartment building. Tries out a new chemical process in the kitchen without up-grading the kitchen sink. Pollutes every corner of the building with toxic smoke and ash. If I own the building Paul understands perfectly if I kick him out and sue his ass but if the government does so that jack-bootery. Meanwhile you're worrying about every body being homeless if the government decides to ban apartment buildings. Get real.

Think it was Jamie Friedman here who reported calculations that the amount of oil which is destroying the Gulf would power America for 21.6 -- wait for it -- seconds.

So was it worth it?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:01 AM   

More Paul hypocrisy.

Paul continued: The President's reaction is "part of this sort of blame game society" where "it's always someone's fault."

Later Paul says:

"If you want to bring up 40-year-old legislation," Paul said, "why don't you bring me on with Senator Byrd, we'll talk about how he filibustered the Civil Rights Act."

Not ready for primetime or morningtime.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:03 AM   

Does he get it? BP engaged in a risky off-shore oil venture, and they had absolutely no back-up plan in case of an accident like this.

Am I missing something? It is outrageous that such a venture would be launched without any back up if the shit were to hit the fan. While the risk are understandable, and the problem immense, BP should absolutely take heat when they don't know how to clean up their own mess.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:47 AM    in reply to itheuser

He's got to be fishing for campaign donation from big oil. How can anyone who is a MD be so stupid as to think this epic disaster should go blameless?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:58 AM    in reply to verite

Remember that Army doctor who is being court-martialed for refusing orders to deploy until the President proves he was born in Hawaii?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:19 AM    in reply to verite

he's not an MD, is he? Is he an optometrist or an ophthalmologist?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:11 PM    in reply to Angry McAngus

He is an opthamologist.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:04 AM   

This is what happens when theory meets practice. The devil, as they say, is in the details.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

bdh

user-pic

May 21, 2010 10:48 AM    in reply to CranialRectalLoopback

This is what happens when practice is based on theory conflated with reality, rather than practice employing theory as one tool in the effort to negotiate reality.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:05 AM   

What planet is he from where BP deserves no blame or criticism? Is it never the private sector's fault? The federal government is overstepping its bounds because it sent a letter to BP? Paul's anti-government philosophy goes way too far here. Reasonable people, inside and outside the government, believe the fault lies with BP. It's not un-american for the White House to agree.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:38 AM    in reply to MJAN

CEO Don Blankenship has been blaming the Massey mine disaster on the Federal safety regulators.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:18 AM    in reply to jeffgee

Well, I'll give him this - it's a novel defense.

He's still full of shit, though. I just heard a memo that Blankenship wrote read on the radio, it's to the effect that the crews should ignore the ventilation equipment, it was mining coal that paid the bills.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

May 21, 2010 12:59 PM    in reply to cwnidog

That sounds like Blankenship.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:05 AM   

Anytime anyone disagrees with me, they're playing partisan politics and should be ashamed of themselves.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:08 AM   

Rand the only reason anyone is trashing you is because you deserve it, you spoiled little twerp.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:09 AM   

Has anyone verified that Rand Paul is a real human being and not a freeper thread that has somehow managed to gain sentience?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:45 AM    in reply to zonk

You just used "sentience" and "freeper" in the same sentence.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

May 21, 2010 1:00 PM    in reply to minnesconsin

+1

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

bdh

user-pic

May 21, 2010 10:56 AM    in reply to zonk

hahaha!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:59 AM    in reply to zonk

RAND PAUL'S LIMBAUGHTOMY GOT KNACKERED!!! IT ATE HIS BRAIN! Well, accidents happen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:24 AM    in reply to zonk

More like a Freeper stool.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:09 AM   

New tagline for Paul campaign -

Rand Paul: Shit Happens.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:09 AM   

Fill me in please. To be sure, I never heard Rand Paul called for the repeal of the Civil Rights Act, nor did I hear it characterized that way throughout the day on MSNBC. I heard his political opponent, Conway, characterized his position in that manner on HardBall on Wednesday night. For most of yesterday, I had MSNBC on my television. I did not hear commentators repeatedly saying that Rand Paul wants to repeal the Civil Rights Act. There was discussion about what Rand Paul said and a re-airing of the interview with Rachael Maddow, but I did not hear the constant drum beating of the phrase “Rand Paul wants to repeal the Civil Rights Act.” Yet, this morning I hear a clip where Rand Paul is saying a major media outlet aired this phrase throughout the day. I’m assuming the network was MSNBC. If I missed this, please direct me to the appropriate links. If not, Rand Paul needs to correct the miss-understanding that he has put forth.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:13 AM    in reply to bison

Rand Paul has now reached that place where when he opens his mouth it merely to change feet.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:20 AM    in reply to jsfox

... to change feet.
ROLFLMAO.
Thanks for a good morning chuckle.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:36 PM    in reply to jsfox

That was good for a laugh. Thanks

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 5:03 PM    in reply to jsfox

... to change feet.
ROLFLMAO.
Thanks for a good morning chuckle.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:01 AM    in reply to bison

I haven't seen anyone say "Rand Paul wants to repeal CRA." He is misrepresenting the points his critics are saying about his position. His critics have stated accurately that Rand Paul DOES NOT SUPPORT the CRA of 1964. Rand Paul has stated those exact same words on numerous occasions. A position of NOT SUPPORT is different from REPEAL, just slightly.

