TPM LiveWire

Republican State Official Gets Fired Instead Of Resigning -- So He Can Collect Unemployment


Former New Jersey Education Commissioner Bret Schundler (R)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ) has fired his state Education Commissioner Bret Schundler, as a result of errors and misrepresentations from Schundler in a matter costing the state $400 million in federal "Race to the Top" money. At the same time, the firing has been arranged at Schundler's request in such a manner so that Schundler -- a former leading figure of the state GOP's right wing -- will be able to collect unemployment benefits.

The key detail is that Schundler preferred to be fired, rather than submit his resignation. "I asked if they would mind writing a termination letter, instead of a resignation letter, because I do have a mortgage to pay, and I do have a daughter who's just started college," Schundler said, the Star-Ledger reports. "And I, frankly, will need the unemployment insurance benefits until I find another job. ... And they said fine. They said sure."

On Wednesday, Christie held a press conference in which he strongly blamed the Obama administration for the loss of federal funding, saying that Schundler had tried to fix an error in the state's application during his presentation to federal education officials, but they would not let him. Then on Thursday, the federal Education Department released a video of the presentation itself, showing the officials pointing out the error to Schundler, who was unable to correct it.

"I was extremely disappointed to learn that the videotape of the Race to the Top presentation was not consistent with the information provided to me by the New Jersey Department of Education and which I then conveyed to the people of New Jersey," Christie said in a statement. "As a result, I ordered an end to Bret Schundler's service as New Jersey's Education Commissioner and as a member of my administration."

Schundler was elected mayor of heavily Democratic Jersey City in 1992 in a special election, helped by corruption scandals and a heavily split Democratic vote that enabled him to win with only 17%. He later won a full term in 1993 with 69% of the vote, and was re-elected again in 1997. In 2001 he became the Republican nominee for governor, upsetting the state GOP's moderate establishment, and lost the general election to Democrat Jim McGreevey by 56%-42%. He ran again for governor in 2005, but lost the Republican primary. When Republicans won the governor's mansion with Chris Christie in 2009, Schundler appeared to have made his comeback as Education Commissioner.

Late Update: As Robert Costa over at National Review points out, the late William F. Buckley once touted Schundler as a future presidential candidate. It's interesting to point out that Buckley praised Schundler as a small government conservative who was taking on the teacher's unions and the welfare state:

What is especially refreshing about Schundler is his confidence in his own approach. Those who are battle-weary over decades of arguments about vouchers and taxes and welfare overloads are arrested by the directness of his approach. But how to discourage somebody elected and then reelected by majorities hardly seen since the Bolsheviks stopped re-electing themselves all but unanimously? Schundler reminds seasoned observers of the usefulness of pretty basic observations, such as that parents want the best for their children. Look for him in 2008.

Late Late Update: The Christie administration has denied making any such deal with Schundler, saying that he was fired when he refused to resign.

More importantly, Schundler is denying that he ever misled the administration about the problems in the presentation, and showed e-mails to that effect to the Associated Press. The Christie administration is also denying these accusations, saying that all of Christie's statements were based on Schundler's account.

This story could get interesting...

Comments (30) | Join the Conversation!

August 27, 2010 2:15 PM   

Go ahead Bret, suck the teat. I hope this is a humbling experience for you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:04 PM    in reply to ohyeathatsright

That's the beauty of being a new age conservative.
They have zero sense of irony.
This guy is proud that he is receiving his hard earned welfare checks.

Heck, probably even prouder that he denied funding to others so that he could have a long harder more fulfilling suck at the teat.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:16 PM    in reply to ohyeathatsright

Are you kidding? "Humble" is probably not in his vocabulary. Note that this "champion" of the Republican party won his status by "taking on unions" who gave us things like "unemployment benefits." He's undoubtedly slashed the benefits of every human unfortunate enough to have ever fallen into his clutches. But he can't rush to the trough fast enough to sink HIS greedy snout in.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 2:21 PM   

Welfare is bad when someone else collects it. Although unemployment benefits is technically not "welfare", that is not what right wingers would say.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 4:15 PM    in reply to PAvoter

Where I live, even asking to be fired automatically disqualifies you from collecting unemployment benefits.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 2:33 PM   

So when is Christie going to publicly apologize to the Obama Adminstrtation for blasting them without reason?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 2:43 PM    in reply to Ana Gama

No, no. Only Obama has to make public apologies when he is wrong.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 2:38 PM   

Schundler was always a hypocritical, opportunistic prick.

McGreevy did some pretty heavy damage to the state, but we would've been in much more dire straits had this clod been given any real power.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 2:44 PM   

Actually Schundler wanter to be laid off, not fired. Unemployment does not cover dismissal for cause, although often an employer won't contest if someone claims to have been laid off instead of fired.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:21 PM    in reply to fafner1

Well, he was clearly fired for cause, since his wretched incompetence cost the State $400 MILLION. Poetic justice would be having the unemployment office decide that his termination does not merit a benefit. Besides, if he has a mortgage and a college-age child to support, that's his damn problem, right? Right, Gov. Christie? Why the hell does this Republican want the taxpayers to give him welfare? Where's his American pride in refusing to take a handout from anybody?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 2:46 PM   

Firing for cause may not entitle him to unemployment. And those checks of $360 or so each week are sure gonna go a long way to helping him with his mortgage and college costs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 2:47 PM   

Christie also blamed the NJEA for not being on board with some provision of the RTTT grant, which also cost the state points. Of course, he failed to mention that Schundler actually struck a compromise with the NJEA on those provisions, but the compromise was rejected. By Chris Christie.