In short, Rand Paul is misrepresenting the arguments of those he is accusing of misrepresenting him.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:10 AM   

someone should drive a tractor trailer into Rand Paul's house and than say "hey accidents happen. let's not play the blame game here."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:11 AM   

It is Un-American for the president to criticize a British company!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:32 AM    in reply to henrythefifth

And Transocean is a Swiss company. So maybe he's defending Halliburton's role in this disaster. Good luck with that Dr. Paul ...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:57 AM    in reply to DanF

Actually Transocean is an American company that moved its HQ to Switzerland to avoid paying U.S. taxes. Nice huh? http://thinkprogress.org/2010/05/14/company-oil-rig-switzerland/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:02 PM    in reply to drinal

And Halliburton moved its corporate HQ to Dubai!

Could this sort of thing comprise an act of war?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:12 AM   

I suspect accidents happen is his approach to medical malpractice claims as well. This guy combines no shame with no blame which is probably consistent.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:13 AM   

So let me get this straight: Rand Paul says that criticizing a FOREIGN company is "un-American?"

I wonder if he would say that if BP were Chinese-owned? Mexican? Russian? Iranian? or worst of all, French-owned?

I think this means that Rand Paul wants Americans to submit to domination by foreign companies. Which would make him the real "un-American."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:16 AM    in reply to bluestatedon

Randroid's Libertarian leanings tell him there should be no borders because free trade is sacrosanct.

Randroid's GOP leanings tell him that he has to play the nationalism card.

Soon his head will explode and we can all go back to our lives.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:15 PM    in reply to bluestatedon

So let me get this straight: Rand Paul says that criticizing a FOREIGN company is "un-American?"

do the words "you're not being a good sport" mean anything to you?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:15 AM   

So, according to Rand Paul's lack of commonsense philosophy, the free market will punish BP, but unfortunately only after it has turned the Gulf of Mexico into one giant cesspool.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:13 AM    in reply to Continuum

Better that, than having the government overreach. You know, like when they forced those lunch counters to integrate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:16 AM   

President Obama is playing the "blame game"? Am I wrong or did BP's PRIVATELY OWNED and operated well explode--killing 11 men--drop to the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, and is now gushing untold amounts of oil into a very sensitive ecosystem, which provides a living for coast-dwellers from Texas to Florida?

That's what I don't appreciate about some on the right. They will crow all the live-long day about how government is trying to take over this and take over that, but when one of their most beloved industries takes a hit because it did not adhere to federal safety guidelines, they wonder why no government oversight.

I'm from Mississippi, so this affectst me heavily. My advice to the right: Pick a horse and ride!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:16 AM   

One must remember the original Tea Party was so pro-British.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:46 AM    in reply to AdAbsurdum

and pro-business too! Because the colonists LOVED the cozy relationship between the British government and the tea industry.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:16 AM   

Paul should fit right in with Mitch McConnell in supporting BIG business at any cost, to heck with the death of the livelihood of thousands of gulf people

I dont see his chances being all that good on election day. he will be a lump of overused bluejeans on the sidewalk by then

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:22 AM    in reply to Mrwilson1

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:49 AM    in reply to bison

exactly - this plays VERY well in Kentucky, and especially among those in Paul's well-funded, mad-as-hell base of supporters.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:16 AM    in reply to bison

Rasmussen? Puh-leeze. For any Rasmussen poll you have to add +10 the Democrats and -10 to the Republicans in order to get an accurate reading.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:47 PM    in reply to Mrwilson1

Wasn't Rasmussen the outfit that had McCain/Palin in a landslide?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 3:25 PM    in reply to Hank

For much of the election cycle, yes. Rasmussen has a reputation of both a GOP house effect and for getting the final polls close to accurate, despite being wrong for months leading up to the vote. Nate Silver's looked at them several times, but the released information never quite clarifies what is going on.

Take the Brown election in Mass., for example. Rasmussen called the final number pretty well, despite the fact their early projections were wrong and the profile of the public they used in those projections (their "likely voter model") didn't match up with the demographics of the actual voters. Are they just lucky? Changing how they frame the question when it isn't about GOP propaganda and fundraising anymore? No one who knows is talking, so what to do with Rasmussen reports is always an open question.

This sort of problem is why fivethirtyeight.com and even pollster.com are such valuable tools to cut through the media noise when trying to understand elections.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:18 AM   

Is this guy on crack? Defending BP? Holy &^(*!!!

Tell that to the fishermen whose livelihoods have been ruined down in the Gulf.

Think anyone is going to eat that toxic crap that comes out of the cesspool we call the Gulf of Mexico anytime soon?

If his intent is to turn the United States into a one party state (the Democrats), he is well on his way to accomplishing that goal.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:19 AM   

i want to see his birth cirt. not to show where, but to prove he meets the age requirement to hold the office. I recognize a tone form him that i find in my preschooler.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:20 AM   

Obama is un-American because he criticized BRITISH Petroleum for turning the Caribbean into a toilet? Does that mean that the American thing to do is to praise a foreign company for contaminating American water and land with oil? Is today Opposite Day or something?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:21 AM   

Wow, this guy went from zero to Michelle Bachman in two days.

When do we get to have a Dem appear with him to correct his lyin' ass?

And is it me, or does he always sound like he's about to cry?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:22 AM   

Rand is the new Claytie Williams. I don't know that I believe Rasmussen's 25 -point lead, but I'm sure he's ahead; the question is whether he'll squander his entire lead before the clock runs out in November.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:23 AM   

Bad interview. We all know that one man could not repeal the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The question was his beliefs, he was allowed to avoid answering that question. The man is not a Republican but a libertarian. That should be brought out. The Tea Baggers has been taken over by the Paul's libertatian movement, I wonder how long it will take them to realize it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:23 AM   

I hope the White House ignores this guy. This is his campaign strategy after all, to look like he is taking on Obama. Obama polls in the low 30's in Kentucky afterall, so Paul wants to name his senate election a referendum on Obama, to make electing him seem like it's a message being sent to the White House.

Conway needs to make it a local race, Rand wants it a national race.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:23 AM   

I'm pretty sure that the War for Independence was fought so that we could be the obedient little toady for British multinationals. Am I right? Oh, no... wait... ok, ok... it's the opposite: the war for Independence was to FREE ourselves of the burden of British multinationals.
So.... this would make Rand Paul what? Benedict Arnold?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:44 AM    in reply to BluGrass

Ironic huh?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:25 AM   

A global multi-national corporation with a record of fatal safety violations causes enormous damage to United States interests, and Paul says, "Maybe sometimes accidents happen."

Would he tell the Gulf Coast state governors to take care of that spill themselves without Federal aid? And tell the fishing and tourism industry to let the free market take its course? And tell the good ol' boys on the redneck riviera that, sheeit, accidents happen?


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:30 AM    in reply to jeffs

The "Oops-A-Daisy" defense. Very compelling. I'm convinced.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:26 PM    in reply to jeffs

Look! It's the party of personal responsibility! (snicker)

By the way, where are the deficit hawks, wringing and moaning their hands about how the taxpayer is going to find the money to pay for BP's cleanup?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:26 AM   

Oh yeah, defending BP is going to go over real well with the American electorate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:35 AM    in reply to agio

just has to go over well with Kentucky voters - who will never have oil spilled on their shores. Paul wants to be seen as the "Teabagger Avenger" taking it to Obama, because that will get him elected in Kentucky.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:46 AM    in reply to Walter Mitty

Which is why the interviewer should have asked is it was "un-American" for the Administration to go after Massey for the safety violations and mine collapse.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 3:16 PM    in reply to Lestatdelc

He already said that on NPR. Along with the CRA and ADA, he claimed mine safety should be a state issue. Never mind that states like Kentucky and West Virginia have never meaningfully gone after mine operators, hate unions with their picky pro-safety stances, and hence why we needed MSHA in the first place. That will not play well in large parts of Kentucky.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:37 AM    in reply to Walter Mitty

True from the point of view of Rand's electoral prospects. I think he's going to win in Ky. no matter how crazy he is.

But as a representative of the Tea Braggers to the rest of America, he's going to be a gift that keeps on giving.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:36 AM    in reply to agio

He only has to worry about the Kentucky electorate. Don't forget that Obama is hugely unpopular. The Federal Government is hugely unpopular. And Rand Paul is received much more favorably in Kentucky than elsewhere in the country.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:28 AM   

I've been trying really hard to believe that Republicans can be intelligent people with valid opinions different from my own and not drooling, neaderthal, bottom of the barrel, mentally disabled morons, but Republicans sure don't make it easy to do that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:28 AM   

Wait a minute. Blame-game society? Nobody's fault? Accidents happen?!

That's rich coming from a libertarian.

Funny how when "accidents happen" to poor and powerless people, that's just their bad luck, and really it's their fault anyway, and it's not society's responsibility to solve their problems.

But when it's a mega-billion dollar corporation that intentionally takes risks under the assumption that they won't be held accountable for damages, waaaaah it's not faaiir to blame them....

Asshole.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:28 AM   

People don't get into car crashes on purpose but someone takes responsibility and pays for it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:30 AM   

"Sometimes accidents happens:" Kentucky proves his point.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:31 AM   

Some pretzel logic there. President Obama criticizes a British corporation for negligence that is fouling the Gulf of Mexico and is called un-American for it. It fits with the other winger noise coming from Limbaugh, Palin, Hannity. Now Rand can follow the tried and true Con ploy - play the victim. He got shredded all day Wednesday about his comments on the CRA and ADA and spent Thursday walking backwards. It's no mystery why Palin doesn't take interviews from non-friendly media and prefers to snipe from her Facebook page, Fox News and to select paying audiences.

Which side are you on Rand, which side are you on?
In teabag world, anything opposed to Obama is automatically good, so maybe the Rand supporters don't care if he's defending the worst polluter in history.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:33 AM   

Maybe sometimes accidents happen?

This just "happened"?

No.

This was completely manmade. It is a disaster of epic proportions. And it is not acceptable for government to do nothing.