This guy was all over TV last year claiming he runs a tight ship and the buck stops with him. All we have gotten in 2010 has been finger pointing and bullying. Now we learn his underlings are incompetent morons who can't fill out an application.

Why oh why did my fellow New Jerseyans vote for this thug?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:10 PM    in reply to mokon

I don't think anyone enthusiastically voted FOR Christie, just enthusiastically AGAINST Corzine.

Corzine was an abject failure and I still voted for him, knowing Christie would be worse.

Ah well. If he hasn't been run out of Newark by 2013, expect Booker to run. And win.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:15 PM    in reply to mokon

They voted for him because the Democrats did not govern. New Jersey taxes are out of sight:a $300,000.00 tract home in a decent neighborhood in North Jersey might incur as much as $14,000.00 per year in real estate taxes. No one takes responsibility for the two problems fueling this in New Jersey: an out of control guaranteed pension system for state workers (most taxpayers pensions are not guaranteed and they do not like guaranteeing anyone else's) and the need for consolidation of municipalities and school districts to cut down on government costs: there are just too many tiny municipalities and school districts Combining many of them reduces costs. Democratic Governor John Corzine tried to fix the problem and actually made some headway with pensions (he got a law passed that you only got one government pension even if you held several government jobs— imagine that!) but his own party (the R's had no say in this because they were outnumbered) shivved him on everything else. The D's earned Christy!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 4:05 PM    in reply to Harry Truman

Christie is not going to do anything about the small municipality problem, since the Republican base is those endlessly subdivided suburbs.

I don't think Corzine was a good governor by any stretch. And he was doomed once Goldman-Sachs rightfully become public enemy number one. But I think Corzine at least made a good faith effort to describe and fix the problems in the state. He just wasn't the type of leader to get people on board. Christie's not either though - he's just a bullying ignoramus content to run a Rovian strategy of division and yelling louder than his opponents.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 2:48 PM   

"Lack of work" is one acceptable reason to collect. But it refers to lack of opportunities, not lack of work by him or lack of skill or brains.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

ns

user-pic

August 27, 2010 2:50 PM   

Dismissal for cause is not covered by unemployment insurance. NJ state representatives should get interested in the fact that a fired official is illegally sucking.. sorry, collecting money from already-depleted unemployment funds. Some prodding from NJ electorate may also be helpful.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:26 PM    in reply to ns

Depends on your state, I think. I know a few people who have been fired for cause and still collected unemployment.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 2:59 PM   

According to the article it appears that he was fired for cause so any attempt by him or the gov. to doctor the results so he is able to collect unemployment is fraud and both should be arrested. please will some Jersey taxpayer sue to prevent these two crooks from gaming the system

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:01 PM   

Uh.... isn't that fraud?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:01 PM   

Where are those rethiglican bootstraps? Quit asking for a handout you lazy bastard.

Handouts are bad unless you are a white GOBPer.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:02 PM   

Where is the MSM on this ?????

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:05 PM    in reply to nick

The MSM is too busy sucking Ruport's teat to be interested in reporting on this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:32 PM    in reply to nick

Avoiding anything that would tamp the fires of controversy. You see, damning behavior like this is only good for a day or two of controversy. Propping up quasi-fascist demagogue douchehats so that the public can mindlessly equivocate and consider them the same as the other side, well, that allows you to turn EVERYTHING into a controversy that requires 2-3 weeks of bobblehead discussion and debate. For example, "death panels"?? No problem! Just ignore the statutory language and avoid well-respected legal experts' opinions becaues those are dangerous and might debunk the claim before it has been sufficiently milked for ratings and ad revenue. No no no, you need to sit David Gergen down with some anti-christ Teatard talking point parrot and pretend they're having a deep, philosphical and educated discussion....12 days in a row.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:12 PM   

Look for him in 2011. At the welfare line. Pretty cheeky, these Republithugs. Cut everyone else's benefits to the bone, but ask to get a honking big package of bennies for themselves. Is he ashamed of himself? Don't bet on it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:18 PM   

Bullshit. I recently quit my job so that I could finish college, and therefore won't get a penny. These rich bastards don't deserve unemployment money. They should sell their house like we did.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:34 PM   

We now know that the govonor and his right wing buddies are nothing but a bunch of crooks so much for doing things for ones self. the papers are already in so the attempt to defraud the state has happened get out the handcuffs

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:40 PM   

Has Christie apologized to the Obama Administration yet?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 3:42 PM   

My son got fired for cause (it was a technicality that had never been enforced before, but he had been way too outspoken for the HR person) and they refused to pay him unemployment. It really depends on what the employer says.

But I'm sure this crooked, lying, shameless Republican (sorry to be redundant) will collect. Heck, he'll probably have some firm paying him under the table while he collects from the state.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2010 4:26 PM   

please note that he makes sure to use the phrase "unemployment insurance benefits"


It's insurance...important to remember when discussing unemployment benefits.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?