Those responsible must pay for it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:34 AM   

Un American? I thought "BP" was "British Petroleum"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:35 AM   

From a purely Libertarian whack-job standpoint, killing people is certainly boorish behavior, but is it really something that the government wants to get involved in? If we don't let some citizens kill other citizens when it seems like a good idea, then we are really limiting freedom. It is just a short step from prohibiting murder to mandatory sex with your mother-in-law.

I love this guy. Not only will he foul the Kentucky race for the GOP, but he will taint the Teabaggers nationally.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:35 AM   

Rand Paul will next defend the CEO of Massey Mining who yesterday at the senate hearing said "If it was not for the 29 killed recently, we would only have killed 23 miners in the last 10 years, which is average"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:40 AM    in reply to kollund

of course he will! accidents happen. that's just the cost of doing business. and the poor should go ahead and die, and decrease the surplus population. why do we continue bailing out the poor, the stupid, and the lazy?

yes, i have literally heard this kind of argument from Kentucky and Tennessee Republicans who are defending Rand Paul's ideology and politics.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:42 AM    in reply to kollund

Beat me to it. I guess he will claim it is un-American to go after Massey for safety violations and the mine collapse that killed the miners. After all, accidents happen and it is a private mine after all and so telling a mine owner they have to mine safely means people should carry guns into restaurants or anywhere they like.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:33 AM    in reply to kollund

So other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:37 AM   

You think he will get tired of the taste of feet? Or will he keep gnawing on his and running to Daddy for support?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:21 AM    in reply to vasu

Remember, he's only been the Republican nominee for three days, and he's already managed to say two colossally stupid things. I have a feeling it's going to be a long, hot summer for Rand Paul.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:29 PM    in reply to commie atheist

And they're stuck with him now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

May 21, 2010 12:24 PM    in reply to vasu

This undoubtedly violates policy but here goes: Rand Paul stuck his foot in his mouth, swallowed hard, bit his ass and is now trying to regurgitate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:39 PM    in reply to AJM

And Daddy Ron is feeding him the ipecac...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:39 AM   

So the sphere in which companies should be allowed to do what they want is now extended to the commons? I'm pretty sure that's not a libertarian stance.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:08 AM    in reply to heraldsquare

So the sphere in which companies should be allowed to do what they want is now extended to the commons? I'm pretty sure that's not a libertarian stance.

Actually, the essence of the libertarian stance is that there should be no commons. And BP is doing its part to make sure there aren't.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:42 AM   

How sad for the GOP that Rand didn't seem to get the message from them or his dad to "shut the F*ck up". If this is going to continue, we should get ready for some real fireworks (opp's the Chinese invented them) through out the Mid Term Election season.

If memory serves me, Ann Rand didn't believe in god, so he can't use the Rick Perry meme that this was an act of god, so he has settled on accidents happen, which is yet another foolish and immature attack. This actually goes nicely with the GOP from the previous adminstration. Didn't Rumsfeld use that same Talking Point with regard to the problems with getting supplies and good safety equipment (like bullet-proof vests that actually stop bullets) during the Iraq invasion?

And yet he continues, attacking the WH, not for all the mis-steps that have occurred with regards to the Oil Disaster, but to say instead that making BP pay for it's errors is anti-Business.

Wowzer! One could wonder what his first piece of legislation would be, if he happened to get elected. Oh, I know, Revoke the 17th amendment, so he could keep his seat without having to go through all this falderal of this pesky election process!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:48 AM   

"Maybe sometimes accidents happen."

You mean like Rand Paul making it thru a primary election on top?

Seriously, I'm suprised he is managing to spew so much ridiculous nonsense with all that corporate wang stuffed in his mouth.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:48 AM   

"He went on to blame the Gulf wildlife for their abhorrent greed, hoarding all of BP's oil in their gills, lungs and eyes."


TheWeekinRebuke.com

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:50 AM   

Sucking up to International Conglomerates is what Real Americans™ do.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:52 AM   

I think the Dems should put out posters with his face and below in big capital letters, "Maybe sometimes accidents happen."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:53 AM   

Think teabagger Paul would be defending an oil company if it was from the middle east or else where? The gop/teabagger gestapo would be calling for war if this company was not from the u.s. or england. Anywho, I hope we hear a great deal more from Rpaul, and how he plans to change this country. Think he supports chickens for checkups too?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 10:59 AM   

I lovin' this! Rand Paul is gonna be the gift that keeps on giving.
His acrid stench is gonna cling cling to everything remotely near him.
Behold the new Foxalite media star; the thinking Man's (and I do mean man) Sarah Palin.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:00 AM   

Yes, Randy, we know you value individual and corporate irresponsibility. But you can't claim those are American values until you and your selfish crowd have completely taken over. Now go take a swim on the gulf coast.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:02 AM   

WHERE ARE CLEVERBULLDOG AND MIDDLECLASSBILL TO EXPLAIN WHAT PAUL REALLY MEANT?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:03 AM   

I, for one, welcome our new feckless and entitled robot overlords.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:05 AM   

I don't understand why the question couldn't be put to Mr. Paul this way:

You have said and written in the past that, under your interpretation on the Constitution, you believe parts of the Civil Rights Act are unconstitutional. Yet, you say that you would not vote to repeal it. However, you have also said that you think the recently passed health care reform is unconstitutional and have signed the Club for Growth's pledge to repeal it. Why do you believe one unconstitutional law should be repealed but not the other?

That is the most irritating part for me. This guy, like a lot of libertarians of his kind, are so arrogant about their beliefs, but they are never called out for what I feel is a fairly blatant logical inconsistency. You can not think something is unconstitutional, against the fundamental law of our nation, but not think it should be repealed. You may not want to admit it, particularly if you are running for public office, but that's the price of your beliefs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:10 AM   

Ummm. BP isn't an American company is it? How can it be un-american to criticize a foreign country that has violated rules and ruined the US environment? This guy is awesome for Democrats, a disaster otherwise.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:29 AM    in reply to jman

Who cares that "BP" stands for "British Petroleum"? The really important thing for you to notice is that our President is a black man.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:30 PM    in reply to Pete Bilderback

Bingo!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:13 AM   

Boy, this guy is a daily case of foot-in-mouth disease. And, he's a doctor, you say?

As far as Robert Byrd goes, he's 90 years old, and his voting record over the past 40 years shows that he made a clean break with his segregationist Southern origins. You'd expect that Rand Paul at 47 wouldn't want to harken back to an age of discrimination, but apparently he does.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:15 AM   

Wait wait! I thought the magic power of the market would punish companies that do bad things, so by Paul's own magic hand thinking, BP being vilified is the natural result of BP killing 11 people and destroying the Gulf. What's more American than getting pissed off at a company that does something this incredibly destructive and irresponsible, all while enjoying record profits and screwing consumers at every opportunity?

Remember kiddies, the Rand-child says we don't need any of that nasty ol' regulation. The big magic hand of the market will come down and give a spanking to any company that misbehaves. That's the way it works!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:16 AM   

Paul is trying hard to run against Obama in his senatorial campaign. We'll see if it works....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:25 AM   

Paul complains about being "trashed" with "talking points," then cheap-shots Byrd with a talking point straight out of the Freeper playbook. Well played, Mr. Dr. Paul.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:26 AM   

Oh wow, this guy is the biggest gift the Democrats could ever hope for. I hope he keeps talking right through November. Paul is an even better opponent to run against for the Democrats than Sarah Palin.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:29 AM   

You know, I generally think Howard Fineman is a total hack, but he made a point yesterday that Rand Paul has the potential to cause national problems for the GOP (in other words, beyond his own race) and at the time I thought that was a step too far--but now I'm not so sure. The tea party is going to be cheering him on the whole way while the more rational part of the GOP will want nothing to do with him. And what if we get Buck in Colorado? Much the same story.

Despite the polling and the local situation, in my mind Conway is the favorite in this election. We haven't even gotten to cutting Social Security and Medicare or eliminating the Department of Education.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:36 AM   

"Sometimes accidents happen",....that's what people say when they're helpless and don't know what to do to help out. This guy is not only helpless, he's clueless on what his positions mean, especially in any historic context. The more he talks the less appeal he will have. Calling the president un-american because he stood up to British Petroleum,....if anything he's un american for not standing up enough and letting the oil spill more. At some point someone with authority has to say, you're not doing the job,....please step aside, we'll fix it and you'll pay for it Mr and Mrs BP.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:36 AM   

I hope that there will be lots of press coverage on Saturday, of that GOP unity rally Mitch McConnell planned. He and Rand Paul on the same stage will be worse than Bush kissing McCain.

http://www.randpaul2010.com/2010/03/rand-supports-gop-unity/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:41 AM   

"Let's not bicker about who killed who..."
Thought the libertarians were big on "personal responsibility". Rand reminds me very much of a teenager/college student who just discovered Communism/Ayn Rand/etc, but doesn't realize that his enthusiasm is not contagious for people who don't have the same ideology. He should also be aware that the blame game is well over, and BP has lost. Rand is volunteering to be associated with fishermen/shrimpers out of work, dead sea animals, American's beach vacations' ruined, and no sea food in the stores or on menus.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:45 AM   

sounds like he is trying to change the subject. obama has nothing to do with this.

the media did not make anything up. he is on tape being interviewed. he stated what he stated.

he is beginning to sound like lowden. he put his foot in his mouth and now he is trying to walk this back.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:54 AM   

Rand Paul has finally decided to utilize his name to gain his goal.
He is just following what others have done before him... get newsworthy, become a household name... be more and more preposterous... become rich through book writing, cable tv, pundit jobs, etc.
Within a few months, this guy will be worth millions, if he isn't already.
The byproduct of all this of course is the continual demise of this once great nation which promoted ethics, values, common sense, etc. and now promotes every abnormal and bizarre behavior one can dream up...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 11:59 AM   

he's trying to flip the script and go on the attack

weak

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:02 PM   

Yes, just what we need, less regulation of energy companies. How many dead coal miners does KY want? How many rivers and streams polluted with mine waste? How many mountains ruined by strip mining? Business over people, that's his principle.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

rip

user-pic

May 21, 2010 12:03 PM   

In a self-regulating marketplace, if a corporation accidently kills a customer through negligence, then that customer will stop purchasing their product, and the corporation will hopefully change policies in order to kill fewer customers.

If a company accidently causes a major ecological disaster, it will have to spend millions on PR to repair its image, and spend even more money on politicians in order to have the government clean up their mess. This should be incentive enough for corporations to work a little harder to avoid such accidents, and if not, well, lesson learned, maybe.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:08 PM   

How did Rand Paul's civil-rights views escaped media scrutiny? Rand Paul's views have been known for quite some time, but the media did not pick up on it. The editorial board of Louisville's Courier-Journal didn't mince words following its sit-down with Rand Paul last month. It wrote that much of what the Republican Senate candidate support "is repulsive to people in the mainstream," including "an unacceptable view of civil rights."

Yet Paul's view that the federal government should not have the power to force integration on private businesses -- part of 1964's landmark Civil Rights Act -- didn't get the attention of the national press until Wednesday, following interviews with NPR's Robert Siegel and MSNBC' and Rachel Maddow. Why?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

May 21, 2010 1:28 PM    in reply to bison

Because Robert Siegel and Rachel Maddow do their homework?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:09 PM   

Rand is the ultimate example of a corporate-owned spokesman for informing the ignorant and misleading the masses.
His outright nullification of all hard questions being asked directly to him illustrates a trained speaker who only offers what he and his handlers want to state and he is dangerous.

It is so tough to listen to his dad and Ron's hard answers to tough questions and then learn of the corporate handling his son exposes by softpeddling answers his dad is at least honest enough to answer.

I think if we listen to Rand and then read writing from the very, very early days of a fellow named Adolf, we just might see some frightening comparisons that we must expose.

Whether that does any good in Kentucky is not known. Teabaggers seem to have their mouths full of nuts and concentrate on them rather than learning the truth.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:12 PM   

For selecting the Ken to Palin's Caribou Barbie, thank you, Kentucky!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

May 21, 2010 1:31 PM    in reply to pirate jenny

Actually, I'm thinking Scott Brown is probably better suited to the Ken role. Ken was such a cypher...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:15 PM   

He is locking up the KY racist vote.

On another topic, he is clearly inconsistent in his thinking when he says that he is personally opposed to racism but I don't think the federal government can mandate it. On his campaign page this is his position on abortion:

"I am 100% pro life. I believe abortion is taking the life of an innocent human being.

"I believe life begins at conception and it is the duty of our government to protect this life."

So far. So good. This is his personal opinion Just as he is personally opposed to racisim. His libertarian principles lead him to believe that government can't impose non-discrimination on a private establishment. But does he feel the same way when it comes to government and abortion?

"I will always vote for any and all legislation that would end abortion or lead us in the direction of ending abortion.

"I believe in a Human Life Amendment and a Life at Conception Act as federal solutions to the abortion issue. I also believe that while we are working toward this goal, there are many other things we can accomplish in the near term."

In other words, he is perfectly willing for the federal or state government to intrude on the privacy of individuals women's right to make reproductive decisions.

Someone should ask him both about this seeming inconsistency with his libertarian principles, as well as whether he believes in an individual right to privacy from government intrustion.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:26 PM    in reply to latichever

Oh, stop muddying the water with all this logic and reasonableness. We're talking Kentucky politics here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:15 PM   

I, myself wouldn't have slaves, and I wouldn't associate with slave owners, but I defend the right of people to keep their own property and do with it as they please, even including the ownership of black people (and their children as the result of breeding them). And by the way, what right does our government have to prosecute people for beating and fighting their own dogs? That's what's wrong with Big government. It's time we took our government back!

RP Teabagger candidate of the GOP

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:18 PM   

This is a man that would fit right in to the culture of oil money and corruption on Capilt Hill and in the Senate...

http://www.facebook.com/campaigncorner

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:19 PM   

A true Libertarian would be in favor of allowing literally ANYONE to perform eye surgery, not just M.D.'s. After all, "the market" will sort things out, right? So someone should ask Randy if he's in favor of de-certifying medical practitioners. I mean, who gave the government permission to say who's a good doctor or not? Let's get Big Government out of doctor certification!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:20 PM   

Randy is feeling put-upon, and appears on the verge of a meltdown. Almost pathetic - almost.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:24 PM   

Criticizing BRITISH Petroleum is verrrrrry un-American.
That'd be like criticizing BRITISH Tea Tarrifs...

oh wait...

http://GetRichCheating.com

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:25 PM   

Rand is being trashed alright. But if he thinks it's a trashing limited to persons of a single political leaning, his tea leaves aren't working.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:25 PM   

Conway should run an ad with this Elvis Costello song in the background:

Accidents will happen
We only hit and run
you used to be a victim
Now you're not the only one

Accidents will happen
We only hit and run
I don't want to hear it
'Cause I know what I've done

There's so many fish in the sea
That only rise up in the sweat and smoke like mercury
But they keep you hanging on
They say you're so young
Your mind is made up but your mouth is undone

(Chorus)

And it's the damage that we do
And never know
It's the words that we don't say
That scare me so

There's so many people to see
So many people you can check up on
And add to your collection
But they keep you hanging on
Until you're well hung
Your mouth is made up but your mind is undone

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:28 PM    in reply to markg8

It was a bright idea at the time
now it's a brilliant mistake

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:20 PM    in reply to jeffgee

now there's newsprint all over your face

I guess that's why I can read you like a book

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:26 PM   

Coo-coo. Coo-coo. Coo-coo.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:26 PM   

I, myself wouldn't have slaves, and I wouldn't associate with slave owners, but I defend the right of people to keep their own property and do with it as they please, even including the ownership of black people (and their children as the result of breeding them). And by the way, what right does our government have to prosecute people for beating and fighting their own dogs? That's what's wrong with Big government. It's time we took our government back!

RP Teabagger candidate of the GOP

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:27 PM   

You know, it's a shame that a senate candidate can't proclaim his preference for money over civil rights and not be jumped on by the vanguards of political correctness who are ruining America for the hard working hedge fund managers that made this country great. Maybe he Rand Paul just needs to work on his code words a bit more, so that he can nudge nudge wink wink and not get attacked so often. Geesh.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:30 PM   

Randy is complaining about 'Democrats who have "trashed" him "up and down" with their "talking points."'

Really?

He does know something about political campaigns, doesn't he? Does he think he should be immune from criticism?

And I have to second Josh Marshall's take on his claim that Obama's criticism of BP is un-American.

Criticism of BRITISH Petroleum is Un-AMERICAN????

Of a company that has single-handedly perpetrated the worst ecological disaster in the Gulf of Mexico in our lifetimes?

Un-American to criticize BRITISH Petroleum?

What the hell is Randy talking about here? What a jerk.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:37 PM    in reply to voreason

maybe he doesn't know much about the original tea-partys.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:33 PM   

I guess any Rethuglican running for Bunning's seat has to lower his IQ to match Bunning's.

If the past two days are any indication, Conway's campaign against Paul will be like shooting fish in a barrel.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:39 PM   

Thank you Dr. Paul for confirming my prejudice against whining lyin' hypocritical Republicans who sit in their country clubs while the hoipaloi are stuck with polluted beaches, dead fish, loss of commercial fishery and tourism income, etc.

Corporate Profits Uberalles! Ignorance Macht Frei! You, Dr. Paul, have challenged Sarah as the stupidest most self-serving politician in America.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:39 PM   

actually, a boot up the ass, is better than a boot on their throats.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:45 PM   

welcome senator conway

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:48 PM   

Define Libertarian: "I have complete rights - including the right to deny everyone else there's."

The problem with Rand is that he is crashing and burning so fast nobody will remember him by November.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:53 PM   

I listen to Rand Paul speak and what comes to mind is a vision of what it might have been like if David Duke had gotten traction many years ago in his bids to achieve political office. Which is to say: a non-stop train wreck for his party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:54 PM   

WhackJob du Jour.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 12:58 PM   

Another while affirmative action candidate rises to the level of his incompetance.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:00 PM   

Doesn't he even realize what a hypocrite he is? He denounces the "blame game" then blames Rachel Maddow and the Dems for his flame out. What a pussy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:07 PM   

You mean Byrd that has moved past it while he apparently hasnt.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:09 PM   

Paul has achieved something that I formerly thought was literally impossible.

He's made Jim Bunning appear competent.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:11 PM    in reply to bluestatedon

LOL!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:12 PM   

Alas, Rand is just another politician who, like BP refuses to take responsibility for his actions. If he thinks that Government should not regulate private business then he should stick with it. IF he just wants to get elected...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:12 PM   

It almost seems to me that this guy may pull out of the race after being hammered all summer. I don't see how the little dweeb is gonna stand up to it. I don't think he's ever been in a real election before, Conway is going to clean his clock.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:13 PM   

Loathesome smug little douchebag.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:18 PM   

The President's reaction is "part of this sort of blame game society" where "it's always someone's fault." Paul added: "Maybe sometimes accidents happen."

Yes, Rand, Accidents do happen! You sir, are a walking, breathing, knuckle dragging example of that old adage. Had your mother taken business in hand you wouldn't be facing the music. But then again.... ACCIDENTS HAPPEN!!! Goddamn!!!! You and Sarah deserve each other.. Teabaggers = Cretins

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:20 PM   

I always thought that Libertarians graciously accepted personal responsibility for what they say and do.

Those weren't Democratic talking points...they were his own talking points he's being beat over the head with.

Libertarianism is like communism; looks great on paper, but in reality people are too greedy and at the same time don't want to be held accountable.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 3:39 PM    in reply to ohyeathatsright

[Libertarianism is like communism; looks great on paper, but in reality people are too greedy and at the same time don't want to be held accountable.]

That's the thing that free marketeers don't understand about their idea; greed will always trump safety and concern for the consumer. If a company isn't held accountable for unethical practices, it will continue to do them as long as it doesn't undermine their bottom line.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 5:11 PM    in reply to Hobbes83

It's easy to be an idealist when it's just an idea. ;)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:22 PM   

GOPS will vote for him in droves anyway. ANYTHING to unwrite history and make Obama an official Kenyan. Give them a complete collapse of America, ANYTHING but a black president.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:36 PM   

Part of the reason for the outrage -- there are many reason -- is this: What Rand Paul is arguing for is "strict constructionism." This is the same thing that George W Bush and many of his judicial nominees supported.

The way the federal government was able to desegregate restaurants and hotels came through the commerce clause. That clause allows the federal government to regulate commerce "among the several states. . . ." That's the very language that allowed the government to restrict the private businesses that Dr. Paul claims to want to protect.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:36 PM   

you guys are absolutely pathetic.

Me saying that Nazis should be able to march in the street in protest doesn't mean that I want Nazis to go out in the street and protest. Do you see what I'm getting at here? the difference there? Dipshits? Anyone? Bueller?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 1:57 PM    in reply to johnny b

I have no idea what your comment has to do with Rand Paul's attack on Obama. Or BP's decision to cut corners and its epic failure to assess or address the oil spill in the Gulf.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

PAB

user-pic

May 21, 2010 1:55 PM   

If stupidity were gold, this man could buy the moon a dozen times over. This argument is breathtaking in its naked idiocy and lands even beyond the Bachmann-Caribou Barbie nut farm.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 2:02 PM   

For all of us appalled by this idiot's comments on Civil Rights and BP's responsibility digest this: he's up 25 points over Conway. It's a Rasmussen poll, so take it for what it's worth but c'mon Kentucky time to enter the 21st century (or at least the 20th).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 2:36 PM   

After accusing Obama of playing the blame game in trying to hold BP accountable, he blames the Dems for his fringe views on the Civil Rights Act.

This clown is supposed to be the new face of the re-branded GOP? He is starting to make Bobby Jindhal look like Machiavelli.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 3:30 PM   

If Paul had his way, in addition to reversing civil rights legislation so that private companies could freely discriminate based on ethnicity, religion, etc., neither the FDA nor the EPA would exist, and corporations would have free reign to sell snake oil to the public, pollute our land, air, and waterways indiscriminately, market food products and children's toys laden with toxins and microbes, and anyone who objected would be labeled as unpatriotic.

Perhaps we should replace "E pluribus unum" with "Buyer Beware".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 4:54 PM   

Somewhere, as I type, I am sure there is a room of connected Republicans using their considerable political savvy, discussing the best way to put the Rand fiasco behind them and have a do-over as far as the Republican primary in Kentucky is concerned. I am a Kentuckian and I am sure that 90%, well, maybe 80% of all Kentuckians would NEVER, ever, even consider going back to the "no colored allowed" days. I don't think the average voter, many caught up in the heady idea of a Tea Party had any slight clue that they were voting for a man who actually and with all his being thinks that any one should be allowed to post signs on their locally-owned businesses saying, No blacks allowed", No Jews allowed, No Mexicans allowed, No Asians allowed, No gays allowed, No Catholics allowed, etc....you get the idea. I was there 50 years ago. Bigotry and racism was totally accepted at the time but even then there was an undercurrent of uneasiness about it. The "nice" people never said the n-word and actually, never discussed race at all. I remember the father of a friend referring, as I'm sure he thought delicately, to a Jewish family and asking if they were Arabs, meaning."Are they Jewish?". He saw Arab as a "nicer" way to say Jew. It was just too uncomfortable. Then was then, now is now.
Please believe me, when I say I would be stunned if Kentucky sent Paul to the U. S. Senate. It could happen but I just don't see Kentucky wanting to mess with all that again, AT ALL, not really because of the high moral ground but more because things are working just fine as they are now and the past is just that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 21, 2010 5:12 PM    in reply to Mary Alice

I should have added that Paul's comments today that the BP oil spill, pouring tens of thousands of barrels of crude into the Gulf of Mexico daily, was akin to an act of nature, much like a hurricane, was terribly ill-advised. He compounded this by criticizing Obama, saying that Obama was being much too hard on BP because it really wasn't their fault and they weren't responsible. Obama was just picking on an innocent business. Some days a guy just can't catch a break.
And, there they sit, the Republican big-wigs, wondering how they can put this all behind them and emerge with some of their authority and gravitas intact and a winning candidate in Kentucky.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 22, 2010 1:30 AM   

True libertarianism pretty much equal anarchy, and with so many weapons in this nation we would soon, if not immediately have multitudes of leader wantabes fighting for power positions... IMHO

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 23, 2010 5:19 PM   

For much of the election cycle, yes. Rasmussen has a reputation of both a GOP house effect and for getting the final polls close to accurate, despite being wrong for months leading up to the vote. Nate Silver's looked at them several times, but the released information never quite clarifies what is going on.

Take the Brown election in Mass., for example. Rasmussen called the final number pretty well, despite the fact their early projections were wrong and the profile of the public they used in those projections (their "likely voter model") didn't match up with the demographics of the actual voters. Are they just lucky? Changing how they frame the question when it isn't about GOP propaganda and fundraising anymore? No one who knows is talking, so what to do with Rasmussen reports is always an open question.

kamagra m65

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 23, 2010 8:06 PM   

He is a Tea Party idiot. What do you expect?
When he says he does not want to repeal the civil rights act and his response is at best ingenious.
He is for repeal most of it. He wants part of it so he can he doesn't want to repeal all of it. Typical Tea party person he skirts the truth and only talks about part of the issue. I am extremely disappointed in the people of Kentucky for electing such a jerk. Stop covering him and he will disappear in the back ground noise like he should. Wasted bandwidth is all this is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?